Chapter 9 Corporate Strategy: Mergers and Acquisitions, Strategic Alliances Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 9-2 Chapter Outline 9.1 Mergers and Acquisitions • Merging with Competitors • Why Do Firms Make Acquisitions? • M&A and Competitive Advantage 9.2 Strategic Alliances • Why Do Firms Enter Strategic Alliances? • Governing Strategic Alliances • Alliance Management Capability 9.3 Implications for the Strategist 9-3 ChapterCase 9 ©Disney, Todd Anderson/AP Images How Buzz Lightyear, Iron Man, and Darth Vader Joined Mickey’s Family Disney earns over $45 billion in revenues − major purchases: • 2006 – acquired Pixar for $7.4 billion After Eisner left Disney in the fall of 2005 • 2009 – acquired Marvel Entertainment for $4 billion • 2012 – acquired Lucasfilm for over $4 billion Disney uses alliances and acquisitions for complementary assets. • Related-linked diversification (see Ch. 8) 9-4 9.1 Mergers and Acquisitions Merger: combining two companies usually similar in size • Friendly approach Ex: Ernst & Young Acquisition: purchase or takeover of a company • Can be friendly Ex: Disney buys Pixar • Hostile takeover Ex: Vodafone buys Mannesmann 9-5 Merging with Competitors Horizontal integration: process of merging and acquiring competitors • HP buys Compaq in 2002. • Pfizer buys Wyeth in 2009. • Live Nation buys Ticketmaster in 2010. Benefits: • • • • Reduce competitive intensity Lower costs Increased differentiation Access to new markets and distribution channels 9-6 Strategy Highlight 9.1 Food Fight: Kraft’s Hostile Takeover of Cadbury Kraft acquired Cadbury in UK. • Hostile takeover, $20 billion deal • Cadbury has strong position in emerging economies. Perfected distribution system in countries like India • Kraft faces strong rivalries worldwide, including China. 2012 − Kraft restructured With Hershey’s attention on China (2013 entry), Kraft has an opportunity for gaining U.S. market share. 9-7 M&A and Competitive Advantage Many M&As actually destroy shareholder value! • When there is value, it often goes to the acquiree. • Acquirers tend to pay a premium. Why still desire M&As? • Principal–agent problems • Overcome competitive disadvantage • Superior acquisition and integration capability 9-8 9.2 Strategic Alliances STRATEGIC ALLIANCE • A voluntary arrangement between firms that involves the sharing of knowledge, resources, and capabilities with the intent of developing processes, products, or services STRATEGIC CRITERIA • An alliance qualifies as strategic only if it has the potential to affect a firm’s competitive advantage. RATIONAL VIEW OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE • Framework where critical resources and capabilities are embedded in strategic alliances that span firm boundaries 9-9 Why Do Firms Enter Strategic Alliances? Strengthen competitive position • Apple vs. Amazon Enter new markets • Local partner for global growth • Microsoft partners with Yahoo on search Hedge against uncertainty • Real options approach Roche invests in Genentech 1990 & buys it in 2009 Access critical complementary assets • Pixar partners with Disney Learn new capabilities • GM & Toyota (NUMMI) – formed in 1984 Who won the learning race? Probably Toyota…. 9-10 Strategy Highlight 9.2 Strategic Alliances to Challenge Amazon Amazon’s Kindle • Content providers do not want fixed price for e-books. ($9.99) • Below cost is the same strategy Amazon started for printed books. Apple’s iPad • Let publishers set the prices directly (Agency model) • Worked with publishers to increase bargaining power Challenge Amazon’s early lead in the delivery of e-content • Amazon share dropped from 90 to 60% in e-books. 2013 – a federal judge ruled that Apple colluded with publishers to drive up prices of e-books 9-11 Exhibit 9.2 Key Characteristics of Different Alliance Types 9-12 NON-EQUITY ALLIANCES Most common forms of alliance • Supply agreements • Distribution agreements • Licensing agreements Vertical strategic alliances Firms share explicit knowledge • Knowledge that can be codified Patents User manuals and fact sheets, Scientific publications 9-13 EQUITY ALLIANCES At least one partner takes partial ownership position • Stronger commitment toward the relationship Allow the sharing of tacit knowledge • Tacit knowledge concerns the “know-how” Partial ownership, thus equity alliances signal stronger commitments Moreover, equity alliances allow for the sharing of tacit knowledge that can not be codified. • Toyota has an equity alliance with Tesla. 9-14 JOINT VENTURES Joint ventures (JVs) are the strong ties, trust, and commitment that can result. Created and owned by two or more companies • Hulu owned by NBC, ABC, and Fox Long-term commitment • Exchange both tacit and explicit knowledge • Frequent interaction of personnel Used to enter foreign markets Least common of the 3 types of alliances 9-15 Alliance Management Capability A firm’s ability to effectively manage three alliancerelated tasks concurrently 30 to 70% of all alliances yield disappointing results 1. Partner selection and alliance formation 2. Alliance design and governance 3. Post-formation alliance management 9-16 PARTNER SELECTION AND ALLIANCE FORMATION The expected alliance benefits must exceed its costs. One or more of the five alliance formation reasons should be present: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Strengthen competitive position Enter new markets Hedge against uncertainty Access critical complementary resources Learn new capabilities Partner compatibility and commitment are necessary conditions for a successful alliance. 9-17 9.3 Implications for the Strategist A strategist has three options to drive firm growth: • Organic growth through internal development • External growth through alliances • External growth through acquisition The build-borrow-or-buy framework: • Aids strategists in deciding whether to pursue internal development (build) • Enter a contract arrangement or strategic alliance (borrow) • Acquire new resources, capabilities, and competencies (buy) 9-18 Exhibit 9.5 How to Implement a Corporate Strategy: The Build-Borrow-or-Buy Framework 9-19 ChapterCase 9 ©Disney, Todd Anderson/AP Images Consider This… • CEO Bob Iger’s acquisition-led growth strategy • Disney has become increasingly diversified • Business revenue streams are more predictable. • Box office, home entertainment, theme parks, cable TV, toys, licensing, etc. • Media industry is being disrupted: • People spend less time watching movies in theaters. • More time-consuming content is available online. 9-20 9-21