The Economics & Politics
of Foreign Aid
Chris Coyne
Department of Economics
George Mason University
1. Context
The Current Reality
• Low and lower-middle income countries
make up more than half the world’s
economies
– Low = $875 or less
– Lower middle = $876 - $3,465
• More than 1 billion people subsists on
less than $1 a day
• In some developing countries, more than
70 percent live on less than $2 a day
U.S. Foreign Aid
• Foreign aid is an essential part of U.S.
foreign policy
– “International aid is one of the most
powerful weapons in the war against
poverty. Today that weapon is underused
and badly targeted.”
- Human Development Report 2005
• There are five major categories of
foreign assistance
1. Bilateral assistance (35%) – Direct transfer from
one government to another
2. Assistance for U.S. Political and Security Goals
(22%) – nation building, War on Terror, War on
Drugs, etc.
3. Humanitarian aid (13%) – short-term immediate
relief
4. Multilateral aid (7%) - Aid given from a
government to an international agency (World
Bank, IMF, UNICEF)
5. Military aid (23%) – Provided to U.S. allies to help
them acquire military equipment and training
U.S. Assistance: Who Gets It?
• The U.S. provides assistance to about
150 countries
– Most are instances of bilateral aid
• From 1989-2009, the largest recipients of
U.S. aid were: Iraq, Egypt, Israel, and
Afghanistan
• For 2013, the top recipients were: Israel,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Egypt
2. Has Assistance Worked?
• No consensus
“The
“Our international
conclusions are
community’s
depressing:response
Taking all
available
to the
catastrophic
evidence
2010
earthquake
over
40
“We
re-examine
keyaccumulated
hypotheses,
and in
findyears
that
of
Haiti
research
wasofone
into
consideration,
the
largest
we have
relief
to
the
effect
aidofon
growth
is disaster
positive
and
conclude
responsesthat
ever
the
carried
AEL [aid
out ...
effectiveness
So it may be
statistically
significant.”
literature]
a bit disconcerting
has failed
that,
to prove
three
years
the
on,effect of
– Mekasha
and that
Tarp,
2013
development
the aid and development
aid on growth
community
is statistically
still
significantly
can’t seem tolarger
agree than
on whether
zero. We
theare
effort
forced to
conclude
should bethat
regarded
aid has
asnot,
largely
on average,
a success or
achieved
a failure.”its stated aims of generating
development.”
– Paulson and Murphy, 2013
– Doucouliagos and Paldam, 2008
Aren’t the Answers Easy?
(1) Identify Technical problem contributing to
poverty (e.g. Vitamin A deficiency)
(2) Make technological solution available (e.g.
Vitamin A capsules)
(3) Provide sufficient financing to scale up tech
solution to meet estimated needs (Required
financing = # Vitamin A deficient *Cost per
unit of Vitamin A)
(4) Repeat for all technical problems
contributing to poverty
(5) Therefore, aid financing  technological
solutions  the end of poverty
Why It Might Not be That
Easy
• Aid money does not spend itself, and
technology does not implement itself
• Humans spend aid money and
implement technology
Celebrities help spread
concern, but…
Tend to Ignore the EWoT
• Adaptability
–Function of:
• Knowledge
• Incentives
3. Why Might Aid Fail?
Econ 101
• Given scarcity:
– What should be produced and
in what quantities?
– How?
– For whom?
“The economic problem of society is . . .
not merely a problem of how to
allocate ‘given’ resources—if ‘given’ is
taken to mean given to a single mind
which deliberately solves the problem
set by these ‘data.’ It is rather a
problem of . . . the utilization of
knowledge which is not given to
anyone in its totality.”
– Hayek,
1945
What Can Aid Do?
• Aid can, in theory, increase
predetermined outputs
• Aid cannot solve the basic
economic problem required for
economic progress
• The difference between
increased outputs and
development
“Mulago’s [located in Kampala,
Uganda] experience is not unique.
Across Sub-Saharan Africa, ‘medical
device graveyards’ litter the empty
closets and spare corners of hospitals.
The World Health Organization
estimates that ‘a large proportion (up
to 70 percent) of equipment lies idle.’”
Political Competition…
•
•
•
•
Between recipient governments
Within the donor government
Between NGOs
Among special interests
•
Implications for those in need:
–
–
They have a weak or nonexistent voice
Those in need often do not receive assistance
Food for Peace
“Growing, manufacturing, bagging,
shipping and transportation of nutritious
“I’ve run these operations, and I know
U.S. food creates jobs and economic
that
food
aid
often
gets
there
after
activity here at home, provides support for
everyone’s
dead.”
our U.S. Merchant Marine, essential to
– Andrew Natsios, 2013
our national defense sealift capability,
and sustains a robust domestic
constituency for these programs not easily
replicated in foreign aid programs.”
– Letter to Congress and Obama Administration
from 60 U.S. food organizations
Bureaucracy
• Discretionary budget
– Mission creep and hubris
– Waste
Unintended Consequences
A complex system has two
characteristics
•
•
•
Interconnected units or elements
Entire system exhibits properties
different from its individual parts
– Reinforce status quo, Corruption,
Political Instability, Dependency,
Escalation in conflict and human rights
violations, etc.
“The cause of this mess is no mystery.
Ever since Uganda began receiving
generous amounts of foreign aid two
decades ago, senior Ugandan politicians
and civil servants have been stealing
virtually every shilling they can get
their hands on … The US, Japan, and
Europe also poured in aid, and as they
did, ever more outrageous scandals
ensued.”
– Helen Murphy, “Murder in Uganda,” The
New York Review of Books, April 3, 2014
4. Institutions: The Key to
Economic Growth
An Illustration
Per Capita
Income (PPP)
= $1,800
Per Capita
Income (PPP)
= $28,000
Economic Freedom
• Economic Freedom means that people
are free to trade with others, compete in
markets, buy what they want, earn a
living in a job they choose, keep what
they earn, and own things privately
Economic Freedom and
Per Capita Income
Economic Freedom and the
Income Level of the Poorest 10%
Economic Freedom and
Life Expectancy
What Explains These
Outcomes?
• Entrepreneurship!
– A discovery process which entails:
•
•
•
•
Experimentation
Trial and error
Success and failure
Profit and loss
• Economic freedom (i.e., private property)
provides general and overarching rules which
allow entrepreneurs to be alert to ideas and to
bet on those ideas
The Difficulty of Picking
Winners
• Ken Olson, chairman/founder of Digital
Equipment Corp., 1977
– “There is no reason anyone would want a
computer in their home.”
• Fred Smith’s (FedEx) Yale University
Senior Project Grade – Remark from
professor:
– “The concept is interesting and well-formed, but
in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must
be feasible.”
Would You Invest?
5. Summing Up
The question that often arises
in discussions of
humanitarian issues:
What must “we” do to
end suffering?
The Myth of the “Man in
Charge”
Most people act as if there is an allpowerful person in charge of
development
•
•
•
But there is nobody in charge of
complex systems
The main effect of the “man in
charge” myth is a bias toward
unconstrained thinking
The Constrained Approach
•
Development as discovery
–
•
Removing barriers to discovery
–
•
Open ended vs. end states
Note that politicians in other countries
can do this if they so choose
What role for developed countries?
–
Inward vs. outward orientation