Allocation-based Rate Structure

advertisement

Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on

Budget-based Water Rate

Structures

Paul D. Jones II, P.E.

General Manager, Eastern Municipal Water District

Presented February 20, 2014

Urban Water Institute www.emwd.org 1

Presentation Topics –

Budget-based Water Rate Structures

• What is a Budget-based Rate

Structure?

• What are its Unique Features?

How does they work? o Indoor Allocations o Outdoor Allocations o Pricing Signals

• Benefits and effectiveness of

Budget-based Rate Structures

• Defensibility of Rate Structure

• Summary www.emwd.org 2

What is a Budget-Based Rate Structure?

• Commonly Used Names: o “Allocation-based Rate Structure” o “Water Budget Rate Structure” o “Conservation-based Rate Structure” o “Sustainable Rate Structure”

Same Basic Rate Structure

• Creates an “Allocation” or “Water Budget” for each customer account based upon reasonable needs and efficient use.

• Uses Economic Incentives: Water is priced to customer lower for use within allocation – much higher for use over allocation

• Are there other types of rate structures that encourage conservation?? Yes , but Allocation-based structures have several unique benefits that facilitate high levels of water use efficiency.

www.emwd.org 3

Unique features of a Budget-based Rate

Structure

• Individualized: based on land use specific uses (indoor needs) and landscape needs (weather adjusted).

• Encourages Efficient Use Pattern: within allocation through a sharply tiered pricing system o Rewards efficiency o Communicates cost of water over-use

• Uses Fair Premise: those who overuse pay more, those who use only what they need, pay much less www.emwd.org 4

Unique features (cont’d.)

• Identifies Over-use customers: water bill functions as a “report card” – focus staff resources

• Provides Appropriate Nexus:

Revenue from over-use tiers reinvested in water use efficiency programs and higher cost supplies

Identifies excessive and wasteful water use

Provides target for efficiency www.emwd.org 5

How it Works – EMWD’s Individualized

Allocations

Allocation = Indoor Needs + Outdoor Needs (seasonal) + Variances

EMWD may also apply an Indoor and/or Outdoor Drought Factor

• Provides individualized allocations for a diverse customer base: o 80% of retail demand is residential o Old and new development o Variation in family size and irrigation area www.emwd.org 6

EMWD’s Indoor Allocation

Indoor Water Allocation =

(Household Size x Consumption per

Person) x Indoor Drought Factor +

Indoor Variances

• Indoor Use Allocations based upon: o 3 persons per household for single family residential o 60 gallons per person per day o 2 persons per household for multifamily residential o No indoor allocation for landscape customers o Variances available for additional occupants and special circumstances www.emwd.org 7

EMWD’s Outdoor Allocations

Outdoor Water Allocation =

[(ET x Conservation Factor x Irrigable

Area) + Outdoor variance] x Outdoor

Drought Factor

Outdoor Use Allocations Based on: o Evapotranspiration data collected for separate zones o Irrigated area:

 Estimated using parcel information, infrared aerial photography and field measurements

Measured in the field o Adjustment (Conservation) Factor Applied for landscaping type:

1.0 for accounts installed before 9/08

 0.8 for accounts installed 9/08 to 1/10

 0.7 for accounts installed after 1/10

ET Zones www.emwd.org 8

Clear Pricing Signal Based Upon Efficiency

• Tier 1: Indoor Use $1.62/unit * o Budget = Number of Persons x 60 Gallons Per Day

Within

“Allocation”

• Tier 2: Outdoor Use $2.96/unit o Budget = Landscaped Area and Evapotranspiration

• Tier 3: Excessive $5.31/unit o Up to 50% use in excess of Indoor and

Outdoor budgets

“ Overallocation”

Usage

• Tier 4: Wasteful $9.71/unit

Over 50% in excess of Indoor and Outdoor budgets

* One billing unit equals 100 cubic feet www.emwd.org 9

Rate Structure Funds Water Efficiency

Programs

• Residential Programs o Free Residential Survey o Turf Buy-back Program o Freesprinklernozzles.com

o Smart Controller Direct Install Program o High Efficiency Clothes Washer Direct

Install Program o Financial Incentives:

 Smart Controllers

 High Efficiency Nozzles

 High Efficiency Clothes Washers

• Commercial, Institutional, Industrial and Landscape o Turf Buy-back o Freesprinklernozzles.com

o Financial Incentives

 High Efficiency Nozzles

 Weather Based Irrigation Controllers

 Ultra Low and Zero Water Urinals

 Connectionless Food Steamers

 Air-Cooled Ice Machines

 Cooling Tower Controllers

 Dry-Vacuum Pumps www.emwd.org 10

EMWD Water Use Efficiency Results

Statewide Average: 198 GPCD

Baseline Average: 212 GPCD

2020 Compliance Target is 184 GPCD

25% reduction

155 GPCD www.emwd.org 11

What do these Water Use Efficiency

Efforts Translate To?

Annual Savings

• Residential Accounts o 30 gal/capita/day reduction o 16,085 af/yr savings

38,604 Mwh

5,724 tons/yr

C02e GHG

• Landscape Accounts o 0.8 af/acre/year reduction o 3,557 af/yr savings

8,536 Mwh

1,266 tons/yr

C02e GHG

Total Annual Water Cost Savings - $10,990,000

Total Annual Energy Cost Savings - $2,671,000

Note: Assumes MWD system Power rate of $136/af, Tier 1 untreated rate of $560/af (2012) www.emwd.org 12

Studying the Efficacy of

EMWD’s Budget-based Rate Structure

• Ongoing Study (first results reported in 2013):

“Average prices rose less than 4% under water budgeting, but would have had to rise 34% under flat rate pricing to achieve the same demand effect.”

• Controlling for the effects of inflation, the recent economic downturn and other water use efficiency programs, EMWD’s

Budget-based rate structure resulted in at least a 15% reduction in water use.

www.emwd.org 13

Legal Defensibility of Rate Structure

• A clear nexus between costs associated with levels of usage ( and over-usage ) and the rates charged for those usage categories is essential .

o Specific, detailed cost attribution by Tier(s) is most defensible. o Pricing differential between tiers should not be arbitrarily set to simply send a “pricing signal”

(ex. Tier 2 is twice the rate of Tier 1).

o Fixed expenses are best allocated to fixed

(meter) charges and the base volumetric tier(s) which all customers consume.

• Still provides substantial flexibility to agencies in rate design.

$ $

$ a g u s e

$ $ T2

T2

$ T1

T1

Costs Revenue www.emwd.org 14

Example: The IRWD Rate Model

• Irvine Ranch Water District pioneered the allocation-based rate structure in

1991 o Motivated by the drought in late

1980s

• Direct nexus between use and cost o Allocates costs funded by penalty tiers to the sales associated with the different levels of wasteful use

• Split between fixed and volumetric costs insulates IRWD from potential negative financial impacts of reduced water sales.

• Lower demands = Less highest cost water supply purchased

Tier

Low Volume

Base

Inefficient

Excessive

Wasteful

Cost Basis

Pumped Water

Melded Cost of

Budgeted Supplies

Imported Water

Tier 1 + 33% of

Programs/

Inefficient Usage

Imported Water

Tier 2 + 33% of

Programs/

Excessive Usage

Imported Water

Penalty Rate + 33% of Programs/

Wasteful Usage www.emwd.org 15

Summary

• Budget-based Rate Structures: o Encourage efficient use and is fair to customers o Communicate the value of water o Identify wasteful use of water – two way communication o Allows reinvestment in water use efficiency programs

• Can be designed to be legally defensible and still very effective.

• Such rate structures will be important in addressing the drought and demand management.

www.emwd.org 16

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

Contact Information

Paul Jones

EMWD, General Manager

(951) 928-3777 jonesp@emwd.org

www.emwd.org

Download