Process - Penn State University

advertisement
Larry Szarek
Penn State University
MGIS Program
Capstone Project Proposal
Using a Utility Geodatabase to
Store & Edit Drainage Plat
Maps
Presentation Outline








Objective
Background
Identification & Description of the Problem
Proposed Solution to the Problem
Process for Solving the Problem
Potential Obstacles
Project Timeline
Questions/Comments/Suggestion
Objective
Arc SDE
Geodatabase
Feature
Classes
Background
Background

Philadelphia Water Department
OUR MISSION
The Philadelphia Water Department and Water Revenue
Bureau serve the Greater Philadelphia region by providing
integrated water, wastewater, and storm water services. The
utility's primary mission is to plan for, operate, and maintain
both the infrastructure and the organization necessary to
purvey high quality drinking water, to provide an adequate
and reliable water supply for all household, commercial, and
community needs, and to sustain and enhance the region's
watersheds and quality of life by managing wastewater and
storm water effectively.
Background

Philadelphia Water Department
System is over 150 Years Old
2 Water Treatment Plants
3 Waste Water Treatment Plants
3,500 miles of Water Mains
3,300 miles of Sewers
GIS at the Philadelphia Water
Department







Began in 1996
Orthophotography & Planimetrics (1996)
GIS Strategic Action Plan (2000)
Raster Imaging (2001)
Engineering Records Viewer (2002)
Data Conversion (2003 -2005)
Data maintenance & Application
Development (Current)
Applications of GIS at PWD










Sewer Assessment & Inspections
Document Management
Hydraulic Modeling
Storm water & Combined Sewer Overflow
Modeling
Planning & Engineering
Preventative Maintenance
Tracing & Valve Isolation
Emergency Response
Work Order/Asset Management
Legacy Application Linking
GIS at PWD

Enterprise GIS
•
•
•
•

ArcSDE 9.2
ArcGIS Server 9.2
ArcGIS Desktop 9.2
AutoDesk Mapguide 6.5
Water & Sewer Infrastructure
Geodatabase
• Geometric Network
• 120 Feature Classes
• Over 1 million features
Identification
& Description
Identification & Description of the
Problem




What is a drainage plat map?
Why are they important?
Issues involved with keeping them
current
How can they be improved through
the use of a Geodatabase
Philadelphia Water Department
Drainage Plat Maps (History)





Date back to the 1940’s when they were
maintained as hand drawn linen maps.
Converted to Mylar sheets with a
corresponding index map in the 1970’s
Converted to .tif files in 2001 and are now
maintained digitally.
Full Sets are printed once a year and
distributed throughout the department
4 Years ago the full set was georeferenced
& rubbersheeted
Philadelphia Water Department
Drainage Plat Maps (Specifications)





Page Size: 44.5” X 34”
Actual Map Size: 42” X 24.5”
Title Block Size: 42” X 5.25”
Scale: 1” = 200’
123 Sheets to cover entire city
What does a Drainage Plat show?







A rough plan view of the entire sewer
system (storm, sanitary & combined)
Size, material, & grade for all sewers
Invert elevations for all manholes
Base map information (hydrology, streets,
facilities, right of ways, railroads, etc.)
Street elevations
Descriptive annotation for specific parts
and aspects of the system
Areas that are currently under construction
Philadelphia Water Department
Drainage Plat Maps (Examples)
Philadelphia Water Department
Drainage Plat Maps (Examples)
Drainage Plat Index Grid overlaid
on top of city boundary
Issues Concerning These Maps





Each change to the system is
manually edited within the .tif file.
The base mapping is out of date and
difficult to maintain
New sets are printed out once a year
They changes made are not
georeferenced
They do not fit into our vision of an
Enterprise GIS
Proposed
Solution
How Using a Geodatabase Can
Improve these maps




Accuracy
Presentation
Maintenance
Analysis
Process
Process

Identification of the Necessary GIS
Datasets and Layers
• Existing Layers



Wastewater & Stormwater Geometric Networks
Hydrology
PWD Facilities
• Layers that will need to be created


Annotation Layer
Drainage Right of Ways
• Layers that will need to be modified

Curblines
Choosing a Pilot Tile

Criteria
•
•
•
•
Area that has all 3 types of sewer systems
Full tile
Relatively congested area
Contains at least 1 of the following:







PWD Facility
Drainage right of way
Body of water
Intercepting Chamber
Intercepting Sewer
Force Main
Pump Station
Process

Creation of a Test Geodatabase
• On Home Computer
• Microsoft SQL Express
• Personal ArcSDE

Full ArcSDE geodatabase capabilities
for a few users and one editor at a
time
Process

Creation of an ArcGIS ArcMap
Template
• Proper Size
• Title Block Area
• Overview Map
• Legend
• Scale Bar
Process

Creation of a
Custom Symbol
Set
• ArcMap Style
Manager
• ArcMap Symbol
Property Editor
Process

Creation of
Annotation
• Use of Annotation
Feature Classes


Feature linked
Stand Alone
Process




Finalize the Map (Put it all together)
QA/QC
Solicit Feedback From Users
Present Results
Potential
Obstacles
Potential Obstacles
Labeling of Congested Areas
Potential Obstacles
Sewer Turnout
Turnouts On Separate Sewers
Potential Obstacles
GIS Curb Lines
(In Red)
House lines
(Legal Right Of Way)
Proposed Project Timeline

March
• Set Up Personal ArcSDE on Home Comp.
• Choose Pilot Tile
• Create Map Template
• Assemble all Necessary Data

April
• Create Custom Symbology
• Store Symbology in Geodatabse
Project Timeline




May
• Annotation
June
• Put it all together
• Get Feedback From Users
• QA/QC
July
• Create a Presentation & Paper
August
• Present Results at ESRI’s User Conference in San Diego, CA
 (Abstract Accepted)
Questions,
Comments,
Suggestions
Download