FEMA Region VIII/State of Utah Wasatch Range Catastrophic Earthquake Planning Region 8 Regional Response Team Meeting April 19, 2011 Project Leads • Planning Co-Leads – Mike Pendergrass – FEMA Region VIII michael.pendergrass@dhs.gov 303-235-4951 (office) 303-746-3640 (mobile) – Judy Watanabe – State of Utah, DHS • HQ FEMA Planning Lead – Sharon Blades 2 Wasatch Catastrophic Earthquake Planning Approach 3 The Collaborative Planning Team 15 Integrated Working Groups State Lead Planner FEMA Lead Planner ESF Representatives Technical Advisors (GIS, NWS, Modelers) Key Stakeholders (State, local and Federal) DHS Protective Security Advisor FEMA Subject Matter Experts (Mitigation, NPD, Logistics, Recovery) Private Industry (Airlines, shipping, retailers) Agency Representatives (State and Federal) Non Governmental Agencies 4 Participating Organizations Local Cities: Salt Lake City Sandy Brigham City South Jordan Park City Midvale Murray Taylorsville West Valley Counties: Salt Lake County Davis County Weber County Tooele County State UT Homeland Security Utah National Guard Transit Authority Unified Fire Authority Unified Police Department Water Conservancy District International Airport Federal DHS FEMA DOJ DOT EPA USFS GSA HHS USDA VA NORTHCOM NGB USACE WAPA NGO, VOLAG, Education, Private Industry ARC LDS Church Salvation Army University of Utah, Salt Lake Community College Utah Office of Education Utah Education Network All West Rocky Mountain Power Questar Qwest Tesoro Corporation Zions Bank 5 Draft Mission Statement The mission of the unified effort of the Local, State and Federal emergency response team is to support the needs and of the impacted areas by saving and sustaining human life, minimize suffering and stabilizing critical infrastructure hazards impacts associated with a catastrophic earthquake in the Wasatch Range of Utah. 6 7.0 Magnitude Earthquake Scenario 7 Major Earthquake History of the Wasatch Fault • At least 25 surface-faulting earthquakes (M7.0+) in the last 10,000 years • Average time between surface-faulting earthquakes on the five central segments (Brigham City to Nephi) is 300-400 years • Most recent larger earthquake was about 350 years ago on the Nephi Segment 8 Basin and Range Province • Salt Lake City is west of the Wasatch Range, which forms the eastern boundary of the actively extending Basin and Range Province. • Slow stretching of the Earth’s crust across this province produces small to large earthquakes on normal faults, such as the Wasatch fault zone. 9 Salt Lake City Segment 10 7.0 M Earthquake Scenario • A 7.0 magnitude earthquake hits the Salt Lake segment of the Wasatch front. • Shaking continues as long as 1 minute in some areas • Earthquake affects 80% of the population of Utah – Covering 120 miles from north to south • High chance for Aftershocks – Statistically, expect one 6.0 M and several 5.0 M within 72 hours 11 12 $70,000,000,000 In Damages and Losses Building Losses $35 billion in building-related losses 25% of the estimated losses were related to the business interruption of the region Largest loss sustained by residential occupancies which make up over 60% of the total loss Transportation Losses Inventory: $27 billion Economic: $948 million Utility Lifeline Losses Inventory: $7 billion Economic: $587 million 13 64,000 Buildings Collapse • Over 204,000 buildings moderately damaged – 38% of the buildings in the region • 82% of the completely destroyed buildings are unreinforced masonry buildings 14 Water Gas Power Life Lines Severed Electrical Power • 257,352 households without power • 8 electrical facilities damaged Water/Waste Water • 306,712 households without potable water • 3,319 breaks and leaks in potable water pipelines • 5 waste water treatment facilities damaged • 2625 breaks and leaks in waste water pipelines Natural Gas • 1 natural gas facility damaged • 98 breaks and leaks in natural gas pipelines Oil Systems • 45 breaks and leaks in oil pipelines • 8 oil facilities damaged Communications • 20 communications facilities damaged 15 Critical Facilities Damaged • Hospitals: 16 (of 39) damaged – Of the 5,713 existing hospital beds only 1,428 (25%) are available for use • • • • Schools: 105 (of 853) damaged EOCs: 25% damaged Police Stations: 4 (of 89) damaged Fire Stations: 18 (of 212) damaged 16 Transportation Impacted • Salt Lake City International Airport – Major damage to all runways, ramps and taxiways – Damage to terminals 1 and 2 • Major highways damaged making ground transportation difficult and impacting egress and traffic around the city – Severe damage to sections of I-80, I-15 and I-215 • Bridges – 140 damaged beyond repair – 469 moderately damaged • Railways – Rail lines twisted and severed in several areas; rail yards damaged 17 161 Fires • Following the earthquake – 161 ignitions that burn about 7.62 sq. mi – Burn about $1.8 billion of building value 18 97,700 Households Displaced • 62,000 people seek temporary shelter in public shelters • Over 200,000 seek shelter on their own 19 Planning Objectives 20 Whole Community - Core Capabilities These core capabilities represent the highest priority essential functions necessary for both saving and sustaining lives, and stabilizing the site and the situation within 72 hours. The first six “enable” a rapid and effective response, while the remainder explicitly address the needs and priorities of the people and communities impacted by the catastrophic event. ENABLES RESPONSE • Situational Assessment • Public Messaging • Command, Control, & Coordination • Critical Communications • Environmental Health & Safety • Critical Transportation SURVIVOR NEEDS • On-Scene Security and Protection • Mass Search and Rescue Operations • Health and Medical Treatment • Mass Care Services • Public & Private Services & Resources • Stabilize and Repair Essential Infrastructure • Fatality Management Services 21 Planning Objectives • Utah Catastrophic Earthquake Planning Objectives were grouped into four separate but overlapping areas of response: – Coordination and Communications – Emergency Services – Health and Human Services – Infrastructure 22 Emergency Services 23 Planning Objectives Emergency Services : • Establish Air Operations to assist with situational awareness to support federal, state, and local response operations • Conduct specialized search and rescue operations for 1,500 survivors within the impacted area. • Reduce Hazards: Suppress Fire, Contain Hazardous Materials – Provide fire response capabilities to address 161 structural fires within the impacted area within the first 72 hours. – Support response operations to one (1) damaged natural gas facility and area support to 98 damaged natural gas line breaks – Support response operations to eight (8) damaged oil processing facilities and area support to 45 damaged oil line leaks 24 Planning Objectives Emergency Services (cont’d): • Conduct Safety Assessments including priority building inspections and environmental monitoring – Provide Conduct safety assessments on priority buildings to include a total of 204,000 damaged structures; including 16 hospitals, 105 schools, 4 police stations, and 18 fire stations. – Perform safety assessments of the impacted area through environmental monitoring. • Safety, Security, and Support for Response Operations 25 Infrastructure Infrastructure 26 Planning Objectives Infrastructure: • Stabilize, Assess, and Prioritize Utilities for Critical Infrastructure (e.g. Water/Wastewater, Power, Communications & Natural Gas) • Establish Lines of Supply: Air, Rail, and Roads • Supply Emergency Food, Water and Sanitation Needs for the general public and Response Operations • Establish and Maintain Emergency Power and Fuel Lines of Supply • Conduct Debris Clearance to support Response Operations 27 Selected Key Planning Issues 28 29 30 31 Current Planning Status 32 Current Planning Status Major Meetings Held: • Project Kickoff – May 2010 • CPT – June 10, 2010; August 12, 2010 • SLSC – July 20, 2010 • IWGs for Planning Assumptions and Objectives – August – September 2010 (15 meetings, over 251 stakeholders) • ESF 6 Strategies Workshop March 1, 2011 • Resources and Shortfalls Workshop – March 2-3, 2011 • HQ FEMA Information Analysis Briefing – 1 April 2011 33 Plan and Exercise Calendar of Events April 2011 Information Analysis Briefing to SLSC May 2011 Utah ShakeOut Logistics Tabletop Exercise (TTX) June 2011 Catastrophic Mutual Aid Plan (CMAP) TTX June - August 2011 Course of Action (COA) Workgroups July 11-14, 2011 Regional Interagency Steering Committee Meeting (SLC) and Command, Control and Coordination COA November 2011 Draft Catastrophic Earthquake Plan complete December 2011 Utah ShakeOut Plan Validation TTX January 2012 Plan Briefing to HQ/SLSC January 2012 Utah ShakeOut Senior Leadership TTX February 2012 Finalize and distribute plan April 17-19, 2012 Utah ShakeOut 2012 Functional Exercise June 2012 Utah ShakeOut Recovery TTX Green – Plan development Blue – Exercise series 34 COA Workgroups Work Group Schedule Purpose: Develop the concept of operations for each of the key objectives – Who does what, when? Format: – Workgroups based on the 13 core capabilities – Each with a 2 to 3 day workshop Goal is to complete the draft plan in November 2011 Utah ShakeOut TTX May, 2011 APR Info Analysis Brief to SLSC Apr 2011 MAY June 1-3 Public Messaging June 13-14 Critical Communications June 15-16 Environmental Health & Safety June 21 On Scene Security and Protection June 22-23 Critical Transportation June 28-30 Mass Search and Rescue July 6-7 Command, Control & Coordination July 13-14 Mass Care Services July 19-21 Public & Private Services/ Resources July 26-28 Stabilize/Repair Essential Infrastructure Aug 2-4 Health and Medical Treatment Aug 15-16 Fatality Management Aug 17 Plan Validation TTX Dec 2011 CMAP TTX Jun 2011 JUN Situational Assessment JUL COA Workgroups Jun – Aug 2011 AUG SEP OCT NOV Draft Plan Complete Nov 2011 Senior Leadership TTX Jan 2012 DEC Plan Brief to SLSC Jan 2012 JAN Utah ShakeOut Functional Exercise Apr 17-19, 2012 FEB MAR Finalize and distribute plan Jan 2012 APR Recovery TTX Jun 2012 MAY 35 JU Questions 36