EMA Technology Overview ElectroMagnetic Actuator – EMA4K • Peak Force = 19kN • Peak Vel = 4m/sec • Typical Damper Pk Performance: 10kN @ 4m/sec • Freq response up to 300Hz • 200mm stroke • All Electric Motion • Also avail in 1K, 2K, 6K configurations Electromagnetic Actuator Fundamentals •U-Channel Brushless Linear Servo Motor •Consists of a non-contacting forcer coil and a U-channel rare earth (Neodymium) magnet track •Ironless forcer means there are no attractive forces and no disturbance forces generated between forcer and magnet track •Ironless forcer has low mass resulting in high acceleration forces •Three phase coil winding with sinusoidal brushless commutation •U-Channel design reduces magnetic flux leakage •Non-contact design supported by standard bearings to handle off-axis loading Electromagnetic Technology – Where Used • • • • Assembly Automotive Data Storage Electronic Manufacturing • Machine Tool • Medical • Military/Aerospace • • • • • Fiber Optics Photovoltaics Packaging Engineered Systems Test & Inspection Electromagnetic Actuator (EMA) Major Components Actuator motion generated here Drylin actuator shaft bearing with replaceable inserts U-Channel Magnet Assembly bolted to column supports both sides Forcer block attached to 3-phase forcer coils on each side (inside Uchannel magnets) End of Travel Limit Switches U-Channel Rare Earth Magnets Lower T-rail bearing support – 1 each side Optical Encoder Read head with 1um resolution EMA Comparisons – Damper Testing EMA vs MTS 30 25 Force KN 20 15 10 5 0 0.00 0.15 EMA 4K 0.51 1.14 1.20 MTS 849.15 1.40 1.98 2.00 Velocity MTS 849.25 2.18 2.30 M/SEC EMA 2K 2.50 2.57 EMA 6K 2.90 2.95 3.30 Linear (MTS 849.15) Typical shock absorber performance as obtained from published literature 4.00 EMA Comparisons – General Performance Actuator Performance Comparison Displacement mm (Pk-Pk) 1000 100 10 1 0.1 1 10 Hyd HS Frequency (Hz) 100 EMA4K Estimates based on the following assumptions: • 2500kg GVW, 40kg unsprung, 650kg sprung mass, 6N/mm/sec viscous loading, 50N/mm spring load. • Hyd HS = Typical hydraulic actuator with hydrostatic bearings, dual 50l/min servovalves, 200l/min 210 bar hydraulic supply 1000 EMA Comparisons – General Performance Displacement (Pk-Pk) Freq(Hz) *Peak Acceleration Hyd HS EMA4K 1 150 177 2 150 177 3 143.5 177 5 86.22 161 7 61.33 113 10 42.67 76 Hyd HS EMA4K 20 19.76 26.3 25.56kg 19kg 30 11.16 12.5 50 4.6 4.68 70 -- 2.41 150 -- 0.53 200 -- 0.26 Hyd HS EMA4K 23.14 24.25 * = peak acceleration based on unsprung mass of 40kg, wheelpan 20kg, and mass of actuator Actuator Mass Estimates based on the following assumptions: • 2500GVW, 40kg unsprung, 650kg sprung mass, 6N/mm/sec viscous loading, 50N/mm spring load. • Hyd HS = Typical hydraulic actuator with hydrostatic bearings, dual 60l/min servovalves, 200l/min 210 bar hydraulic supply EMA2K Performance – Road Data Plot of Track Data Command and Feedback Profiles – Direct file Playback (No transfer function compensation required) EMA2K Performance – Road Data Zoom In on portion of Command AND Feedback Track Data (there are 2 plots) EMA2K Performance – Road Data Plot of Error throughout Entire Track File (Command – Feedback) RMS Error less than 0.001” (0.025mm) EMA2K Performance – Road Data Plot of Actual Forces Achieved during dynamic Track Data Playback on EMA2K EMA2K Performance – Road Data Zoom Plot of Dynamic Force - Track Data EMA Benefits Summary Higher performance / frequency response due to: No oil column resonance Lower actuator mass Lower friction (no seals) Tighter closed loop control Direct file playback often 10X better than hydraulic system with transfer function compensation! Independent of operating temperature No oil viscosity variables to affect control loop Independent of waveform content Can accurately run low velocity/low force and high velocity/high force without changeover from 2stage to 3stage, etc Independent of accumulator charging/discharging cycles EMA Benefits Summary Less Maintenance and Downtime No seals, accumulators, servovalves, filtration, oil contamination DryLin bearings only contact points – easily replaceable No system degradation due to component wear (pumps, valves, etc) Modular design and less components makes troubleshooting easier Lower Operating Costs Increased efficiency over servohydraulics means annual electrical operating costs are 30% of comparable hydraulic systems No filters, accumulators, servovalves, seals, hoses, pumps to repair/replace Service and Support fees a fraction of major hydraulic competitors! The new leader in dynamic testing