Strategic Management BALANCED SCORECARD Balanced Score Card IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 12 Diffusion of a New Idea • “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance” (Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, Harvard Business Review, February 1992) • About 35% of Fortune 2000 firms have adopted a balanced scorecard, 55% of those firms are very satisfied with it. (R. D. Banker, C. Konstans and S. Janakiraman; January 2000) IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 2 Balanced Score Card • A new approach to strategic management was developed in the early 1990's by Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and David Norton (Balanced Scorecard Collaborative). • They named this system the 'balanced scorecard'. Recognizing some of the weaknesses and vagueness of previous management approaches, the balanced scorecard approach provides a clear prescription as to what companies should measure in order to 'balance' the financial perspective. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 3 Balanced Score Card • Kaplan and Norton describe the innovation of the balanced scorecard as follows: “The balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for which investments in long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and innovation." IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 4 Evaluation Methods Balanced Scorecard – Four Perspectives Financial Perspective How should we appear to our shareholders? Customer Perspective How should we appear to our customers? Vision And Strategy Internal Business Perspective At what business practice must we excel? Learning and Innovation Perspective How should we sustain our ability to change and improve? IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 5 Balanced Scorecard Financial Perspective How do we look to our shareholders? Customer Perspective How do we look to our customers? Vision & Strategy Internal Process Perspective What business processes are the value drivers? Learning & Growth Perspective Are we able to sustain innovation, change and improvement IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 6 Balanced Scorecard for a Retailer Financial Perspective EVA (Residual Income) Profit per square foot Customer Perspective •Customer satisfaction •Customer retention •Market share Vision & Strategy Internal Process Perspective •Service quality •Product quality •Inventory management Learning & Growth Perspective •Information systems •Employee satisfaction •Employee training IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 7 Balance in the Scorecard • Balance between financial, customer, internal process and learning perspectives • Balance between financial and nonfinancial measures • Balance between short-term and long-term objectives Balance between hard, objective measures and softer, more subjective measures Balance between different stakeholders Balance between strategic and diagnostic measures IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 8 Horizontal Balanced Scorecard Investors Lenders Customers Employees Suppliers Financial Financial Customer Internal Process Perspective Perspective Perspective Perspective Perspective Balance between different stakeholders. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 9 Vertical Balanced Scorecard Financial Objectives Customer Objectives Internal Process Objectives Learning and Growth Objectives IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 10 BALANCED SCORECARD DESIGN 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Identify strategic objectives for each perspective. An objective is a statement of strategic intent. An objective states how a strategy will be made operational. Application will allow strategic objectives to be aligned with at least one perspective. Associate measures with strategic objectives. A measure is a performance metric that will reflect progress against an objective. A measure must be quantifiable. Leading measures are predictors of future performance, while lagging measures are outcomes. Measure has to be linked with an objective. Assign targets to measures. A target is a quantifiable goal for each measure with a specified time frame. Link strategic objectives in cause and effect relationships (Theme). Objectives are linked to one another through cause and effect relationships. Application should be able to represent the linkages graphically and should able to edit/change as appropriate. List strategic initiatives. Strategic initiatives are action programs that drive performance. The application should allow for setting of strategic initiatives to be linked to at least one objective. View the strategy from four perspectives (Financial, Customer, Internal and Learning). A perspective is a component into which the strategy is decomposed to drive implementation. Other perspective may be added to the typical set or replace based on specific strategic need. Balanced Score Card IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 12 A Balanced Scorecard “Is a performance measurement system that translates an organization’s strategy into clear objectives, measures, targets, and initiatives.” (Kaplan and Norton, Harvard Business Review, 1996) ”A method for the organization to systematically develop a comprehensive link between its strategy and a coherent set of performance measures.” “A method for the organization to systematically develop a comprehensive system of planning and control”. (Kaplan and Norton, Harvard Business Review, 1992) IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 13 Balanced Scorecard The balanced scorecard (BSC) provides a framework for selecting multiple performance measures focused on critical aspects of business (Kaplan and Norton 1992). The essence of the BSC is the articulation of linkages between performance measures and strategic objectives (Kaplan and Norton 1996). 2 Translating Strategy Into Initiatives For each perspective: Strategy Key Success Factors Performance Measures Targets IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard Initiatives 15 A Strategic Scorecard • Should include leading indicators Leading indicators: Drivers of long term value Lagging indicators: Feedback measures on current performance • Should include outcome measures as well as measures of the drivers of those outcomes • Should link all measures with the overall strategy IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 16 Diagnostic vs Strategic Measures Diagnostic measures Monitor whether the business remains “in control” Signal when unusual events occur that require immediate attention Necessary, but not sufficient, for achieving long term goals Strategic measures Articulate a strategy designed for competitive excellence Evaluate strategies based on new information about competitors, customers, markets, technologies & suppliers IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 17 Financial Perspective Customizing Measures for the Growth Stage • • • • • • • • IHW 2005 Sales growth rate Sales in new markets Sales to new customers Sales from new products Investment in product development Investment in information technology Investment in employee skills Investment in new distribution channels Balanced Scorecard 18 Financial Perspective Customizing Measures for the Sustain Stage • • • • • • • • Return on capital employed Economic Value Added (EVA) Operating income/Gross margin Discounted cash flows Asset utilization rates Cost reduction rates Cost benchmarked against competitors Customer and product line profitability IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 19 Financial Perspective Customizing Measures for the Harvest Stage • • • • • • IHW 2005 Current cash flows Payback period Spending ratios Throughput ratios Product line profitability Negative cash flow customers Balanced Scorecard 20 Customer Perspective: Strategic Outcome Measures Financial Objectives Customer Outcomes Market Share Account Share Customer Acquisition Customer Profitability Customer Retention Customer Satisfaction Internal Process Outcome Drivers IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 21 Customer Perspective: Unique Value Proposition Customer Acquisition Customer Retention Customer Satisfaction Value = Product/Service Attributes + Uniqueness Functionality Quality Price Time IHW 2005 Image Brand Equity Balanced Scorecard + Relationship Convenient Trusted Responsive 22 The Internal Perspective Generic Service Value Chain Model Innovation Cycle Identify Custome r Needs Identify the Market Operations Cycle Create the Service Offering Produce the Services Post-Sale Service Cycle Deliver the Services Service the Customer Satisfy Custome r Needs Efficiency Effectiveness IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 23 Learning and Growth Perspective Objectives Capability Measures Employee Skills Long Term Success Information Systems •Satisfaction •Retention Organizational •Training Processes •Capabilities IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard •Real-time availability •Accuracy •Pervasiveness •Alignment of incentives with key success factors •Improvement in key customer and internal processes 24 So, A Balanced Scorecard… • Is much more than a collection of indicators of key success factors. • Is a flight simulator, not a dashboard of instrument dials. • Integrates performance measures with a unique strategy. • Incorporates cause-and-effect relationships, including leads, lags and feedback loops. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 25 Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy A Strategy Is a Set of Hypotheses About Cause and Effect Financial Return on Capital Employed Customer Customer Loyalty Customer On-time Delivery Internal Process Learning & Growth IHW 2005 Process Quality Process Cycle Time Employee Skills Balanced Scorecard 26 Link to Financial Objectives • Balanced scorecard retains a strong emphasis on financial outcome measures. • Ultimately, causal paths from all performance measures should be linked to financial objectives. • Failure to link improvement programs (e.g. TQM, cycle time reduction, reengineering, and employee empowerment) results inevitably in organizations becoming disillusioned about lack of tangible payoffs. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 27 The Balanced Scorecard for The Women’s Store Employed in the Experiment Percent Better than Target Measure Target Actual Financial: 1. Sales margins 2. Sales growth per store 3. Inventory turnover 4. Debt-to-assets ratio 60% 15% 6 < 20% 67.02% 16.75% 6.59 18.07% 11.70% 11.67% 9.83% 9.65% +7% 80% $30,000 8,000 7.79% 88.44% $33,090 8,911 11.29% 10.55% 10.30% 11.39% Internal Process: 1. Brand recognition rating 2. Number of stock-outs 80% < 3 times 87.60% 2.66 9.50% 3. “Mystery Shopper” audit rating 4. Time to process customer returns 85% < 4 min. 93.47% 3.54 Learning and Growth: 1. Employee satisfaction 2. Employee suggestions per year 80% 2.5 times 87.96% 2.74 3. Store computerization 4. Hours of training invested in brand managers each year 60% 80 hours 66.24% 89.10 Customer: 1. Price relative to competitors’ price 2. Customer satisfaction rating 3. Sales per square foot of retail space 4. Number of credit card customers per store 11.33% 9.96% 11.50% 9.95% 9.60% 10.40% 11.38% Metropolitan Bank’s Strategy • “We must increase our income and revenue by broadening the services sold to a targeted group of customers.” • “We cannot continue only receiving deposits and processing checks. Competitive pressure implies that we develop and sell new services such as mutual funds, credit cards and financial advice.” IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 29 Metropolitan Bank: Cause and Effect Financial Perspective Increase Return to Stockholders Broaden Revenue Mix Customer Perspective Increase Customer Satisfaction With Our Products Understand Customer Needs Develop New Products Cross-Sell Products Learning Perspective Instill a Selling Culture Develop Selling Skills IHW 2005 Access to Strategic Information Balanced Scorecard Internal Process Perspective Align Personal Goals 30 Metropolitan Bank’s Balanced Scorecard Strategic Objectives Strategic Measures Learning Internal Customer Financial Lag Indicators Lead Indicators Improve Returns to Stockholders Broaden Revenue Mix Return on Investment Revenue Mix Revenue Growth Increase Customer Satisfaction Knowledgeable People Convenient Access Superior Service Customer Retention Depth of Relation (Sale of Multiple Products to a Customer) Customer Satisfaction Survey Understand Our Customers Create Innovative Products Cross-Sell Products Share of Segment Revenue from New Products Cross-Sell Ratio Product Development Cycle Hours with Customers Instill a Selling Culture o Build Strategic Information o Develop Strategic Skills o Align Incentives IHW 2005 Revenue per Employee Employee Satisfaction Survey Balanced Scorecard Strategic Information Availability Strategic Job Coverage Personal Goals Alignment 31 Why Do We Need a Balanced Scorecard? To Implement Business Strategy! “Business Strategy is now the single most important issue… and will remain so for the next five years” Business Week “Less than 10% of strategies effectively formulated are effectively executed” Fortune IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 32 Scorecard Structure • Scorecard is very context-specific Industry and competitive factors Life-cycle of business unit Business strategy • It is important to validate cause-effect relationships for each individual business. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 33 To Implement a Balanced Scorecard The organization must • Define and develop measures for its primary strategic objectives. • Understand how different business processes contribute to its strategic objectives. • Identify the drivers of performance on strategic objectives. • Develop a set of measures to monitor drivers of strategic objectives. • Communicate its beliefs about how processes create results. IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 34