Introduction to Internet Protocol Over Satellite (IPoS)TIA-1008 Sebastian Coe TSM 601 Professor Bowman Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 1 How is IPoS attractive as a business opportunity? Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 2 What Technologies is IPoS Replacing? IPoS has the objective of replacing previous VSAT systems for satellite internet In order to use these systems you had to be under the particular operator’s footprint, using only its technology This forced users to only subscribe to their satellite provider and to be forced to pay whatever the provider felt fit as an acceptable rate Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 3 IPoS as a Business Opportunity There are many potential winners from the implementation of IPoS, according to Hughes Network Systems these include [1]: Residential and Corporate End Users Applications Developers VPN Application and Appliance Vendors A/V Streaming, and Multimedia Appliance Vendors PC Hardware, OS, and Appliance Vendors Satellite Operators Service Providers Satellite Terminal and Appliance Developers Hub Manufacturers Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 4 How will the ‘winners’ make money? Satellite Operators: By selling transponder capacity Application and Appliance Vendors: By creating software and Hardware systems compatible with IPoS Service Providers: By offering users access to the internet through IPoS connected networks Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 5 How will the ‘winners’ make money? PC Hardware, OS, Appliance Vendors: By selling more advanced systems that can take advantage of full-broadband Hub Manufacturers: By Developing equipment that works well with the IPoS standard End Users: Will benefit through lower costs and better service Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 6 But what are the Costs? For Users: Monthly Service Fees (as low as $30-40/month) Equipment (many times included in monthly fee) [5] For Satellite Operators: Existing Transponder Capacity can be Used (no cost) New satellites could be launched (80 million $ each) [10] Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 7 Making Money Hughes Network Systems wished for its standard to be open for the greatest amount of interoperability between satellite systems This means that a host of application developers can develop software to be run on IPoS systems with the assurance that it will work on a wide variety of networks. More Users of an application means more potential for greater profits Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 8 Saving Money An IPoS terminal is 30-40 percent cheaper than using other satellite terminals [9] “there are several satellite operators who can offer global coverage without any investments in expensive terrestrial networks which is good news for ISPs.” [5] Laying cable across the Atlantic costs 175 million dollars, much more than what it costs to develop and launch a successful comsat [10] Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 9 What Technology could Threaten IPoS? WiMax: A cheap solution for areas that cannot get traditional access to Cable and DSL technologies [9] Does not require the setup, launch, and maintenance of expensive satellite technologies Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 10 References [1] Hughes Network Systems. HNS-30740. January 2004. “IP Over Satellite (IPoS)” October 12, 2008, http://www.hughes.com/HUGHES/Doc/0/01LKEPT5PQH43D7PP4NMB9195C/IPOSwhitepaper-Jan2004.pdf [2] Telecommunications Industry Association. Standards Department. 2008. “About Standards” October 23, 2008. http://www.tiaonline.org/standards/about/index.cfm [3] Ciber Habitat. Gobierno de Mexico Satelites Mexicanos. 2008. “Sistema Satmex” October 23, 2008 http://ciberhabitat.gob.mx/medios/satelites/mexicanos/satmex.htm [4] Project MESA. MESA DTR 70.0008v1.5.4 Technical Report. Technical Specifications Group SYSTEM. April, 2005. “Technologies with Potential Applicability to Project MESA”. October 12, 2008, http://www.projectmesa.org/ftp/TSG_SYS/SYS07_Boston_2006/SYS07_07_Technologies%20 with%20Potential%20Applicability%20to%20Project%20MESA%20SYS0070008v154.doc Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 11 References [5] Viinamaki, Jarkko. Department of Electrical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology. “IP Over Satellite”. October 12, 2008, http://www.tml.hut.fi/Opinnot/T-109.551/2004/reports/ipoversatellite_v3.doc [6] Working Party 4B. Draft Revision of Recommendation ITU-R S. 1709. 2006 “Technical Characteristics of Air Interfaces of Global Broadband Satellite Systems.” October 12, 2008, www.catr.cn/itu/itujy/P020061123539714986882.doc [7] Universidade de Vigo. Recomendación UIT-R S. 1709-1 Cuestion UIT-R 269/4. 2005-2007 “Características técnicas de las interfaces radioeléctricas para sistemas mundiales de comunicaciones por satélite en banda ancha” October 12, 2008, http://webs.uvigo.es/servicios/biblioteca/uit/rec/S/R-REC-S.1709-1-200701I!!PDF-S.pdf [8] Rahul Neel Mani. May 17, 2004. Express Computer, India’s No.1 IT Weekly. IPoS: Lifeline of Satellite Industry. November 22, 2008. http://www.expresscomputeronline.com/20040517/newsanalysis01.shtml [9] Wimax.Com. n.d. Faq’s. Will WiMax Replace DSL and Cable? November 22, 2008. http://www.wimax.com/education/faq/faq07 Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 12 References [10] Megan G. April 17, 1997. Communications Satellites. November 22, 2008. http://www.smgaels.org/physics/97/MGRAHLFS.HTM Sebastian Coe - IPoS (TIA-1008) 13