DoD Systems Engineering Update
Col Donald Robbins
Deputy for SE Plans and Policy
Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
for Systems Engineering, OUSD(AT&L)
NDIA SE Division Annual Strategic Planning Meeting
December 11, 2013
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-1
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Key Elements of
Defense Strategic Guidance
• The military will be smaller and leaner, but
it will be agile, flexible, ready and
technologically advanced.
• Rebalance our global posture and presence
to emphasize Asia-Pacific regions.
• Build innovative partnerships and
strengthen key alliances and partnerships
elsewhere in the world.
• Ensure that we can quickly confront and
defeat aggression from any adversary –
anytime, anywhere.
• Protect and prioritize key investments in
technology and new capabilities, as well as
our capacity to grow, adapt and mobilize as
needed.
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-2
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
2013 DoD Leadership Focus:
Challenges, Choices, Opportunities
• The challenges posed by a changing
strategic landscape and new budget
constraints;
• The choices we have in responding
to these challenges; and
Chuck Hagel
24th
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-3
Secretary of Defense
• The opportunities that exist to
fundamentally reshape the defense
enterprise to better reflect 21st
century realities.
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
DASD, Systems Engineering
DASD, Systems Engineering
Stephen Welby
Principal Deputy Kristen Baldwin
Systems Analysis
Kristen Baldwin (Acting)
Major Program Support
James Thompson
Addressing Emerging Challenges on Supporting USD(AT&L) Decisions with
the Frontiers of Systems Engineering Independent Engineering Expertise
Analysis of Complex Systems/Systems
of Systems
Program Protection/Acquisition Cyber
Security
Engineering Assessment /
Mentoring of Major Defense
Programs
Program Support Reviews
University, FFRDC and Industry
Engineering and Research
OIPT / DAB / ITAB Support
Modeling and Simulation
Systemic Root Cause Analysis
Systems Engineering Plans
Mission Assurance
Vacant
Leading Systems Engineering Practice
in DoD and Industry
Systems Engineering Policy & Guidance
Development Planning/Early SE
Specialty Engineering (System Safety,
Reliability and Maintainability
Engineering, Quality, Manufacturing,
Producibility, Human Systems
Integration)
Counterfeit Prevention
Technical Workforce Development
Standardization
Providing technical support and systems engineering leadership and oversight to
USD(AT&L) in support of planned and ongoing acquisition programs
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-4
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
DASD, Systems Engineering Mission
Systems Engineering focuses on engineering excellence
− the creative application of scientific principles:
– To design, develop, construct and operate complex systems
– To forecast their behavior under specific operating conditions
– To deliver their intended function while addressing economic
efficiency, environmental stewardship and safety of life and property
DASD(SE) Mission: Develop and grow the Systems Engineering
capability of the Department of Defense – through engineering
policy, continuous engagement with component Systems
Engineering organizations and through substantive technical
engagement throughout the acquisition life cycle with major
and selected acquisition programs.
US Department
of Defense is the
World’s Largest
Engineering
Organization
Over 99,000
Uniformed and
Civilian Engineers
Over 39,000 in
the Engineering
(ENG) Acquisition
Workforce
A Robust Systems Engineering Capability Across the
Department Requires Attention to Policy, People and Practice
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-5
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
DASD(SE) Portfolio
• Perform system engineering oversight of 182 programs
with acquisition costs of $1.8T
• Approve System Engineering Plans (SEPs)
• Assess preliminary and critical design reviews (PDR, CDR)
$1.15T
$625B
$=Total Acquisition Cost
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-6
$28B
$16B
Program data – SE oversight; Cost data from DAMIR
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Program Engagement
• Engineering Assessment / Mentoring of
Major Defense Programs
• Technical Reviews
• AT&L Decision Forums
• Systems Engineering Plans
• Systemic Root Cause Analysis
• Support Acquisition Leadership with
Independent Engineering Analysis and
Advice
Our Focus: Supporting Knowledge-Based Decision Making
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-7
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
FY13 Major Program Support Activity
Program Support Reviews: 15
Critical Change Report: 2
Focused Reviews: 10
PDR/CDR Assessments: 10
DPAP RFP Peer Reviews: 5
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-8
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Deputy Secretary of Defense
Memorandum, “Defense Acquisition”
• Interim DoDI 5000.02 is
effective immediately
• Cancels DoDI 5000.02,
dated December 8, 2008,
EXCEPT for Enclosure 9,
Acquisition of Services
• Revised DoDI 5000.02 to be
prepared within 180 days
• New Acquisition of
Services Instruction to be
drafted within 180 days
Signed November 26, 2013
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-9
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
USD(AT&L) Memorandum, “The New
Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02”
•
“Our purpose of this new version is to
implement a number of statutes and
regulations that have come into existence
since the last version was published in 2008…
•
I have tried to make the document more
readable and helpful to acquisition
professionals, both those new to the world of
defense acquisition and those more
experienced professionals…
•
The basic structure of the “acquisition
system” is unchanged with minor
exceptions… a “Requirements Decision Point”
and a “Development RFP Release Decision
Point”
•
Updating 5000.02 provided an opportunity to
integrate several of the Better Buying Power
initiatives…
•
Finally, I have also tried to reinforce the
importance and primacy of the acquisition
chain of command – particularly the Program
Executive Officers (PEOs) and PMs…”
“It is about us all constantly working to make the acquisition
system as efficient and effective as we can.”
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-10
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Statute & Policy Driving the Update
POLICY
USD(AT&L) Memos
• Better Buying Power 1 & 2
• Designation of Subprograms for MDAPs
• EVM Systems Performance, Oversight, and Governance
• Government Performance of Critical Acquisition Functions
• Preservation and Storage of Tooling for MDAPs
• Reporting Requirements for Programs Qualifying as Both MAIS & MDAP
• Should-cost Memos
• Strengthened Sustainment Governance
• Improving Technology Readiness Assessment Effectiveness
STATUTE
Title 10
§2334: Independent cost estimation and analysis
§2366: Major systems and munitions programs: survivability and lethality
testing required before full scale production
§2445c: MAIS Programs
PDUSD(AT&L) Memos
• Improving Milestone Process Effectiveness
• Post-CDR Reports and Assessments
• Milestone Decision Documentation Outlines
NDAA
§332 of FY09:
§805 of FY10:
§803 of FY11:
§804 of FY11:
Fuel Logistics Requirements
Life-Cycle Management and Product Support
Enhancing … Rapid Acquisition
… Acquisition Process for Rapid Fielding of Capabilities in
Response to Urgent Operation Needs
§811 of FY11: Cost Estimates for MDAP and MAIS
§812 of FY11: Management of Manufacturing Risk
§932 of FY11: Computer Software Assurance
§831 of FY11: [Waiver of Nunn-McCurdy for a Change in Quantity]
§811 of FY12: Calculation Of Time Period [for MAIS] Critical Changes…
§801 of FY12: Core Depot-level Maintenance and Repair Capabilities
§832 of FY12: Assessment, Management, and Control of Operating and Support
Costs for Major Weapon Systems
§834 of FY12: Management of Manufacturing Risk in MDAPs
§901 of FY12: Revision of DBS Requirements
§811 of FY13: Limitation on use of cost-type contracts
§812 of FY13: Estimates of Potential Termination Liability …
§904 of FY13: Additional Responsibilities ….. (T&E)
Other Memos
• Guidelines for Operational Test and Evaluation of Information and Business
Systems
• DoD CIO Policy for CCA Confirmations
DIRECTIVE TYPE MEMOS
DTM 09-027: Implementation of WSARA 2009
DTM 09-025: Space Systems Acquisition Policy
DTM 09-016: Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM) to Improve the
Integrity of Components Used in DoD Systems
DTM 10-015: Requirements for Life Cycle Management and Product
Support
DTM 10-017: Development Planning
DTM 11-003: Reliability Analysis, Planning, Tracking, and Reporting
DTM 11-009: Acquisition Policy for Defense Business Systems
http://www.acq.osd.mil/docs/DSD%205000.02_Memo+Doc.pdf
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-11
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
•
•
•
•
JCIDS Reissuance
New Emphasis on Cybersecurity
New Emphasis on Intellectual Property (IP) Strategy
FY10 NDAA, Sec. 804: Agile IT Development
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
New Acquisition Models
• Interim DoDI 5000.02 introduces six acquisition
program models as a starting point for programspecific planning
–
–
–
–
–
–
Model 1: Hardware Intensive Program
Model 2: Defense Unique Software Intensive Program
Model 3: Incrementally Fielded Software Intensive Program
Model 4: Accelerated Acquisition Program
Hybrid Program A (Hardware Dominant)
Hybrid Program B (Software Dominant)
• All models recognize the critical role of software
Acquisition programs should use these models as a starting
point in structuring a program to acquire a specific product
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-12
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Six Acquisition Models
Model 1: Hardware Intensive Program
Model 2: Defense Unique Software Intensive Program
Model 3: Incrementally Fielded Software Intensive Program
Hybrid Program A (Hardware Dominant)
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-13
Model 4: Accelerated Acquisition Program
Hybrid Program B (Software Dominant)
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Interim DoDI 5000.02 Structure
• Core Instruction - Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
• 13 Enclosures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Acquisition Program Categories and Compliance Requirements
Program Management
Systems Engineering
Developmental Test and Evaluation (DT&E) (New)
Operational and Live Fire Test and Evaluation
Life-Cycle Sustainment Planning (New)
Human Systems Integration (HSI)
Affordability Analysis and Investment Constraints (New)
Analysis of Alternatives
Cost Estimating and Reporting
Requirements Applicable to All Programs Containing Information
Technology (IT)
12. Defense Business Systems (DBS)
13. Rapid Acquisition of Urgent Needs (New)
Added four new enclosures (4, 6, 8, and 13); many others
(including Systems Engineering) underwent major revision
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-14
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Enclosure 3 – Systems
Engineering
Enclosure 3
Systems Engineering
• ALL paragraphs have been
revised
• New paragraphs are
highlighted in Red
• Old paragraphs with major
revisions are highlighted in
Blue
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-15
Purpose
Systems Engineering Plan
Development Planning
Systems Engineering Trade-Off Analyses
Technical Risk and Opportunity Management
Technical Performance Measures and Metrics
Technical Reviews
Configuration Management
Modeling and Simulation
Manufacturing and Producibility
Software
Reliability and Maintainability
Program Protection
Open Systems Architecture
Corrosion Prevention and Control
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health
(ESOH)
Insensitive Munitions
Item Unique Identification
Spectrum Supportability
Design Reviews
Program Support Assessments
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Protecting Information
“America must also face the rapidly growing threat from cyber-attacks… We cannot
look back years from now and wonder why we did nothing in the face of real threats
to our security and our economy.
“We are going to aggressively protect our intellectual property. Our single greatest
asset is the innovation and the ingenuity and creativity of the American people. It is
essential to our prosperity and it will only become more so in this century.”
President Barack Obama
February 2013
DoD efforts to advance cyber security in the Defense Industrial Base
(DIB) include:
– DIB Cyber Security/Information Assurance (CS/IA) Program, and its optional
enhanced component the DIB Enhanced Cybersecurity Services
(http://dibnet.dod.mil)
– Standards development in collaboration with Industry
– Reinforcing protection of technical information in acquisition activities
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-16
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Safeguarding Unclassified Controlled
Technical Information Memo
•
Secretary of Defense Memorandum,
October 10, 2013
– Emphasizes DoD commitment to
preserving the intellectual property (IP) and
competitive capabilities of the Defense
Industrial Base (DIB) and the technological
superiority of our fielded military systems.
•
Key Goals
– Protect DoD unclassified controlled
technical information from cyber intrusions
– Minimize the consequences associated
with loss of this information
•
Augments current activities
– Including the DIB Cyber
Security/Information Assurance (CS/IA)
Program
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-17
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Secretary of Defense Memorandum,
“Safeguarding Unclassified Controlled
Technical Information,” October 10, 2013
Secretary of Defense direction:
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-18
1.
Implement policy and acquisition regulations
to improve protection of technical
information
2.
Establish a joint analysis capability to
assess technical information losses
3.
Identify critical acquisition and technology
programs requiring higher levels of
protection; review classification guidance
4.
Identify technical standards for protection of
information; align with JIE security
architecture
5.
Conduct assessment of unclassified DoD
networks to determine vulnerabilities to
cyber attack
6.
Monitor the effectiveness of actions taken
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
DFARS Clause 252.204-7012: Safeguarding
Unclassified Controlled Technical Information
•
Rule Published November 18, 2013
– Clause affects all new contracts that contain, or will contain unclassified controlled
technical information
•
Purpose: Establish minimum requirements for DoD unclassified
controlled technical information on contractor information
systems
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
Requires contractors implement minimum set of information security controls
Requires contractors report cyber incident and compromises
Requires contractor actions to support DoD damage assessment
Minimum Security Controls
Set of 51 information security controls from NIST SP 800-53, Revision 4
Combination of Technical, Process, Awareness & Training measures
Incident Reporting
– Reporting includes:
− DoD contracts and subcontractor information affected by a cyber incident or compromise
− DoD programs, platforms, or systems involved
− Description of DoD technical information compromised
– Reported information does not include attack signatures or other threat actor
indicators
•
Clause includes flow down in all subcontracts
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/204_73.htm
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-19
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Challenges to the
DoD Engineering Enterprise
• Lay solid foundations…create opportunities
• Envision multiple futures…enable flexible choices
• Design and build systems with focus on lifecycle
cost
• Protect our critical defense “intellectual property”
• Focus on “3 Ps” of the DoD Engineering Enterprise:
Policy, Practice and, most importantly, People
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-20
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Summary of DASD(SE) Goals
• Continued excellence in SE support to programs and
acquisition decisions
• Improved, consistent PPP engagement with programs
resulting in successful protection strategies
– New processes for Software Assurance, Trusted Microelectronics,
Exportability
• Advocacy and impact in ensuring SE workforce capacity
and capability
• Provide depth to acquisition policy and processes with SE
guidance, practices, and continuous learning opportunities
• Make progress on areas of DoD interest:
–
–
–
–
–
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-21
Quantitative Risk Management
SE Tradespace Analysis
Supply Chain Risk Management and Damage Assessment
Anti-Counterfeit
Advanced Modeling for Engineering Resiliency
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.
Systems Engineering:
Critical to Defense Acquisition
Innovation, Speed, Agility
http://www.acq.osd.mil/se
DoD Sys Eng
2013/12/11 | Page-22
Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release by OSR on 12/11/2013; SR Case #14-S-0528 applies. Distribution is unlimited.