IMPLEMENTATION OF HEALTH CARE PROGRAMMES B.V.L.NARAYANA RAILWAY STAFF COLLEGE STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION • • • • • • • DEFINITIONS KEY MESSAGES ROLE OF PROGRAMME CHARACTERISTICS RESOURCE GENERATION RESOURCE MOBILISATION RESOURCE UTILISATION MONITORING, EVALUATION, COURSE CORRECTION • MODEL • CONCLUSION Health indices comparison Indicator name Av. Value for India Lowest in any state Highest in any state Infant mortality rate 58 13( Manipur ) 76 ( Madhya Pradesh) Maternal mortality ratio 301 110 ( Kerala ) 517( Uttar Pradesh) Institutional deliveries ( %) 40.7 12.2 (Nagaland) 99.5( Kerala) Full ANC check up ( %) 50.7 16.5 ( Bihar) 96.5 ( Tamil Nadu) Children fully immunized 43.5% 80.8 % (TN) 20.1( Nagaland) Children breastfed at birth 23.4 % 7.2% (UP) 65.4(Mizoram) Children underweight ( < 3) 45.9% 22.6 (Sikkim) 60.4 (Madhya Pradesh) Utilization of government facilities by poorest 37.9% 19.4% ( Bihar) 55 % ( Karnataka) Source: Health profile of India 2006 Motivation Developed countries INDICATORS Developing countries India ( average) India (highest) India (lowest) 9 100 58 76 13 13 114 95 130 19 3 41 46 60.4 22.6 40 630 301 517 110 5 40 27 NA NA 31 164 6.8 NA NA Full ANC % 97 65 50.7 96.5 16.7 Safe deliveries % 98 45 40.2 99.7 12.2 Children fully immunized % 90 60 43.5 80.8 20.1 NA 32 23.4 60.4 7.2 IMR(/ 1000 live births) <5 MR(/ 1000 live births) UNDERWEIGHT % MMR ( / Lakhs births) Deaths due to TB( / Lakhs population) Deaths due to AIDS(/ Lakhs population) INTERVENTIONS Children breast fed % Source : National health profile 2006, based on NFHS 3(2005-06) Comparison of health indices state <5 MR Malnutrition MMR Andhra Pradesh 88 37 195 4.6 Kerala 19 26 110 4.3 Karnataka 77 44 228 5.7 Tamil nadu 69 36 134 2.2 Punjab 67 29 158 4 Gujarat 84 44 180 3.8 Haryana 91 33 162 3.6 Maharashtra 65 51 149 4.3 West Bengal 69 47 194 3.9 Madhya Pradesh 116 57 379 3.7 Bihar 84 55 371 2.7 Uttar Pradesh 112 53 517 2.7 Rajasthan 107 52 445 3 Orissa 130 55 358 4.5 India 95 46 301 %TB deaths 3.8 Motivation • Disparity in distribution of mortality and morbidity – Between developed and developing countries – Between states in India • Conditions preventable • Proven cost effective interventions available • Common health care programmes • Why the disparity in India Motivation • India and other developing countries • Investments and funding (Bajpai, Dholakia and Sachs 2006; CMH 2001) •Mediated through good governance (Wagstaff and Claeson 2004 ) –Institutional factors (NCMH 2005; Wagstaff and Claeson 2004) Implementation is one of the key issues –Service delivery mechanisms (Bajpai and Goyal 2001; Mavalankar 1999; Seshadri rao 2001; Wagstaff and Claeson 2004) INDIA THE CONTEXT • Contributes to 20% of worlds mortality and morbidity • High variation in mortality and morbidity • Last 60 years – Gap between intention and reality – Unfocussed infrastructural development – Lack of a good referral system – emphasis on centrally driven and controlled vertical disease specific programs • Communicable diseases contribute 50% of burden (NCMH 2005) INDIA THE CONTEXT • National health policy(2002) ; By 2010 the goals stated to be achieved are ( sujata rao 2004): • increase public investment from 0.95 of GDP to 23% of GDP • increase utilization of primary care facilities from 19% to 75% • reduce MMR(maternal mortality ratio) by 75%( from 540 to 135) • reduce IMR( infant mortality rate from 62/1000 to <30/1000 • eradicate polo, eliminate leprosy • reduce deaths due to TB and malaria by 50% Concepts • Implementation of strategy (Wheelen and Hunger 2001). – “the process by which strategies and policies are put into action through the development of programs, budgets and procedures” • Policy Implementation – actions by people that are directed at achievement of objectives set forth in the policy decision (Van meter and Van Horne 1974). Characteristics ( Hrebiniak and Joyce 2001) – Is a dynamic, non linear process – Multiple variables interacting, reciprocal causality( Fajourn 2000) – Takes time (Miller 1997) – for effect, for study Literature review Health care • Millions saved (what works group, CGDEV 2006) – – – – Study of 20 successful program implementations Identified policy level factors Program characteristics influence implementation No pattern of association of success in implementation with socio-economic contexts – Even in weak policy environments effective implementation is possible • Secondary analysis shows role of community involvement DEFINITIONS • Implementation is defined – as the process of allocation of tasks – and resources and – creation of administrative mechanisms to monitor and integrate actions required to – achieve the objectives of program/strategy, including those which cross organizational boundaries. • Is a process– Sequence of events, actions and activities unfolding over time in a context ( Pettigrew 1997) Scope of research Inputs Process Action planning Output Corporate strategy Business strategy Policy Program Influencing Process factors characteristics Health Policy Health care Program Influencing Process factors characteristics Budgeting Action Outcomes Process outcome Program outcome Process outcome OPERATIONAL FRAME WORK Program outcome Task organization • Programme characteristics – Type of goods/services planned – Organization of service delivery • Inter-linkages among components • Key steps in process – Technology used for service delivery – Implementation organization High Requirement of intensity of resource Low High Intra organisation coordination Low health AIDS Condom use AIDS fertility Mental health RCH Vector control ORS CANCER Iodine Vitamin deficiency A deficiency measles NLEP II TB Blindness control ICDS IDSP Small pox Low Intensity of interactions Low Intersectoral coordination High High Task organization • Based on the degree of intangibility, a service good can be classified as: – search goods where the customer can test it or get information about it before deciding to buy e.g. : a test drive of a car – experience goods where the customer has to experience the service before you can make an opinion about it e.g. a meal in a restaurant – Credence goods where even after purchase you are not sure of the quality of the service—e.g. health care service. • relationship between the service provider and the customer becomes important and need to be incorporated in service delivery strategy (Susan Segal horn 2001). Task organization • How will service delivery be done • What activities are components of it • Who will do these activities and whose control are they under • What technology will be used to do it • Interrelationships among activities – – – – Determines Determines Determines Determines criticality dependencies coordination costs nature of governance mechanisms • Identifies the implementation organization Comparison of programmes Characteristic NBCP RNTCP NVBDCP RCH Number of components Two One Two Four Technology used Mediating Long linked Intensive Long linked + intensive Dependencies within group Pooled Sequential Sequential Reciprocal Dependencies across group None None Reciprocal Reciprocal Components under direct control All All One Varying levels Control mechanisms Financial incentives Cooperation, material incentives-skills Cooperation Cooperation, financial incentives in some cases Key resources Surgeons LT,MO MO,LT MO, FHW, specialists Mechanisms to get alternate resources Pooling, contracting Community provision, contracting Community provision, Pooling, community provision, contracting Comparison of programmes Characteristic NBCP RNTCP NVBDCP RCH Lead/lag of impact of interventions None Moderate, 6-9 months Moderate for vector control measures Long lag Requirement of skill levels High at tertiary or secondary level Medium at PHC level Low Low to very high Degree of standardizati on of treatment Very high High High Low to very high Task grouping At highest level At programme unit level At field unit level At field unit level Scope for resource transfer Very high Restricted Minimal Minimal Evaluation and control At highest aggregate level At unit level At lowest level At lowest level Coordination costs Low Medium Very high Very high Facilitation by Planning, incentives, innovation in technology Planning, standard guidelines, training, cooperation Planning, continuous feed back, cooperation, coordination Planning, continuous feed back, cooperation, coordination Implementation organisation-NBCP Training of suregons JD headqua rters DH, GH, MCs,CHC OPD PHC equipment community surgery NGO Incentives NGO s and PP cataract patients screening camps opthalmic assistants Implementation organisation NVBDCP monitoring and feed back PPs and CHCs PHCs--MO ,LT,MHS district DMO JD-NVBDCP state SC--MMP W,FHW blood smear collection positive cases spraying teams focal spraying villages-MLV,GA M,AWW fever surveillance, BS treatment community IRS schedule vector teams vector density studies anti -larval measures anti vector measures hatchery and seeding teams biological control ITM nets community nets IMN usage and distribution Implementation organisation RNTCP STO-state headquarters DTO contractual LTs MO-TC monitoring and feedback PHI/MO for categoris ation training treatment STLS--Micro scopy quality DMC/ LTS OPD screening DOTS worker private DMCs sputum examination referral from community AWW.GAM. MLV.MMP W,FHW PPS, STS--treatm ent follow up treatment as DOTS worker Implementation organisation RCH house to house survey--CNAA activity plan district plan feed back state headquarters-Addl director FW targets District head quarters--CDHO , RCHO primary health centre-MO,LT, FHS sub centre MMPW FHW identification of high risk cases village --AWW community immunisation initiatives referrals to PHC capital projects services at PHC level, lab tests facilities, equi pment,staffing FRUs FP motivation health education management of complications referrals to FRU services at SC level MCH services management of high risk cases special clinics specialist services institutional services Differences in service delivery Resource generation • Role of top management crucial--Attention – Consists of polity, administrative head, technical head/heads – Suggests possible resource generation mechanisms – Drives all processes by identification of key resources – Focuses on implementation – Determine the cognitive architecture of the system—determines problem and opportunity identification and utilization – Identifies new initiatives and incorporates Resource distribution • Key role of middle management-directioning – Make available key resources at point of use – Focus on distribution mechanisms-translate processes into activities • Motivates field staff to produce – Analyze and identify future requirements— existing and new resources – Ensure focus of staff, discipline Resource utilization • Role of unit heads--governance • Use of resources to deliver service • Require supervision and discipline – To maintain alignment with desired output – Improves with participation in planning – Is a function of work load facilitation • Micro planning, management of extra work load, scarcities, technical help, skill development Resource utilization • Use of governance mechanisms to – – – – Control output Discipline staff Facilitate performance evaluation Generate feed back • From staff • From consumers – Validity and reliability of data • to be used in planning • Identify new initiatives • Governance mechanisms— – Direct control – Cooperative mechanisms Monitoring, evaluation, course correction • Starts at the field level • Have process monitoring – Identify outcomes at every step of process to monitor – Record, analyze –identify reasons for deviation – Incorporate corrections into process • Skill development • Technology introduction • Discipline staff • Ensure focus of staff, unit heads, programme heads Mega frame- mapping of factors Key factor Service delivery UNIT Final services DISTRICT Resource delivery STATE Idea delivery Motivation to produce Work load management Interest of staff Adequacy of facilities and equipment MO interest Supervision Adequacy of resources Adequacy of field Adequacy of key staff staff Alternate resources Availability of alternate resources Training and learning Initiatives and management skills MO interest and Supervision Process monitoring Resource generation Policy directives Utilization of adaptation Policy directives mechanisms Emphasis on skill development Incorporation of initiatives Learning from past experiences CDHO focus and initiatives Top management focus Emphasis on monitoring Focus on implementation Identification of key resources Consistent allocation Take away messages • Understanding of characteristics of service delivery—important – Determines key resources – Directs logic for governance mechanisms • Positioning of responsibility and attention –should be appropriate – Ability to solve problems, take opportunities—idea, power, execution, Take away messages • Resource allocation – Ensure consistent allocation • Ability to generate • Efficiency of utilization • Management of scarcity • Resource distribution – Ensure availability at point of use consistently Take away messages • Resource utilization – Ensure ability to use resources appropriately • Alignment with purpose-service to be delivered – Ensure continuous adaptation to • Changes being done in services • Feed back systems – Listen to consumers – Listen to field staff – Ensure validity and reliability of field or primary data – Monitor and correct processes Take away messages • Maintain slack of key resources – Helps manage scarcities – Facilitates introduction of new services • Position mechanisms to generate key resources at short notice – Alternate resources generation – Emergency mechanisms • Look for problems, new services demand and plausible applications as solutions THANK YOU – ANY QUESTIONS Resource allocation-NBCP RESOURCE GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION GOI resource provision INCENTIVES -- monetary---capital Medical colleges STATE PROGRAMME HEAD FOCUS RESOURCE UTILISATION NGOS and PPS in DISTRICT SKILL LEVELS TRAINING, INFRASTRUCTURE, CONSUMABLES SUPERVISION GOVERNMENT DISTRICT SURGEONS SURGEONS CATARACT SURGERY OUTCOME Resource allocation--RNTCP RESOURCE UTILISATION RESOURCE GENERATION and DISTRIBUTION SERVICE DELIVERY COMPONENTS SERVICE PROVIDERS FHW/MHW STATE HEALTH SYSTEM Provision of field workers Provision of community workers DISTRICT PROGRAMME HEAD FOCUS Community worker DOTS MO OUTCOME Categorisation Provision of MOs NGOS/PPS Enrollment of NGOS/PPs Pvt DMCs and Contractual LTS Management of DMCs and LTs DMCS and LTS Diagnosis EQA/IQA PHI monitoring SUPERVISION Supervisor monitoring Resource allocation--NVBDCP RESOURCE GENERATION RESOURCE UTILISATION RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION INITIATIVES SUPERVISION Community aspirations and feed back DISTRICT HEAD FOCUS and work facilitation Provision of field workers Fever surveillance Field workers Provision of staff Provision of community workers Community workers Consumables HEADQUARTERS Spraying contracts MO S Supervision and work facilitation Training and skill development PROGRAMME STRATEGIC CONTEXT IMN Vector density Spraying Supervisors Contract labor Fish hatcheries Number of cases LTS IMN impregnation GOI CONSUMABLES Detection and diagnosis Vector controlbiological Vector density studies Entomologist Seeding contracts Entomologists RESOURCE PROVISION MECHANIS MS UNIT HEAD SERVICE DELIVERE RS SERVICE DELIVERY COMPONE NTS OUTCOMES Resource allocation -RCH SITES OF SERVICE DELIVERY COMMUNITY ---Aspirations and feedback CNAA POLITICAL SYSTEM TOP MANAGEMENT FOCUS STRATEGY AND INITIATIVES LINKAGES WITH-medical colleges; international agencies SERVICE PROVIDERS MOOTIVATION -- field staff, MO, speciaslists RESOURCE PROVISION MECHANISMS-provision of staff, provision of MOs and specialists, provision of equipment, provision of infrastructure, provision of consumables, DISTRICT HEAD FOCUS MONITORING and EVALUATION SUPERVISION AND MONITORING DATA COLLECTION and RECORDING TRAINING and SKILL DEVELOPMENT OUT REACH REGULAR SERVICES MO S --INITIATIVES-supervision, work facilitation, community participation, microplanning, on job training and knowledge enhancement, SEVICE DELIVERY COMPONENTS -Maternal health, child health, RTI/STI. Health and nutrition eductaion; FP services; EMERGENCY SERVICES VITAL EVENTS SURVEY RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION SPECIALIST CLINICS TRANSPORT FRU s STATE HEALTH SYSTEM RESOURCE GENERATION SC/PHC RESOURCE UTILISATION OUTCOMES-BR,IMR,CPR ,TFR,MMR