www.worldec.ru International Trade System Table of Content Slide www.worldec.ru References 1 Trade policy development 2 WTO as a cornerstone of modern ITS 3 Trade in Goods 4 Trade in Agriculture 5 Trade in Services 6 Intellectual property rights and trade 7 Trade and investments 8 Regional trade agreements (RTAs) 9 Trade and competition policy 10 Trade and environment 2 References www.worldec.ru • • • • • • Agriculture, Trade, and the WTO in South Asia. Ed. by Merlinda D. Ingco, Washington, The World Bank, 2003. Hoekman, Bernard; Aaditya Mattoo, and Philip English, eds., Development, Trade, and the WTO: A Handbook (Washington: World Bank, 2002), Kjeldsen-Kragh Sǿren (2001). International Trade policy. Copenhagen. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. The Legal Texts. World Trade Organisation. Trebilcock Michael J. and Robert Howse. The Regulation of International Trade. London and New York. 1999. Economic development and multilateral trade cooperation / edited by Simon J. Evenett and Bernard M. Hoekman. Washington, DC : World Bank, cop. 2006 3 References: Internet resources www.worldec.ru Official site of World Trade Organisation www.wto.org US — www.ustr.gov Canada — www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/menu-e.asp EU — http://europa.eu.int/pol/comm/index_en.htm Japan — www.meti.go.jp/english/index.html Russia – www.wto.ru 4 www.worldec.ru 1. Trade policy development 1.1. Understanding of trade policy 1.2. Institutes of the international trade system 5 www.worldec.ru 1.1. UNDERSTANDING OF TRADE POLICY 6 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Question: What are the key players of international trade and investments? 7 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Question: Do you like shopping? Who do you do your shopping? 8 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Answer: You do your shopping in order to make decisions to discriminate 9 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Questions of access, protection and discrimination Discrimination is the basis of choice, that is, choosing one thing over another thing for whatever reason. Most trade policy involves decisions to discriminate: to discriminate between goods or groups domestically or between services suppliers from different countries. 10 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Trade policy involves values, preferences, priorities, and an institutional setting and social context that can vary from country to country. Social context, in particular, can have an important bearing on how national values, preferences and priorities are pursued. 11 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Commercial Interests - Trade policy is designed to meet a country's commercial interests. Question: what are country’s commercial interest? Who decides? Social Interests - An increasing reality for trade officials is the need to respond to broader societal interests. 12 www.worldec.ru Japan 1978 Japan 2004 www.worldec.ru Germany 1978 Germany 2004 www.worldec.ru USA 1978 USA 2004 www.worldec.ru Russia (USSR) 1978 Russia 2004 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Legal Norms and Ideas are critical to putting trade policy into practice. They involve the implementation of rules and the practice of diplomacy. 17 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Trade policy applies to the international movement of goods, services, capital, technology and people. provides the framework for the conduct of trade promotion and trade relations. The practice of trade policy involves a combination of analysis, consultation, negotiation, implementation, and diplomacy. 18 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Question: What are the goals of consultation process? 19 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru stability and predictability in government policy and trade and investment circumstances 20 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Institutional context Government policy professionals operate within an institutional setting that influences, constrains, and conditions how they address and resolve issues that cross their desk 21 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Assignment: compare political and institutional settings within operate the governments of United States, Canada, Germany, and China 22 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru The role of international organizations International and national institutions provide permanence and stability in addressing differences and in pursuing competing priorities. Positions and approaches adopted by most governments reflect not only their interests, objectives, and preferences, but also the political/institutional setting within which governments operate 23 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru Question: 1. 2. 3. Why countries enter international trade agreements/join international organizations? to tell other countries what to do because they have week governments and cannot deal with many issues themselves to promote economic growth and development 24 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru The role of international organizations Different countries have different objectives — e.g., Canada/US/Japan/EU/developing countries/Caribbean countries/transitional economies — all have various objectives, approaches, and preferences that may require negotiations to resolve. The result is compromise between ideals and reality and the imperfection that is part of reality. 25 1.1. Understanding of trade policy www.worldec.ru The Role of International Organizations When countries enter into trade agreements they agree to such broadlybased objectives as increased economic welfare, and promotion of international cooperation. However, countries also enter trade agreements for a variety of specific, subjective reasons that reflect a country's particular political and economic profile. 26 Readings www.worldec.ru China http://export.gov/china/country_information/tradepolicyandagreements.asp European Union http://www.eurunion.org/policyareas/trade.htm Tothova, M. (2009), “The Trade and Trade Policy Implications of Different Policy Responses to Societal Concerns”, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 20, OECD Publishing. Greene M., Dihel N., Kowalski P, and Lippoldt D. (2006) CHINA'S TRADE AND GROWTH: IMPACT ON SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 44 27 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru Exercise Describe where and how trade policy in (country) is developed. 28 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru Questions 1. Give examples of government regulations that can affect trade. 2. Why is public ownership a trade issue? 3. Give examples of sectoral policies of your government. How might they affect international trade and investment? 29 www.worldec.ru 1.2. INSTITUTES OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SYSTEM 30 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru Question: What are the institutions of international trade system? 31 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru Institutions provide permanence and stability in a changing world, as well as a forum for states to discuss their concerns. Some of the ideas and practices that support modern organizations for international cooperation originated with the League of Nations (which would later emerge as the United Nations). There are now some 300 intergovernmental organizations devoted to economic issues alone. 32 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru At the core are the Bretton Woods agreements laid the groundwork for the establishment of: World Bank International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Trade Organization (ITO). 33 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru The United Nations has also created a number of specialized and technically oriented institutions to deal with a range of economic issues: Labour - International Labour Organization - ILO Food - Food and Agriculture Organization -FAO Aviation - International Civil Aviation Organization - ICAO Customs - World Customs Organization - WCO Intellectual Property - World Intellectual Property Organization - WIPO 34 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru The Quad Some of the most difficult negotiations have needed an initial breakthrough in talks among the four largest members: Canada European Union Japan United States 35 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru European Communities Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) MERCOSUR, the Southern Common Market North American Free Trade Agreement: NAFTA African Group, Least-developed countries, African, Caribbean and Pacific Group (ACP) Latin American Economic System (SELA). 36 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru The multilateral trade regime is complemented by dozens of regional and bilateral agreements and arrangements. Two regional agreements and arrangements are particularly important: the European Union (EU) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), in providing a basis for assessing alternative approaches to integration and liberalization. Both of these agreements illustrate various characteristics of regionalism. A wide range of other regional arrangements are currently extant. The WTO catalogs over 200 such arrangements 37 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru Regionalism provides both positive and negative dimension in the further evolution of the global trade regime. Trade policy practitioners need to be aware of the dense network of specialized bilateral agreements addressing, e.g., investment, export credits, and double taxation. 38 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru national governments and their related agencies, private sector organizations (national and international), industry associations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), labour unions, universities and think tanks, media organizations, technical regulators and inspectors, consumers, and many others 39 Exercise www.worldec.ru Discuss societal concerns with respect to agricultural production. How could trade policy deal with these concerns? Discuss societal concerns of the development of Chinese economy. How does Chinese trade policy respond to these concerns? www.worldec.ru 2. The WTO as a cornerstone of the modern ITS 2.1. The organization 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO 41 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru The WTO WTO vs GATT WTO: The institution Developing countries and the WTO WTO: The first years 42 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru The World Trade Organization International organization embodied in the results of the Uruguay Round Established: 1 January 1995 Membership – 153 countries (23.07.08) The Secretariat: around 630 staff, headed by a Director-General, based in Geneva Budget is over 160 million Swiss francs 43 Observer governments www.worldec.ru Afghanistan Equatorial Guinea Libya Algeria Holy See (Vatican) Samoa Andorra Iran Sao Tomé and Principe Azerbaijan Iraq Serbia Bahamas Kazakhstan Seychelles Belarus Lao People's Democratic Republic Sudan Bhutan Lebanese Republic Tajikistan Bosnia and Herzegovina Liberia, Republic of Uzbekistan Comoros Montenegro Vanuatu Ethiopia Russian Federation 44 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru WTO: Objectives To raise standards of living To ensure full employment Growing volume of real income and effective demand Expanding the production of and trade in goods & services Sustainable development and environmental protection Developing countries 45 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru WTO: Main functions Implementation, administration and operation of the covered agreements Forum for negotiations Dispute settlement Review of national trade policies Coherence in global economic policy-making 46 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Cornerstone of the multilateral trading system Trade in goods Trade in services Protection of intellectual property rights The WTO contract Rights and obligations Dispute settlement Successor to GATT 47 1.3.1. Understanding the WTO www.worldec.ru 48 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru WTO: Structure Ministerial Conference General Council Dispute Settlement Body Trade Policy Review Body Councils Council for Trade in Goods Council for Trade in Services Council for TRIPs Committees and other subsidiary bodies Decision-making 49 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Self-study: what are the main functions of: Ministerial conference General Council General Director of the WTO 50 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Decision-making procedures (1) As a rule, decisions are reached by consensus unless otherwise provided and necessary one member, one vote Most decisions can be decided by simple majority. 51 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Decision-making procedures (2) Matters of interpreting obligations require three-quarter majority, by Ministerial Conference and General Council only, but based on advice of relevant council. Waivers from obligations can be granted for a year on a specific issue, but require consensus or notice and three-quarters majority. 52 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Decision-making procedures (3) Budgetary decisions – a two-thirds majority. General Council acting as DS Body operates by consensus. Decisions on accession require two-thirds majority of Ministerial Conference, or General Council acting on its behalf. 53 2.1. The organization www.worldec.ru Relations with other international organizations International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO (ITC) Cooperation with the Bretton Woods Institutions UNCTAD 54 www.worldec.ru 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru The accession process 1. 2. 3. 4. “Tell us about yourself”. “Work out with us individually what you have to offer”. “Let’s draft membership terms”. “The decision”. 56 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Issues to be discussed 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The political economy of WTO accession Benefits of WTO membership for new members The GATT System’s accession process Accession rules in the WTO system Determinants of the length of the accession process Outstanding accession cases Conclusions 57 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Acceding Governments: Africa - Algeria, Comoros, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Liberia, Libya, STP, Seychelles, Sudan Asia/Pacific - Afghanistan, Bhutan, Laos, Samoa, Vanuatu Caribbean - Bahamas CEECAC - Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Belarus, BosniaHerzegovina, Kazakhstan, Montenegro, Russian Federation, Serbia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan Europe - Andorra MENA - Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan, Yemen LDCs - Afghanistan, Bhutan, Comoros, Laos, Liberia, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Sao Tomé and Principe, Samoa, Sudan, Vanuatu, Yemen 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Recently Acceded Members (RAMs) 1995-1997: Ecuador, Bulgaria, Mongolia, Panama 1998-2001: Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Estonia, Jordan, Georgia, Albania, Oman, Croatia, Lithuania, Moldova Doha (2001)-2003: China, Chinese Taipei, Armenia, FYROM Cancun (2003)-2004: Nepal, Cambodia 2005 - 2008 : Saudi Arabia, Viet Nam, Tonga, Ukraine, Cape Verde 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru The political economy of WTO accession 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Value of new membership Accession terms Length of negotiations Economic benefits Value for the WTO members 60 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Benefits of WTO membership for new members 1. Rules-based organizational network 2. Multilateral bargaining network 3. Dispute resolution mechanism 4. Integration of national economies into global markets 5. Development of legal and regulatory systems 61 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru The GATT System’s accession process Easier More open Limited agreement Modest scope Admission procedures: Article 33 and Article 26 Varying terms of accession Various levels of participation 62 ARTICLE XII www.worldec.ru AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ..... Article XII Accession 1. Any State or separate customs territory possessing full autonomy in the conduct of its external commercial relations and of the other matters provided for in this Agreement and the Multilateral Trade Agreements may accede to this Agreement, on terms to be agreed between it and the WTO. Such accession shall apply to this Agreement and the Multilateral Trade Agreements annexed thereto. 2. Decisions on accession shall be taken by the Ministerial Conference. The Ministerial Conference shall approve the agreement on the terms of accession by a two-thirds majority of the Members of the WTO. 3. Accession to a Plurilateral Trade Agreement shall be governed by the provisions of that Agreement. Any State or separate customs territory On “terms to be agreed”... 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. 4. Building a large network for trade-offs: single undertaking More formal accession process Decisions driven by the members Doha declaration: attach great importance of to concluding accession as quickly as possible facilitation and accelerating accession for LDCs (art. 9, art. 46) 64 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Determinants of the length of the accession process 1. More than 100 month 2. “Price of admission” 3. 4. lengthy, complicated, costly Imbalance in concessions WTO-plus terms of accession 65 2.2. Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Determinants of the length of the accession process (cont) 1. GDP (GDP per capita) 2. Real exports, especially to key WTO members 3. Real imports 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Bargaining experience of the incumbent WTO members Governmental effectiveness Political stability Lobbies: who is interested Pre- vs Post-Marrakesh application 66 Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru A few numbers 25 governments have acceded since 1995 29 are in the process of accession 1 request for accession pending approval from the General Council Outstanding accession cases www.worldec.ru No accession related docs Application (year) Accessio n (year) Accession process (no of years) Albania 27 1992 2000 8 Armenia 12 1993 2003 10 Croatia 19 1993 2000 7 Georgia 9 1996 2000 4 Kyrgyz Republic 19 1996 1998 2 Macedonia 12 1994 2003 9 Moldova 21 1993 2003 10 Ukraine 15 1993 2008 15 Outstanding accession cases Belarus Kazakstan Montenegro Russia Serbia Tajikistan Uzbekistan Application 1997 1993 1999 1996 2004 1993 2004 2001 1994 Working party 1997 1993 1999 1996 2005 1993 2005 2001 1994 Memorandum 1999 1996 2002 1996 2005 19941997 2005 2003 1998 Q&A 2000 1997 2003 1997 2005 1995 2005 2003 19992001 Period 20022008 19972005 20032009 19972008 20052008 19952006 20052008 20042006 20022005 No 7 6 6 9 7 30 6 3 3 Issue d 20052008 20042006 20032009 19972008 20062009 20052008 20062008 20042008 20042006 No 7 6 8 10 10 7 7 7 7 WP Rec. docu ments Bosnia and Herzegovi Azerbaijan www.worldec.ru Outstanding accession cases Belarus Kazakstan Montenegro Russia Serbia Tajikistan Uzbekistan Application 1997 1993 1999 1996 2004 1993 2004 2001 1994 Market access negotiations 20052008 19982006 20042007 19972004 2008 19972001 20062008 20042009 2005 Summary / 20042007 2007 19972004 2007 / 2007 20052006 / Draft WP Report 2008 / 2009 20052008 20082009 2002 2004 20072008 / / No of non restricted documents 18 56 6 176 / 190 / 6 39 Duration of procedure so far 12 16 10 13 5 16 5 8 15 Bosnia and Herzegovi Azerbaijan www.worldec.ru ad Bu or lg M a ria on go lia K yr P gy an z R am ep a ub l ic La tv ia Es to ni a Jo rd an G eo rg A ia lb an ia O m an Cr oa Li t ia th ua n M ia ol do va Ch C h in e s ina e Ta ip A ei rm en FY i a RO M N e Ca pal m Sa bo ud dia iA ra V bi a iet Na m To ng U a kr Ca ain pe e Ve rd e Ec u Time since establishment of Working Party (years) Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Length of accesion process 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average: 8 years, 6 months ad Bu or lg M a ria on go li K yr P a gy an z R am ep a ub l ic La tv i Es a to ni a Jo rd an G eo rg A ia lb an ia O m an Cr oa Li t ia th ua n M ia ol do va Ch C h in e s ina e Ta ip A ei rm en FY i a RO M N e Ca pal m Sa bo ud dia iA ra V bi a iet Na m To ng U a k Ca rain pe e Ve rd e Ec u Time since submission of Memorandum (years) Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Length of accession negotiations 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Average: 6 years, 4 months Tariff commitments of RAMs: nonagricultural products www.worldec.ru (average tariff bindings) 25 23,6 23,7 22,9 21,1 20 17,7 17,3 17,3 15,3 15 11,6 9,4 10 8,4 6,7 5 10,5 10,3 9,1 7,3 6,5 6,6 5,5 7,5 6 6,2 4,8 5 0 Ec ua Mo dor ng o Bu lia lga Pa ria Ky nam rgy a zR ep La . tv Es i a ton Jor ia da Ge n org Al ia ban Cr i a oat ia Om Lit an hu Mo ania ldo va Ch Ch i n. na Ta i Ar pei me FY nia R Ca O M mb od ia Ne S. pal Ar Vi abia et Na m To n Uk ga Ca rain pe Ve e rde PER CENT 15,2 Recently Aceeded Members (by date of membership, 1995-2008) Tariff commitments of RAMs: agricultural products www.worldec.ru (Average tariff bindings) 45 41,4 40 35,5 34,6 28,1 30 27,7 25,5 23,7 25 20 28 19,2 18,5 18,9 17,5 15,8 15,314,7 12,2 11,3 19,3 15,2 15 10 12,3 11,7 9,4 9,4 12,4 10,7 5 Ec ua Mo dor ng o Bu lia lga Pa r ia Ky nam rgy a zR ep La . tv Es i a ton Jor ia d Ge an org Al ia ban Cr i a oat ia Om Lit an hu Mo ania l do va C Ch hin a n. Ta i Ar pei m FY enia R Ca O M mb od ia Ne S. pal Ar Vi abia et Na m To n Uk ga Ca rain pe Ve e rde PER CENT 35 Recently Acceded Members (by date of membership, 1995-2008) Ec uad or Bu lga Mo ria ngo l Pan ia a Ky rgy ma zR ep. La tvi Est a oni a Jor dan Ge org i Alb a ani a Om an Cr oa Lit ti a hua n Mo ia ldo va Ch i Ch n. T na ai p ei Ar me n FY ia RO M Ca mb odi a Ne p al S. Ar a Vie bia tN am To ng Uk a Ca raine pe Ve rde No. of service sub-sectors Services Commitments of new WTO Members www.worldec.ru 160 80 40 147 140 138 121 120 100 66 125 136 110 103 126 110 100 98 119 93 115 106 80 70 New Members (by date of membership, 1995-2008) 120 94 105 90 93 77 60 37 20 0 Accession rules in the WTO system www.worldec.ru Conclusion Length Demanding concessions Severe terms of accession Ambiguity of difficult accessions for the acceding countries for the multilateral trading system and the WTO 76 www.worldec.ru 2.3. The Agreements 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement (1994) encompasses the following agreements: (I) The Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods which consists of: (i) GATT 1994, which includes: GATT 1947 (the original GATT and its amendments) Decisions taken under GATT 1947 by contracting parties Tariff Schedules and their implementation 78 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru Uruguay Round Understandings in six areas dealt with in GATT 1947: other duties and charges state trading enterprises balance of payments provisions customs unions and free trade areas waivers of obligations tariff modification 79 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru (ii) Other Agreements in the Area of Goods including: Agriculture Textiles and Clothing (no longer in force) Anti-Dumping Customs Valuations Rules of Origin Subsidies and Safeguards 80 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru (ii) Other Agreements in the Area of Goods including: Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Technical Barriers to Trade Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs) Pre-shipment Inspection Import Licensing 81 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru (II) Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) (III) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) (IV) Trade Policy Review Mechanism (V) Understanding on the Settlement of Disputes (I) – (V) the Multilateral Trade Agreements 82 2.3. The Agreements www.worldec.ru (VI) Plurilateral Agreements (among less than all WTO Members): Civil Aircraft Government Procurement New initiatives Agreement on IT 83 www.worldec.ru 2.4. WTO versus GATT 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade A provisional set of rules Originally 23 contracting parties Entered into force: 1 January 1948 Terminated on 31 December 1994 85 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Eight trade "rounds" (multilateral trade negotiations) Reduction of trade barriers and strengthening of rules for the conduct of international trade Growth of world trade consistently outpaced growth in world industrial production 86 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Год Place, round Issues Countries 1947 1949 1951 1956 Geneva Annecy Torquay Geneva Tariffs Tariffs Tariffs 1960 1961 1964 1967 1973 1979 1986 1994 Geneva (Dillon) Tariffs 23 13 38 26 26 Geneva (Kennedy) Geneva (Tokyo) Tariffs, anti-dumping measures 62 Tariffs, non-tariff measures, structural agreements Tariffs, non-tariff measures, services, intellectual property, textiles, agriculture, WTO agreement 102 Geneva (Uruguay) Tariffs 123 87 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Main features of GATT 1947 (1) Non-discrimination (MFN, NT) Multilateralism and joint decisionmaking tariffs only permissible form of standing protection progressive liberalization rules-based 88 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Main features of GATT 1947 (2) code of conduct — largely based on negative prescriptions: agreement not to do certain things balance of mutually beneficial concessions among contracting parties resulting from process of reciprocal (mercantilist) bargaining transparency and due process 89 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Lessons from GATT (1) broad respect for its core principles vs pragmatic application with room for exceptions and exemptions broad geopolitical benefits to USA provided basis for US generally benign, hegemonic leadership: economic, political, and social — cumulative effect based on incrementalism. broadly beneficial impact on other players — Canada, EEC/EC/EU other OECD, developing countries. 90 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru Lessons from GATT (2) Mercantilist bargaining — basis for progressive deepening and broadening of concessions and commitments ‘Balance of advantage’ ideology. Institutions matter — both the broadly accepted rules, conventions, and assumptions that provide much of the basis for international cooperation and coordination of policies, but also 91 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru WTO vs GATT: Main differences 1. 2. 3. 4. Formal rather than informal The WTO has Members rather than signatories The WTO Agreement is a single undertaking rather than a collection of agreements Dispute settlements are binding 92 2.4. WTO versus GATT www.worldec.ru WTO ministerial conferences Doha Round: issues for discussion 93 www.worldec.ru 2.5. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE WTO 94 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru A rules-based regime is one of the key benefits of the WTO especially from the perspective of smaller trading economies attempting to compete against larger players. The binding dispute settlement systems helps to answer that disputes are resolved in accordance with legal rules of the WTO, rather than political and economic power. 95 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru Dispute settlement plays a crucial role in the international trading system. It is an important way to ensure that the members of the WTO abide by commitments made during trade negotiations. 96 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru Dispute settlement under the GATT was strengthened during the Uruguay Round and the rats are set out in the 1994 Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). 97 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru The dispute settlement of the WTO is a central element in providing security and predictability to the multilateral trading system. It serves to preserve the rights and obligations of Members under the covered agreements, and to clarify the existing provisions of those agreements in accordance with customary rules of interpretation of public international law. 98 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru The concept of an impartial referee is a key element in the settlement of international trade disputes under the WTO. It is very important to the WTO that all member nations, large or small, be treated as equals in the settlement of disputes. The DSU system is commonly said to embody approach that is based on rules and not power. 99 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru The exporting industry that faces a protectionist measure which in its view denies market access in a manner contrary to the WTO may decide to lobby its government to do something about it. If the government decides that the complaint of its industry is worth pursuing, it can resort to WTO dispute settlement in order to convince the importing country to remove its measure. 100 2.5. Dispute Settlement in the WTO www.worldec.ru Once a government has decided to challenge the measure under the WTO, the process to be followed is set out in the Dispute Settlement Understanding. Consultations - The parties try to resolve the dispute through discussions Adjudication - The dispute is referred to a specialized panel for a legal determination Implementation - The legal decision is put into effect in the WTO system 101 2. Central elements of dispute settlement www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 102 Consultations Panel Request Panel Composition Terms of Reference Procedure Before the Panel Report of the Panel Adoption of the Panel Reports Appeal of a Panel Reports Implementation Utilization of the Panel Process Consultations www.worldec.ru A request for the panel must be preceded by consultations Should be responded within 10 days Consultations must be entered within 30 days Requests are notified to the DSB Other states with “a substantial trade interests” may participate Confidential 60 days (20 days for perishable goods) Panel Request www.worldec.ru The request is made to DSB The responding party can object to the creation of a panel (once) The panel might be established at the next meeting of DSB unless the DSB decides by consensus not to do so (reverse consensus) Complaining party is a part of “reverse consensus” Readings and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. The Post-Uruguay Round Tariff Environment for developing country exports 105 Readings and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. Describe the main functions of Ministerial conference General Council General Director of the WTO 106 www.worldec.ru 3. Trade in Goods 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru 3.1. TRADE IN GOODS: KEY PRINCIPLES 108 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru 1. Trade without discrimination Most-favoured-nation clause (MFN) National treatment 2. Reciprocity 3. Market access Transparency Equilibrium of rights and obligations, Remedies for nullification or impairment of benefits, Commitments of trading partners to progressively reduce tariffs. 109 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) Treatment means that the best treatment given to any country must be given to all countries. In other words, any benefit given to a product of a most-favoured nation (whether GATT Member or not) has to be given to the like products of all Members. 110 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru According to GATT Article I.1 MFN treatment in relation to goods is:… any advantage, favour, privilege or immunity granted by any contracting party to any product originating in or destined for any other country shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally to the like product originating in or destined for the territories of all other contracting parties. 111 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Tariff Schedules and the GATT/WTO The preamble of the GATT 1947 advises that member countries should enter into "reciprocal and mutually advantageous arrangements directed to the substantial reduction of tariffs and other barriers to trade and to the elimination of discriminatory treatment in international commerce.“ 112 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Each schedule consists of four parts (1): Part I : Most-favoured-nation or MFN concessions, maximum tariffs to goods from other WTO members. Part I is further divided into: Section 1A — tariffs on agricultural products Section 1B — tariff quotas on agricultural products Section II — Other products 113 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Each schedule consists of four parts (2): Part II: Preferential concessions (tariffs relating to trade arrangements listed in GATT Article I) Part III: Concessions on non-tariff measures (NTMs) Part IV: Specific commitments on domestic support and export subsidies on agricultural products 114 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Each schedule contains the following information: Tariff item number Description of the product Rate of duty Present concession established Initial Negotiation Rights (or INR, such as main suppliers of product) Concession first incorporated in a GATT Schedule INR on earlier occasions Other duties and charges For agricultural products special safeguards may also 115 be defined 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Bound and applied rates: a difference bound rates (tariff binding): commitment not to increase a rate of duty beyond an agreed level. Once a rate of duty is bound, it may not be raised without compensating the affected parties applied rates: duties that are actually charged on imports. Applied can be below the bound rates 116 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Bound and applied rates: a difference MFN (most-favoured-nation) tariff: normal non-discriminatory tariff charged on imports (excludes preferential tariffs under free trade agreements and other schemes or tariffs charged inside quotas) 117 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru National Treatment National Treatment (NT) prohibits discrimination between foreign and national products, services, and service suppliers, as well as between foreign and national intellectual property rights holders. For example, once a foreign product has been cleared through customs, it cannot be treated any differently from a like product produced domestically. 118 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru According to GATT Article III.1 and 4, national measures in relation to goods ... should not be applied to imported or domestic products so as to afford protection to domestic production. … The products of the territory of any contracting party imported into the territory of any other contracting party shall be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to like products of national origin … 119 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Question Does National Treatment mean identical treatment for domestic and imported products? Answer: The same or better 120 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Reciprocity The WTO agreement serves as a type of binding contract under which members voluntarily accept a "negotiated equilibrium" of rights and obligations that they see as being in their mutual interest. This negotiated equilibrium exemplifies the principle of reciprocity. Concessions negotiated in this way are then multilateralized under the most-favoured nation rule. 121 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Market Access Binding of tariffs Prohibition of quantitative restrictions Tariff negotiations: progressive reduction in protection Emergency import measures: safeguards Tariff renegotiations: compensation 122 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Some Exceptions to Non-Discrimination One factor contributing to the success of the GATT/WTO trading regime is the recognition of the need to balance multilateral disciplines with national policy objectives. For this reason, a number of exceptions were drafted by the framers of the GATT, some of which have been altered (limited or expanded) by the WTO Agreement that serves as the umbrella for the GATT text. 123 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Most-Favoured Nation treatment is derogated by the following: exceptions for customs unions and free trade areas such as the European Union or North American Free Trade Agreement (covered in Article XXIV); acceptance (grandfathering) of pre-existing preferential arrangements (covered in Article I); waivers in "exceptional circumstances" (covered in Article XXV); 124 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Most-Favoured Nation treatment is derogated by the following: exceptions allowing for "special and differential treatment" for developing countries (covered in Part IV of the GATT, Articles XVIII and XXXVI to XXXVIII, and non-application or "opt-out" procedures that permit WTO Members to withhold MFN from other Members in particular circumstances (covered in Articles XXXV). 125 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru National treatment does not apply to: government procurement; or subsidies paid exclusively to domestic producers. 126 3.1 Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Both MFN and National treatment are derogated by the following exceptions: exceptions for unanticipated market disruptions (see the emergency action/safeguard provisions in Article XIX, trade remedies); general exceptions (Article XX); national security exceptions (Article XXI); exceptions to the commitment to eliminate quantitative restrictions (Article XI); and exceptions for countries experiencing temporary balance of payments difficulties (Articles XII to XV) 127 3.1 Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Reading: Examine the Legal text of the GATT47 (see reading materials) Discover main exceptions from nondiscrimination 128 3.1. Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Measures in WTO agreements Provisions aimed at increasing trade opportunities Provisions which require WTO Members to safeguard the interests of developing country Members Provisions allowing flexibility to developing countries in the use of economic and commercial policy instruments Provisions allowing longer transitional periods to developing countries Provision of technical assistance to developing country Members 129 Basic framework for negotiating tariff concessions www.worldec.ru Modalities Postmodalities Defining the rules of the game GATT Article XXVIII bis Tariff reduction: which option? Request/Offer? Sectoral? Formula? If so, which one? New bindings: how many? at what level? Implementation period S&D / Flexibility provisions Members prepare and submit offers Multilateral verification Final Schedules of concessions GATT/WTO – 60 years of tariff reductions (Estimated MFN tariff reduction of industrial countries for industrial products (excl. petroleum)) www.worldec.ru Implem. Period Round Covered Weighted tariff reduction Weights based on MFN imports (year) 1948 Geneva (1947) -26 1939 1959 Annecy (1949) -3 1947 1952 Torquay (1959-51) -4 1949 1956-58 Geneva (1955-56) -3 1954 1962-64 Dillon Round (1961-62) -4 1960 1968-72 Kennedy Round (196467) -38 1964 1980-87 Tokyo Round (1973-79) -33 1977 (or 1976) 1995-99 Uruguay Round (198694) -38 1988 (or 1989) Previous Rounds www.worldec.ru Round Developed GATT ~ Dillon request / offer Developing request/offer (1947 ~ 1961) Kennedy Round Linear cut formula (50% (1964-1967) Tokyo Round (1973-1979) cut), with exceptions. “Swiss formula” w/ coef. of 14 and 16 was used, with exceptions Uruguay Round Targeted simple average (1986-1994) request/offer reduction (33.3% AVG), plus some sectoral agreements (zero for zero and harmonization) request/offer request/offer ceiling bindings www.worldec.ru The simple Swiss formula c*T0 T1 = c + T0 T1 – final rate of the tariff T0 – initial rate of the tariff c – coefficient DDA (NAMA): Sequence of main events www.worldec.ru 2001 -> Doha Ministerial Declaration (Paragraph 16) July 2002 -> Work program is adopted (deadline for modalities = 31 May 2003) May 2003 -> Chairman’s Draft Elements for Modalities (TN/MA/W/35 i.e. “Girard Text”) September 2003 -> Cancun Ministerial fails to adopt a “framework” on NAMA (JOB(03)152/Rev.2) July 2004 -> “July Package” adopts the NAMA Framework with initial elements (Annex B of WT/L/579) December 2005 -> Hong Kong Ministerial clarified add. elements 2007 First draft modalities (JOB(07)/126) 2008 Third revision of draft modalities (TN/MA/W/103/Rev.2) July Mini-ministerial Fourth revision of draft modalities (TN/MA/W/103/Rev.3) The formula www.worldec.ru Ministers had previously agreed: A Swiss formula Reduce or as appropriate eliminate tariffs, including the reduction or elimination of tariff peaks, high tariffs and tariff escalation, in particular on products of interest to developing countries Special & Differential Treatment, including through less than full reciprocity in reduction commitments The formula www.worldec.ru Fourth revision said: Simple Swiss formula with four coefficients Coefficient for developed countries: 8 Coefficient for developing countries: “sliding scale” with 3 options: “X” = 20, “Y” = 22, “Z” = 25 depending on flexibilities chosen (a or (x, y or z))*T0 T1 = (a or (x, y or z)) + T0 The mark-up for unbound tariffs www.worldec.ru Ministers had previously agreed : A non-linear mark-up to establish the base rate for commencing tariff reductions i.e. 2001 MFN applied rate + mark-up = base rate Then apply Swiss formula on that base rate Fourth revision said: A mark-up of 25 percentage points Formula flexibilities (Paragraph 7) www.worldec.ru “Sliding scale”: Set of 3 options for an increased number of tariff lines for flexibilities in exchange of a lower coefficient: Swiss-20 = 14% lines with half-cut and 16% import cap; or 6.5% lines with no-cut and 7.5% import cap Swiss-22 = 10% lines with half-cut and 10% import cap; or 5% lines with no-cut and 5% import cap Swiss-25 = no flexibilities “Anti-concentration”: Formula needs to be applied on a minimum of 20% of lines or 9% of value in each HS Chapter Specific situations: Mercosur, Oman, South Africa (SACU), [Argentina?], [Venezuela?] Fourth revision said: Implementation period of 5 years (6 equal cuts) for developed countries and 10 years (11 equal cuts) for developing countries Setting the base rate www.worldec.ru Bound rates Unbound rates 2001 MFN applied Mark-up (+25 pts) Base rates Formula New Bound rates 3.1 Trade in goods: key principles www.worldec.ru Questions and exercises Describe main exceptions from the nondiscrimination principles www.worldec.ru 3.2. RULES OF ORIGIN 141 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru Rules of origin are rules for determining from which country or group of countries a product originates. In other words, they determine the nationality of a product. 142 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru Once the origin of a good is known, the importing country can apply any regionspecific trade preferences or restrictions to the imported goods Information about product origin also made it easier for countries to compile economic statistics, and provide consumers with important product information. 143 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru The original GATT (1947) contained no provisions on rules of origin. In 1974, the Kyoto Convention on the Harmonization and Simplification of Customs Procedures was signed by members of the Customs Cooperation Council. This convention stipulated that the origin of a product should be its last place of substantial transformation. 144 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru It also permitted alternative indicators of a substantial transformation of a product such as a change in the tariff classification as a result of further processing of the product that added value to it. The Kyoto Convention was not an enforceable agreement and did not provide for dispute settlement. 145 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement on Rules of Origin Since its adoption in 1994, the main objective of the Agreement on Rules of Origin has been to harmonize non-preferential rules of origin and to ensure that such rules do not themselves create unnecessary obstacles to trade. The Agreement established interim disciplines for the use of non-preferential rules of origin, pending agreement on harmonized procedures to be developed through a work programme at 146 the WTO. 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement on Rules of Origin recognizes three methodologies for administering rules of origin (also described in the previous page): Change of tariff classification Ad valorem percentage criterion Manufacturing or processing operation The WTO requires that each system be administered with clarity and precision. 147 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru WTO Members must ensure that (1): their rules of origin are transparent; rules of origin are not used as instruments to pursue trade objectives directly or indirectly; they do not have restrictive, distorting or disruptive effects on international trade; they are administered in a consistent, uniform, impartial and reasonable manner; 148 3.2. Rules of origin www.worldec.ru WTO Members must ensure that (2): they are administered in a consistent, uniform, impartial and reasonable manner; regulations and procedures regarding rules of origin are published and available to the public; rules of origin are based on a positive standard (in other words, they should state what confers origin, rather than what does not.) assessments of rule of origin should take no more than 150 days; and changes in rules of origin should not be applied retroactively 149 www.worldec.ru 4. Standards and technical barriers to trade 4.1. Standards and technical barriers 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru 4.1. STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL BARRIERS 151 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Technical standards range from those designed to ensure compliance with health and safety norms to product packaging and labelling requirements for tradable goods. 152 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru The Uruguay Round ushered in both the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. The intention of these agreements is to reduce the impact of standards as a trade barrier. 153 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru The WTO ensures that states retain the rights to set their own standards but subjects them to certain requirements regarding the basis for the standards they choose and the process used for creating and imposing standards, countries have a right to adopt and apply standards-related measures as long as these do not restrict international trade more than is necessary. 154 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Technical barriers to trade are obstacles to trade that may result from standards and conformity assessment systems designed to ensure uniform specifications or attributes of a product or a service. Technical regulations and standards set out specific characteristics of a product - such as its size, shape, design, functions and performance, or the way it is labelled or packaged - before it is put on sale. 155 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Voluntary versus mandatory Technical regulations Standards Obligatory Voluntary 156 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Product standards Process standards 157 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Among the leading voluntary standardization bodies are: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC); International Organization for Standardization (ISO) both based in Geneva, Switzerland. 158 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Technical standards deal with: Labelling of food, drink and drugs Quality requirements for fresh food Packaging requirements for fresh food Packaging and labelling for dangerous chemicals and toxic substances Regulations for electrical appliances 159 4.1. Standards and technical barriers www.worldec.ru Technical standards deal with (2): Regulations for wireless telephones, radio equipment, etc. Textiles and garment labelling Testing vehicles and accessories Regulations for ships and ship equipment Safety regulations for toys, etc. 160 www.worldec.ru 4.4. SANITARY AND PHITOSANITARY MEASURES 161 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru Sanitary and phytosanitary measures deal with measures taken to protect human, animal, or plant health and have the greatest relevance to the agriculture sector. Sanitary measures are those having to do with animal products while phytosanitary measures have to do with plant products. 162 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru Sanitary and phytosanitary measures usually deal with (1): Additives in food or drink Contaminants in food Poisonous substances in food or drink Residues of veterinary drugs or pesticides in food or drink Certification: food safety, animal or plant health Processing methods with implications for food safety 163 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru Sanitary and phytosanitary measures usually deal with (2): Labeling requirements directly related to food safety Plant/animal quarantine Declaring areas free from pests or disease Preventing disease or pests from spreading to a country Other sanitary requirements for imports (e.g. imported pallets used to transport animals) 164 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru The major elements of the SPS Agreement are: Members’ Sovereignty Over Domestic Standards A Balance Between Environmental Protection and Trade Liberalization Mutual Recognition Versus Harmonization Transparency and SPS Measures Respect for Subnational Measures Dispute Settlement 165 4.2. Sanitary and phytosanitary measures www.worldec.ru FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission World Health Organization Office International des Epizooties (OIE) FAO International Plant Protection Convention IPPC 166 www.worldec.ru 5. Trade Remedies 5.1. Safeguards 5.2. Anti-dumping 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail 167 5. Trade remedies www.worldec.ru Conditions under which trade remedies measures can be applied Unfair competition Anti-dumping duties Countervailing duties “Normal” market conditions Safeguards Additional duties, exceeding bound rates Quantitative restrictions 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru A safeguard is an emergency action taken by a government to provide temporary protection to domestic producers against unanticipated surges in imports caused by changes in competitive circumstances due to the reduction or removal of tariffs or other trade concessions. 169 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru When certain import surge's cause or threatens to cause serious injuries to domestic industry, safeguard measures may be used to give time to domestic producers to adjust to the new conditions. 170 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Domestic industry is defined as the producers as a whole of the like or directly competitive products operating within the territory of a Member, or producers who collectively account for a major proportion of the total domestic production of those products 171 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Safeguards are permitted under GATT Article XIX on certain terms. The WTO Agreement on Safeguards establishes the rules for the application of safeguard measures provided for in GATT Article XIX, and a Committee on Safeguards to oversee their application. 172 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Such measures, which take the form of suspension of concessions or obligations, can consist of quantitative import restrictions or of duty increases to higher than bound rates However, the WTO encourages trading nations to move away from quantitative restrictions. 173 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Serious injury as: “a significant overall impairment in the position of the domestic industry” taking into account such factors as: the rate and amount of the increase in imports; the share of domestic market taken by increased imports and; the changes in the level of sales, production, productivity, capacity utilization, profits, and employment in the importing country. If a causal link between the surges in imports and the serious injury is established, then safeguard measures may be applied. 174 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru A WTO member proposing to take a safeguard action must offer to consult with those members whose exports will be substantially affected by it. Under the Agreement on Safeguards, the member must endeavour to maintain the benefits of its trade concession to affected exporting countries. To achieve this it may agree with the exporting countries on compensation sufficient to offset the adverse effects of the safeguard measure. If no agreement is reached, the exporting members may suspend concessions they had agreed to for the benefit of the member applying to safeguards. 175 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Questions: What kind of compensations member countries could offer? Who gets these compensations? 176 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Competent authorities might apply safeguard measures after following an investigation conducted by pursuant to previously published procedures. reasonable public notice of the investigation, and that interested parties be given the opportunity to present their views publishing a report presenting and explaining their findings on all pertinent issues Confidentiality! 177 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Maximum protection – 8 (10) years Progressive liberalization Review of the measures (if longer than 3 years) De minimis import exemption A safeguard measure shall not be applied to low volume from developing country Members (3% for individual Member and 9% from all developing countries). 178 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Forbidden grey area measures include such protective devices as voluntary export restraints, orderly marketing arrangements, and discretionary impact on export licensing schemes. Although they have been used as an alternative to safeguards to deal with similar economic phenomenon, they are quite distinct from safeguards. However, they are dealt with (and prohibited) in the WTO Safeguards Agreement. 179 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Safeguards must be: temporary applied on an MFN basis* States applying safeguards have notification and consultation obligations. Developing countries are accorded special rights regarding the application of safeguard provisions. Disputes arising under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards may be referred to the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. 180 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru Question: Why do you think safeguards are used less than anti-dumping and subsidycountervail? 181 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru By contrast anti-dumping and subsidy/countervail actions are taken on the basis of quasi-judicial procedures, and no compensation is required for "dumpers" or "subsidizers" as they are deemed to be acting in contravention of "fair trade" principles. 182 www.worldec.ru 5.2. Anti-Dumping 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Dumping occurs when goods are sold into an importing market at prices below those prevailing in the home market or at prices below their cost of production (including reasonable amounts for administration, marketing costs, and profits). An anti-dumping action is taken by a state as a remedy for dumping 184 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Question: How ho calculate an AD duty? Answer: key beginning point is to calculate a normal value of the product 185 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping Dumping occurs when the products of one country are introduced into the commerce of another country at less than the normal value of the products (a) is less than the comparable price, in the ordinary course of trade, for the like product when destined for consumption in the exporting country, or, (b) in the absence of such domestic price, is less than either (i) the highest comparable price for the like product for export to any third country in the ordinary course of trade, or (ii) the cost of production of the product in the country of origin plus a reasonable addition for selling cost and profit. 186 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The usual remedy for dumping is an antidumping duty that is applied to incoming shipments of "dumped" goods. Since the purpose of the duty is to offset the effects of dumping, the amount of the duty should be equivalent to the difference between the "dumped" price and the "home market" price. This difference is called the margin of dumping. 187 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Anti-dumping investigations are to end immediately in cases: where the authorities determine that the margin of dumping is insignificantly small (defined as less than 2% of the export price of the product). if the volume of dumped imports is negligible (i.e. if the volume from one country is less than 3% of total imports from one country of that product and 7% or more of total imports from several countries) 188 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping (1) 1.A complaint is initiated on behalf of the industry affected (the complaining business must account for a "major proportion" of total domestic production of like products). If the relevant authorities find the complaint presents a sufficient basis for formal procedures, an investigation is begun. 2.The relevant authority may make a preliminary finding of dumping. 3.The relevant authority may make a preliminary finding of material injury. 189 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping (2) 4.On the basis of these two preliminary findings, provisional duties may be imposed. 5.If neither preliminary finding is made, the case is terminated. 6.The relevant authorities continue their investigations leading to final determinations with respect to the existence of dumping margins and injury. 7. The investigation may be terminated on the basis of voluntary price undertakings from dumping exporters to increase their prices to eliminate the dumping. 190 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping (3) 8. If suitable voluntary price undertakings are not agreed to, dumping margins are calculated for each exporter found to be dumping. 9. Final dumping duties, the amounts of which are not to exceed the margins of dumping, may be applied. 10. Dumping duties are to remain in force "only so long as and to the extent necessary to counteract dumping which is causing injury." An injury determination expires after five years. Dumping duties may be extended beyond five years only on the basis of a new investigation that confirms continued threat of injury. 191 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping (4) Each member's anti-dumping regime must include provision for independent judicial review of administrative actions relating to final determinations of dumping and injury and of the final determination. 192 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru The mechanics of anti-dumping Under Article VI of GATT 1994, and the AntiDumping Agreement, WTO Members can impose anti-dumping measures, if, after investigation in accordance with the Agreement, a determination is made (a) that dumping is occurring, (b) that the domestic industry producing the like product in the importing country is suffering material injury, and (c) that there is a causal link between the two 193 5.1. Safeguards www.worldec.ru For an anti-dumping action to be used, two conditions must be met. There must be dumping. The dumping must have: caused material injury to an established industry in the importing country threatened to cause such industry or if it materially retarded the establishment of a domestic industry. 194 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Refund or reimbursement Duties have to be collected on a nondiscriminatory basis on imports from all sources found to be dumped and causing injury, except with respect to sources from which a price undertaking has been accepted The amount of the duty collected may not exceed the dumping margin, although it may be a lesser amount 195 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Refund or reimbursement Individual exporter dumping margins The Agreement requires that, when antidumping duties are imposed, a dumping margin be calculated for each exporter. 196 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Refund or reimbursement New shippers The investigating authorities are required to conduct an expedited review to determine a specific margin of dumping attributable to the exports of such a “new shipper”. While that review is in progress, the authorities may request guarantees or withhold appraisement on imports, but may not actually collect anti-dumping duties on those imports. 197 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru A WTO Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices oversees anti-dumping actions. Statistics on Anti-dumping: reporting countries 198 5.2. Anti-dumping www.worldec.ru Number of AD measures, by reporting country 400 Number of measures 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year Totals for 01/01/95 - 31/12/08 - 3427 199 www.worldec.ru 5.3. Subsidies 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Subsidies are a common instrument of state policy used by all countries for a range of purposes. There is nothing inherently wrong with subsidies but, in some cases, they may have trade-distorting effects. The GATT, and now the WTO, have sought to restrict the use of subsidies which have such effects while allowing states to subsidize for other purposes (research and development for example). 201 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Subsidies Export subsidies: to compete with producers on the target market Subsidies to compete on domestic market with imported products Export subsidies: to compete with producers on the third markets 202 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru A subsidy is defined by the WTO as a financial contribution made by a government or any public body that confers a benefit on the recipient. Subsidies can be in any form of direct funds transfers, grants, low interest loans, or price supports. Subsidies also can be offered in the form of government revenue forgone or not collected. 203 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru The agreement defines two categories of subsidies: prohibited and actionable. Non-actionable subsidies (end on 31 December 1999) 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Prohibited subsidies: subsidies that require recipients to meet certain export targets, or to use domestic goods instead of imported goods. They are prohibited because they are specifically designed to distort international trade, and are therefore likely to hurt other countries’ trade. 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Actionable subsidies: in this category the complaining country has to show that the subsidy has an adverse effect on its interests otherwise the subsidy is permitted. 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Actionable subsidies: three types of damage they can cause. One country’s subsidies can hurt a domestic industry in an importing country. They can hurt rival exporters from another country when the two compete in third markets Domestic subsidies in one country can hurt exporters trying to compete in the subsidizing country’s domestic market. 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Countervailing duties are special duties imposed on imports to offset the benefits of government subsidies to producers or exporters in the exporting country. 208 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Conditions to CV: formal investigation there is a subsidy imports of subsidized products are causing injury to domestic industry Period for protection – 5 years Voluntary raise of prices – removal of CV 209 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Number of CVs Number of CV duties, by reporting economy 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jan.June 2009 Year Total for 01/01/95 - 30/06/09 - 226 rg e A ntin us a tra B lia C raz an il a C C da hi h na i l E C ,P e ur o s op ta .R ea R . n i C E ca om gy m pt un i In ty d Is ia r Ja ael p La an N M tvi ew e a Ze xic al o a S ou P nd t h er A u f U ni Tu rica te r d ke V Sta y en t ez es ue la A 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Number of CV measures, by reporting member 100 20 10 94 90 80 70 60 48 50 40 30 23 10 3 3 6 13 1 1 4 1 2 Year 1 1 2 6 4 1 0 2 en tin a Br a Ca zil na da Ch C Eu C i h ro hin na, ile pe es P an e .R. Co Tai m pei m un Fr ity a G nc er e m an y In In d do ia ne sia Ko re a, Ita Re ly p M .o a So la f ut ys i h Af a ri c Sp a Un Tha ain ite ila d nd St at es Ar g 5.3. Subsidy/Countervail www.worldec.ru Number of CV measures, by exporting member 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 46 29 7 7 8 3 7 10 7 11 13 3 Year 17 4 6 9 8 3 4.2. Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru Questions 1. What aspect of the GATT deals with subsidies? 2. What does serious injury mean? 3. What is the mechanics of AD? 213 4.2. Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru Readings 1. Readings for lecture 4 214 www.worldec.ru 6. Trade in agriculture 6.1. Trade in agriculture: approaches to the regulation 6.2. Market access 6.3. Domestic support 6.4. Export competition/subsidies 6.1. Trade in agriculture: approaches to the regulation www.worldec.ru Agriculture: a sensitive issue Question: Multilateral negotiations on agriculture started much later than on other goods. Why? 216 6.1. Trade in agriculture: approaches to the regulation www.worldec.ru Agriculture has traditionally been treated as an exceptional or sensitive sector in the global trading regime Agriculture is an important part of overall economic activity and continues to play a major role in domestic agricultural production and employment. The trading system plays also a fundamentally important role in global food security. 217 Leading exporters of agricultural products, 2006 Share in world exports/imports Value 2006 1980 1990 2000 2006 405,25 - - 41,5 42,9 95,31 - - 10,1 10,1 United States 92,66 17,0 14,3 12,9 9,8 Canada 44,23 5,0 5,4 6,3 4,7 Brazil 39,53 3,4 2,4 2,8 4,2 China 32,54 1,5 2,4 3,0 3,4 Australia 22,18 3,3 2,9 3,0 2,3 Thailand 21,58 1,2 1,9 2,2 2,3 Argentina 21,33 1,9 1,8 2,2 2,3 Indonesia 18,32 1,6 1,0 1,4 1,9 Russian Federation a 17,06 - - 1,4 1,8 Malaysia 15,57 2,0 1,8 1,5 1,6 Mexico 14,69 0,8 0,8 1,6 1,6 India a, b 14,41 1,0 0,8 1,2 1,5 New Zealand 13,24 1,3 1,4 1,4 1,4 Chile 11,49 0,4 0,7 1,2 1,2 784,09 - - 83,5 83,0 www.worldec.ru Exporters European Union (25) extra-EU (25) exports Above 15 Leading importers of agricultural products, 2006 Value, USD bn Share in world /imports 2006 1980 1990 2000 2006 433,66 - - 42,3 43,3 123,72 - - 13,3 12,4 103,65 8,7 9,0 11,6 10,3 Japan 65,62 9,6 11,5 10,4 6,6 China 51,65 2,1 1,8 3,3 5,2 Canada d 23,95 1,8 2,0 2,6 2,4 Russian Federation a, d 23,38 - - 1,6 2,3 Korea, Republic of 18,58 1,5 2,2 2,2 1,9 Mexico d 18,46 1,2 1,2 1,8 1,8 Hong Kong, China 11,90 1,2 1,9 2,0 1,2 7,79 1,0 1,0 1,1 0,8 Taipei, Chinese 9,67 1,1 1,4 1,3 1,0 Switzerland 8,85 1,2 1,3 1,0 0,9 United Arab Emirates a, c 8,81 0,3 0,4 0,6 0,9 Saudi Arabia a 8,56 1,5 0,8 0,9 0,9 Malaysia 8,50 0,5 0,5 0,8 0,8 India a, b 7,84 0,5 0,4 0,7 0,8 Above 15 798,99 - - 82,1 79,8 www.worldec.ru European Union (25) extra-EU (25) imports United States retained imports Export of agricultural products US dollar at current prices (Millions) www.worldec.ru Reporter World 2005 2006 2007 2008 Share in 2008 847148 942353 1128734 1341564 100,00 Argentina 19182 21351 28806 37502 2,80 Brazil 35052 39528 48287 61400 4,58 China 28711 32542 38858 42291 3,15 Finland 4559 5647 6409 6027 0,45 France 52336 56448 65975 76057 5,67 Germany 53728 60161 74151 88034 6,56 4139 4736 5102 5854 0,44 14063 17907 23805 32857 2,45 1725 1799 2253 2114 0,16 27339 29887 35371 40426 3,01 6007 6482 7565 8351 0,62 14485 17192 23565 25021 1,87 Sweden 9973 11237 13306 14232 1,06 Switzerland 4000 4693 5993 7634 0,57 Greece Indonesia Israel Italy Japan Russian Federation Export of agricultural products US dollar at current prices (Millions) Reporter www.worldec.ru World 2005 2006 2007 2008 Share in 2008 908757 1002228 1192167 1413383 Argentina 1247 1396 2225 3242 0,23 Brazil 4341 5487 7266 9690 0,69 China 45189 51653 65368 86830 6,14 Finland 4760 5165 6442 7708 0,55 France 44402 47147 55960 65623 4,64 Germany 69340 77883 93298 108251 7,66 Greece 6810 7583 9305 10401 0,74 Indonesia 7316 7487 10473 13312 0,94 Israel 2930 3253 4018 5059 0,36 Italy 44981 49101 55765 59809 4,23 Japan 65947 65594 68817 80627 5,70 Russia 19154 23377 26884 34266 2,42 Sweden 10272 11561 13875 15969 1,13 8248 8854 10387 12325 0,87 Switzerland 100,00 6.1. Trade in agriculture: approaches to the regulation Export of agriculture, 2006 World - 944,5 USD billion www.worldec.ru South and Central America 12% Africa 4% CIS 3% Middle East 2% Europe 40% North America 18% Asia 21% 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Uruguay Round included negotiations on disciplines with regard to all measures affecting trade in agriculture, domestic agricultural policies and the subsidization of agricultural exports 223 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The Agreement on Agriculture and the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures were negotiated in parallel Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Programme on Least-developed and Net Food-importing Developing Countries also formed part of the overall outcome 224 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The Agreement on Agriculture came into force on 1 January 1995. Agreed long-term objective of the reform process initiated by the Uruguay Round reform programme is to establish a fair and marketoriented agricultural trading system. The reform programme comprises specific commitments to reduce support and protection in the areas of domestic support, export subsidies and market access 225 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The Agreement takes into account non-trade concerns, including food security and need to protect the environment, and provides special and differential treatment for developing countries, including an improvement in the opportunities and terms of access for agricultural products of particular export interest to these Members. 226 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Product coverage Agricultural products by reference to the harmonised system of product classification agricultural products wheat, milk live animals products derived from them bread, butter and meat, all processed agricultural products such as chocolate and sausages. 227 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Product coverage The coverage also includes wines, spirits and tobacco products, fibers such as cotton, wool and silk, and raw animal skins destined for leather production. Fish and fish products are not included, nor are forestry products 228 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Committee on Agriculture The Agreement established a Committee on Agriculture. The Committee oversees the implementation of the Agreement on Agriculture and affords Members the opportunity of consulting on any matter relating to the implementation of commitments, including rule-based commitments. 229 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Single rate Flat-rate percentage reductions Uruguay Round approach Harmonizing reductions Other methods 230 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Single rate: Tariffs are cut to a single rate for all products. Theoretically, this is the simplest outcome. In practice it is mainly used in regional free trade agreements where the final tariff rate is zero, or a low tariff, for trade within the group. 231 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Flat-rate percentage reductions: the same percentage reduction for all products, no matter whether the starting tariff is high or low. For example, all tariffs cut by 25% in equal steps over five years. 232 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Uruguay Round approach: The 1986-94 Uruguay Round negotiations in agriculture produced an agreement for developed countries to cut tariffs on agricultural products by an average of 36% over six years (6% per year) with a minimum of 15% on each product for the period. 233 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru 6% per year cuts Ta riff 160 Start Start Start Start Start Start Start 140 120 100 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% 25% 10% 80 60 40 20 0 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Yea r 5 Year 6 THE ‘URUGUAY ROUND APPROACH’ 234 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Harmonizing reductions. These are designed principally to make steeper cuts on higher tariffs, bringing the final tariffs closer together (to “harmonize” the rates): Different percentages for different tariff bands. For example, no cuts for tariffs between 0 and 10%, 25% cuts for tariffs between 11% and 50%, 50% cuts for tariffs above that, etc. A variation could include scrapping all tariffs below 5% which are sometimes seen as a nuisance with little benefit. These could be simple or average reductions within each band. Mathematical formulas designed to make steeper cuts (i.e. higher percentage cuts) on higher tariffs. One example is the socalled Swiss formula. 235 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The “Swiss formula” uses a single mathematical formula to produce: a narrow range of final tariff rates from a wide set of initial tariffs a maximum final rate, no matter how high the original tariff was. Z = AX/(A+X) where X = initial tariff rate A = coefficient and maximum final tariff rate Z= resulting lower tariff rate (end of period) 236 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Swiss formula. Coefficient=25 Tariff 160 Start Start Start Start Start Start Start 140 120 100 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% 25% 10% 80 60 40 20 0 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 237 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Reduction methods Other methods. There are a number of possibilities: Different rates for different categories of products. For example steeper cuts on processed products than on raw materials. This is an attempt to deal with “tariff escalation”, where countries protect their processing industries by making imported raw materials cheap and imported processed products expensive. Combinations of any of these. 238 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Market access Under the reform programme, members have converted their non-tariff measures to equivalent bound tariffs. Some additional market access is provided through tariff rate quotas, and the tariffs are being reduced. Contingency protection is provided through special safeguards, and transparency works through notifications. 239 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Schedule of tariff concessions Developed country Members have agreed to reduce, over a six-year period beginning in 1995, their tariffs by 36 per cent on average of all agricultural products, with a minimum cut of 15 per cent for any product. For developing countries, the cuts are 24 and 10 per cent, respectively, to be implemented over ten years. Those developing country Members which bound tariffs at ceiling levels did not, in many cases, undertake reduction commitments. Least-developed country Members were required to bind all agricultural tariffs, but not to undertake tariff reductions. 240 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Tariff quota commitments As part of the tariffication package, WTO Members were required to maintain, for tariffied products, current import access opportunities at levels corresponding to those existing during the 1986-88 base period. Where such “current” access had been less than 5 per cent of domestic consumption of the product in question in the base period, an (additional) minimum access opportunity had to be opened on a most-favoured-nation basis. 241 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Tariff quota commitments The current and minimum access opportunities are generally implemented in the form of tariff quotas. In case of minimum access, the applicable duty was required to be low or minimal, low that is either in absolute terms or, at least, in relation to the “normal” ordinary customs duty that applies to any imports outside the tariff quota. These tariff quotas, including the applicable tariff rates and any other conditions related to the tariff quotas, are specified in the schedules of the WTO Members concerned. 242 43 WTO members apply 1,425 tariff quotas www.worldec.ru Australia (2) Barbados (36) Brazil (2) Bulgaria (73) Canada (21) Chile (1) China (10) Chinese Taipei (22) Colombia (67) Costa Rica (27) Croatia (9) Czech Rep (24) Dominican Rep (8) Ecuador (14) El Salvador (11) EU (87) Guatemala (22) Hungary (70) Iceland (90) Indonesia (2) Israel (12) Japan (20) Korea (67) Latvia (4) Lithuania (4) Malaysia (19) Mexico (11) Morocco (16) New Zealand (3) Nicaragua (9) Norway (232) Panama (19) Philippines (14) Poland (109) Romania (12) Slovak Rep (24) Slovenia (20) South Africa (53) Switzerland (28) Thailand (23) Tunisia (13) United States243(54) 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The prohibition of non-tariff border measures (1) Article 3.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture prohibits the use of agriculture-specific non-tariff measures. Such measures include quantitative import restrictions, variable import levies, minimum import prices, discretionary import licensing procedures, voluntary export restraint agreements and non-tariff measures maintained through state-trading enterprises. All similar border measures other than “normal customs duties” are also no longer permitted. 244 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The prohibition of non-tariff border measures (2) However, Article 3.2 of the Agreement on Agriculture does not prevent the use of non-tariff import restrictions consistent with the provisions of the GATT or other WTO agreements which are applicable to traded goods generally (industrial or agricultural). Such measures include those maintained under balance-of-payments provisions (Articles XII and XVIII of GATT), general safeguard provisions (Article XIX of GATT and the related WTO agreement), general exceptions (Article XX of GATT), the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade or other general, non-agriculture-specific WTO provisions. 245 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru Special treatment The Agreement on Agriculture contains a “special treatment” clause (Annex 5), under which four countries were permitted, subject to strictly circumscribed conditions, to maintain non-tariff border measures on certain products during the period of tariff reductions (with the possibility of extending the special treatment, subject to further negotiations). As one of the conditions, market access in the form of progressively increasing import quotas has to be provided for the products concerned. The products and countries concerned are: rice in the case of Japan, Korea and the Philippines; and cheese and sheepmeat in the case of Israel. 246 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The special safeguard provisions (1) As a third element of the tariffication package, Members have the right to invoke for tariffied products the special safeguard provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture (Article 5), provided that a reservation to this effect (“SSG”) appears beside the products concerned in the relevant Member’s schedule. The right to make use of the special safeguard provisions has been reserved by 38 Members, and for a limited number of products in each case. 247 6.2. Market access www.worldec.ru The special safeguard provisions (2) The special safeguard provisions allow the imposition of an additional tariff where certain criteria are met. The criteria involve either a specified surge in imports (volume trigger), or, on a shipment by shipment basis, a fall of the import price below a specified reference price (price trigger). In case of the volume trigger, the higher duties only apply until the end of the year in question. In case of the price trigger, any additional duty can only be imposed on the shipment concerned. The additional duties cannot be applied to imports taking place within tariff quotas 248 39 WTO members use 6,156 SSG www.worldec.ru Indonesia (13) Romania (175) Israel (41) Slovak Republic Japan (121) (114) Korea (111) South Africa (166) Malaysia (72) Swaziland (166) Mexico (293) SwitzerlandMorocco (374) Liechtenstein (961) Namibia (166) Chinese Taipei (84) New Zealand (4) Thailand (52) Nicaragua (21) Tunisia (32) Norway (581) United States (189) Panama (6) Philippines (118) Uruguay (2) Venezuela (76) Poland (144) Australia (10) Barbados (37) Botswana (161) Bulgaria (21) Canada (150) Colombia (56) Costa Rica (87) Czech Republic (236) Ecuador (7) El Salvador (84) EU (539) Guatemala (107) Hungary (117) 249 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru The main conceptual consideration is that there are basically two categories of domestic support: support with no, or minimal, distortive effect on trade on the one hand (often referred to as “Green Box” measures); trade-distorting support on the other hand (often referred to as “Amber Box” measures). 250 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Domestic support in agriculture THE BOXES In WTO terminology, subsidies in general are identified by “boxes” which are given the colours of traffic lights: green (permitted), amber (slow down — i.e. be reduced), red (forbidden). Blue box measures? 251 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru AMBER BOX All domestic support measures considered to distort production and trade (with some exceptions) fall into the amber box, which is defined in Article 6 of the Agriculture Agreement as all domestic supports except those in the blue and green boxes. These include measures to support prices, or subsidies directly related to production quantities. 252 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru BLUE BOX This is the “amber box with conditions” — conditions designed to reduce distortion. Any support that would normally be in the amber box, is placed in the blue box if the support also requires farmers to limit production (details set out in Paragraph 5 of Article 6 of the Agriculture Agreement). 253 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Blue box measures are those that are directly linked to production, for example payments tied to the size of the acreage or the number of animals, but are part of production limiting schemes that set ceilings on production volume or require farms to set aside part of their land as follow. Blue box measures are exempted from the general rule that all subsidies linked to production must be reduced or kept at de minimis levels. 254 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Countries that use these sorts of arrangements argue that they are less trade distorting than amber box alternatives. Whether or not the blue box provisions will remain in the agreement is subject to debate. 255 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru GREEN BOX The green box is defined in Annex 2 of the Agriculture Agreement. Green box subsidies must not distort trade, or at most cause minimal distortion (paragraph 1). They have to be government-funded (not by charging consumers higher prices) and must not involve price support. 256 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru GREEN BOX They tend to be programmes that are not targeted at particular products, and include direct income supports for farmers that are not related to (are “decoupled” from) current production levels or prices. Include environmental protection and regional development programmes. Allowed without limits, provided they comply with the policy-specific criteria set out in Annex 2. 257 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Green box measures are permissible because they have minimal effects on trade, do not involve transfers from consumers (in the form of price hikes to offset subsidies), and do not have the effect of providing price support to producers. Measure that may be eligible for green box status include: general government services such as agricultural research, pest and disease control; measures necessary for food security purposes; and a few specific forms of direct payments to producers for such things as crop insurance, disaster relief, and income support which is not tied to commodity pricing or production levels. 258 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Reduction commitments (1) The reduction commitments are expressed in terms of a “Total Aggregate Measurement of Support” (Total AMS) which includes all product-specific support and nonproduct-specific support in one single figure. In any year of the implementation period, the Current Total AMS value of non-exempt measures must not exceed the scheduled Total AMS limit as specified in the schedule for that year. In other words, the maximum levels of such support are bound in the WTO. 259 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Reduction commitments (2) Twenty-eight Members (counting the EC as one) had non-exempt domestic support during the base period and hence reduction commitments specified in their schedules. In the case of Members with no scheduled reduction commitments, any domestic support not covered by one or another of the exception categories outlined above, must be maintained within the relevant “product-specific” and “nonproduct-specific” de minimis levels. 260 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Aggregate Measurement of Support (1) For the purpose of Current Total AMS calculations, price support is generally measured by multiplying the gap between the applied administered price and a specified fixed external reference price (“world market price”) by the quantity of production eligible to receive the administered price. 261 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Aggregate Measurement of Support (2) For each product, the implicit subsidy of price support measures is added to other productspecific subsidies – a product-specific fertiliser subsidy, for example – to arrive at a product-specific AMS which is then evaluated against the applicable de minimis threshold. Non-product-specific subsidies are calculated separately and, as in the former case, are included in the Current Total AMS only if they exceed the relevant de minimis level. 262 6.3. Domestic support Countries that apply amber box measures www.worldec.ru Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic EU Hungary Iceland Israel Japan Jordan Korea Lithuania Mexico Moldova Morocco New Zealand Norway Papua New Guinea Poland Slovak Republic Slovenia South Africa SwitzerlandLiechtenstein Chinese Taipei Thailand Tunisia United States Venezuela 263 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Example: Calculation of the current total AMS Member X (developed country), year Y Wheat: Intervention price for wheat = $255 per tonne Fixed external reference price (world market price) = $110 per tonne Domestic production of wheat = 2,000,000 tonnes Value of wheat production = $510,000,000 Wheat AMS (AMS 1) ($255–$110) x 2,000,000 tonnes = $290,000,000 (de minimis level=$25,500,000) 264 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Barley > Deficiency payments for barley = $3,000,000 > Value of barley production = $100,000,000 > Barley AMS (AMS 2) = $3,000,000 (de minimis level=$5,000,000) Oilseeds: > Deficiency payments for oilseeds = $13,000,000 > Fertilizer subsidy = $1,000,000 > Value of oilseeds production = $250,000,000 > Oilseeds AMS (AMS 3) = $14,000,000 (de minimis level=$12,500,000) 265 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Support not specific to products > Generally available interest rate subsidy = $ 4,000,000 Value of total agricultural production = $860,000,000 > Non-product-specific AMS (AMS 4) = $4,000,000 de minimis level=$43,000,000 Current total AMS (AMS 1 + AMS 3) = $304,000,000 266 6.3. Domestic support www.worldec.ru Equivalent Measurement of Support Where it is not practicable to calculate a product-specific AMS as set out in the Agreement, provisions are made of an “Equivalent Measurement of Support” (EMS). The EMS is generally calculated on the basis of budgetary outlays – the money spent by governments to support a product, for example, rather than market price support calculated with respect to a fixed external reference price. 267 6.4. Export competition/subsidies www.worldec.ru Developed countries 6 years: 1995–2000 Developing countries 10 years: 1995–2004 average cut for all agricultural products minimum cut per product Domestic support –36% –24% –15% –10% cuts in total (“AMS”) support for the sector Exports –20% –13% value of subsidies (outlays) subsidized quantities –36% –24% –21% –14% 268 The reductions in agricultural subsidies and protection agreed in the Uruguay Round Tariffs 6.4. Export competition/subsidies www.worldec.ru The proliferation of export subsidies in the years leading to the Uruguay Round was one of the key issues that were addressed in the agricultural negotiations. While under the GATT 1947 export subsidies for industrial products have been prohibited all along, in the case of agricultural primary products such subsidies were only subject to limited disciplines (Article XVI of GATT) which moreover did not prove to be operational. 269 6.4. Export competition/subsidies www.worldec.ru The right to use export subsidies is now limited to four situations: (i) export subsidies subject to product-specific reduction commitments within the limits specified in the schedule of the WTO Member concerned; (ii) any excess of budgetary outlays for export subsidies or subsidized export volume over the limits specified in the schedule which is covered by the “downstream flexibility” provision of 270 Article 8.2(b) of the Agreement on Agriculture; 6.4. Export competition/subsidies www.worldec.ru The right to use export subsidies is now limited to four situations: iii. export subsidies consistent with the special and differential treatment provision for developing country Members (Article 9.4 of the Agreement); and iv. export subsidies other than those subject to reduction commitments provided that they are in conformity with the anti-circumvention disciplines of Article 10 of the Agreement on Agriculture. 271 6.4. Export competition/subsidies www.worldec.ru Reduction commitments Under the Agreement on Agriculture export subsidies are defined as referring to “subsidies contingent on export performance, including the export subsidies listed in detail in Article 9 of the Agreement”. This list covers most of the export subsidy practices which are prevalent in the agricultural sector 272 6.5. Other issues www.worldec.ru Export restrictions Pease clause Resolving disputes Continuation clause Net food-importing developing countries Future agenda 273 Questions and assignment www.worldec.ru Assignment Find out what kind of measures of support in agriculture are used in Russia/your country. 274 www.worldec.ru 7. Trade in Textiles and Clothing 7.1. Textiles and clothing: sensitive sectors 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO 7.1. Textiles and clothing: sensitive sectors www.worldec.ru The textile and clothing industries are very important to both developing and developed countries for basic economic and political reasons—thousands of people are employed in them and the skills needed are fairly low-level. They are even more significant to some developing countries because they comprise a significant percentage of total export earnings. 276 7.1. Textiles and clothing: sensitive sectors www.worldec.ru Most governments in developed countries have restricted and controlled the international trade in textiles and clothing for many years. Trade in textiles and clothing products has not been subject to normal GATT rules since the United Kingdom introduced voluntary restraints on exports of cotton textiles from Hong Kong, India, and Pakistan in 1960. 277 World merchandise exports by major product group, 2007 Billion dollars and perentage Agricul tu re www.worldec.ru Fuels and mining products Manufactures Clothing Textiles Automotive product s Fuels 1128 2659 2038 9500 474 1483 1514 1183 238 345 8,3 19,5 15,0 69,8 3,5 10,9 11,1 8,7 1,7 2,5 1980-85 -2 -5 -5 2 -2 1 9 5 -1 4 1985-90 9 3 0 15 9 14 18 14 15 18 1990-95 7 2 1 9 8 10 15 8 8 8 1995-00 -1 10 12 5 -2 4 10 5 0 5 2000-07 13 21 20 12 22 17 8 13 7 10 2005 8 38 43 10 17 12 11 7 4 6 2006 11 28 23 13 18 13 14 11 8 12 2007 19 15 13 15 27 19 4 16 9 12 Value Share in world merchandise trade Total Office and telecom equipm ent Chemicals Iron and steel Total Annual percentage change Share of textiles in trade in total merchandise and in manufactures by region, 2007 www.worldec.ru Exports Imports Share in total merchandise Exports Imports Share in manufactures World 1,7 1,7 2,5 2,5 North America 0,9 1,3 1,3 1,8 South and Central America 0,7 2,7 2,2 3,9 Europe 1,6 1,6 2,0 2,2 CIS 0,4 2,2 1,6 2,8 Africa 0,5 4,0 2,8 5,9 Middle East 0,9 2,7 4,4 3,5 Asia 3,0 1,8 3,7 2,8 Australia, Japan and New Zealand 0,9 1,3 1,2 2,3 Other Asia 3,6 2,0 4,4 3,0 Share of clothing in trade in total merchandise and in manufactures by region, 2007 www.worldec.ru Exports Imports Share in total merchandise Exports Imports Share in manufactures World 2,5 2,5 3,6 3,6 North America 0,6 3,5 0,8 4,8 South and Central America 2,5 1,7 8,1 2,5 Europe 2,1 2,8 2,7 3,8 CIS 0,3 5,3 1,4 6,9 Africa 2,7 2,1 14,3 3,1 Middle East 0,7 2,3 3,3 3,1 Asia 4,8 1,4 5,8 2,1 Australia, Japan and New Zealand 0,1 3,5 0,1 6,2 Other Asia 6,2 0,7 7,4 1,1 7.1. Textiles and clothing: sensitive sectors www.worldec.ru Multifibre Arrangement (MFA) The MFA was a plurilateral agreement that "managed" international trade in textiles and clothing through a wide array of bilateral agreements that restrained exports according to certain categories of textiles and clothing products. 281 7.1. Textiles and clothing: sensitive sectors www.worldec.ru The MFA set out rules for: determining categories and quotas; establishing restraint levels; and for other provisions such as annual growth rates for quotas, carry-over of unutilized quotas from the previous year and carry-forward of portions of current year quotas into the next year. 282 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) (1) Article 6 of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing allows for special selective transitional safeguards to be taken against any product listed in the ATC prior to its integration into GATT 1994. 283 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO The WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) (2) The ATC safeguards are to be applied on a country-bycountry basis. Before imposing a transitional safeguard on a textile or clothing product, an importing country must determine that: www.worldec.ru The product is being imported in such increased quantities as to cause serious damage or actual threat thereof to the domestic industry producing the like product and/or a directly competitive product. There is a direct causal link between such serious injury to the domestic injury and a sharp and substantial increase in imports from the specific originating country or countries rather than other factors such as changes in technology or 284 consumer preference. 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) (3) The safeguards will restrain exports from the targeted country at levels agreed between the exporting and importing member or, failing agreement, as recommended by the Textile Monitoring Body (TMB). When this safeguard mechanism is invoked, more favourable treatment must be given to least developed countries, small suppliers, new entrants to the market and to re-imports from outward processing zones. 285 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO www.worldec.ru The WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) (4) A transitional safeguard measure will have a maximum term of three years, or until the product is integrated into GATT 1994, whichever comes first. If a measure is in place for more than one year, levels of permissible imports must increase by no less than 6 % per annum, unless otherwise justified to the TMB. The measure must also allow certain amounts of carry-over and carry-forward 286 7.2. Trade in textiles and clothing within the framework of the WTO www.worldec.ru 1st of January, 2005 – termination of the agreement Consequences for developed countries developing countries 287 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. 4. How important is trade in textiles and clothing for developed and developing countries? Please, analyse: production, employment, imports, exports, etc. Analyse the position of Russian producers of textile and clothing. Analyse the rules and practice of market access for textile and clothing to Russian/your country market. Are there any difference in applying safeguard measures under ATC agreement and nowadays? 288 www.worldec.ru 8. Trade in Services 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues 8.2. The GATS 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru The International Services Economy High and growing importance for income, employment and production Increasing share in world trade 290 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues European Union www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 667 163 ... 13 22 Commercial services imports (million US$) 544 899 ... 9 19 2007 Share in world total exports 27.70 200 6 2007 2007 Share in world total 24.01 imports 291 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues Germany www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 205 786 15 15 15 Commercial services imports (million US$) 250 471 10 8 15 2006 2007 Share in world total exports 6.25 2007 2007 Share in world total imports 8.12 292 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues USA www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 456 363 7 10 15 Commercial services imports (million US$) 335 851 7 9 9 2006 2007 2007 Share in world total exports 13.86 2007 Share in world total imports 10.9 293 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues Switzerland www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 61 496 12 10 21 Commercial services imports (million US$) 33 860 13 5 18 200 6 2007 Share in world total exports 1.87 2007 2007 Share in world total imports 1.10 294 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues China www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 121 655 22 24 33 Commercial services imports (million US$) 129 254 20 21 29 2006 2007 2007 Share in world total exports 3.70 2007 Share in world total imports 4.19 295 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues Russian Federation www.worldec.ru COMMERCIAL SERVICES TRADE Value Annual percentage change 2007 20002007 Commercial services exports (million US$) 39 050 22 25 27 Commercial services imports (million US$) 57 805 20 16 32 2006 2007 Share in world total exports 1.19 2007 2007 Share in world total imports 1.87 296 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Definition (1) While trade policy traditionally dealt with trade in goods – generally physical products – an increasing amount of international trade today is in invisible, non-physical products or "services." 297 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Definition (2) The term "trade in services" applies to international transactions involving such diverse fields as retail sales, tourism, banking, insurance, transport, telecommunications, education, construction, and consulting engineering, among others. 298 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Definition (3) The delivery of services may involve the international movement of people, particularly highly skilled individuals who provide services that are intellectual output, such as advice to clients. 299 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Some Services Agreements (1) Articles on services could be found in… NAFTA, Treaty of Rome, OECD Code on transactions in current invisibles, and various sector specific arrangements like the Chicago Convention dealing with air traffic and various agreements relating to financial services and telecommunications) 300 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Some Services Agreements (2) As well, some services are commonly incorporated in goods which are themselves subject to border regulation under the GATT exposed photographic film, audio recordings, blue prints and legal documents. 301 8.1. Trade in Services – key issues www.worldec.ru Question: What are the barriers to cross-border trade in services? Barriers to trade in services are quite varied and depend on numerous local regulations. Crafting a services agreement was also complicated by the different ways in which services may be supplied internationally. 302 5.1. Trade in Services – Background www.worldec.ru Question: What are the barriers to cross-border trade in services? In some industries, it may be necessary for a company to set up a local office to supply some services (such as banking, or restaurants). So, market access in such cases is affected by restrictions on foreign direct investment. In other instances, specialized services, such as entertainment, may only be supplied by artists or musicians who must travel to another country for short periods of time to perform in concerts. Immigration laws or restrictions on work permits would be a barrier to the export of such services. 303 5.1. Trade in Services – Background Market Access (Article XVI) www.worldec.ru The following six policy measures inhibit services trade. They must be stated in their schedules in order to be permitted: limits on the number of service providers; limits on the total value of service transactions; limits on the total number of service operations or the amount of services supplied; limits on the number of persons employed in a particular service sector; restrictions on the type of legal entity through which a foreign service company may deliver its service (e.g., branches, joint-ventures, subsidiaries) 304 restrictions on foreign investment. 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Objectives Progressive liberalization of trade in services Promoting economic growth and development Increasing participation of developing countries 305 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Main Characteristics Liberalization not deregulation New definition of trade Relationship to domestic regulation 306 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Scope and Definition (1) Part I: Article 1 (Scope and Definition) Scope of application of the Agreement Definition of "trade in services" Cross-border supply Consumption abroad Supply through commercial presence Supply through the presence of natural persons Regulatory implications Sectoral coverage: all services 307 8.2. The GATS Coverage of the GATS (Article I) The GATS covers all internationally traded services except services supplied in the exercise of government authority (i.e., those supplied on a non-commercial basis and not in competition with the private sector —police, customs, etc.). The GATS negotiators identified a list of 12 service sectors and 49 broad categories with many sub-categories or activities (e.g., Business Services as a sector and "Computer and Related Services" as a category). The list of about 160 services used in the negotiations was based on a list developed by the United Nations called the Central Products Classification. 308 www.worldec.ru 8.2. The GATS The main service sectors included are: www.worldec.ru Business Services Communication Services Construction and Related Engineering Services Distribution Services Educational Services Environmental Services Financial Services Health Related and Social Services Tourism and Travel Related Services Recreational, Cultural and Sporting Services Transport Services Other Services - Services Not Included Elsewhere 309 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Coverage of the GATS (Article I) GATS rules apply to all levels of government (national, sub-national and municipal) as well as non-governmental bodies that operate through powers delegated by these three levels of government – e.g., independent agencies and commissions and self-regulatory bodies. In many countries, state and local governments are quite important in regulating many service industries so it was necessary to ensure that the disciplines that national governments assumed in an international treaty would apply to all levels 310 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru The commitment in relation to subnational governments formally is not so different from the commitment in the GATT. Article XXIV.12 of the GATT uses language that is very similar to Article I.3 of the GATS, except that only GATS refers to nongovernmental bodies and specifically defines the measures to which the obligations apply as including all levels of government and their delegates. 311 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Modes of Supply Mode 1. Cross-border Supply Services are supplied by firms in one country to firms or consumers in another country and neither the services supplier nor the firm or person consuming the service travels to the other's country (e.g., consultancy services supplied through international telephone calls, cargo transportation). 312 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Modes of Supply Mode 2. Consumption Abroad Consumers or firms in one country travel to another country to purchase or make use of services (e.g., tourism, education). 313 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Modes of Supply Mode 3. Commercial Presence Services are supplied through the presence of a commercial entity of one WTO member in the territory of any other member (e.g., banking, restaurants). In other words, a firm from one country sets up a business establishment in another country in order to supply services. Establishment can take various forms, including incorporation, branch, and joint-venture. 314 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Modes of Supply Mode 4. Presence of Natural Persons Services are supplied through temporary cross-border movement of persons (e.g., consultants, musicians or performers) from one country to another. This is also referred to as temporary entry. Temporary entry may be important for managers and specialized personnel to work at a commercial presence in a foreign jurisdiction. 315 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment The Principle The Exemptions 316 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru National Treatment (Article XVII) The national treatment obligation of the GATS only applies to services activities listed in a member's national schedules of commitments. It is also conditional; a country can maintain specific exceptions to national treatment for any service sector or subsector listed in its schedule. 317 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru National Treatment (Article XVII) If a sector or service activity is included in a country’s schedule, and there is no exception stated for it, the government is obliged to treat foreign services and service companies no less favourably than similar service suppliers. 318 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Market Access (Article XVI) Like national treatment, the market access obligation only applies to services that a country lists in its schedule, subject to the terms, limitations and conditions that it specifies in that schedule. 319 8.2. The GATS Progressive Liberalization (Article XIX) A fundamental aspect of the GATS is the principle of progressive liberalization. The GATS calls for further negotiations in five years that are expected to lead to increased market access. Future rounds of negotiations will try to improve the level of commitments undertaken by each WTO member and to increase and deepen the coverage of the service sectors and activities in each national schedule. The GATS is an important first step in liberalizing world services trade but few members agreed to improve access to their markets. Most members simply committed not to make their existing regimes more restrictive. www.worldec.ru 320 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Monopolies and Exclusive Service Providers (Article VIII, IX) Governments are obligated under Article VIII to ensure that monopoly service suppliers (such as telecommunications and other utilities in many countries) do not act in a manner that works against the mostfavoured nation principle. The obligation is intended to prevent monopolists or exclusive service suppliers (whose exclusive rights are authorized, established or otherwise protected) from abusing their power in the market where they are dominant when (and if) they compete in a market for another service (i.e. not the market in which they are321 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Financial Services This Annex defines financial services as including insurance and banking and financial services related to the issuing and trading of securities. It excludes central bank activities and these relating to social security and public retirement plans. It says that governments have the right to take measures such as those for the protection of investors, depositors and insurance policy holders, and to ensure the integrity and stability of their national financial system. The Annex itself imposes no obligations. 322 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Financial Services The negotiations on financial services resulted in market access commitments by 70 countries which came into effect in June 1999 as the Fifth Protocol of the GATS. Many members accepted new commitments including reduced limitations on foreign ownership of local banks and on the expansion of existing operations and commercial presence. Some developed countries also allowed greater access to their securities markets. However, most developing countries did not allow significant new market access in financial services 323 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Telecommunications The Annex recognizes the roles of telecommunications as a distinct sector of economic activity as well as its vital importance to the delivery of many other services. Its core obligations concern access to and use of “public telecommunications transport networks and services”. It requires governments to ensure that all service suppliers (in sectors in which a member has made specific commitments) are allowed access to, and use of public basic telecommunications, both networks and services, on a reasonable and non-discriminatory basis. Developing countries are allowed to place “reasonable conditions” on access to and use of telecommunications networks and services in order to strengthen their local capacity with the aim of increasing their trade in this 324 industry. 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Telecommunications The negotiations on basic telecommunications covered a broad range of services from telephone calls to mobile data services and teleconferencing. When the negotiations finished in 1997, countries that provided increased market access for various telecommunications services indicated so in their schedules. In addition, many members agreed to the disciplines in the Reference Paper on Regulatory Principles, in whole or in part, which sets specific standards for interconnection to networks, fair competition, transparent government regulation, among other obligations. 325 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Transparency Introduction Publication of all relevant laws and regulations Enquiry points Notification obligations Protection of confidential information 326 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Transparency (Article III) WTO members are obligated publish all relevant laws and regulation affecting trade in services, including those made by regional or local authorities, notify changes in their laws which significantly affect trade in services in a listed sector to the WTO (Council on Trade in Services) establish and maintain enquiry points within their bureaucracies to enable governments of member states to obtain information about regulations of general application, and international commitments related to trade in services as well as changes in measures which327 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Transparency (Article III) Governments are exempted from providing confidential information that could undermine or jeopardise law enforcement or legitimate commercial interests. 328 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Participation of developing countries Significance of developing countries Liberalization supports development Contact points Least developed countries 329 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Domestic regulation Appeals procedure Reasonable, objective and impartial administration of regulations Licensing, qualifications and technical standards Taking account of international standards Procedures to verify competence of professionals Development of new disciplines on domestic regulation 330 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Recognition Adequate opportunity to negotiate Obligation to notify Use of internationally recognized standards 331 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Monopolies and business practices Conformity with obligations and commitments New monopoly rights Consultations on business practices 332 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Safeguards, Government Procurement and Subsidies Emergency Safeguard Measures Government Procurement Subsidies 333 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Payments and transfers Current account transfers Capital account transfers 334 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Restrictions to safeguard the balance-of-payments Parameters for types of restrictions Notification and Consultation 335 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Exceptions General exceptions Security exceptions 336 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru General and Security Exceptions (Article XIII, XIV, XIVbis) (1) The GATS provisions on general and security exceptions allowing governments to pursue their national interests are perhaps the closest of all to their GATT equivalents. The general exceptions must not be applied as a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries or as a disguised restriction on trade in services. 337 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru General and Security Exceptions (Article XIII, XIV, XIVbis) (2) The allowable list of exceptions includes, among others, the protection of public morals and human, animal or plant life or health. It also contains provisions particular to services such as the prevention of deceptive and fraudulent practices, the protection of individual privacy in the handling of personal data, and equitable and effective taxation. 338 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru General and Security Exceptions (Article XIII, XIV, XIVbis) (3) The security exceptions state that nothing in the GATS requires a government to give information, or take action, against its essential security interests or to prevent it from carrying out its obligations under the United Nations Charter for peace and security. 339 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Services Schedules What is the significance of the services schedule? A country’s obligations – even in such fundamental respects as treating a foreign service supplier on the same basis as a national supplier – depend largely on the specific commitments it has made in its national schedule. As with other trade sectors, an individual country’s commitment to open markets in specific service sectors and the extent of such opening are the result of negotiations. The market access commitments of each country appear 340 in its Schedule of Specific Commitments. 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru What is contained in a service schedule? The services schedules are complex, and very different from GATT schedules, which consist of little more than long lists of numbers identifying different products and specifying a maximum import duty for each. 341 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru What is contained in a service schedule? A member’s GATS schedule is a document that lists: the services sectors, subsectors or activities subject to specific commitments, notably national treatment and market access ("listed sectors"), the extent of market access allowed for listed sectors (e.g., whether there are restrictions on foreign ownership), and any limitations on national treatment (whether some privileges granted to local companies will not be given to foreign companies) relating to 342 listed sectors. 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Specific commitments Schedules of Commitments Horizontal Commitments Commitments relating to Sectors and/or SubSectors Market Access National Treatment 343 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Part IV - Progressive liberalization Negotiation of specific commitments Schedules of specific commitments Modification of Schedules 344 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Part IV - The process of progressive liberalization in services Listing a services sector activities in a services schedule is a specific commitment to provide market access and national treatment for the service activity in question on the terms and conditions specified in the schedule. 345 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Part V - Institutional provisions Consultations Dispute settlement and enforcement Institutional provisions 346 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Part VI - Final provisions Denial of benefits Definitions Annexes 347 8.2. The GATS GATS: Annexes Introduction Permanent validity www.worldec.ru Air Transport Movement of Natural Persons Article II Exemptions Telecommunications Financial Services Temporary annexes Related instruments Decision on professional services Understanding on commitments in financial services348 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Financial services Background Activities covered Insurance and insurance-related services Banking and other financial services Interim agreement concluded by 28 July 1995 New negotiations concluded on 12 December 1997 349 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Basic Telecommunications Overview How basic telecommunications were defined How the negotiations evolved 350 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Telecom commitments (1) Market access Regulatory disciplines MFN treatment 351 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Telecom commitments (2) – Basic Services 352 8.2. The GATS GATS: Telecom commitments (3) – Enhanced or value-added services www.worldec.ru 353 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Movement of natural persons Background Concluded by 28 July 1995 Level of commitments 354 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Professional services (1) Activities covered Working Party on Professional Services Work programme: accountancy sector first ... ... then sector-by sector or horizontally? 355 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Professional services (2) Working Party: mandate Disciplines relating to market access Use of international standards Recognition of qualifications Fact-finding 356 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Rules Working Party on GATS Rules Emergency safeguard Government procurement in services Subsidies 357 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru GATS: Maritime transport Background Activities covered Questionnaire Draft model schedule of commitments To be concluded by 30 June 1996 ... suspended 358 8.2. The GATS www.worldec.ru Having looked briefly at the GATS one must remember that Uruguay Round services package is only a beginning. The GATS rules are incomplete and are untested and they will develop over time. If we compare the achievement of the GATS to the rules on goods, it is only a starting point as in 1947 when the original GATT agreement was signed, not the current GATT commitments by WTO members. 359 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. Why multilateral negotiations on trade in services were launched much later than negotiations on goods Pick up any sector or a sub-sector of services. Analyze the current stage of regulation of chosen sector in Russia (your country) Analyse modern trends of international trade in services. Take into consideration the following figures (volume, leading exporters, main importers, etc.). 360 6. Intellectual property rights and trade www.worldec.ru 6.1. The nature of IPRs 6.2. The TRIPs Agreement 361 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Overview What are intellectual property rights (IPRs)? The economics of IPRs protection The pharmaceutical debate 362 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru What is Intellectual Property? Intellectual property may be described as rights to intellectual creations that allow the owner of those rights to prevent others from gaining economic and other benefits from the creation. These rights can be thought of as a form of limited monopoly. The form of intellectual property protection varies depending on the type of intellectual property 363 6.1. What are IPRs www.worldec.ru Intellectual property is not like other goods. A piece of knowledge, whether the blueprint for a new machine or a new variety of wheat – unlike a physical object - can be used by one person without limiting its use by others. The widest possible dissemination of new knowledge or technology leads to the greatest efficiency. 364 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Intellectual property rights (IPRs) consist of two main branches Industrial property — This consists mainly of inventions, trademarks, industrial designs, and geographical indications; Copyright and related rights — This consists mainly of literary, musical, artistic, photographic, and audiovisual works. 365 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Two categories of IPRs IPRs that stimulate inventive and creative activities Patents, copyright, industrial designs, plant breeders’ rights, layout designs for integrated circuits, utility models, trade secrets IPRs that resolve information asymmetries Trademarks, geographic indications 366 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Patents Protect inventions that are new, non-obvious, and commercially useful Protection for 20 years, after which the invention moves into public domain Main users: All manufacturing industries Since the early 1980s: agricultural biotechnology, computer software, business methods 367 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Copyright and neighboring rights Protects the expression of an intellectual creation Protection lasts for the life of author plus 50-70 years Main users: Authors in literary, artistic, and scientific fields Performers and broadcasting organizations Producers of computer software 368 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Trademarks Words, signs, or symbols that identify a certain product of company Protection can endure virtually indefinitely provided they remain in use Main users All goods and service industries Of high importance for certain consumer goods Recent economic significance: Internet domain names 369 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Plant breeders’ rights Protect new plant varieties that are distinct from existing varieties, uniform, and stable. Exclusive sale and distribution rights for 15 years. But Research exemption Farmers’ privilege to reuse harvested seeds Main users: Plant breeders 370 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Components of an IPRs system Intellectual property laws National registries for patents, trademarks, and plant breeders’ rights Judicial system responsible for enforcing IPRs Treaties to promote international cooperation and facilitate registration of IPRs in more than one jurisdiction Control of anti-competitive practices 371 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Resolution of market failure Information (and knowledge) possess characteristics of public goods Non-rival in consumption Creators (typically) cannot appropriate new information 372 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Resolution of market failure If left to the market, there would be few resources devoted to the production of information, as competitors could take a free ride 373 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru IPR protection – two polar views: Proponents: more R&D, more FDI, more rapid economic growth Opponents: forestalled access to new technologies, higher prices and rent transfers High implementation costs? WTO+ commitments in the accession process? 374 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Patents: a second best solution Through time-bound exclusivity, creators of knowledge can charge prices above marginal costs and thereby recoup initial investment in generating information Second-best: because static market distortion But: decision-making decentralized and driven by profit motive Government can, in principle, fix the length of protection, such as to maximize social benefits and minimize associated economic costs 375 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Practical complications Lack of information on parameters needed to optimize scope of protection Optimal scope of protection differs across economic sectors, depending on the availability of other means to appropriate knowledge-generating activities (e.g., technology, first mover advantage, etc.) Patents and the diffusion of knowledge: Restrict imitation Disclosure of knowledge; tool for licensing 376 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru “If we did not have a patent system, it would be irresponsible, on the basis of our present knowledge of its economic consequences, to recommend instituting one. But since we have had a patent system for a long time, it would be irresponsible, on the basis of our present knowledge, to recommend abolishing it.” —Fritz Machlup (1958) 377 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Trademarks are different Market failure of asymmetric information Trademarks assure consumers that they purchase what they intend to purchase Trademarks thus offer an incentive to invest in reputation and superior quality Trademark protection can co-exist with competitive markets Protection is not time-bound 378 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru Practical complications Special case: status goods, which confer prestige on their owners (apart from any utility derived from their function and physical characteristic) Brand ownership can confer substantial market power to producers Should trademark protection also be considered as a tool to stimulate inventive and creative activities? 379 6.1. The nature of IPRs www.worldec.ru IPRs in open economies Basic asymmetry: Northern countries are both producers and consumers of intellectual assets Southern countries are mostly consumers of these assets 380 6.2. The TRIPs Agreement www.worldec.ru Transitional arrangements 1 January 1995: entry into force 1 January 1996: developed countries + non-discrimination (all Members) 1 January 2000: developing countries & economies in transformation 1 January 2006: least-developed countries (exceeded till 2016) 381 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS Overview Multilateral WTO Agreement, applicable to all existing and newly acceding Members General obligations: national treatment and mostfavored nation treatment Minimum standards of protection for all types of IPRs Obligations on the enforcement of IPRs Members can invoke the WTO’s inter-governmental dispute settlement system 382 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: flexibility Definition of novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness of patentable inventions Fair use exemptions in the area of copyright No obligation on the permissibility of parallel trade 383 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: flexibility TRIPS allows the use of compulsory licenses In case of emergencies, compulsory licenses can be granted without an attempt to obtain voluntary license from patent holder TRIPS permits “use exception” to allow generic producers to obtain market authorization prior to patent expiry No obligation on legality of parallel imports Members are free to impose price regulations 384 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: obligations Article 27: Patents to be awarded without discrimination among fields of technology Patents to cover both processes and products Patents to be protected for 20 years from the date of filing 385 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: obligations Article 39: Protection of undisclosed test data against unfair commercial use, where such data is submitted to regulatory authorities 386 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: obligations Developing countries without product patent laws have until January 1, 2005 to comply, but must, nonetheless, grant market exclusivity to pharmaceutical products Least developed countries were given until January 1, 2006 to comply. The Doha Declaration extended the deadline to January 1, 2016 for least developed countries 387 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru Doha declaration Background: Spreading HIV/AIDS pandemic in large parts of the developing world General concern that there may be conflicts between TRIPS and public health objectives Content: Confirms TRIPS flexibilities (political endorsement) Extension of implementation deadlines for LDCs Unresolved issue: compulsory licensing when manufacturing capacity is insufficient 388 6.2.The TRIPS Agreement www.worldec.ru IPRs in bilateral/regional FTAs New wave of US FTAs include IPRs provision that go beyond TRIPS: Concluded agreements: Jordan, Singapore, Chile, Central America, Morocco, Australia Currently under negotiations: Thailand, Dominican Republic, SACU, Bahrain 389 6.2. The TRIPs Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: Council for TRIPS Monitoring the operation of the Agreement Review of national laws and regulations Consultations Technical cooperation Forum for further negotiation 390 6.2. The TRIPs Agreement www.worldec.ru TRIPS: Cooperation with WIPO Agreement between WIPO and the WTO Notification of, access to and translation of national laws and regulations National emblems Technical cooperation 391 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. What is intellectual property? How is it addressed in the WTO? 2. Were intellectual property rights covered under GATT 1947? 3. What is the place of the TRIPS Agreement in the multilateral trading system? 4. What is the relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the pre-existing international conventions referred to in the Agreement? 5. Does the TRIPS Agreement apply to all Members? 6. Do Members have any obligations under the TRIPS agreement during the transition period? 392 Questions and Exercises www.worldec.ru 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Discuss the consequences of stronger intellectual property rights protection. What are the international conventions in the field of IPR protection? What is the role of WIPO in IPR protection? Does the TRIPS Agreement require all Member's rules on protection of intellectual property to be identical? Does the Agreement allow compulsory licensing of patents? 393 7. Trade and investments www.worldec.ru 7.1. National Regulation of FDI 7.2. International Rules on Investment 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO 394 7.1. National Regulation of FDI www.worldec.ru Investment is a significant form of international economic activity but is not yet the subject of comprehensive international rules. National regulation may take many forms ranging from prohibitions on FDI in some sectors to differential treatment of foreign investors. 395 7.1. National Regulation of FDI www.worldec.ru States may impose limits on ownership by foreigners or require approval of foreign investment. Approval may be required in all cases, for investments exceeding certain monetary thresholds or in certain sectors which are strategically important or economically or politically sensitive. Often national rules impose "performance requirements" as a condition of approving the investment. 396 7.1. National Regulation of FDI www.worldec.ru Types of Host State Performance Requirements: regarding the form of investment (e.g. only in a joint venture with a national firm); for local content in goods manufactured by the foreign investor; for local employment in the foreign investor's operations; limiting a foreign investor's right to import goods to the value of its goods exports ("trade balancing requirements"); 397 7.1. National Regulation of FDI www.worldec.ru Types of Host State Performance Requirements: to meet targets for export sales ("export performance requirements"); to produce certain products or sell in certain regions of the host country or elsewhere ("product mandating requirements"); and to transfer technology 398 7.2. International Rules on Investment www.worldec.ru More recently, developed countries, especially the United States and the European Union, have been actively negotiating bilateral investment treaties (BIT's). There have also been significant commitments entered into regionally such as in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and ongoing efforts to negotiate multilateral rules such as in the current negotiations to create a Free Trade Agreement for the Americas (FTAA) . In the WTO, commitments have been much more limited. 399 7.2. International Rules on Investment www.worldec.ru The OECD has long worked to strengthen international rules regarding investment. The 1961 Code on the Liberalization of Current Investment Transactions and the Code on the Liberalization of Capital Movements are binding instruments which limit the ability of OECD members to put in place measures interfering with the flow of FDI. Both codes are based on the principle of non-discrimination between domestic and 400 foreign investors. 7.2. International Rules on Investment www.worldec.ru Subject to certain exclusions and national reservations, the codes create a right for foreign investors to establish themselves in the member states of the OECD. As well, the 1976 Declaration on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises creates a national treatment obligation though it is not a binding commitment. Decisions of the OECD Council, which are binding, require that members give notice of any national measures inconsistent with national treatment. 401 7.2. International Rules on Investment www.worldec.ru The 1976 Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, part of the 1976 Declaration, adopt a different approach to international rules on investment, focussing on the concerns of host states with the behaviour of foreign investors regarding, for example, corruption, avoidance of domestic regulation, anti-competitive conduct and labour practices. 402 7.2. International Rules on Investment www.worldec.ru Beginning in 1995, the OECD sponsored negotiations on a Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) which would be binding on the 30 members of the organization and open for any other country to join. In draft form it contained a comprehensive set of investment rules, more elaborate and stronger than the rules in the standard BIT's and the NAFTA investment chapter discussed below. 403 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO www.worldec.ru While there is no comprehensive set of rules dealing with investment under the WTO, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) applies to services delivered through a commercial presence, meaning through FDI. The obligations under the GATS have not meant much improvement in market access for foreign investors. The main obligations applying to all services sectors are limited to MFN and a modest transparency commitment and even the MFN commitment is subject to a list of MFN exemptions for most 404 countries. 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO www.worldec.ru Members have committed to give foreign investors higher levels of market access and national treatment in certain sectors by listing these sectors in their national schedules. Even in these sectors, however, most commitments undertaken reflect only the degree of access permitted under existing national regimes at the time the commitments were entered into. To the extent that the ongoing negotiations on services in the WTO result in stronger commitments on commercial presence the GATS may become more important as an investment agreement. 405 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO www.worldec.ru Some rules in the WTO relating to trade in goods restrict the kinds of performance requirements that may be imposed by national governments in connection with their schemes of investment regulation. 406 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO www.worldec.ru Other types of measures relating to investment are inconsistent with GATT Article III or with Article XI, the prohibition on quantitative restrictions, such as: trade balancing requirements, restricting imports by a foreign investor of products to be used in, or related to, its local production by restricting the investor's access to foreign exchange to an amount related to the foreign exchange inflows attributable to the business ("foreign exchange balancing"), and restrictions on the export of products in terms of the volume or value of products produced locally. 407 7.3. Rules on Investment and the WTO www.worldec.ru The Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMS) agreement negotiated as part of the Uruguay Round makes clear that these sorts of investment measures are contrary to the obligations of GATT 1994 and are prohibited. Notwithstanding that the TRIMS agreement only states an already existing obligation, however, members are not required to eliminate non-conforming measures immediately. Each member has an obligation to notify such measures to the Committee on TRIMS, which was established under the agreement to monitor the implementation of 408 agreement, and to eliminate them over specified time Questions and assignment www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. 4. Describe the how foreign investment is regulated in your country What countries are the main investors and recipients of FDI What is the influence of FDI on the economy of the exporting and importing country What kind of measures related to FDI that inconsistent with the WTO rules uses Russia 409 8. Regional trade agreements (RTAs) www.worldec.ru 8.1. Scope of RTAs 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs 410 8.1. Scope of RTAs www.worldec.ru The vast majority of WTO members are party to one or more regional trade agreements. The surge in RTAs has continued unabated since the early 1990s. Some 250 RTAs have been notified to the GATT/WTO up to December 2002, of which 130 were notified after January 1995. 411 8.1. Scope of RTAs www.worldec.ru Over 170 RTAs are currently in force; an additional 70 are estimated to be operational although not yet notified. By the end of 2005, if RTAs reportedly planned or already under negotiation are concluded, the total number of RTAs in force might well approach 300. 412 8.1. Scope of RTAs www.worldec.ru Negotiations are taking place within the Negotiating Group on Rules (NGR) which reports to the Trade Negotiations Committee (TNC). The negotiating group is pursuing a twotrack approach: identifying issues for negotiation in formal meetings and; holding open-ended informal consultations on more procedural issues related to transparency of RTAs. 413 8.1. Scope of RTAs www.worldec.ru Regionalism is described in the Dictionary of Trade Policy Terms, as “actions by governments to liberalize or facilitate trade on a regional basis, sometimes through free-trade areas or customs unions”. In the WTO context, regional trade agreements (RTAs) have both a more general and a more specific meaning: more general, because RTAs may be agreements concluded between countries not necessarily belonging to the same geographical region; more specific, because the WTO provisions which relate specifically to conditions of preferential trade liberalization with RTAs. 414 8.1. Scope of RTAs www.worldec.ru RTAs can complement the multilateral trading system, help to build and strengthen it. RTAs are discriminatory: they are a departure from the MFN principle, a cornerstone of the multilateral trading system. Their effects on global trade liberalization and economic growth are not clear. Though RTAs are designed to the advantage of signatory countries, expected benefits may be undercut if distortions in resource allocation, as well as trade and investment diversion, potentially present in any RTA process, are not minimized, if not eliminated altogether. 415 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs www.worldec.ru When a WTO member enters into a regional integration arrangement through which it grants more favourable conditions to its trade with other parties to that arrangement than to other WTO members’ trade, it departs from the guiding principle of non-discrimination defined in Article I of GATT, Article II of GATS, and elsewhere. 416 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs www.worldec.ru WTO Members are however permitted to enter into such arrangements under specific conditions which are spelled out in three sets of rules: Paragraphs 4 to 10 of Article XXIV of GATT (as clarified in the Understanding on the Interpretation of Article XXIV of the GATT 1994) provide for the formation and operation of customs unions and free-trade areas covering trade in goods ; 417 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs www.worldec.ru Continued the so-called Enabling Clause (i.e., the 1979 Decision on Differential and More Favorable Treatment, Reciprocity and Fuller Participation of Developing Countries) refers to preferential trade arrangements in trade in goods between developing country Members; and Article V of GATS governs the conclusion of RTAs in the area of trade in services, for both developed and developing countries. 418 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs www.worldec.ru Other non-generalized preferential schemes, for example non-reciprocal preferential agreements involving developing and developed countries, require Members to seek a waiver from WTO rules. Such waivers require the approval of three quarters of WTO Members. 419 8.2. The WTO rules on RTAs www.worldec.ru Differential and more favourable treatment reciprocity and fuller participation of developing countries This decision by signatories to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT “CONTRACTING PARTIES”) in 1979 allows derogations to the most-favored nation (nondiscrimination) treatment in favor of developing countries. In particular, its paragraph 2(c) permits preferential arrangements among developing countries in goods trade. 420 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru 1. 2. 3. Analyze trade and investment flows between the leading regional organizations. What are trade creating and trade distorting effects? Case study: Mullavia 421 9. Trade and competition policy www.worldec.ru 9.1. Understanding of competition policy 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules 422 9.1. Understanding of competition policy www.worldec.ru Subjects of Competition Policy Horizontal agreements to fix prices or otherwise limit competition Abuse of dominant or monopoly position in the market Predatory pricing Vertical competition-restricting agreements Mergers Marketing practices which interfere with 423 9.1. Understanding of competition policy www.worldec.ru Competition policy and rules promoting trade and investment liberalization share a common objective: both are intended to promote competition, economic efficiency and consumer welfare. But trade rules also authorize certain types of government measures which will limit competition from foreign businesses in a domestic market, such as tariffs and duties imposed as a result of trade remedies actions, for example anti-dumping. 424 9.1. Understanding of competition policy www.worldec.ru Despite having a common objective, competition and trade rules have a different focus: trade and investment rules constrain government measures, while most competition rules constrain private behaviour. More generally, trade rules deal with the protection of producer interests, whereas competition policy is not concerned with the protection of producers to the exclusion of other market participants. 425 9.1. Understanding of competition policy www.worldec.ru Competition policy seeks to protect the competitive process itself in order to ensure that markets function efficiently which means taking into account consumer interests as well. This can result in conflicts between trade and competition policy. 426 9.1. Understanding of competition policy www.worldec.ru Question: Give the examples of the conflicts between trade and competition policy. 427 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Main WTO provisions dealing with Competition Policy Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) -Article 40 (Members' ability to take action against anti-competitive abuse of intellectual property rights) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) -Article VIII (Monopoly and exclusive services providers not to abuse market power) and -Article IX (State to state consultation on restrictive business practices) 428 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Main WTO provisions dealing with Competition Policy Trade Related Investment Measures Agreement (TRIMS) -Article 9 (Council on Trade in Goods to consider need for provisions relating to competition policy) 429 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Regional and bilateral agreements on competition policy Canada, the United States, the European Union and a few other developed countries have entered into agreements relating to investigation and enforcement in competition law matters. Typically such agreements require notification and consultation by the national competition authority of one state upon or prior to its initiation of a competition case affecting the interests of the other state in order to avoid conflicts and provide for cooperation. These arrangements are based on the principle of comity, meaning that in enforcing national competition laws each national competition authority will seek to take into account the important interests of other states. 430 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Question: Why would a multilateral agreement on competition policy be desirable? Trade policy arguments One of the concerns raised by trade policy experts in support of international rules on competition policy is the risk that as barriers to trade and investment created by government measures are diminished though the implementation of international agreements like the WTO they will be replaced with private barriers in the form of anti-competitive conduct. Competition rules are seen as a key complement to the privatization and regulatory reform occurring in many countries. In the absence of such rules, state monopolies may be replaced with private ones. 431 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Question: Why would a multilateral agreement on competition policy be desirable? 432 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Competition policy arguments The internationalization of commercial activity means that competition issues are increasingly international in character. Enforcing competition law rules against international cartels and other anti-competitive activities involving actors in multiple states requires cooperation and coordination among national competition agencies. Where anti-competitive activity takes place outside the national jurisdiction in which the effects are felt, the competition authority in that jurisdiction may need the assistance of the competition authority for the country in which the activity did take place, both to investigate the activity and to take enforcement action. 433 9.2. Competition policy and the WTO rules www.worldec.ru Differences in approaches to competition policy Compatibility with existing trade rules Challenges related to setting minimum enforcement 434 11. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 435 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru GDP per capita 436 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The WTO Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) is the major forum for discussion of environmental issues, although they are also discussed in other WTO bodies such as the Ministerial Conference, the General Council, and sectoral negotiating group. The WTO Secretariat organizes information programs on trade and the environment for developing countries. 437 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru How does the WTO deal with the environment in broad terms? The WTO has approached environmental issues within the context of two main themes: 1) the general relationship between trade liberalization and the environment; and 2) how specific trade rules relate to international environmental agreements together with the environmental protection 438 policies held by individual member 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru Many of the WTO agreements and official documents contain provisions relevant to the environment. These include: The Preamble to the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (the "WTO Agreement") The GATT Provisions on Non-Discrimination The GATT General Exceptions The GATS General Exceptions The SPS Agreement (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures) The TBT Agreement (Technical Barriers to 439 Trade) 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru Environmental Implications of NonDiscrimination Non-discrimination helps to prevent the misuse of environmental policies as disguised barriers to trade. National environmental policies can be as strong as governments wish but they must not arbitrarily discriminate between foreign and domestically made products, or between products imported from different 440 trading partners. 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru Like Products MFN prohibits discrimination between like products imported from different trading partners. National treatment prohibits the discrimination between like products produced domestically and those produced abroad. The WTO defines "like products" as products that are the same or equivalent. 441 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The test of equivalency has traditionally been based on the composition and characteristics of the end product. 442 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The WTO has not accepted processing methods and standards as a basis for discrimination even if the two processes result in products which are identical. They argue that governments should be able to discriminate against products produced using environmentally harmful processes in a number of cases brought to dispute settlement because of discrimination on the basis of environmentally harmful processes. 443 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The GATT General Exceptions The general exceptions, set out in Article XX, allow WTO members to adopt policies that would normally be inconsistent with GATT but which are necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or health, or if such measures are related to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources. Some environmental measures which would otherwise be inconsistent with the GATT may be permitted under these provisions. 444 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The Committee on Trade and the Environment (CTE) is responsible for studying the relationship between trade and the environment across all WTO agreements including commitments on goods, services and intellectual property. The CTE makes recommendations about changes that might be needed in trade agreements. 445 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The CTE has adopted two broad principles in its approach to environmental issues: 1) The WTO is only competent to deal with trade matters. Because it is not an environmental agency, the CTE only deals with issues that appear when environmental policies have a significant impact on trade. The WTO believes that other organizations with greater environmental expertise are better equipped to deal with specialized environmental questions. 446 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The CTE has adopted two broad principles in its approach to environmental issues: 2) Where problems are found, the solutions must be compatible with the principles of the WTO trading system. These principles are based on commitments to non-discrimination, transparency and progressive reduction of barriers to trade. 447 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The relationship between the WTO and international environmental agreements (1) In approaching potential conflict between trade and environment and, in fact, most issues, the WTO has a clearly stated preference for international cooperation on issues that are more than just national in scope. Consequently, the organization has thrown its support behind multilateral environmental agreements as a way to deal with regional 448 and global environmental problems. 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The relationship between the WTO and international environmental agreements (2) The WTO attempts to discourage unilateralism, i.e. where a state takes independent action to deal with a problem that may reach well beyond its borders. First, because the GATT/WTO system is commitment to the view shared problems are best dealt with through international cooperation. Secondly, unilateral environmental policies may be implemented in ways that clash with WTO's collective principles on trade. Unilateral action by a state may result in discrimination that violates existing trade 449 principles. 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru The WTO Committee on Trade and the Environment says that international environmental agreements are the best way to deal with environmental problems. Among the agreements are the Montreal Protocol for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, the Basel Convention on the trade or transportation of hazardous waste across international borders, and 450 the Convention on International Trade in 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru What does the principle of "lex specialis" mean to environmental protection? The CTE has speculated that the trade-related measures of an environmental agreement to which WTO members are signatories could be regarded as lex specialis, meaning that such measures would prevail over WTO provisions in the event of a conflict. 451 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 2) How should disputes be handled? If a WTO member has taken an action on trade under the provisions of a Multilateral Environmental Agreement and another WTO member complains about it, where should the dispute be heard? The CTE suggests that if both countries are signatories to the MEA, then they should try to settle the dispute within the framework provided by the MEA. Special difficulties arise when MEA trade measures are applied to WTO members who are not signatories to that particular MEA. 452 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 3) Eco-labeling Eco-labels provide consumers with information about the environmental impact of the product in terms of its production, processing, packaging or transportation as well as information regarding its consumer and post-consumer use (also called the product life-cycle). 453 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 3) Eco-labeling Eco-labels serve a number of purposes. They reward producers and suppliers for using environmentally friendly production practices and they give consumers an opportunity to express their environmental and social values in their purchasing decisions. As well, they may help to push producers toward better environmental stewardship. 454 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 4) Transparency One tool used by the WTO to improve transparency is the requirement that members notify the WTO about any new trade laws, actions, or decisions. The CTE is working together with the WTO Secretariat to compile information on trade-related environmental measures from its Central Registry of Notifications. 455 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 5) Exporting domestically prohibited goods The issue of domestically prohibited goods has been on the GATT/WTO agenda since the early 1980s. Essentially the problem is an ethical one involving the decision by some countries to export goods that cannot be sold in their home markets for health or environmental reasons. 456 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru 6) The relationship between trade liberalization and sustainable development The 1987 Brundtland Report, produced by the World Commission on Environment and Development coined the term sustainable development as a way to describe the interlinkage between human development and the environment. It is "development seeking to meet the need of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It aims at assuring the on-going productivity of exploitable natural resources and conserving all 457 species of fauna and flora." 10. Trade and environment www.worldec.ru Trade: · Causes pollution; · Encourages the rapid depletion of nonrenewable resources such as fossil fuels and minerals; and · Exploits renewable resources such as water, air, and forests beyond their replenishment levels. At the same time, the free trader has an equally skewed perspective on the effect of 458 environmental measures. Questions and assignment www.worldec.ru Assignment Describe negative and positive effects of international trade on the environment in Russia/your country 459 Questions and exercises www.worldec.ru Exercise Discuss the pluses and minuses of the WTO 460 Glossary www.worldec.ru tariff line (TL in the tables): a product, as defined by a system of code numbers for tariffs 461 www.worldec.ru 1.2. PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SYSTEM 462 1.2. Principles of international trade system www.worldec.ru Basic concepts underpinning modern trade agreements Non-discrimination: Most favoured nation (MFN) national treatment (NT) Transparency Due process Joint decision making 463 1.2. Principles of international trade system www.worldec.ru Non-Discrimination and Market Efficiency Non-discrimination helps to provide consumers with access to higher quality goods at better prices by improving the competitive conditions in domestic markets and improving the competitiveness of domestic firms. 464 1.2. Principles of international trade system www.worldec.ru Transparency means visibility and clarity of laws and regulations. In the GATT/WTO system transparency obligations require that all trade law and related decisions be made public and administered in a reasonable and impartial manner. 465 1.2. Principles of international trade system www.worldec.ru Why is transparency so important? For producers - transparency means secure, predictable rules for governing national markets for goods and services and helps to ensure equality of competitive conditions. For consumers - transparency ensures that all essential information is available to make informed decisions about quality, safety, and price. For investors - transparency contributes to a stable legal framework and a market environment that is secure enough to facilitate long-range investment planning. 466 1.2. Institutes of international trade system www.worldec.ru Due process — all aggrieved parties should have the right to have their grievances addressed on the basis of an open, rules based process. 467 1.2. Principles of international trade system www.worldec.ru Joint decision making and resolution of disputes — problems, conflicts, new rules, and other developments should be addressed jointly and cooperatively. 468