Rio+20 NGO Meeting 23 May 2012 1 Rio+20 New Zealand has taken a leadership role on: • Oceans • ‘Blue economy’ now top of the agenda • Working side by side with the Pacific throughout 2011-2012 • UN Secretary General’s ‘UN Oceans Compact’, World Bank’s Global Partnership for Oceans • Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform (FFSR) • Established in 2010 the Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform http://www.mfat.govt.nz/fffsr/ • FFSR issue has now been picked up by others including the IMF and the Secretary General’s HighLevel Panel on Sustainable Development 2 Rio+20 Other issues… • Green Economy • Sustainable agriculture • Biodiversity • Forests • Education & Health • Alternatives to GDP • Goals and targets • Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development (UNEP, ECOSOC, High Com) • And many more….. • Charter of Responsibilities • Non-regression • Aarhus Convention 3 Rio+20 Informal Informal, 23 April- 4 May 2012 • 2 parallel working groups (WGs), 2 weeks, 3 x 3 hour sessions per day • WG 1: • WG 2: • Section I & II – Renewing political commitment • Section IV – Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development • Section III – Green Economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication • Section V – Framework for action and follow up 4 Rio+20 Informal Informal, 23 April- 4 May 2012 By 4 May: • Appx 170 pages of text • 21 agreed paras SHA ZUKANG, SECRETARY-GENERAL OF RIO+20 “The negotiating text, as it stands now: • is a far cry from the focused political document mandated by the General Assembly; • contains too much duplication and repetition; and • is losing its readability, with action lost in words;” 5 • Aim: concise, focused, and action orientated. We need to make every word count. Section I & II: Renewing Political Commitment • Needs to be concise and encapsulate the key issues • If one does not read the rest of the outcome document, what will we remember? • Sets the overall vision for sustainable development 6 Section IV: Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development • Does form follow function? Will the framework ensure greater coherence, coordination and integration of the three dimensions of sustainable development? Are institutions responsive to the needs of states and ensure better incountry delivery of objectives? Section III & V: Green Economy & Framework for action and follow up • Should be future focussed action, rather than noting past events or agreements 7 Issues • Balanced integration of the three dimensions of sustainable development • Green Economy • Human rights • Gender equality/gender issues including in relation to sexual and reproductive health • Participation • Sustainable consumption and production • Ecosystem services • Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development 8 Oceans: • Growing realisation that oceans ‘time has come’ • Big challenges: over-fishing, climate change effects, marine pollution • Ambitious targets were set at Johannesburg but we need concerted action to meet them • Key concern of Pacific countries and other Small Island Developing States • New Zealand acknowledged as playing a part in helping our regional priority to become a global priority (e.g. in Review of European Community and International Environment Law) 9 Oceans: New Zealand wants… • Commitment to complete the UN’s global assessment of the marine environment by 2014 and integrate science into policy making • Forward movement to prohibit harmful subsidies in the fishing sector that contribute to over fishing and over capacity • Better implementation of existing agreements to combat illegal fishing activities • Further reinforcement of the principle that small island developing states need to get a greater return from their fisheries resources • Progress to meet the agreed targets for marine protected areas. 10 Oceans: • Slow progress through the text. Opposition to or weaker counterproposals made in areas relating to illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing, fisheries subsidies and Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The latter in particular has had strong opposition. • We are championing the proposal for a Small Islands Developing States (SIDS) conference in 2014 in the Pacific • Overall we remain fairly optimistic of achieving a good outcome on oceans at Rio, although likely to be weaker than what NZ has proposed 11 Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform (FFSR) • Commitment to phase out over the medium term inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption and undermine sustainable development, while mitigating adverse impacts on vulnerable groups, supported by mechanisms such as technical assistance underpinned by research and development and the sharing of tools for achievement of reforms. 12 Energy/Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform (FFSR) • NZ has been a leading advocate for FFSR, working with Friends (Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform) • Makes sense – from an environmental, social and economic point of view • It is estimated only 8% of subsidies reach the poorest 20%. These subsidies could be used to eradicate poverty and promote development more efficiently and effectively. • Text remains under the energy section for a commitment to phase out fossil fuel subsidies while mitigating adverse impacts on vulnerable groups 13 Issues raised previously 14 Rio principles • All of the principles are important. • They are reaffirmed in section I, and are taken to apply to the whole of the document. • It would be contrary to the aims of sustainable development and the balanced integration of the three dimensions to selective promote one or the other out of context. • E.g. 7. Common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) • Contribution to pollution • Ability to take action • But it has now been interpreted as only “developed” countries have a responsibility to take action • There is no doubt that “developed” countries do need to take the lead. But the challenges are such that all countries need to pitch in 15 Rio principles • E.g. Principle 10 (Participation) • The text is a crude reflection of negotiations, and one can often be recorded with the same position for different or even opposite reasons • NZ, like others, have proposed deletion to the reference to principle 10 • We are not opposed to principle 10. We have already reaffirmed its importance in section I. • We are supporting stronger text on the substance of principle 10, rather than have, as other have sought, the deletion of this language 16 Water • Provision of clean drinking water and sanitation is key. • Text proposed by the co-chairs recognises the right to water as being progressively realisable. • NZ recognises a right to water based on the International Covenant on Economic and Social Rights. These rights are progressively realisable. • We and many others, are supportive of the co-chair’s approach, which reflects common ground 17 Sustainability reporting • Various text options range from compulsory sustainability reporting to voluntary adoption • Proposals to develop global standards for sustainability reporting • New Zealand generally wary of mandatory requirements where there is no little opportunity for New Zealand to participate in their development • Support businesses increasing their use of sustainability reporting within their business cycles • Not all requirements are set by government – e.g. NZSE listing requirements 18 Food security and sustainable agriculture • Federated Farmers, WSPA • Sustainable agriculture, including livestock • Trade and market distorting subsidies • Ecosystem services 19 Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development • UNEP • Views at both ends – support for/against a specialised agency. G77/China split on this issue • NZ: current institutions should be as effective as possible. New institutions must address current issues • ECOSOC • Proposals to include sustainable development fully into ECOSOC’s work • Possible annual Ministerial/High-level meetings • No consensus on whether there should be a Sustainable Development Council • High Commissioner/ For Youth/Future Generations • Again, support for/against • Unclear what exactly the role would do and how it would fit into current institutions 20 21 22 23