Tathiana Flores Acuña, Ph.D.
Visiting Fellow, CHR
17 July , 2012
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is known to have one of the highest rates of sexual violence in the world, and there is significant evidence, gathered by local and international organisations of rape and other forms of sexual violence taking place in the Ituri region in eastern DRC.
In 2009, the UN Special Representative for Sexual
Violence in Conflict, Margot Wallström, referred to the DRC as the 'rape capital of the world'.
Efforts towards repression of sexual related crimes. Final results: provisions incorporated in the Rome Statute
Former Yugoslavia- Sexual related crimes enormous scale
Lobbying for explicit formulation of crimes
Years of efforts culminated in the adoption of a Rome
Statute containing specific categories of sexual related crimes
For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity
ARTICLE 8 -WAR CRIMES
1. The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.
2. For the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:
(a) Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva
Convention:
(xxii) Committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph
2 (f), enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence also constituting a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions
Extensive evidence on sexual violence was heard throughout the trial proceedings
Girl soldiers, some as young as 12 years, were the daily victims of rape by their commanders' and they were used as cooks and fighters, cleaners and spies, scouts and sexual slaves
The Prosecutor acknowledged the multiple roles of girl soldiers, and also underlined that sexual violence was part of their daily lives:
“One minute they will carry a gun, the next minute they will serve meals to the commanders, the next minute the commanders will rape them. They were killed if they refused to be raped”
Confirmed these facts asserting that “rape began as soon as they were abducted and continued throughout their stay”
Often the abuses were greatest in the initial stages of their abduction and in the training camps where they were trained to become militia soldiers
In response to questions from Judge Odio Benito about sexual violence committed against girl soldiers during the initial training phase, Witness 16 confirmed that “out of here, being in the centre for the first time, the trainers and other guards in the centre took advantage of the situation and they would rape the recruits”
In May 2009, the Legal Representatives filed a joint submission requesting the Trial Chamber to consider modifying the legal characterisation of the facts
Pursuant to Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and add the crimes of sexual slavery and inhuman and cruel treatment to the existing characterisation
Regulation 55 provides that the Chamber may change the legal characterisation of the facts in its final decision on the merits based on the evidence presented before it during the trial
In their filing argued that the evidence and witness testimony in the case could support additional charges of sexual slavery and inhuman and cruel treatment of recruits, including girl recruits who were pregnant as a result of rape
While a majority opinion found that Regulation 55 permitted the Trial Chamber to modify the legal characterisation of facts to include facts and circumstances not originally contained in the charges, the Appeals
Chamber reversed this decision on procedural grounds
Thomas Lubanga was convicted of the three separate war crimes
conscripting and
enlisting children under the age of 15
using them to participate actively in hostilities
On 10 July 2012, Trial Chamber I sentenced Thomas
Lubanga Dyilo (Lubanga) to 14 years imprisonment, in the first sentencing judgement issued by the ICC
The case involved two stays of proceedings, an adjournment, 67 witnesses and the participation of 129 victims. The Chamber will issue a reparations order at a later date
Since 2008, based on documentation and analysis, several organizations had advocated that sexual violence is an integral component of each of the three crimes for which Lubanga was charged and convicted
Information presented showed that sexual violence was often used against child soldiers, especially girl soldiers, to demonstrate control and ownership and to sever any attachment with their lives prior to abduction
The sexual violence was recognised in the expert testimony of Radhika Coomaraswamy, UN Special Representative for the Secretary General (UNSRSG) for Children in Armed
Conflict
She highlighted that girls recruited into armed groups play multiple roles:
Combat scouting portering in addition to sexual slavery and forced marriage
UNSRSG Coomaraswamy urged the Chamber to consider
“the central abuse perpetrated against girls during their association with armed groups after they have been recruited or enlisted, regardless of whether or not they mostly engaged in direct combat functions during conflict”
She added that 'though some are mainly combatants, others may be mainly sex slaves … they have all been recruited and enlisted into this group…'
TFV also recognised the prevalence of gender-based crimes against child soldiers in its First Report on
Reparations, in which it noted that sexual violence was perpetrated widely against girl and boy soldiers during their conscription, enlistment and/or participation
Noted that in interviews carried out by the Trust Fund in 2010 with former child soldier beneficiaries of its assistance projects, over 48% of former child soldiers
(of whom 66.7% were girls and 32.2% were boys)
Para 37. “ The crime of using children to participate actively in hostilities involves exposing them to real danger as potential targets.”
Para 38. “As the Chamber described in the Judgment, the principal historical objective underlying the prohibition against the use of child soldiers is to protect children under the age of 15 from the risks that are associated with armed conflict, and particularly they are directed at securing their physical and psychological wellbeing”.
Balance defense, prosecution and the interest of the victims
Para 60. of the Sentencing Judgment:
“not only did the former Prosecutor fail to apply to include sexual violence or sexual slavery at any stage during these proceedings, including in the original charges, but he actively opposed taking this step during the trial when he submitted that it would cause unfairness to the accused if he was convicted on this basis. Notwithstanding this stance on his part throughout these proceedings, he suggested that sexual violence ought to be considered for the purposes of sentencing.”
In its Para 67 the Chamber affirms:
“The Chamber is entitled to consider sexual violence under Rule 145(l)(c) of the Rules as part of:
(i) the harm suffered by the victims;
(ii) the nature of the unlawful behaviour; and
(iii) the circumstances of manner in which the crime was committed; additionally, this can be considered as showing the crime was committed with particular cruelty.”
In its Para 69 the Chamber states:
“However, that said, it remains necessary for the Chamber to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that:
(i) child soldiers under 15 were subjected to sexual violence; and
(ii) this can be attributed to Mr Lubanga in a manner that reflects his culpability, pursuant to Rule 145(1 )(a) of the
Rules.”
The Chamber arrives to the conclusion in Para 74 that:
“On the basis of the totality of the evidence introduced during the trial on this issue, the Majority is unable to conclude that sexual violence against the children who were recruited was sufficiently widespread that it could be characterised as occurring in the ordinary course of the implementation of the common plan for which Mr Lubanga is responsible.”
Based on Article 21 Rome Statute
Article sets out the applicable law that the Court shall apply:
“The application and interpretation of law pursuant to this article must be consistent with internationally recognised human rights, and be without any adverse distinction founded on grounds such as gender as defined in article 7, paragraph 3, age, race, colour, language, religion or belief, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, wealth, birth or other status.”
Judge Odio Benito characterised sexual violence as inherent in the use of child soldiers. She added that 'sexual violence is an intrinsic element of the criminal conduct of “use to participate actively in the hostilities”'.
Judge Odio Benito further underscored the different and disparate impact that sexual violence had upon female child soldiers
Explained that “Sexual violence and enslavement are the main crimes committed against girls and their illegal recruitment is often intended for that purpose.”
Emphasised the different experiences and consequences for girl and boy child soldiers, noting
“a gender-specific potential consequence of unwanted pregnancies for girls that often lead to maternal or infant's deaths, disease, HIV, psychological traumatisation and social isolation”.
Historical moment-international and broader perspective of the role of international justice
Responsibility vis-à-vis international community as a whole
In my opinion, ICC trial proceedings should also attend to the harm suffered by the victims as a result of the crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court
Irrelevant if the prosecution submitted the charges as separate crimes or rightfully including them as embedded in the crimes of which Mr Lubanga is accused
The harm suffered by victims is not only reserved for reparations proceedings, but should be a fundamental aspect of the Chamber's evaluation of the crimes committed
While a framework for reparations is provided in the
Rome Statute, the Lubanga case presents the first occasion for an ICC Trial Chamber to undertake reparations proceedings
Following Lubanga's conviction on 14 March 2012, Trial
Chamber I issued a 'Scheduling order concerning timetable for sentencing and reparations'
The Trial Chamber invited submissions from parties and participants, as well as the Registry and the TFV on
(a) the principles to be applied by the Chamber with regard to reparations
(b) the procedure to be followed by the Chamber in the reparations
The Trial Chamber also invited other individuals or interested parties to request leave to submit observations on these issues
The integration of women and girls in reparations consultations is of particular importance
Types of crimes suffered by women and girls,
gender-inequalities, and
their access to services and programmes for justice
Need to ensure that a reparations order does not have the unintended effect of replicating gender discrimination
Reparations should:
(i) not only restorative, but also transformative
(ii) address existing gender inequalities within communities
(iii) contribute to advancing gender equality through the types of programmes funded and the type of support provided
QUESTIONS, COMMENTS REMARKS