Academic Impact: What it means and how to calculate it Prof. Neal Ashkanasy 1 About the Presenter Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Organizational Behavior (2007-2014) Published by Wiley-Blackwell First published in 1981 2012 2-year Impact Factor = 3.626 Top 5, Applied Psychology Associate Editor, Academy of Management Review (2011-2014) Published by the Academy of Management 2012 2-year Impact Factor = 7.895 #1 Journal in Management Associate Editor, Emotion Review Book Series Editor, Research on Emotion in Organizations Published by Emerald, JAI Press Imprint First published in 2005 Editorial boards (selection) Academy of Management Journal (1996-2007) Journal of Applied Psychology Academy of Management Learning & Education Journal of Management Personality & Individual Differences Published by Sage on behalf of the International Society for Research on Emotions 2012 2-year Impact Factor = 1.894 First published 2009 https://www.business.uq.edu.au/staff/details/neal-ashkanasy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neal_Ashkanasy 2 Outline • • • • • Citation Indices Meaning of citations Boosting your citations Journal Impact factors Concluding Comments 3 Citation Indexing • Developed in its modern form by Eugene Garfield of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) – Now published by Thomson Reuters Scientific • The Web of Science (Thomson Reuter Scientific) – – – – – – Sciences Citation Index (SCI) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) Conference Proceeding Citation Index Book Citation Index (New) Select “All Databases” (broadest) • Click the little orange down arrow next to “Web of Science Core Collection” to see the full menu (see next slide). 4 WoS Start Page Click to see menu, including “All databases” Click to see menu, including “Cited Reference Search” 5 Alternatives to WoS • SCOPUS – Elsevier – Broader then SSCI – New: SCOPUS “Journal Analyzer” • Research Gate • Academia • Google Scholar – See http://www.harzing.com – “Publish or Perish” – Calculates ‘h’ and ‘g’ citation indices • Authors • Journals – Quick and easy to use 6 h- and g-indices • Citations per publication • Hirsch’s “h-index” – h = no. publications with at least h citations – e.g., h = 6 if six publications have been cited 6 or more times • Egghe’s “g-index” – g = no. publications whose combined citation count is at least g2 (or average citations for the top g pubs ≥ g) – e.g., g = 6 if the average no of citations for the top 6 publications is at least 6. – Gives more weight to highly cited articles than h. 7 Meaning of Citations • Article is cited in WoS-Indexed journals – Citations in other journals and books do not count – But citations to non-WoS-Indexed journal articles, book chapters, and books are counted • WoS is three databases! – (Source) “Search” – “Cited Reference Search” • Click the little blue down arrow next to “Basic Search” (see Slide 5) – “Secret” data based used to calculate IF’s. 8 Why are articles cited? • Genuine contribution to the literature – Ideas cited more than data – Books cited more than journal articles (??!!) • Handy references – Review articles (e.g., AMR, JoM) – Snapshots (e.g., J. J. Ray in the 1980’s) • ‘Bad’ citations? • Fashion – Harzing’s study of mis-citations • Harzing, A. W. 2002. Are our referencing errors undermining our scholarship and credibility? The case of expatriate failure rates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 127-148. 9 Boosting Your Citations • Publish in the top-tier journals • Write quality articles that attract attention and interest • Advertise • Self-cite (!!??) • Contact Thomson Reuters re. errors • Make publications available in the public domain – See SHERPA RoMEO database – http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php 10 Journal Impact Factor • Calculated as N citations in year y to articles published in y-1 and y-2 divided by N “citable” articles published in y-1 and y-”2. • E.g. 2013 impact factor = Number of citations in 2013 to articles published in 2011 and 2012, divided by the number of “citable” articles published in 2011 and 2012. • “Citable” articles = “Articles”, “Reviews”, and ( more recently) “Conference Proceedings”. • E.g., AMR 2013 Impact Factor calculated as … – Total citations in 2013 to articles published in 2011 and 2012 = 469 • Cites in 2013 to articles published in 2011 = 315; in 2012 = 154 – Total citable articles published in 2011 and 2012 = 60 • Number of citable articles published in 2011 = 30; in 2012 = 30 – AMR’s 2013 Impact Factor = 469/60 = 7.817 11 5-Year Indices • WoS recently introduced 5-year indices, more applicable to the social sciences where the review process is typically 18-30 months rather than 6-12 months typical in the sciences • 5-Year Impact Factor – Same as 2-year, but calculated over 5 years • Article Influence Score – Takes account of the quality of the citing journals 12 2013 Management Journals Ranked by 5-Year Impact Factor Rank 1 Title ACAD MANAG ANN No. cites 778 2-Year IF 7.333 5-Year IF 10.154 Immediacy 0.6 15 Half-life 4.4 Eigen 0.00713 Influence 6.56 2 ACAD MANAGE REV 17707 7.817 9.698 1.414 29 >10.0 0.01441 5.317 3 ACAD MANAGE J 19426 4.974 8.443 0.541 74 >10.0 0.02533 5.239 4 MIS QUART 8705 5.405 8.157 1.103 58 >10.0 0.01039 2.785 5 J MANAGE 9110 6.862 8.027 0.657 70 >10.0 0.01798 4.134 6 J OPER MANAG 5596 4.478 7.718 0.525 40 8.3 0.00697 2.062 7 ADMIN SCI QUART 11897 2.394 7.057 0.471 17 >10.0 0.00784 5.386 8 J APPL PSYCHOL 22440 4.367 6.952 0.471 70 >10.0 0.02853 3.538 9 STRATEGIC MANAGE J 17225 2.993 5.929 0.419 86 >10.0 0.0188 3.087 10 PERS PSYCHOL 4560 4.54 5.845 0.464 28 >10.0 0.00746 3.459 11 ORGAN RES METHODS 2727 3.525 5.713 0.308 26 7.9 0.00825 2.954 12 J INT BUS STUD 6676 3.594 5.534 0.87 46 9.8 0.01136 1.991 13 ORGAN SCI 10499 3.807 5.512 0.319 94 >10.0 0.02303 3.595 14 J MANAGE STUD 5473 3.277 5.196 0.824 51 8.6 0.01174 2.294 15 J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG 1072 3.717 4.946 0.621 29 5.8 0.002 1.078 16 J INF TECHNOL 1282 3.789 4.917 0.476 21 6.4 0.00376 1.872 17 RES ORGAN BEHAV 2236 1.25 4.87 0 7 >10.0 0.00272 3.538 18 J ORGAN BEHAV 5999 3.262 4.734 0.551 69 >10.0 0.01003 2.126 19 INT J MANAG REV 1066 2.673 4.468 0.52 25 6.1 0.003 1.615 20 LONG RANGE PLANN 1588 2.111 4.365 0.591 22 >10.0 0.00291 1.382 13 Closing Comments • Citations count more than ever as an index of impact • Already the primary criterion in the sciences – Already a key criterion in the social sciences – Now becoming a key criterion in the organization sciences 14 Thank You! n.ashkanasy@uq.edu.au 15