Society of American Military Engineers
Northern Virginia Chapter
Lloyd C. Caldwell, P.E., SES
Director, Military Programs
25 April 2013
USArmy
ArmyCorps
CorpsofofEngineers
Engineers
US
BUILDINGSTRONG
STRONG®
BUILDING
®
Agenda
• Overview and Missions
• MILCON & Environmental Programs Overview
• Strategic Context and Direction
• Project Delivery
• USACE Support to DoD Energy Programs
• FY13 Military Construction Contracting Forecast
2
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Overview
 USACE provides value for the Nation and diverse stakeholders.
 Across the globe, we deliver positive
impacts for today and tomorrow - in
construction, natural resource
management, energy and sustainability
and capacity building, disaster response,
contingency support, and more.
 We deliver services in partnership with
industry based on historically strong
collaborative and innovative working relationships.
3
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Military Missions
 Military Construction
 Overseas Contingency
Operations (OCO)
FORSCOM HQ, Fort Bragg, NC
 COCOM Support
FOB Leatherneck, Afghanistan
 Installation Support
 Environmental
 Real Estate Services
National Geospatial Center, FT Belvoir, VA
 Interagency and
USAG Humphries High School (DODEA)
International Services
 Energy and
Sustainability
School and Cyclone Shelter, Bangladesh 2012
Kabul Road, Bagram, Afghanistan
BUILDING STRONG®
Military Missions Program Trends
FY00-16
Program
($Millions)
30,000
ECIP (too small
to show)
Other
ARRA
Engineering &
Design (P&D)
OMA/SRM
25,000
Air Force
Construction
RE
20,000
OCO
RDT&E
DOD
Environmental
15,000
Host Nation/FMS
10,000
Army Construction
5,000
0
'00
'01
'02
'03
'04
'05
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
BUILDING STRONG®
As of 19 Apr 13
MILCON OVERVIEW
MILCON FY 13 & Prior Total Program 219 projects / $6.5B
EOY Execution Projection 194 projects / $5.9B
 Army – 86 projects / $2.6B
 Air Force – 16 projects / $388M
 DOD – 71 projects / $2.8B
 ECIP – 21 projects / $76M
MILCON FY14 President’s Budget - 126 Projects / $4.0B
 Army – 41 projects / $1.2B
(MCA, MCAR, AFHC, AFHI)

Air Force – 29 projects / $577M
(MCAF, MAFR, FHAF)


DOD – 47 projects / $2.2B
(DODM, DODS, DLA, MCN, MCDA, MDAM, NSA,SOF)
ECIP – 9 projects / $40M
6
BUILDING STRONG®
NWD
21/$720M
Alaska
Military Construction
Division and District Boundaries
(FY14 President’s Budget)
Seattle
SPD
24/$431M
NAD
21/$925M
LRD
19/$608M
North
Atlantic
Portland
Northwestern
New York
Sacramento
San
Francisco
Chicago
Cincinnati
Omaha
Great Lakes &
Ohio River
South Pacific
Baltimore
Norfolk
Kansas City
POD
12/$551M
Louisville
Los
Angeles
Albuquerque
Southwestern
Honolulu
Pacific
Ocean
LEGEND:
Div./Regional HQ location
District HQ location
Division boundary
District boundary
State boundary
Tulsa
Ft. Worth
Little
Rock
Atlanta
South Atlantic
Mobile
Dallas
Districts Outside the US:
Europe (Germany)
Far East (Korea)
Japan
Savannah
SAD
19/$380M
TAD
1/$45M
SWD
9/$374M
# Projects/Funding
7
Other Special Assignments:
Huntsville Engr & Spt Center (Chemdemil)
TAC-Winchester (Africa, Bosnia, Mid East)
St Louis District - Archaeology
Philadelphia District-Brokered MILCON
Mobile District (Panama, Puerto Rico, etc)
BUILDING STRONG®
NWD
$259M
Alaska
FY14 Environmental Programs
($1.3B)
LRD
Seattle
SPD
$146M
NAD
$305M
$78M
North
Atlantic
Portland
Northwestern
New York
Sacramento
San
Francisco
Chicago
Cincinnati
Omaha
Great Lakes &
Ohio River
South Pacific
Baltimore
Norfolk
Kansas City
POD
$129M
Louisville
Los
Angeles
Albuquerque
Southwestern
Honolulu
Pacific
Ocean
LEGEND:
Div./Regional HQ location
District HQ location
Division boundary
District boundary
State boundary
Tulsa
Little
Rock
Atlanta
South Atlantic
Ft. Worth
Savannah
SAD
$130M
Mobile
Dallas
Districts Outside the US:
Europe (Germany)
Far East (Korea)
Japan
MVD
$25M
SWD
$150M
HNC
$130M
8
BUILDING STRONG®
What is Changing and Where
are We going?
9
BUILDING STRONG®
Strategic Context
• Transformation
• BRAC05 and Realignment
• Grow the Army
Army Facility Strategy 2020
Spans full Facilities Life Cycle; MILCON
last resort
New Construction Centric
1.005B Current GSF
Real Property
End Strength
Mil Missions Strategic Focus
MILCON
Transformation
Timely Delivery of
Surge Construction
• Continued Streamlining of Process
• Integration of technical capabilities across facilities life
cycle enabling smart capital investment decisions of the
Installation Management Community
Funding
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
10
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
BUILDING STRONG®
WHERE ARE WE GOING?
Integrated, technical capabilities across the full facilities life cycle providing solutions
to complex engineering & construction problems
• Master Plan
Planning • Area
Development
Plan
Design
DBB or DB
RFP
•
ENV Restoration
•
RE Acquisition
Construction
•
Construction
•
Contract Admin
Fit-Out
Centralized
Furniture
Sustainment
and R&M
• Assessment
• R&M
Projects
Disposal
• FRP
Regional
MATOCs
• RE
Disposal
BUILDING STRONG®
Project Delivery Trends
•
Principal Acquisition Methods
 Design-Bid Build
 Design-Build
 Adapt-Build (for Army Standard Facilities)
•
Standard Facilities
 Acquisition via geographic districts
 Centers of Standardization responsible for Army Standards/Criteria, maintaining
Standard Designs, and Adapt-Build Models
 Developing regional models (based on climate zone) and updating standard designs for
energy.
•
Trends
 Less reliance on MATOCs for Military Construction; more stand-alone contracts*
 Reemphasizing use of 2-step procurement process for Design-Build
(ensure sufficient design development in RFP for 1-step procurements)
 Other Services developing facilities standardization programs.
 Interest in more centralized management of Restoration and Modernization Programs
*Use of MATOCs will continue for more specialized work and when procurement time is limited
(eg. end of FY installation support
12
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Support to DoD Energy Program

Achieving savings 5-10 percent better on average over EPAct 2005 levels
•
Strive to meet Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA 2007) by designing
energy efficient facilities using current industry standards that promote life-cycle
cost (LCC) effective energy efficient measures
 Renewable energy sources integrated into projects when LCC effective
 Seeking opportunities to immerse new technologies
LEED Certification – Level Silver
Army is developing Energy Use Intensity
(EUI) targets for standard facilities to
establish a baseline that ties directly into
the Army’s metering system (MDMS)
Intent is total accountability, designer ,
builder and operator
BUILDING STRONG®
Installation Energy & Sustainability
USACE Adds Value…
•Support Net-Zero Initiative (energy, water and waste, 18
Installations)
• Life Cycle Approach (planning, design, construction,
commissioning, operation, sustainment and disposal)
• Sustainment Restoration and Modernization (SRM), deep
energy cuts, up to 50 percent
• Support planning and execution of alternative financing
strategies
 Energy Savings Performance Contracts
 Utility Energy Saving Contracts
 Power Purchase Agreements
 Enhanced Use Leases
• Regional Energy Centers of Expertise (knowledge creation
and sharing)
BUILDING STRONG®
Support to DoD and the Nation- Today
and Tomorrow
• Support the Combatant Commands’ security activities and the efforts
of other U.S. government agencies around the globe to advance our
Nation’s interests.
• Partner with the Installation Management Community at all echelons to
deliver and maintain enduring installations and contingency basing
• Support the Nation and the Army in achieving energy security and
sustainability goals
15
BUILDING STRONG®