February_2014_OSLC_Community_Update

advertisement
OSLC Community Update
&
Introduction to PROMCODE
19 February 2014
Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration
Lifecycle integration inspired by the web
1
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Agenda & Presenters
1. OSLC Community Update
Sean Kennedy
IBM
http://manualassembly.net
2. Introduction to PROMCODE
Dr. Mikio Aoyama
Nanzan University
http://www.nise.org
2
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC MS Affiliated TC Creation Pipeline
Prioritization &
Preparation
with MS
members
TC Charter
Creation & TC
Co-submitter
Recruiting
TC Charter
Submission &
OASIS Process
OASIS
Approval & 1st
TC meeting
Core TC
 Done
 Done
 Done
 Nov 2013
OSLC CCM TC
 Done
 Done
 Done
 Jan 2014
OSLC
Automation TC
 Done
 Done
 Done
 Mar 2014
 Done
OSLC
PROMCODE TC
 Done
 Done
 Mar 2014
Mar 2014
Apr-May 2014
Jun 2014
 Dec 2013 –
Feb 2014
OSLC RAQ
Mgmt TC
Jul ‘13
Oct ‘13
Feb ‘14
Jun ‘14
Core
Change and Configuration Mgmt
Automation
PROMCODE
Requirements, Architecture, and Quality Mgmt
3
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Integrating and extending ALM, PLM and beyond
OSLC is being standardized at OASIS
Member Section Co-Founders
Technical Committees are Driving Growth of Participation
4
IBM Confidential - NDA
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC: Collaborating across the industry
OSLC Member Section
Linked Data Platform Working Group
http://oasis-oslc.org
http://LinkedDataPlatform.org
Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration
Lifecycle integration inspired by the web
.NET too:
http://oslc4net.codeplex.com/
The Resource for OSLC Implementers
http://eclipse.org/lyo
European Safety-Critical
Interoperability Specification
http://www.crystal-artemis.eu/
Tool Integration and Interoperability
Working Group
http://bit.ly/INCOSE-TIIWG
5
Systems Engineering DSIG:
OSLC4MBSE Working Group
http://bit.ly/OMG-OSLC4MBSE
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC Connect @ ALM Forum
http://alm-forum.com
Great Presentations
Towards a Lean Software Lifecycle - Industry Panel
Mik Kersten, Tasktop
Wide range of other
topics, including:
Agile, DevOps,
Architecture, Testing, &
the Business of Software
Better Integration through Open Interfaces
Steve Speicher, IBM
Link, not Synch!
Arthur Ryman, IBM
PROMCODE: An Open Platform for Large-Scale
Contracted Software Delivery in Software Supply Chains
Dr. Mikio Aoyama, Nanzan University
April 1-3, 2014
Seattle, WA
Integration Principles and Reality
Ludmila Ohlsson, Ericsson
Overcoming Mobility Challenges
Dave Stecher, PointSource
Facilitating Stockdale: Confronting and Overcoming
the Brutal Facts of Continuous Improvement
Sean Kennedy, IBM
6
Networking too!
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Introduction to PROMCODE
Dr. Mikio Aoyama
Nanzan University
http://www.nise.org
Dr. Mikio Aoyama is a professor at the department of software
engineering, Nanzan University, Japan. Before he joined the
university, he has 15 years of experiences in the industry
including managing large-scale software development. Currently,
he is a chair of PROMCODE consortium, a joint research
consortium with IBM, Fujitsu, NEC, NTT DATA, Hitachi and
Nomura Research Institute founded on May 21, 2012.
His research interest include software architecture, including
cloud computing, SOA and automotive software, and
requirements engineering. He published many books and more
than 100 refereed papers. He has been serving many
international conferences, including ICSE, IEEE Cloud, IEEE
RE, and APSEC.
7
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC BACKGROUND
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
The Integration Problem
Point-to-point
Integrations
don’t scale
Monocultures
lock you in
Maintenance, management,
and change costs go up over time
Ongoing and unexpected
costs drain resources
End-user productivity suffers:
Either stuck with the wrong tool,
stuck doing manual integration;
often stuck doing both
Creating new
integrations is
unpredictable
Past choices
restrict present
action and
future vision
Integrations consume more of the IT budget:
integration failures are the top 2 causes
of software project delays*
More limited ability to respond to change
Constrained by exhausted IT budget and lower productivity
9
* Commissioned study conducted by
Forrester Consulting on behalf of IBM.
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC’s Simple Solution
Users can work seamlessly across their tools
(complex and fragile synchronization schemes not required)
Architecture of the Web
Standard Interfaces
Automation
Linked Data
“Just Enough” integration
Increased reuse
Increased traceability
Monitoring
Decreased maintenance costs
Better visibility
OSLC is an open and scalable approach to lifecycle integration.
It simplifies key integration scenarios across heterogeneous tools
10
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
The Basics: What is OSLC, and why should I care?
OSLC is an open community building practical specifications for integrating software
Tool
Maker
• create software using reusable and open assets that will
interoperate with other tools both inside and outside your influence
providing time and cost savings
Tool
Manager
• reduce the complexity and risk of increasingly complex software
infrastructures, and improve the value of software across a broader
set of internal and external stakeholders
Tool User
• choose the best tools for your job and have them interact
seamlessly to achieve traceability and visibility with the rest of your
organization
Systems
Integrator
• focus energy and resources on higher-value customizations,
deliver more business value to your clients, and increase client
satisfaction
OSLC is beneficial to many stakeholders
Contributing Organizations: http://oslc.co/organizations
11
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Aspirations for OSLC
(From the OSLC Steering Committee)
Foundational technology for all
integration
The household name for integrations
Natural choice for standardizing looselycoupled integrations in new domains
12
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
The Organizational Vision for OSLC
OSLC Member Section at OASIS
Steering
Committee
Approved
Standard
Approved
News
Subcommittees
Technical
Committees
Implementer’s
Expo
User Groups
Forums
Standard
Approved Approved
Standard Standard
W3C LDP WG
open-services.net
~~~
~~..~~
Resources
and Tutorials
Use what you need,
share what you can.
Eclipse Lyo
Libraries
Test Suites
Samples
and
Examples
OSLC4Net
Reference Implementations
13
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC HISTORY
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC History Lesson (through October 2013)
OSLC Steering Committee votes
to pursue OASIS:
The plan that will eventually see
OSLC specification development
happen at OASIS is approved
OASIS OSLC Core TC co-founded by Ericsson, fluid
Operations, IBM, KTH, Software AG, and Tasktop
First OSLC Member Section Election:
Boeing joins the Steering Committee
W3C Linked Data Platform WG approved:
Parts of OSLC Core V2 spec contributed and used as the
seed document; OSLC Core V3 work started with plans to
rebase off of this future W3C Standard
OSLC Member Section
at OASIS created by 22
co-founders
OSLC V2 specs start finalizing:
there are a growing number of
implementations, many popular ALM
tools are made available through
adapters using a façade pattern
OSLC Architecture matures:
OSLC Core WG founded, it will
serve as the common basis for
the OSLC V2 specs
OSLC Change Mgmt
V1 spec released:
impls available from 3
vendors and in open
source
OSLC Governance Matures:
More rigorous IP policies introduced and
Steering Committee created; members
from: Accenture, Creative Intellect,
EADS, IBM, Siemens, and Tasktop
OSLC WGs start to address new segments:
DevOps and Product Lifecycle Management first,
Integrated Systems Management follows
Eclipse Lyo project created:
it is to become the resource for
OSLC developers
Many new WGs get started, including: Quality Mgmt,
Requirements Mgmt, and Architecture Mgmt
OSLC Change Mgmt is the first WG:
scenario discussions will lead to a draft, implementations, and the V1 spec
15
OSLC announced: a revolutionary way to make application integrations simple
& effective, building on the experience of the Web and the Jazz Platform
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC Governance History
Community governance of OSLC
OASIS
 Internationally recognized
independent SDO
 Formal support from 22
organizations (at launch)
 Participation governed by
established OASIS model
Steering committee
IBM de facto
governance
(with
community
support)
 Multi-organization steering
committee established
 New governance model
introduced
June 2012
16
May 2013
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Why OSLC and Standardizing at OASIS Matters
Software runs the world
But it is heterogeneous and disjoint
And it needs to be integrated
Traditional approaches to software integration require custom software
Custom software is expensive to maintain and a limit on future choice
Custom integrations drive software TCO higher and limit choice
Open standards are key enablers for broad and large-scale integration
OSLC standards simplify lifecycle integration leading to cost savings and increased flexibility
OSLC is helping the world run more efficiently
Standardizing OSLC at OASIS will increase adoption and acceptance of OSLC
The world will benefit from standardized integration through OSLC
17
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
OSLC: Standardizing the sharing of lifecycle data
Scenario-driven &
Solution-oriented
Leading choice for strategic
integration technology
Generally applicable: specs available for many
domains covering ALM, DevOps, ISM, and PLM
Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration
Lifecycle integration inspired by the web
OSLC Member Section
Linked Data Platform Working Group
Based on and
Shaping the
Future of Internet
Architecture
OSLC:
18
Open and Independent
Governance and Leadership
The Resource for OSLC Implementers
Inspired by the web
Free to use and share
Changing the industry
Proven
Open
Innovative
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Timing and Mission of OSLC Domain TCs, TBD
Scope
Draft
Converge
Current spec
progress?
Final
Core 3.0
Change Management 3.0
Asset Management 3.0
Configuration Management
Quality Management 3.0
Automation 3.0
Core TC
2
Change and Configuration Management TC
A
Requirements, Architecture, and Quality
Management TC
B
Automation TC
C
Integrated Service Management TC
D
Performance Monitoring 3.0
Resource Reconciliation 3.0
PLM/ALM
Other TCs based on other OSLC WGs,
OSLC UGs, existing external initiatives,
Member interest, or a combination of.
E
Estimation and Measurement
OSLC UG
OSLC UG
OSLC UG
Active specification work continues at open-services.net until
19
those
specs are contributed to an affiliated TC at OASIS
External
External
Initiative
External
Initiative
Initiative
Member
Member
Interest
Member
Interest
Interest
© 2014 OSLC UG for Communications
Unordered
Requirements Management 3.0
Architecture Management 3.0
1
OSLC Member Section
Download