The Economics of Eco-Ships Noboru Ueda Chairman & President, ClassNK S-1 The First Factor – Charter Rates The Peak BDI: 11,000 The Crash Today: BDI: 650~ BDI: 650~ Roughly the same as 2009 Baltic Dry Index (BDI) Source: Bloomberg S-2 The Second Factor – Ship Prices The Peak (2008) Capesize $104m Panamax $58.5m Handymax $50m Handysize $40m The Crash (2009) Capesize $57m Panamax $35m Handymax $31m Handysize $25m Today NB Price: 20% below 2009 prices $45m $27m $25m $19m Capesize Panamax Handymax Handysize Source: Drewry S-3 The Third Factor – Bunker Fuel Prices The Peak Bunkers: $750/t The Crash Bunkers: $250/t Today Bunkers: $680/t More than 2.5x 2009 prices Baltic Dry Index (BDI) 380cst Bunker (Singapore) Source: Bloomberg S-4 The Third Factor – Bunker Fuel Prices Bunker Prices: Singapore 380 CST 1999: Bunkers Less than $100/t Long term trend of higher prices Today: Bunker Price almost 7 times higher than 1999! Source: SSY S-5 Why Fuel Costs Matter Now Test Case: Panamax BC Year: 1999 Mil. US$ 200 Newbuilding Price: $27 mil Fuel: 35 t/day Voyages: 250 days 150 35t/day x $100/t x 250 days =$875,000/year x 25 years Fuel price Ship price Lifetime Fuel Cost 100 $21.8 Million Lifetime Fuel Cost 50 Only 80% of Ship Price 0 5 10 15 20 Years after Delivery 25 Source: Drewry S-6 Why Fuel Costs Matter Now Test Case: Panamax BC Year: 2012 Mil. US$ Fuel price 200 Ship price Newbuilding Price: $27 mil Fuel: 35 t/day Voyages: 250 days 35t/day x $700/t x 250 days =$6.1 Mil/year x 25 years 150 Lifetime Fuel Cost 100 $153 Million Lifetime Fuel Cost 50 550% 0 5 20 15 10 Years after Delivery 25 of Ship Price Source: Drewry S-7 The Value of Eco-Ships Standard Panamax BC and 20% More Fuel Efficient Eco-Ship 35 tons / day Mil. US$ 28 tons / day 160 140 120 With Bunkers @ $700 tons a day a 20% decrease in fuel consumption = $1.2 million 100 savings each year 80 60 Lifetime Savings of 40 $30.6 Million 20 0 5 10 15 20 Years after Delivery 25 over 25 years (per ship) Source: Drewry S-8 Eco-Ships have already arrived IHI Marine United (IHIMU) eFuture 310T Tanker & 56B Bulk Carrier 30% GHG reduction via integrating the following technologies: Whale back bow Electronically controlled diesel engine Variable nozzle area turbocharger Waste heat recovery system Single-screw, twin-engine propulsion system Contra-rotating propellers IHIMU estimates that the initial cost of these new systems will be recouped within 5 or 6 years. S-9 Eco-Ships have already arrived Universal Shipbuilding Corp. (USC) Next-generation “G-Series” Capesize & Panamax BC G209BC (209,000 DWT) G80BC (80,000 DWT) 20% Fuel savings from new technology: • LEADGE-Bow • Super Stream Duct (SSD) • SURF-BULB • Delivery from end of 2013 S-10 Eco-Ships have already arrived Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Neo Supramax 66BC • 66,000 DWT • Length: abt. 200 m • Beam: 36.0 m • Depth: 18.45 m • Draft: 15.2 m • Fuel savings: 30% • Launched onto market Conventional 56BC 35 tons/day Neo Supramax 66BC 25 tons/day Fuel Savings 30% MES estimates that the initial cost of these new systems will be recouped within a few years. S-11 Eco-Ships have already arrived Imabari Shipbuilding Panamax BC (84,000 DWT) Fuel consumption: under 30 tons/day Oshima Shipbuilding Panamax BC (77,000 & 82,000 DWT) Fuel consumption: under 30 tons/day Sanoyasu Hishino Meisho Panamax BC (82,000 DWT) Fuel consumption: under 30 tons/day “Handy Cape” (120,000 DWT) Fuel consumption: 13% saving Namura Shipbuilding High Bulk 34 BC (34,000 dwt) Fuel Consumption:10% less than 32BC Capesize BC (170-180,000 DWT) To market in near future. S-12 How do we improve efficiency? Improvement of Optimum Hull Form (New bow, hull shape) Reduction of Hull Friction (Coatings, Air lubrication) Improvement of Propeller Efficiency (CRP, ducts) Improvement of Engine Efficiency (Turbochargers, engines Utilization of Renewable Energy (Solar, hybrid systems) We have to look at the entire ship but this requires cooperation across many sectors…. S-13 Industry Wide Initiatives All-Japan GHG Emission Program 12 Shipping Co. 7 Shipbuilders MHI, IHI, Oshima… NYK, MOL, K-Line... 7 Makers 11 NPO/Gov ClassNK, MTI, MLIT… Yanmar, Nippon Paint... 22 R&D Projects 30% GHG Emission Reduction vs. Existing Ships 2009-2013 Our Contribution: USD 28 Million to 19 of 22 projects S-14 Hybrid Turbocharger Combined generator + Turbocharger. Already in use on bulk carrier Shin Koho CO2 Reduction: 2% Flexible Coupling High Speed PM Generator Output Terminal Box S-15 Hybrid Power Systems Auriga Leader Vehicle Carrier Hybrid solar panel and battery/fuel cell system used to reduce electric power needs during voyage – reducing fuel use. CO2 Reduction: 2% S-16 Hybrid Power Systems Emerald Ace Vehicle Carrier Delivered: June 2012! Hybrid solar panel and battery/fuel cell system used to eliminate the need for generators/fuel use in berth at port CO2 Reduction: No emissions in port S-17 Air lubrication System Bubbles generated by blower reduce the frictional resistance between the vessel’s bottom and water. CO2 Reduction : 12-13% at sea trials on Module Carrier S-18 Air Lubrication Revolutionary Technology but with many challenges… The Solution: A united effort by 10+ Shipyards and research organizations S-19 Many Challenges: • Development and optimization of blower system and controls. • Testing shape of openings, size of bubbles and effect on hull. • Study flow of bubbles along hull in order to improve efficiency. • Develop design tools for application to other ship types. • Ensure performance (propeller, sea chest, etc) not affected by new system. S-20 Results of Collaboration: Soyo Type: Size: Length: Beam: Draft: Coal Carrier (BC) 91k DWT 235m 43m 13m First test application of new MALS Air Lubrication technology on a traditional deep draft cargo vessel, built at Oshima Shipbuilding in Japan for NYK. CO2 Reduction : 4-8% during sea trials depending on draft level S-21 Results of Collaboration: MALS-ADMMAX Size: Length: Beam: Draft: 95k dwt BC 237m 40m 12.5m (Designed Load) Jointly developed by rival shipbuilders Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) & Oshima Shipbuilding for sale to U.S. based grain/dry bulk major ADM. S-22 The Next Steps MALS-14000CS • Capacity: 14,000 TEU • Length: 366 m • Beam: 48.8 m • Draft: 15.2 m • MHI Air Lubrication System (MALS) • Fuel savings : 35% S-23 Is this Green Revolution Real? MPG Avg. Fuel Economy for Passenger Cars USA (1975-2011) 28 26 24 22 +15% 20 18 +70% 16 14 12 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Source: US EPA S-24 Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow S-25 谢谢! Thank you very much