PFOA/PFSA overview and regulations Jin Yang 6/17/2011 Outline History of PFOA/PFSA EPA regulations Replacements of PFOA/PFSA Conclusions PFOA/PFSA Chemistry ◦ PFOA CF3(CF2)nCO2X n=6 X=-H, NH4, etc. ◦ PFSA CF3(CF2)nSO2X n=7 X=F, OH, ONa, phosphate ester etc. Applications and unique properties Applications ◦ Surfactants ◦ Emulsifiers in fluoropolymers (C7F15CO2NH4) ◦ Building block for introducing Rf chain. Unique properties: ◦ Chemical inert and stable ◦ C8F17 is both hydrophobic and oleophobic. History of PFOA/PFSA issues 3M announced phase-out of PFSA in May 2000 ◦ Blood test results of 3M employees showed high level of PFSA (ppm level in manufacturing workers, ~3020ppb level in blood bank) ◦ EPA also concerned the PFOA EPA stepped in and other fluorine chemical companies were pressed to do the similar thing. Environment groups and state/local administration stepped in. EPA responses and actions PFOA/PFSA 2010/2015 stewardship program ◦ Voluntary base program ◦ Arkema, Asahi, BASF Corporation (successor to Ciba), Clariant, Daikin, 3M/Dyneon, DuPont, Solvay Solexis Participating companies: ◦ Submitted baseline year 2000 data on emissions and product content. ◦ Report annual progress toward goals and report progress in terms of both U.S. and global operations. ◦ Reduce 95% of PFOA/PFSA in 2010. ◦ Totally ban PFOA/PFSA in Dec. 2015. The power of EPA-TSCA TSCA (Toxic substances control act) ◦ It was established in 1976 ◦ Scope of TSCA: Manufacture in US (PMN-pre-manufacture notice) Import Blend/mixing Export from US ◦ TSCA not only apply in new chemicals but also apply in new applications of existing chemicals. PMN regulations Exempts of PMN (pre-manufacture notice): ◦ R&D only ◦ LV (Low Volume (<25,000lb/year)) ◦ Export only Fluorine-containing compounds are not entitled to be LV exempt. Anti-fluorine panic in US Halogenated compounds (flame-retard materials) had been strictly regulated by various environment groups and green movements such as cable manufactures, green building movement and furnish manufactures. There is totally ban fluorine compounds movement in US. Fluorine compounds are under attacked by different groups. What we can learn from US Be pro-active. ◦ Involving the regulations decision in the beginning. Be open mind. ◦ Don’t deny and defend some fluorine compounds are not health. Be scientific mind. ◦ Using solid scientific data/evidences to support the decisions. Do not be emotional. International regulations Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ◦ 2000 - OECD developed a Hazard Assessment of PFOS and Its Salts. ◦ 2006 - OECD released a Survey on the Production and Use of PFOS, PFOA, PFAS, PFCA, and related substances. ◦ 2006 - OECD held a workshop on PFCs and precursors and published a Workshop Report in 2007. International regulations United Nation's Economic Commission for Europe (ECE)on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) ◦ December 2005 - LRTAP parties agreed to consider PFOS as a persistent organic pollutant (POPs). ◦ 2006 United Nations ECE published a report on existing information on PFOSproduction, use, emissions and pathways to the environment United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) ◦ February 2009 - UNEP, in cooperation with U.S., hosted an International Workshop on Managing PFCs and Transitioning to Safer Alternatives International regulations Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) ◦ June 2005 - Sweden proposed the listing of PFOS and its precursors in Annex A of POPs. ◦ May 2009 - The production and use of PFOS and its salts, were restricted under Annex B. Read more information on the chemicals listed under Annex A and B. International regulations May 2009 - UN Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) ◦ Agreed to consider stewardship programs and regulatory approaches to reduce emissions and product content of PFAC and PFAS chemicals and to work toward their elimination , where feasible Expanding stewardship program Reaching out to other countries, especially to China Chinese fluorine chemicals companies are invited to join this stewardship program Deadline for phase out PFOA/PFSA is soon (Dec. 2015) EPA regulations The point view of EPA (PBT of PFOA/PFSA) ◦ Persistent ◦ Bio-accumulative ◦ Toxic ◦ In Dec. 2015 phase out of PFOA/PFSA totally. Regulations changed for F-polymers Fluoro-polymers are treated as normal polymers in term of EPA regulation polymer exempt is gone. Fluoro-polymer with CF3-CF2- chain length of 2 or more need file TSCA and PMN (pre-manufacture notice). PMN is not only required for manufacture in US but also for import from oversea. Long-chain perfluorinated chemicals Long-chain perfluorinated chemicals (LCPFC) are the targets by EPA EPA treats long chain perfluorinated chemicals as PBT. In Dec. 2009, EPA published actions plan on LCPFCs. ◦ Given the concerns with LCPFCs, it can reasonably be anticipated that continued exposure could increase body burdens to levels that would result in adverse outcomes ◦ TSCA section 6 provides EPA the authority to ban or restrict the manufacture, processing, and use of these chemicals Some exempts for PFOA/PFSA applications Since the critical roles of PFOA/PFSA in some industrials. So some industrials can continue to use PFOA/PFSA ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Imaging/photography Auto industrial Aero-space industrial Military applications Semi-conductor industrial Replacements of PFOA/PFSA Currently EPA are reviewing over 120 chemicals for PFOA/PFSA replacements. F(CF2)n- type compounds, n>=6 will be considered PBT like PFOA/PFSA C4F9- type compounds showed less toxic and shorter half-life time in environment. Approaches for PFOA/PFSA replacement Short perfluorinated chain: ◦ C4F9 or shorter than C4 Short perfluorinated chain with CH2 as linkage: ◦ C4F9CH2C4F8CH2◦ -(CF2)n(CH2)m-, n<=3 and m>=1 Conclusion PFOA/PFSA is Persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic. PFOA/PFSA will be totally phase out in Dec. 2015 Long-chain perfluorinated chemicals (n>4) will be strictly monitored by EPA. Short-chain perfluorinated chemicals will be the focus for future development.