Using Results Based Financing to Strengthen Health Systems RBF Team, World Bank Group Content • Overview of Results-Based Financing (RBF) – About RBF: definition, diversity, intervention • Supply Side RBF – Inter Governmental – PBF at Facilities – Performance Based Contracting • Demand Side Financing – CCT/ Vouchers • Design & Implementation Tips 2 Definition • Results-Based Financing (RBF) is a cash payment or nonmonetary transfer made to a national or sub-national government, manager, provider, payer or consumer of health services after predefined results have been attained and verified. • RBF is an umbrella term that encompasses various types of interventions that target beneficiaries (for example, conditional cash transfers), providers (for example, performance-based financing), and country governments (for example, cash on delivery, program for results). 3 Different Types of RBF Incentives primarily for: COD/P4R Countries & Organizations Nigeria, Ethiopia Community Primary Secondary PBF Rwanda , Burundi PBC Afghanistan CCT/Vouchers Type of Reward: Payment based on FFS “PRP”* Providers OBA BurkinaFaso, Gambia, Nigeria Other monetary payments Non-monetary rewards Beneficiaries *Provider Recognition Programs 4 What is Results-Based Financing (RBF)? • Demand-side incentive payments to individuals, households or communities, conditional on engaging in pre-agreed healthy behaviors or utilization of health services • Supply-side incentive payments to facilities, teams of health workers conditional on increasing processes, health outputs or outcomes • ‘Results-Based Financing (RBF) encompass the entire gamut of supply and demand side approaches Why so much interest in RBF? Disenchantment with traditional supply-side financing of inputs w/o accountability for outputs (a ‘sinkhole’ issue) A way of motivating behavior change at household level by providing incentives conditional on households attending health education, clinics, or adopting preventive behaviors Redirect attention of providers to making greater headway on priority diseases and health problems of the poor Promising instrument(s) to more effectively target socially excluded and/or poorest households in remote areas, Urgent scaling up of national performance to attain MDG 4 + 5 targets Rapid Expansion of RBF 7 RBF & Inter Government Transfers Plan Nacer in Argentina 8 Plan Nacer • Health Insurance plan for: – Uninsured pregnant women (up to 45 days after birth) – Uninsured Children under 6 – Target coverage of 2M women and children • New strategy for health services provision: – Payments tied to performance – About 6% of health expenditures (2006 - NOA/NEA) • Objectives: – Strengthen primary healthcare network – Increase accessibility and improve quality of health services – Reduce maternal and child mortality & morbidity Argentina: Plan Nacer Intervention Two Levels of Payments 1. Nation to Province – Enrollment of eligible population – Targets for eligible population • Outcomes: Birth weight & APGAR • Utilization: Prenatal care, well baby care, etc • Process and management 2. Province to public clinics – Enroll public – Fee-for-service for 80 priority MCH services – Provider autonomy over use of funds 10 Plan Nacer’s Payment Mechanism 60% Enrollment National Level Result Based-Financing (RBF) 40% Health Outcomes (Tracers) Provincial Level Fee for Service Providers Additional Budget: Staff incentives, equipment, etc Target Population Change in health outcomes Health in Argentina • Spike in Maternal and Infant mortality and morbidity following 2001 crisis, mostly amongst poor/uninsured Evolution of infant mortality rates in Argentina Expressed as a rate per 1,000 live births 30 25.6 25 Infant Mortality rate 22.2 20 16.6 16.3 16.8 16.5 14.4 15 13.3 12.9 2005 2006 10 5 1990 • 1995 2000 2001 2002 Health coverage (2008) – Social Security (52%) – Private (10%) – Public Sector Budget (38%): uninsured 2003 2004 Argentina: Plan Nacer Results • Provided 4.7 million pregnant women and children with health coverage • Delivered 37 million maternal and child health services – Reduced the probability of low birth weight by 23% – Reduced the probability of in-hospital neonatal death by 74 % • Based on Plan Nacer’s success, the Government of Argentina has launched Program SUMAR – SUMAR uses RBF mechanisms to expand health coverage to uninsured children and adolescents under 19 and to uninsured women between the ages of 20 and 64 13 Performance Based Financing Community/ Health Facilities/ Hospitals Rwanda, Burundi , Zambia, Zimbabwe 14 Traditional Financing Inputs Results Based Financing Activities Outputs Rwanda: Increasing Coverage and Quality 17 Improving Efficiency in Zambia & Zimbabwe 18 Performance Based Contracting Afghanistan 19 Performance based contracting • A method of contracting where the results are defined rather than the process. o Includes measurements o Incentives • Benefits o Better performance • Results oriented o Better price • Best and commercial practices and less mandated “how to’s” reduces costs o Contractor has flexibility and incentive to be innovative • Contractor motivated to save money The standards & measurement are results oriented o quality of work or product o quantity of work or product o accessibility o timeliness o accuracy o customer satisfaction o not unduly burdensome. Performance indicators and standards o o o o Collect, track, and share data Conduct surveillance systemically Document results Review periodically and jointly with the contractor • “Are we measuring the right things Demand Side Financing Vouchers in Bangladesh & Pakistan 22 Bangladesh DSF program overview: incentives for both demand and supply side • Aims to rapidly increase utilization of maternal health (MH) services via: – Vouchers for free antenatal (ANC), delivery, emergency referral, and postnatal care (PNC), and laboratory tests. – Cash transfers Tk. 2000 [$25] and gift bags if women deliver with skilled birth attendant at home or in facility, and transport stipend Tk. 500 [$ 6.25]. Emergency referral transport is also available. – Cash incentives for providers/field workers for registering women and providing MH services – “Seed fund” for facilities 23 Token for free consultation 24 ANC1 (%) of DSF vs National (BDHS) ANC (DSF) Achievement Percentage (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ANC (BDH) 87 88 89 91 76 49 52 49 59 55 0 2004 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (upto july) Year Source: DSF project office 25 Assessing the Effects of RBF Approach Zimbabwe: acute respiratory infection cases per 10,000 in RBF and non-RBF districts 350 RBF districts non RBF districts Program start per 10,000 population 300 250 200 150 100 The trend in nonincentivized indicator appears similar between RBF and non-RBF districts, indicating no negative spill over 50 0 26 ANC in DSF Upazila vs Control Upazila Control 100 90 80 Intervention 92 76 70 % 55 60 50 40 34 30 20 10 0 Had any ANC visit Source: Economic evaluation, 2010 Had at least 3 ANC check-ups 27 Safe delivery (%) of DSF vs National (BDHS) Safe delivery(DSF) Safe delivery(BDHS) 100 90 87 80 84 79 85 82 Percentage 70 60 59 50 40 32 30 25 18 20 10 13 0 2004 Source: DSF project office 2007 2008 2009 Year 2010 2011 20122013 (upto july) 28