View Presentations - Indian Merchant Chamber

advertisement
Amendments relating to
royalty
Sunil D Shah
Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Indian Merchants' Chamber
21 September 2012
Agenda
 Background
 Amendments by the Finance Act 2012 relating to royalty
 Some issues
 Case study
2
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Background
Royalty – Definition
Royalty as per the Income-tax Act
Consideration for:
• Transfer of all or any rights (including granting of a licence) in respect of:
‒ Patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or
similar property
‒ Copyright, literary, artistic or scientific work, etc.
• Use of:
‒ patents, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or
similar property;
‒ industrial, commercial or scientific equipment excluding amounts referred in
Section 44BB
• Imparting of any information concerning:
‒ working of or use of patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process
or trade mark or similar property
‒ technical, industrial, commercial or scientific knowledge, experience or skill
• Rendering of services in respect of the above
4
Includes lump sum consideration
Excludes capital gains
Excludes bundled payment under Computer Software
Policy
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Royalty – Definition as per OECD and UN Model
As per OECD Model
Consideration
for use of
right to use
As per UN Model
 copyright of literary, artistic, or scientific work
including cinematograph films,
 any patent, trade mark,
 design or model,
 plan, secret formula or process,
 or for information concerning industrial, commercial
or scientific experience
 Copyright of films or tapes used for radio or
television broadcasting
 industrial, commercial or scientific equipment
5
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Taxability of Royalty
Taxability under Income tax Act
6
Section
Payer
Whether Taxable
9(1)(vi)(a)
Government
All
9(1)(vi)(b)
Resident
All except payments for
business/profession/source of income of the
payer outside India
9(1)(vi)(c)
Non Resident
Only payments for business/profession/source of
income of the payer in India
Section
Royalty
Section 44DA
If arising out of PE/ fixed place of profession
Section 115A
No PE and in pursuance of agreement with the government
or Indian concern
Section 28
Other cases
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Taxability of Royalty (contd.)
Taxability as per OECD and UN Model
UN Model
OECD Model
PE
Exists?
Yes
No
No
PE
Exists?
Article 12
Yes
Yes
Article 7
Article 7
(If arising in business
carried through PE)
7
Article 14
(Arising on performance
of independent personal
services from fixed base)
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Taxability of Royalty –Tax Rates
Income-tax Act
Tax Treaty
Section 115A
Gross Basis @
10%*
Article 7
Net Basis @ 40%
Section 44DA
Net Basis @ 40%*
Article 14
Net Basis @ 40%
Other
Net @ 40%*
Article 12
Gross Basis
At treaty rates
*Plus applicable surcharge & Education Cess
8
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Amendments relating to Royalty
Amendments by the Finance Act 2012
 Explanation 4
 Transfer of all or any rights includes right for or to use a computer
software (including granting of a license) irrespective of the
medium
 Explanation 5
Includes consideration in respect of any right, property or information,
whether or not—
 the possession or control is with the payer;
 it is used directly by the payer;
 the location is in India
 Explanation 6
 "process" includes transmission by satellite , cable, optic fibre, etc.
whether or not secret
Retrospective w.e.f. 1 June 1976
10
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
CBDT Clarifications
 No re-opening of completed assessments on account of retrospective clarificatory
amendments if:


Assessment proceedings completed before 1 April 2012; and
No notice for reassessment been issued prior to 1 April 2012.
Assessment or any other order which stands validated due to the clarificatory
amendments would be enforced.
(Letter F. No. 500/111 12009-FTD-l (Pt.) dated 29 May 2012)
 No withholding under section 194J on transfer of software to a resident where:



Software acquired on subsequent transfer without any modification;
Tax has been deducted on payment on any previous transfer;
Transferee obtains a declaration that the tax has been deducted and PAN of the
transferor.
Effective from 1 July, 2012.
(Notification No. 21/2012 dated 13 June 2012)
11
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Controversies on Royalty
Issue 1: Taxability of Software Payments
Rulings on software
Pre-amendment
 CIT v. Dynamic Vertical Software India P. Ltd, 322 ITR 222 (Del) (payment by
reseller)
 DIT v. Ericsson 343 ITR 470 (Del) (bundled software)
 TII Team Telecom International 60 DTR 177 (bundled software)
 Dassault Systems K.K. v. DIT (AAR No. 821/2009) (payment by re-seller)
 DDIT v Solid Works Corporation, 18 taxmann.com 189 (payment by reseller)
14
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Rulings on software (contd.)
Pre-amendment
 CIT v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 345 ITR 494 (Kar) (payment by reseller)
 CIT v. Synopsis International Old Ltd. (Licensing of shrink wrapped software)
 Citrix Systems Asia Pacific Pty Limited v. DIT, 205 Taxman 320 (AAR) (payment
by reseller)
 Microsoft/ Gracemac 42 SOT 550 (Del) (payment by reseller)
 Millennium IT Software Ltd 338 ITR 391(AAR) (Licensing of shrink wrapped
software)
 ING Vysya Bank Ltd 61 DTR 401( Bang) (Licensing of shrink wrapped
software)
15
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Rulings on software (contd.)
Post Amendment
 CIT, International Taxation v. P.S.I Data System Ltd, 23 taxmann.com 432 (Kar.)
 DIT v. Nokia Networks OY (ITA 512 of 2007) (Delhi) (bundled software)
16
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Issue 2: Transmission by satellite
/telecommunication
Rulings on satellite/telecommunication charges
Pre-amendment
 Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DCIT, 332 ITR 340 (Del)
 ISRO Satellite Centre, In re [2008] 175 Taxman 97 (AAR)
 Infosys Technologies Ltd v. DCIT , 45 SOT 157 (Bang.)
 New Skies Satellite NV v. ADIT, 121 ITD 1 (Del)(SB)
18
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Rulings on satellite charges (contd.)
Post amendment
19

Dishnet Wireless Ltd., In re [2012] 24 taxmann.com 298 (AAR) (cable
capacity)

B4U International Holdings Ltd.v. DCIT, 23 taxmann.com 372 (MumTrib)
(transponder charges)

Channel Guide India Ltd. v. ACIT, 25 taxmann.com (Mum Trib) (transponder
charges)
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Issues
 Amendments whether clarificatory
 Software payments – reseller, end-user, bundled software
 Telecommunication charges – satellite, telephone, internet, etc.
 E-commerce and cloud computing – server space rentals, web hosting
 Database access
 Impact on other sections e.g. 40(a), 115A, 194J
 Withholding tax on past and current payments to non-residents or to
residents
 Impact on tax treaties
20
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Case Study
Facts
 US Co grants a non-exclusive license to Sing Co to reproduce, market
and distribute US Co software products in India to endusers.
 All the intellectual property rights products vest with US Co
 End-users sign an End-User License Agreement with US Co
 Sing Co pays US Co a fee on each product sublicensed.
 Sing Co receives payments from the Indian end-users against the
sublicenses
22
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Facts (contd.)
US
US Co
Non Exclusive
license for
distribution
Payments
Singapore
End user license agreement
Sing Co
Non Exclusive
license
Payments
India
End Users
23
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Issues
1. Whether the payment received by US Co from Sing Co is taxable as income
from royalties under the Income-tax Act and under the India-US DTAA ?
2. Whether the payment received by Sing Co from Indian customers is taxable
as income from royalties under the Income-tax Act and under the IndiaSingapore DTAA ?
24
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
This material prepared by Deloitte Haskins & Sells (DHS) is intended to provide general information on a particular subject or subjects and are not
an exhaustive treatment of such subject(s). Further, the views and opinions expressed herein are the subjective views and opinions of DHS based
on such parameters and analyses which in its opinion are relevant to the subject.
Accordingly, the information in this material is not intended to constitute accounting, tax, legal, investment, consulting, or other professional advice
or services. The information is not intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for any decision which may affect you or your business. Before
making any decision or taking any action that might affect your personal finances or business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.
Neither DHS nor its affiliates shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this material.
25
© 2012 Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Download