Samuel Herbert Nsubuga
Chief Executive Officer
Torture Victims ceo@actvuganda.org
HEAD OFFICE, KAMPALA Block No. 39, Plot No. 113Owen Road (Off Tufnell Drive),Kamwokya
P.O. Box 6108 Kampala, Uganda Tel: +256 312 263918/ 312 263620 Fax: +256 312 263 919
Email: actv@actvuganda.org
Web: www.actvuganda.org



African Centre for Treatment and
Rehabilitation of Torture Victims (ACTV) is a
Non-Governmental Organisation in Uganda dedicated to the promotion and protection of human rights with emphasis on the treatment and rehabilitation of survivors of torture .
ACTV commenced operations in 1993 and has two out-patient Medical centres, one in
Kampala-Central Uganda and the other in
Gulu-Northern Uganda.
2



ACTV provides Holistic care to Torture Survivors, both Ugandans and Refugees, which entails physical treatment ,psychological treatment, psycho-social counselling, nursing care and legal advice. We also make referrals for specialized treatment and legal redress to our partners, health institutions regarding the former and
UHRC regarding the latter , for example.
Our holistic team includes Doctors, psychologist, counsellors, physiotherapists, social workers, nurses and legal officers.
3



ACTV is one of the 145 torture treatment centres across the globe accredited to the
International Rehabilitation Council for
Torture Victims (IRCT), a global network in 74 countries.
ACTV is also the Current Chair of the
Coalition Against Torture (CAT), a grouping of nine Civil Society organisations who together with the Uganda Human Rights
Commission collectively advance Anti-Torture causes in Uganda.
4



The Coalition Against Torture (CAT) was set up in
November 2004 as an initiative of Civil Society
Organisations in Uganda whose overall goal is to enhance the capacity of Human Rights organisations to effectively advocate for Human
Rights using reliable and systematically collected data.
Uganda being party to the International legal instruments which outlawed torture and made freedom from torture a non-derogable right felt that it needed to go the extra step to domesticate the Anti-Torture legislation and hence the birth of CAT to lead this process.
5



The common adage that “ Prevention is better than Cure” comes into play critically in the work ACTV does. The seven year journey since CAT was formed was basically to criminalise Torture in Uganda by having an
Anti-Torture Law in Uganda.
This process included sensitisation of various stakeholders, most importantly in the Justice,
Law and Order Sector (JLOS).
6



These institutions include but are not limited to the Uganda Police, who still lead the list of perpetrators[see UHRC Annual reports over the years), the Uganda Peoples Defence
Forces, the Uganda Prisons Service and all levels of the Judicial system.
The Executive and the Parliament of Uganda were also sensitised in this period with the latter having the mover of the Prevention and
Prohibition of Torture, 2010 bill, Hon. Wilfred
Niwagaba coming from its midst.
7



The Prevention and Prohibition of Torture,
2010 bill was passed by the Parliament of
Uganda on April 26 th 2012 and now we await its assent by the President in order for it to become law.
Over the last seven years before this momentous achievement ,the Bill has been disseminated to the various stakeholders outlined earlier. The provisions in the Law will go a long way in Preventing occurrence of
Torture by the would be perpetrators.
8




Internationally Criminalizing torture and affirmation of the non- derogable nature of this right with strong deterrent penalties up to life imprisonment.
Expounds the offense of torture beyond state actors to include non-state actors.
Emphasizes Individual responsibility for perpetrators for the offense and resultant reparations.
9





Places responsibility for Rehabilitation services on the state. Currently, the Civil Society organisations perform the bulk of treatment and rehabilitation of Torture survivors.
Provides no Amnesty for Offense of Torture
Makes all evidence obtained through torture inadmissible in court.
Places Jurisdiction of the offense of Torture in
Chief Magistrate’s Court for wider Court coverage.
10





Human Rights Awareness of all the Citizens to empower them so that they know this vice and their freedom from torture.
Encourage forwarding Torture complaints to the Uganda Human Rights Commission.
Training of Security Agencies, Media, Health
Workers, Community leaders about the
Concepts of Torture , its effects and the legal framework is also a prevention mechanism.
Activism: Press releases, reports, use of international and regional mechanisms.
11




The protracted nature of sensitising and disseminating the Anti-Torture bill to various stakeholders mentioned above required large financial outlay, one of the major reasons why it took over seven years for it to be passed by Parliament. Two benchmark visits by the MPs to
Burundi and Philippines fully funded by Development
Partners formed the bulk of the funds required.
Financial support from the arms of Government was negligible stalling the process of passing the bill.
Specialised Medical Treatment is financially prohibitive, that is surgical operations, and hence many a time, clients are not treated because of this funding gap.
12




Being that now the Anti- Torture legislation is in place, the three arms of Government, Executive, Judiciary and
Legislature should consciously create awareness of Torture prevention measures which are clearly spelt out in the Bill to the Public or facilitate the dissemination of the same by providing funds for this important activity. They should commence with disseminating to their respective institutions.
The time is now to put all that is needed at the various arms of government so that implementation of the law is effective and this requires funds for this exercise budgeted for.
Rehabilitation of survivors of Torture should also be consciously included in the Workplans and budgets of the hospitals and health centres.
13


The Grassroots, or the Public in general and the Survivors of Torture in particular should have been involved more in developing this
Anti-Torture legislation. There may be some issues which we, the CSO’s and Government may not have captured to make it a better document.
14


Achieving the positive result of having the
Anti-Torture Bill passed was first of all making sure we created avenues of engagement with all the stakeholders mentioned especially in areas of Training and
Awareness raising about the Bill. Constant and constructive engagement with the Police,
Army, Prisons, Executive, Parliament and
Judiciary made the difference.
15



Secondly, having a champion come forward, in this case, Hon. Wilfred Niwagaba, to front the bill also was a plus. Being that the bill was passed with minimal debate also illustrated that the dissemination and sensitisation of the MPs was thorough.
Thirdly, the Uganda Human Rights Commission should be mentioned here in that they were extremely forthright and focused towards attaining this Anti-Torture legislation and the Annual reports which always illustrated Torture as the top Human
Rights violation would back them to pursue this cause to its logical conclusion.
16



A National Human Rights Commission which has rapport with the Government would be an excellent starting point. Take note that it should have teeth to inform government that it is not abiding to the international Human Rights standards and be firm to tell them to correct their ways.
Constructive engagement of the Civil Society
Organisations and the National Human Rights
Organisations with the Security agencies who are usually the main culprits and try not to have a blame game.
17

Conclusion
In a nutshell, with the collective voice and support of the respective National Human
Rights Organisations, the Civil Society organisations and the Governments,
Prevention of Torture on our beloved continent would go a long way in putting us on the path to a “ World free from Torture”
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR LISTENING!
18