2014 Annual Conference - Construction Industry Institute

advertisement

Using Near Miss Reporting to

Enhance Safety Performance

Jeff Ruebesam , Fluor Corporation

RT 301, Using Near Miss Reporting to Enhance Safety Performance

2014 CII Annual Conference July 21 –23 • Indianapolis, Indiana

Research Team 301, Using Near Miss Reporting to

Enhance Safety Performance

Patricia Anthony , DTE Energy

David Clark , SAIC Constructors, LLC

Glen Clement , ConocoPhillips

Bryon Creech , CH2M HILL

Dennis Cobb , Phillips 66

Bill Drust , Praxair

Bob Fitzgerald , Southern Company

Jason Fulton , Dresser-Rand Company

Larry Green , BP

Carroll Higdon , The Robins & Morton Group

Jimmie Hinze , University of Florida

Steve Holland , GE Energy

John Holliday , Georgia-Pacific Corporation

Eric Marks , Georgia Tech

Brian McKay , Bechtel/Fairweather

Sixto Mendez , SKEC USA, Inc

Anthony Miller , Parsons

Wes Rimes , Yates Construction

Jeff Ruebesam , Fluor Corporation

Brandon Shell , ExxonMobil

Roger Smith , Zurich Services Corporation

Alicia Weber , Jacobs

RT 301: Building on Existing CII Safety Research

Pro-Active

Safety

Safety

Management

Foundation for Safety

Near Miss Reporting (RT 301)

Design for Safety

(RT 101) 1995

Hazard Recognition

(RT 293) 2003

Implementing

Active Leading

Indicators

(RT 284) 2012

Real-time Pro-

Active Safety in

Construction

(RT 269) 2010

Targeted Safety Programs

(RT 216) 2006

Managing Subcontractor

Safety (RT 13) 1990

Safety Plus: Making Zero Accidents a

Reality (RT 160) 2002

Improved Workers’

Compensation

Management (RT 45) 1995

Owner’s Role in

Construction Worker Safety

(RT 190) 2003

Zero Injury Techniques (RT 32) 1993

Organizational Commitment to Safety

Dr. Jimmie Hinze

CII RT 284

What is a Near Miss?

• Why near miss reporting?

– Motivate and empower the workforce to be a partner in safety

– Recognize and communicate unsafe conditions and close-calls

– Take action to reduce risk and prevent adverse outcomes

• Near miss definition:

– An unplanned event or unsafe condition that has the potential for injury or illness to people, or damage to property, or the environment

Lagging vs. Leading Indicators

Fatality

Near Miss

(including hazardous conditions)

At Risk

Behavior

Heinrich’s Safety Pyramid

Research Methodology

Near Miss Reporting Process

Define

Encourage Roll Out

Communicate

Corrective

Actions

Analyze

Collect

Near Miss Implementation Resources

• Reporting flowchart

• Reporting card

• Database

• Evaluation Tool

Findings: Barriers and Enablers

Barriers

• Fear of retaliation

• Fear that reporting reflects poorly on performance

• Absence of a trusting environment

• Lack of training

• No follow-up

Enablers

• Communication

• Leadership and motivation

• Guidance and resources

• Near miss reporting training

• Reward strategy

“If you see it, you own it” – Interviewed Safety Manager

Research Conclusions

• A strong safety foundation is a prerequisite, however…

• An effective near miss reporting program:

– Is the most effective leading indicator (CII RT 284)

– Helps overcome “fear” and builds “trust” with the workforce

– Is best measured by user feedback, not reporting quotas

– Enhances hazard awareness, lowers risk, and improves safety performance

– Only works if everyone (craft worker to senior management) buys in

– Can help us break the performance plateau

– Can help save lives

Implementation Session Agenda

• Detailed discussions

– Site interviews

– Monitoring and intervention

– Implementation strategies

• Demonstration of implementation tools

– Information flowchart/reporting card

– Reporting database template

– Program evaluation tool

• Panel Q & A

Visit the Implementation Sessions and

Product Display Table

Implementation Session 1

Grand Ballroom 7-8 today, 5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.

Implementation Session 2

Grand Ballroom 7-8 tomorrow, 8:35 a.m. – 9:35 a.m.

Dr. Jimmie Hinze

Download