Gender Mainstreaming and Sustainable Livelihood Approach a Case Study from Sri Lanka in a longitudinal lens Colloquium on Poverty Research 2011-CEPA Paper by Maneka Jayasinghe and Rajith W.D. Lakshman Research Problem How far rural development interventions which adopt gender sensitive approaches have been able to promote gender equality in the medium term? Rural development intervention: Gemidiriya Community development and livelihood improvement project (12 years project commenced in 2004 and c0mpleted the 1st phase in 2010 and is preparing for the 2nd phase) Whether the project uses a gender sensitive approach? Yes Gemidiriya Community Development and Livelihood Improvement Project Gender Concern: reduction of gender imbalances in rural communities and thereby empowering women and mainstreaming them in development Gendered Targets of the Project: 50% of the women in the village should hold managerial positions in all committees All the village level decisions should be approved in the general meeting of the village with more than 50% female participation. Gemidiriya Project Cont: Gemidiriya Project Infrastructure Development Credit and Savings Fund+ Onetime Grant Livelihood Improvement Skill Development Capacity Building Innovative Seeds Fund Data and Methodology Primary data [Survey (110 households) and in-depth interviews (10 household), Interviews with project officers, members of the Gemidiriya village organization] Secondary data [Baseline data collected by the project in 2004 (adjusted for inflation), project specific and other literature] Sample properties 457 individuals, 51 % male and 49 % female 110 households, 12 % is female headed and 88% is male headed Marital status: 53 % is married, 42 % is unmarried Occupation distribution: 35 individual Mining , 34 -cultivation workers and 34laborers,15- garment factories, 10working in tea estates. Data and Methodology cont: The data is gathered and analyzed both at the household level and the individual level. The analytical framework we used is DIFD “Sustainable Livelihood Framework” We examined how the development intervention has been able to increase Financial , Social and Human Capital Ownership in the asset pentagon. Source: DFID Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheet, 1999 Research Findings Financial Capital: Income Level Table 1: Individual Level income by gender Criteria Mean income t Value by gender Sig. (2 tailed) 124 Before the Male project income Female 29 Male 2.60 0.010 (151) 142 After the project Male income Female 40 Male 3.376 0.001 (180) Number of individuals employed 4556 Female 3216 9958 Female 6875 Table 2: Household level income by gender of the head of the household Criteria t Value Sig. (2 tailed) Before the project income* -1.159 0.249(108) After the project income** 0.927 0.356(108) Improvement in income 1.161 0.109 Source: * Baseline survey 2004 ** Household survey 2010 Research Findings cont: Financial Capital: Savings Behavior Number of Minimum Maximum Mean individuals number of number of number saved years saved years saved of years saved overall Female Male Median Std. number Deviatio of years n saved Before the project* 19 6 20 12.63 10.00 4.549 After the project** 58 2 5 6.69 4.00 4.943 Before the project* 5 6 16 11.20 10.00 4.604 After the project** 22 2 5 5.23 4.00 3.915 Before the project* 14 8 20 13.14 12.50 4.58 After the project** 35 3 5 7.71 5.00 5.35 Source: * Base line survey 2004 ** Household survey 2010 Research Findings cont: Financial Capital: Access to loans Total Financial institutions Number people have access to loans overall Female Male Before project* the Individu Samurdhi al Money Lenders Gemidiriy a (VSCO) 25 9 3 13 - After the project** 51 10 2 12 27 Before project* 7 1 - 6 - After the project** 23 2 0 6 15 Before project* 18 8 3 7 - 28 8 2 6 12 the the After the project** Source: * Baseline survey 2004 ** Household survey 2010 Research Findings cont: Human Capital: Education Education Total Cannot Read or Write Gender Total Pearson Chi-Square Male Female Value 7.126a 3 4 Grade 1-5 Grade 6-11 62 129 Grade 12- Diploma or 13 Degree 26 2 5 43 121 37 8 Df 105 250 63 5 222 211 7 433 Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) 0.129 Source: Household survey 2010 •Human Capital improvement through Skill development: 15 individuals (1 female and 14 male have been able to improve their livelihood skills under skills development component Social Capital: Female participation and Leadership Representation of women in Decision-Making Village Organizations (Percentage) Village Organization Officials 2007 Board of Director 56 Finance Committee 60 Procurement Committee 60 Social Audit Committee 60 Village Savings and Credit Committee 100 (VSCO) Positions of 2010 66 60 60 80 100 Source: 2007: Our Village SAARC village, Gemidiriya 2007 2010: Calculated by the author using West Mudunkotuwa Gemidiriya field office committee report Conclusion Research findings show mixed results Overall achievements: Development interventions increases Financial Capital Ownership, Social Capital Ownership and Human Capital Ownership of the community Impact on reducing Gender Imbalances Where there is well defined targets, it is more likely to achieve those However, Where there is no targets, the achievements are not substantial The persistence of medium term gender disparity in livelihoods and hence the income levels leads to question the sustainability of these gendered initiatives. Recommendations Set up well defined targets to reduce imbalances in the ownership of financial and human capital • 1: Eliminate gender inequality in access to employment opportunities • 2: Eliminating disparities in livelihood skills Thank you Q&A