Early Intervention & Targeted Support ‘It’s Everybody’s Business’ Children and Young People’s Strategic Partnership Board 28th January 2013 Our Key Areas for Impact are as follows: Make sure early intervention makes a difference Ensure our early intervention and targeted support approaches are embedded and have direct impact for children. Close the gaps and secure social mobility Promote the highest aspirations and ambition for all our children and young people right across the partnership, particularly to close gaps and secure social mobility. Involve children and young people and their families Key Areas for Impact Ensure we have the best people working for our children and young people Secure and retain a strong, committed and highly skilled workforce across the partnership, with outstanding leadership and management Promote the effective involvement of children and young people in their communities as active citizens; secure the involvement of children, young people and parents/ carers in decision making, service development and evaluation of services which affect their lives. Improving life chances and choices Closing the gaps Early Intervention Proactive at first signs of trouble OUTCOMES ! Using predictive patterns – go for the siblings! Building resilience – children, young people and families able to make the difference themselves No wrong door Tailored and creative approaches which actually help Partnerships and relationships which work for families rather than for providers Lewisham Providers Children’s Centres Area 1 & 2: The Children’s Society Evelyn Children’s Centre Amersham Children’s Centre Annexe Hatcham Oak Children’s Centre Besson Street Gardens Ladywell Children’s Centre Manor House Children’s Centre St Swithun’s Children’s Centre Heathside and Lethbridge Children‘s Centre Area 3 & 4: Pre-School Learning Alliance Bellingham Children’s Centre Torridon Children’s Centre Limelight Area 1 & 2 Schoolbased Children’s Centres: Area 3 & 4 Schoolbased Children’s Centres: Clyde Early Childhood Centre Beecroft Gardens (Jan 2013) Downderry Elliot Bank Kelvin Grove Kilmorie Marvels Lane Single Centre Provider: Ackroyd Children’s Centre Targeted Family Support: The Social Work Company Outcomes To improve outcomes for targeted children, young people and their families, namely: Children’s Centres Targeted Family Support • • • • Improved parenting and attachment Improved school readiness Prevention of escalation Improved Family and Child Resilience • Improved School Participation and Engagement • Prevention and Reduction in Escalation of Need Families to target include…. • • • • • • • • Families with children with challenging behaviour Children of parents with mental health issues Children of parents with substance misuse issues Children subject to actual or potential delayed development due to poor parenting capacity and/or non engagement with universal services Children with poor linguistic development Children in families with poor school attendance Children with parents with learning disabilities New arrivals with poor networks • • • • • • • • • Children in domestic violence situations Children with disabilities Children with parents who have disabilities Families with current or history of offending Families with poor attachment Lone parents with vulnerabilities Families with evidenced risk of teenage pregnancy Families experiencing worklessness Families with risks of poor health outcomes Targeted Families Estimated Targeted Families in Lewisham 5,522 Projected Children’s Centre Reach for First Year Projected Targeted Family Support Reach for First Year 1524* (5,522) Total Projected Reach for First Year 1920 (35%) *Expectation that this figure will increase as Centres expand provision and Beecroft Children’s Centre re-opens 396 (400) The Government’s Troubled Families Programme The Government estimates that there are 910 Troubled Families in Lewisham 758 of which will be eligible for funding TFP Breakdown – (08/01/2013) Crime 17 School 22 220 631 61 73 222* 195 Total number of families identified: Number of families meeting 2 or more TFP criteria: 378 Work * Following the revised definition from DCLG that removed authorised absences from the definition of persistent absence, this reduced the figure from 392 to 222. 10 Tracking progress against the Government’s Troubled Families Criteria Troubled Family Criteria Data source Demographic s Autumn 2011 % Unauthorised Absence Spring 2012 % Unauthorised Absence Summer 2012 % Unauthorised Absence School Persistent absence Son (7) 25.4 35.3 6.1 Work DWP search Mother None 2 Year Old offer Baby (3) Family meets two of the specified criteria “School” Improvement in attendance of Son, which followed an intervention by AWS and Children’s Centre Work 2012 Q2 Work 2012 Q3 Work 2012 Q4 N N N “Work” Mother identified as claiming benefits through DWP search - Lewisham CAFs and outcomes trend to date (CSC with EIS from May 2012 onwards) 100% 90% 80% % CAFs taken in the month 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Apr Jun Sep Dec- Feb- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 Inclusion Service (Ed Psych / Other) 12% 12% 14% 1% 4% 2% 2% 0% 2 year old Free Entitlement 7% 4% 4% 10% 5% 2% 5% 3% 8% 9% 8% 9% 4% 7% 5% 10% 9% 6% 3% 13% 24% 24% 26% Information / Advice 11% 7% 5% 8% 7% 6% 7% 9% 10% 7% 13% 8% 7% 10% 11% 13% 11% 13% 10% 13% 9% 11% 11% 10% 7% 12% 5% 9% EIS Other 9% 30% 36% 42% 51% 30% 37% 37% 35% EIS Advice & Guidance / TAC / TAF & Other Actions NFA 21% 19% 17% 27% 31% 34% 28% 26% 35% 29% 32% 39% 36% 41% 29% 38% 35% 31% 43% 44% 38% 38% 37% 44% 40% 44% 38% 42% Linked to Open Referral 14% 19% 12% 14% 11% 14% 16% 16% 12% 12% 17% 8% Referrals Taken 51% 51% 62% 48% 46% 46% 49% 48% 44% 52% 37% 43% 47% 38% 48% 36% 40% 46% 34% 31% 42% 38% 37% 36% 43% 33% 46% 34% 22% 19% 15% 19% 23% 17% 20% 20% 9% 10% 9% 11% 12% 9% 12% 9% 11% 12% 15% 9% 10% 9% 11% 14% 10% 11% 10% 7% 14% 13% 5% 10% % CAFs not reaching CSC threshold by need Nov ‘11 – Dec ‘12 Lone parents with vulnerabilities, 6.36% Families with poor attachment, 6.92% Other, 8.19% Families with current or history of offending, 1.41% Children subject to actual or potential delayed development due to poor parenting capacity and/or non engagement with universal services. This is specifically crucial for children within their early years (0-5). , 5.37% Families with an older child presenting vulnerability, 7.34% Families who are new arrivals to the UK with poor networks, 0.85% Children in domestic violence situations, 16.53% Families where there is a recognised risk of poor health outcomes, 6.92% Families where there is a high and evidenced risk of teenage conception / pregnancy, 0.28% Families where there is a history of leaving children inappropriately home alone., 1.55% Families where one or more immediate family member is in prison or has a history of violent offending, 0.28% Children in families with poor school attendance, 4.66% Children of parents who are under 19 years, 1.27% Children with poor linguistic development, 1.13% Children of parents who have disabilities, 2.82% Children with disabilities, 0.85% Children with challenging behaviour, 9.89% Children of parents with substance misuse issues, 7.63% Children of parents with mental health issues, 9.75% % CAFs by sending agency type Nov ‘11 – Dec ’12 LBL - Other 0.74% LBL - Attendance & Welfare 0.55% Portage 5.17% Hospital 0.28% LBL - Housing 0.28% GP's 0.28% LBL - Youth Offending 0.18% Health Visitors 14.39% Family Nurse Partnership 0.92% LBL - Youth Service 0.37% Nursery School 0.83% District Nurses 0.18% Other 1.01% CAMHS 1.38% Federation 1.38% College 0.18% Children's Social Care 1.85% Children's Centre 3.41% Academy 5.54% Primary School 45.20% Unknown 0.65% Voluntary Organisation 0.09% Special School 1.94% Secondary School 6.83% PVI Nursery 6.00% SALT 0.09% School - Non LBL 0.28% % CAFs by receiving agency type Nov ‘11 – Dec ‘12 Other 1.20% Housing 0.09% MAPP 0.46% Home Tuition Medical Programme 0.18% Home School Education 0.28% New Woodlands 0.46% Inclusion service 38.56% Paediatrician 0.28% Fair Access Panel 0.37% SALT 1.11% Educational Psychology 11.07% School Nurse 0.09% Education 0.09% Drumbeat 0.92% Sensory Team 0.28% CWD 0.65% Social Services 0.09% CSV 0.09% Community Service Volunteers 1.11% SpLD 3.41% Targeted Family Support 5.07% Communications Clinic 3.23% Children Centres 4.61% 2 Year Early Learning Offer 20.39% CAHMs 4.15% Abbey Manor 0.28% BEST 0.37% Attendance & Welfare 0.09% Youth Keyworker Service 1.01% Challenges… • Are our estimated numbers of targeted families right? CC providers need to reach more targeted families • More evidence of outcomes needed – tracking impact • Increased co-ordination of CAF’s through logging and E-CAF • CAF as an assessment tool not just a referral tool • Multiple referral forms (eg S&LT/CAMHS)