Skills Planning for SIPs: Methodology used & reflections on possible

advertisement

Skills Planning for SIPs:

Methodology used & reflections on possible implications and issues for

‘a credible institutional mechanism for skills planning’

As at 19th March 2014

By Adrienne Bird, DDG: Special Projects Unit, DHET

Introduction

This is as much about ‘our future’ as about ‘yours’.

SIPs planning to become part of

‘mechanism’

The document therefore has two purposes:

to describe the methodology being used by the

SIPs team

Delivery pressure

building model as we go

Lessons and convergence to reflect on the possible implications of the methodology being used for the

‘credible mechanism’

The PICC is impatient of delays – wants numbers

SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY

Occupations required

Occupations in demand

Inform DHET institutions

Occupational Teams

Engagement with SETAs

Engagement with

Engagement with Institutions

Reporting

M&E & Reports

Occupations required

• All PICC projects have been grouped under a list of sectors and subsectors

• A typical size project has been selected for each sub-sector

• A skills prototype has been developed for each typical project

Occupations in demand

• Prototypes have been used to estimate the skills required for all real projects

• Technical experts have also been asked which positions are hard to fill

• List takes into account supply & nat. demand

• These estimations have been used to generate a 'occupations in demand' list

Critically scarce:

(50-100% scarcity)

SIPs Skills Plan:

Occupations in Demand

Surveyor 500

(incl land and eng. surveyors)

Materials Engineer 450

Grader Operator

Programme/ Project

Manager

Electronic Eng Technician

450

350

300

Gap 1 – broad estimates

Significantly scarce:

(20 – 50%)

Concreter

Bricklayer

Civil Engineer

Electrician

2500

1700

1400

1200

Electrical Engineer

Construction supervisor

1100

/clerk of works 1100

Electrical Engineering Technician

950

Millwright (incl. electromechanician) 600

Safety, Health, Environment and

Quality Practitioner 550

Boilermaker 500

Carpenter and Joiner

Mechanical Engineer

500

450

Ind. Machinery Mechanic 450

Construction Project

Manager / Site Manager 450

Plumber

Painter

400

400

Mech. Eng Technician 350

Draughtsperson 350

Excavator Operator

Environmental Eng

300

300

Chem Eng Technician 300

Pipe Fitter 300

Concrete Plant Worker 250

Earthmoving Plant

Operator 250

Plasterer

Welder

Quantity Surveyor

Rigger

250

220

200

200

Crane or Hoist Operator 200

0 – 20% scarcity not shown

6

Inform DHET institutions

• The 'scarce skills' list was given to DHET institutions for bottomup planning

• Institutions infuse into overall institutional priorities (e.g. SSPs for

SETAs, univ/college plan)

• Data collected from other data sources

Occupational Clusters Intermediate Bodies

Occupational Teams

Managers (primarily public sector)

Professionals & Associate

Professionals

Department of Public Service and

Administration

Council for the Built Environment

Service and Clerical Workers Services SETA

• Intermediate Bodies

Trades INDLELA, DHET

(IBs) set up to establish Transport/Construction SETAs

Occupational Teams Elementary and non-trade Construction Industry Development

(OTs) production workers Board

• DHET prepares standard reporting template

Theory convener

Training

Centre convener

Theory Practical

• OTs generate reports which include problem analysis & proposed solutions

Workplace convener

Structure d workplace learning

Final assessm ent

Assessor

Example

Mechanical Engineer Occupational Team and

Network

Occupational Team

University

University of Technology

Professional Body

Work Placed Training

SharePoint and Reporting per Occupation

Reports

Consolidated

Occupation

Information

Occupations required over time per location

SharePoint

Occupational Teams

Example of OT Report

From Entry to Expertise – learning pathway

Land Surveyors

OFO Occupation Theory Workplace Building capacity

216502 Land surveyors

Land and engineering surveyors are in short supply, but to increase the numbers more equipment and the development of more academics is essential.

MSc Scholarship for

10 @ R 100 000 per post grad p.a.

PhD Scholarship for 5

@ R 150 000 per post grad p.a.

R180 000 per candidate over 3 years. A total of 40 new candidates to be taken on annually

Increase enrolment, in all degrees through marketing: R

100 000 p.a.

Postgraduate research project support for UCT: R 250 000 p.a

Post graduate research project grant for 15 @ R 50 000

Equipment required for increased enrolment

UCT - R 2 755 000

UKZN - R 1 182 136

CHIETAs Commitments to SIP Scarce Skills – Feb 2014

Theory (Post-graduate /

OFO Occupation

No.

Bursaries)

Engagement with SETAs cost

Total

Workplace

No.

Unit Cost Total

• DHET engages one-onone with SETAs asking them to respond to OT reports;

212908

(Employed)

3 R 10,500

R 906,000 20

R 14,000

R 660,000

14 R 142,000 R 592,000 10 R 288,000 R 360,000

Programme and

SETAs interrogate

Professionals and associate

10 R 30,000 R 300,000 10 R 30,000 R 300,000 report in the light of their SSPs and make

R

12,421,900

796

R

28,813,000 commitments

214501

Chemical engineering (WIL)

149 R 294,200 R 5,198,200 153

R

2,074,800

R 5,619,600

Chemical

SETAs locate workplace learning sites thru’ grant incentives to

R 7,000

R 5,198,200 153

R 77,000

R

2,074,800

R 5,619,600

Other

(see definition above)

R 0

Key

R 0

Engage with institutions

• DHET engages one-onone with institutions

(or groups of institutions) asking them to respond to OT reports

• Institutions interrogate report in the light of their plans & make commitments integrated into enrolment, PQM and earmarked funding plans

Minister signs off Final plan

Linked to funding allocation

Institutional plan

OT plan

Key issue: Planning cycles

Centres of specialisation

(Differentiation - occupations

Reports and M&E

• Reports prepared 'up' to PICC and 'down' to institutions

• Monitoring and evaluation of commitments built into mainline reporting system back into DHET

INNOVATION ‘New Skills for New Jobs’ with EU

NB. Role of ESSA

Reflections

Central language:

‘Occupation’

 Enables planning to migrate from ‘single employer’ needs to skill sets which will give learner maximum labour market mobility

 Address debates:

 Occupations and tasks

 Occupations and sectors

 Occupations and discipline knowledge

 Occupational Teams – interface between demand and supply, built on

Advisory Committees of UOTs/Technikons, extend model to other clusters.

Note: Networks with ‘theme 4’ intermediate agencies.

 Pathways (NCAP) is another way to map OFO to CESM. NLRD has data.

 DANGER: If occupations are used exclusively, there is the danger that they become ‘islands’ and that progression is undermined. This danger could be managed by introducing the notion of the National Occupational

Pathway Framework (NOPF) structures where the experts that interface with the sectoral specialists are responsible for pathways of occupations and not ‘islands’.

O*NET

http://www.onetonline.org

• We are eager to tangibly demonstrate the benefits of detailed occupational information and to explore the ways it might inform human-resource development in South Africa.

• As a way to kick-start our involvement and to give you an occupation-centric resource to point to, I am contemplating asking

Alex to develop profiles of the occupations on South Africa’s critical skills list based on information in the O*NET database. We could combine these occupational profiles with existing research in our field on how best to train and develop the various knowledge, skills, and abilities that O*NET identifies as critical to these scarce occupations. All of this could be packaged into a report and presentation that we could deliver to DHET and/or the Human

Science Research Council.

Prof. Lori Foster Thompson <lfthompson.mail@gmail.com>

Reflections

 Could ‘prototype’ model be used in other non-SIP contexts e.g. predictable service delivery contexts (government departments & entities own skill needs?) [Could be regularly reviewed]

 If yes, this would be useful, inter alia, for workplace learning planning in public spaces.

 Best results gained when prototype builders have specialist knowledge or at least some relevant technical expertise. This has implications for capacity of proposed Unit. (NOPF??)

 Use standard tools e.g. ‘toolkit’ will make consolidation of data much easier. Will need standard ‘languages’ e.g. sector definitions

Download