Research Paper Presentation

advertisement
Instagram: Uses and
Gratification of Users
By: Lance Nave
Abstract
 This paper is an examination of the different reasons why
individuals use the social media platform Instagram. This
paper also examines the different variables that influence
users to use social media and the gratifications users of
Instagram receive through their engagement. Acceptance
from others, desire to stay informed on worldly or scholarly
news, relationship maintenance, and escapism from reality
are all examined as possible uses Instagram could
potentially be used for. These variables are all being
considered because of common trends that are noticed with
users of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter,
and so on.
Introduction
 Social networking sites have revolutionized media
communication and computer mediated
communication (CMC)in so many ways.
 Three Concepts/theories
 Uses and Gratification Theory
 Relationship Maintenance
 Motives for new use and consumption
Uses and Gratification
 The uses and gratification theory (UG) is an extension
of the needs and motives theory (Maslow, 1970).
 Mainstream
 Gender and cultural differences
 Escape
Relationship Maintenance
 Relationship Maintenance refers to the upkeep of
relationships that an individual is involved in.
 Different aspects of relationship maintenance involve
openness, disclosure of personal information, time
spent with individual, and trust
 Loneliness
Motives for News Use
 Staying informed on worldly or scholarly news
 “Internet” generation
 It’s quick and easy
Conclusion
 Instagram offers many uses and gratifications, allows
the maintenance of relationships, and also provides
updates worldly and scholarly news.
References

Ancu, M. (2012). Older Adults on Facebook: A Survey Examination of Motives and Use of Social Networking by People
50 and Older. Florida Communication Journal, 40(2), 1-12.

Berg, J. J., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Loneliness: The relationship of self-disclosure and androgyny. Personality And Social
Psychology Bulletin, 8

Croteau, D. & Hoynes, W. (1997). "Industries and Audience".

Media/Society. London: Pine Forge Press.

Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting Hooked on News: Uses and Gratifications and the Formation of News Habits
Among College Students in an Internet Environment. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193-210.
doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_2

Fairfax Digital News (2007) “Turning Japanese”, 1 March, URL,na

Gadlin, H. (1978) “Child Discipline and the Pursuit of Self: An Historical Interpretation”, in H.W. reese and L.P.Lipsitt
(ed) Advances in Child
Development and Behavior. Vol. 12, pp. 231-61. New York: Academic Press

Kubey, R. (1990). Television and the Quality of Family Life. Communication Quarterly, 38(4), 312-324

Ledbetter, A. M. (2008). Media use and relational closeness in long-term friendships: interpreting patterns of
multimodality. New Media & Society, 10(4), 547-564.
References

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for
intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411.

Maslow, A.A. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2nd edition). New York: Harper

& Row
26.

Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the
imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114-133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313

Mongeau, P., & Henningsen, M. (2008). Stage theories of relationship development: Charting the course of interpersonal
communication. 363-375.

Palmgreen, P. P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1984). A comparison of gratification models of media satisfaction.

Panek, E. (2014). Left to Their Own Devices: College Students’ “Guilty Pleasure” Media Use and Time Management.
Communication Research, 41(4), 561-577. doi:10.1177/0093650213499657

Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant
Messaging. Bulletin Of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361. doi:10.1177/0270467610380009
References

Rawlins, W. (1992) “Friendship matters: Communication. Dialectics, and the Life
Course. New York :Aldine de Gruyter

Sawyer, R., & Guo-Ming, C. (2012). The Impact of Social Media on Intercultural
Adaptation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 21(2), 151-169.

Shiv, B. B., & Fedorikhin, A. A. (1999). Heart and Mind in Conflict; The Interplay of Affect
and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making. Journal Of Consumer Research, 26(3)

Sundar, S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for

New Media. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504-525.
doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.845827

Wang, Q., Fink, E. L., & Cai, D. A. (2008). Loneliness, Gender, and Parasocial
Interaction: A Uses and Gratifications Approach. Communication Quarterly, 56(1), 87109. doi:10.1080/01463370701839057
Download