Isha Ray Energy & Resources Group, UC Berkeley isharay@berkeley.edu Waste not, want not Wastewater re-use for urban / peri-urban irrigation March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 1 “The sewer is the conscience of the city” (Victor Hugo, Les Miserables) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 2 The sewer is the conscience of the city 2 million tons of human waste dumped untreated in water bodies *every day* (UNESCO 2003) Lancet, v 368, 2006: Investments in sewer systems in 20th century led directly to massive reductions in mortality British Medical Journal 2007 poll: sanitation voted ‘greatest medical advance’ in 166 years Sanitation & collection / treatment of human waste is as critical to public & environmental health as is water supply (recognized by HPEC Report 2011 chaired by Isher Judge Ahluwalia) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 3 Indian cities treat very little of the wastewater they generate Access to improved sanitation in urban India, 2008: 54% Urban India generates >26 million liters of ww/day Official capacity to treat is 27% of that volume. In reality, (e.g.) Delhi treats less than 20% of its wastewater (HDR 2006) Cost of treatment types vary hugely; construction $15 - $75 /person and O&M $1 - $10 / person/year. Variation depends on technology, population density, climate, end-use (Nelson & Murray 2008). March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 4 This is true for most cities in most of the world Accra, Ghana. Photo: Ashley Murray March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 5 But partially treated wastewater is a valuable resource Biogas recovery Irrigation (food & non-food crops, with differences in quality of treated water; landscaping) Aquaculture Groundwater recharge; Streamflow recharge Industrial uses Therefore financial costs of treatment can be partially recouped (Murray, Ray & Nelson 2009) (also HPEC 2011 p53, tho’ irrigation not discussed) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 6 Urban & peri-urban agriculture needs water and nutrients QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 7 Sewage-fed aquaculture is well-known in Kolkata QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 8 Seasonal / vegetable crops are especially suited to peri-urban agriculture QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Photo: CGIAR March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 9 Why aren’t more cities designing their ww tx for re-use? 1) Planning: Usually compartmentalized (also HPEC 2011 p 62) ‘Waste’water systems -- when they exist -- designed for disposal, not for re-use. 2) Economic / environmental: does wastewater irrigation make sense for the city? For the farmer? IS IT WORTH IT? [Also: cost recovery? health risks? Consumer acceptance?] March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 10 A model of wastewater irrigation: assess, simulate, select Coupled performance assessment and optimization model for wastewater systems for re-use in agriculture (Murray & Ray WR 2010) Three steps: 1) Assess: performance of current agriculture in catchment area of city (with current level of irrigation) Simulate: multiple feasible re-use scenarios Select: optimal wastewater re-use design & scenario -- based on what is “optimal”. Make trade-offs *transparent* 2) 3) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 11 Pixian and its farm economy Peri-urban district in Sichuan province, south west China 25,000 m3/d wastewater, usually discharged untreated 127,000 farmers; average landholding < 0.5 acres 4 irrigation canals: Xuyan, Zouma, Baitiao, Jiangan Main crops: rice, winter wheat, rapeseed, fall vegetables, spring vegetables, cabbage, green onion, garlic, chuanxiong March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 12 Model results: freshwater can be saved by irrigating with urban wastewater QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 13 Model results: agricultural incomes benefit from wastewater irrigation Zouma irrigation system with conventional irrigation supplemented by wastewater: farm profits change between 0% and +13% Zouma irrigation system with conventional irrigation replaced by wastewater: farm profits change between -3% and +16% Head-tail asymmetry on canal system also declines March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 14 Financing could partially be covered by back-end users of sanitation For Pixian, regional farm profits could rise by $20 million / year with ww supplement (or treated water could be conserved for other purposes) This approach needs demand analysis of re-use as part of planning process, not afterthought Needs coordinated sanitation and irrigation planning - traditionally these are completely separated (Murray and Ray, JPER 2010) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 15 Wastewater re-use simultaneously addresses sanitation and irrigation Mainly a planning strategy for high-density urban areas where it’s feasible to collect and treat large volumes of wastewater Urban sanitation usually treated as disposal problem, not re-use opportunity Irrigation in urban periphery usually faces water shortage; “competes” with domestic needs Wastewater re-use is potential solution to *both* Hence: waste not, want not HPEC 2011: “…build synergies between urban & rural parts of the economy…” (p5) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 16 Wastewater re-use: barriers Monitoring and regulation are critical -- handling waste is hazardous Sewers (even if low cost sewers) have to be built to transport waste away towards treatment sites. It’s expensive to build sewers & treat waste Water & sanitation agencies have to be “decompartmentalized”. Possibly expensive. Definitely political. -- None of this is trivial -March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 17 Wastewater re-use: advantages On the other hand: 1. 4. 5. Significant public health benefits Significant urban environment benefits Can be achieved through low-energy treatment systems such as stabilization ponds Potential to reduce peri-urban water constraints Potential for partial cost recovery 6. Potential to “generate urban-rural synergy” 2. 3. (HPEC 2011, p22) -- And don’t forget Victor Hugo -March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 18 Wastewater re-use: conclusions Design for re-use, not for disposal (Murray/Nelson/Ray 2009) Consider the lack of wastewater infrastructure as an opportunity to design for re-use Assess, simulate, select: Conduct market analysis. Calculate the costs & benefits of alternative forms of wastewater treatment at the design stage (What is the user demand? How / how much to treat depending on end use? What do different sewer + treatment systems cost? Can water agencies adapt to unconventional strategies? ) March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 19 Thank you (and to my colleagues Dr. Ashley Murray, Dr. Kara Nelson) QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Photo: Kibera by breathedreamgo WW fed fish pond, Ghana. Photo: Ashley Murray March 25 2011 Cities Conference | New Delhi 20