“Mind the trap”: Mindfulness Practice Associated with Reduced Cognitive Rigidity Jonathan Greenberg Under the supervision of Prof. Nachshon Meiran Learning from experience is often crucial for our adaptive functioning and survival May experience hinder adaptive responding? Rigidity “…The tendency to form and perseverate in the use of mental and behavioral sets” (Schultz & Searman, 2002, pp. 1) Rigidity may play a key role in psychopathology: Suicidal Ideation Depression Mania Eating disorders OCD Alcoholism ADHD A method for decreasing such rigidity may be of value regarding treatment of these and other conditions Mindfulness Practice “Paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment and non-judgmentally” (Kabat-Zinn, 1994) Mindfulness associated with alleviation of symptoms in: Suicidal tendencies Depression Mania Eating disorders OCD Alcoholism ADHD Psoriasis PTSD Chronic pain Cancer Heart desease GAD Mindfulness and cognitive rigidity: Stroop Task Nonsensical sentence completion (Hayling task) Verbal fluency The present study Rigidity Mindfulness practice Overcoming recently formed habits Hypothesis: Mindfulness meditators will exhibit lower levels of rigidity than non-meditators, due to more of a “Beginners mind”. Participants 12 Long term mindfulness meditators 9.32 years of practice on average Practicing 4 hours a week on average 13 “Pre-meditators” Non-meditators who are registered for their 1st mindfulness retreat Equivalent in age, academic degree, academic abilities (PET score) Eisntellung water jar task: “Please solve the following problems. Try to solve rather quickly, yet make sure you use the shortest and simplest solution”. (Luchins, 1942) Eisntellung water jar task 6 “set” trials 3 “critical” or “trap” trials 2 “extinction” trials Rigidity score - 1 point for each: Long solution on a “critical” or “extinction” trial “Extinction” trial solved in more than 90 seconds RESULTS Covariate means: Age: 33.23077 Rigidity Scores (p<0.01) 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 Rigidity scores 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 Pre-Meditators Long term meditators Group Long term meditation associated with reduced rigidity Willing and able to let go of habits, and utilize alternatives when appropriate Mindfulness and treatment of psychiatric symptoms Many conditions characterized by a stereotyped or undifferentiated view of the environment “Things always go wrong”’ “There is no other way” “The world is dangerous, I must always be alert and prepared” Need for “un-learning” thought patterns and responses Current Work Randomized experimental study design 8 week mindfulness intervention Participators vs. waiting list Pre-intervention: Alphabet maze Post-intervention: Water Jar task Alphabet maze (Cowen, Wiener, & Hess, 1953) Thanks: Prof. Nachchson Meiran Thank you for listening Self reported measures Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory Scores Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale Scores Current ef f ect: F(1, 16)=7.7034, p=.01351 Current ef f ect: F(1, 17)=10.596, p=.00466 4.1 44 4.0 42 3.9 3.8 MAAS Score FMI Score 40 38 36 34 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 32 3.1 3.0 30 Pre-Meditators Meditators Group Pre-Meditators Meditators Group C orrelat ions (Real Luc hins) Marked correlat ions are s ignif icant at p < . 05000 N =18 (C as ewise delet ion of mis s ing dat a) Variable Means St d. Dev . R ןgid ity Sco re FMI Score MAAS Sc ore R igidity Sc ore 1.61111 1.851514 1.000000 -0. 011909 -0. 145565 FMI Score 37. 27778 8.151547 -0. 011909 1.000000 0.660686 MAAS Sc ore 3.50333 0.750075 -0. 145565 0.660686 1.000000 Hayling Task “Please complete the sentence with an unrelated, nonsensical word as quickly as possible”: “The captain decided to stay with the sinking…” Paperclip? (e.g Heeren,Van Broeck, & Philippot, 2009) Stroop Task: “Please name the colour of the ink”: Congruent Condition Green Yellow Red Blue (Moore, & Malinowski, 2009) Incongruent Condition Green Yellow Red Blue Verbal Fluency “Say as many words as you can think of beginning with the letters F, A, and S” (e.g Zeidan, et al, 2010; Heeren,Van Broeck, & Philippot, 2009) Not Forming sets, or better in overcoming them? Current ef f ect: F(1, 17)=2.0780, p=.16760 1.05E5 1E5 95000 Solving Time 90000 85000 80000 75000 70000 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 1st set RT last set RT Set Trial Position Pre-meditators Meditators