Assessment of Microgroove-Aligned Endothelial Cells for in vitro Simulations 1 Fischer , 1 Gray , 2 Trinkle , 1 Eitel , 1 Anderson Jennifer L. Lindsay N. Christine A. Richard E. Kimberly W. 1 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS - MORPHOLOGY RESULTS - CHEMISTRY The circulatory system is lined with a thin layer of endothelial cells, which compose the lining of the vessel walls. Adhesion of cancer cells to this endothelial cell lining is an important step in the metastatic cascade and researchers are currently using in vitro techniques to investigate these interactions. Under static culture conditions, endothelial cells grow in a characteristic cobblestone pattern rather than growing in straight lines due to the absence of shear stresses that would normally be found in circulatory vessels. It has recently been suggested that such changes in cell morphology can affect surface expression profiles, which may alter how frequently or strongly cancer cells bind to endothelial cells. While flow adapting endothelial cells is important prior to studying cancer cell binding in vitro, traditional methods can be cumbersome due to the fact that the cells have to be exposed to flow for an extended period of time under controlled environmental conditions. In this study, we are investigating the efficacy of a microgroovealigned flow adaptation method for acquiring a flow adapted phenotype. Micropatterning and Seeding Protocols F-actin Staining VCAM-1 Staining Endothelial Cells: Cobblestone vs. Unidirectional Growth Microgrooves were created on glass slides using the negative epoxy-based photoresist, SU-8 2000.5, as shown below. Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs) were then seeding onto unmodified (control) glass slides and micropatterned slides as shown below. F-actin staining was used to stain the actin fibers in the cellular cytoskeleton so Initial fluorescent images of antibody tagging to evaluate surface expression that the aspect ratios and orientation angles could be tabulated more readily Primary Antibody: Anti-VCAM-1 Antibody, clone P3C4 Images show noticeable elongation of HUVECs on micropatterned versus control Secondary Antibody: Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (Fc), Fluorescein Conjugated slides regardless of seeding density Staining completed for N=3 slides for both the unmodified control and Morphology and Surface Chemistry Evaluation Protocols Elongation and orientation were compared at high and low seeding densities for micropatterns. Unmodified slides stimulated with 480U/ml TNF-α The HUVEC morphology was characterized by aspect ratios and orientation unmodified control and micropatterned slides (tumor necrosis factor alpha) were also used as a positive control (N=3). angles. High density: 62,000cells/cm2, Low density: 25,000 cells/cm2 Three images were analyzed per slide. Aspect ratio = length of cell/width of cell Preliminary results from images and median pixel intensities Aspect Ratio Comparison Orientation angle = deviation from horizontal (histogram peaks) suggest upregulation of VCAM-1 on the surface Grooves defined as 0° of microgroove-aligned HUVECs. This was not statistically Positive deviations represent above horizontal, negative represent below significant in comparisons of mean pixel intensities. The surface chemistry was first evaluated by examining vascular cell adhesion molecule VCAM-1 expression due to its significance in the metastatic cascade. This was done using the following protocol: Using microgrooves created with SU-8 photoresist on glass, HUVECs were successfully cultured statically in a more elongated and unidirectional form reminiscent of in vivo morphology Initial fluorescent images suggest upregulation of VCAM-1 on micropatterned glass slides which is more representative of the in vivo surface chemistry. The average histograms derived from the images also suggest upregulation (as evidenced by positive shift in median peak) on the microgrooves, however this effect was not apparent in the means likely due to the asymmetry from cutoffs of autofluorescence and nonspecific Atomic Force Microscopy Characterization staining on the left and the variability in the right tail regions. At both seeding densities, statistically higher aspect ratios were obtained for the micropatterned versus the control slides (p-value <0.05) Grooves Glass Error bars represent SE Examine surface expression of ICAM-1, E-selectin and P-selectin In unmodified controls, n= 60. In micropatterned studies, n = 138 and n = 114 Quantify results of surface chemistry in spectrophotometer for Orientation Angle Comparison comparison Compare results to cells flow adapted in a parallel plate flow chamber CONCLUSIONS RESULTS – APPROACH VALIDATION OBJECTIVES Overall Objective The overall objective of this work was to create a static culture system that better mimics the chemistry and morphology of endothelial cells grown in vivo using microfabrication techniques. FUTURE WORK Specific Objectives Investigate and compare morphology of endothelial cells grown on micropatterned grooves with those grown on a blank glass slide by quantifying aspect ratios and orientation angles. Investigate surface expression of cells grown on micropatterned grooves in comparison to cells grown on a blank slides using fluorescent tagging of antibodies for the following proteins involved in tumor cell adhesion to the endothelium: ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin and P-selectin. The AFM was used to confirm that our methods for patterning SU-8 2000.5 were Shown above are orientation angle histograms for the high density micropatterned slides (left) vs. control (right) correct and resulted in the desired topography. Micropatterned slides show small distribution mostly between ± 20° Average groove depth was 500 nm as expected Control slides show large distribution between ± 100° Consistent trench widths and spacing was achieved Results demonstrate elongated, unidirectional growth achieved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UKY NCI CNTC (Grant # R25CA153954) UKY NSF IGERT Grant in Bioactive Interfaces and Devices (NSF Award # 0653710) CeNSE Laboratory at the University of Kentucky Support from the National Science Foundation REU Program #EEC-1156667 and the Bucks For Brains Program, Office of Undergraduate Research, University of Kentucky REFERENCES 1. MicroChem. http://www.microchem.com/Prod-SU8_KMPR.htm (April 2012). 2. Cines et al. Endothelial Cells in Physiology and in the Pathophysiology of Vascular Disorders. Blood Journal. 1998; vol 91 3. Park, T; Shuler M. Integration of Cell Culture and Microfabrication Technology. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 243-253