SeMaS: a tool for personalized counselling and support of selfmanagement in primary care Nathalie Eikelenboom, MSc September 2014 SeMaS: Self-Management screening • Self-management: one size does not fit all1 • SeMaS: assessment of patients’ competences/barriers for selfmanagement • 27 items, 10 minutes fill-in time • Tailored self-management support by trained practice nurse 1 Trappenburg et al, Self-management: One size does not fit all. Patient Educ Couns (2013) SeMaS study outline Stratified cluster randomization of 15 DOH general practices Control arm: 8 practices Intervention arm: 7 practices Training SeMaS en practice visit Baseline measurement +/- 400 patients Baseline measurement +/- 350 patients SeMaS profile with feedback T=0: follow-up consult with practice nurse ; care as usual T=1 week: questionnaire consult T=0: follow-up consult with practice nurse with tailored selfmanagement support T=1 week: questionnaire consult Eikelenboom et al., Implementation of personalized self-management support using the self-management screening questionnaire SeMaS; a study protocol for a cluster randomized trial . Trials (2013) SeMaS profile Locus of control Internal •depri Self-monitoring Somewhat willing More competent Self-efficacy High Social support Low Coping Problem solving Functioning in groups Difficult Anxiety Sometimes Computer skills Average Burden of disease Average Depression High © Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. 2012 SeMaS categories 100 90 80 70 control 1 60 Intervention 1 50 control 2 40 Intervention 2 30 control 3 20 Intervention 3 10 0 Locus of control self-efficacy social support coping anxiety depression Qualitative analysis Level1 Facilitator Barrier Innovation Provides a structure to discuss characteristics Difficult wording of items Patient Increased insight in individual characteristics Random selection of patients, not based on current level of selfmanagement Professional Provides input for individual care plan Attitude towards selfmanagement 1 Grol & Wensing, What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidencebased practice. Med J Aust (2004) Qualitative analysis Level Facilitator Barrier Social context Support from colleagues Interest of GPs is variable Organizational context Sufficient capacity for innovation Limited time planned for consult Financial and political context Practice and care group policy on self-management Self-monitoring tools for patients not reimbursed Quotes • Innovation “there was a clear line to self-management in my consult” “some patients said they found the questions difficult” • Patient “patients recognized themselves in the profiles” “there is a group that is happy that things can be organized differently. There will also be a middle group, and a group that does not want to, or is not able to self-manage” Quotes • Professional “SeMaS is usefull when creating an individual care plan with the patient” “we have to stimulate people, but I notice that it doesn’t work anymore nowadays” • Social context “the GP’s differed in how involved they were in the SeMaS project” “I discussed the SeMaS with my colleague practice nurse” Quotes • Organizational context “it was sometimes difficult to plan the SeMaS in the consult, besides the usual subjects and measurements that have to be done” • Financial and political context “making people aware of their own responsibility for their health is part of the policy in our practice” “sometimes the financial agreements with health insurers are not translated to the workplace” Subjects discussed during consult 70 % of patients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Control Intervention Take home message SeMaS is the first step in providing personalized self-management support. © Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland Co-creation team SeMaS Contact: Nathalie Eikelenboom nathalie.eikelenboom@radboudumc.nl n.eikelenboom@doh-huisarts.nl