Axel Marx – Research Manager – Senior Researcher axel.marx@ggs.kuleuven.be Networks for Prosperity Initiative Origin – Importance of Knowledge in Development Development is increasingly about learning -> Knowledge management -> Networks are crucial for learning/knowledge management • Networks differ significantly in design and their capability to manage and create knowledge and facilitate learning. •Different types of networks exist, and some are more instrumental in the context of learning, information exchange and knowledge creation. Networks for Prosperity Initiative Origin – The Emergence of Network Governance Observe the emergence of a profound new form of governance => network governance => Non-hierarchical coordination of policy actionbetween actors => Distinct from governing by hierarchies (states) and markets (Börzel, Williamson; Powell; Torfing; Scharpf; Slaughter; Woods). Renate Mayntz (1993): “the notion of ‘policy networks’ does not so much represent a new analytical perspective but rather signals a real change in the structure of the polity.” Networks for Prosperity Initiative Origin – Network Governance Network governance – some characteristics (Lobel) (1) increased participation of non-state (private) actors in public policy making and provision due to their knowledge and expert capabilities and efficiency. (2) adaptability and constant learning. Given the nature of a highly dynamic policy environment with increasingly new complex policy challenges governance requires adaptability and constant learning, recognizing the constant requirement to adapt to change. Systems/networks to facilitate this form of learning are increasingly developed Networks for Prosperity Initiative Origin – Functions of Networks Martinez-Diaz and Woods (2009) 1. agenda-setting 2. consensus building 3. policy coordination 4. knowledge production and exchange 5. norm-setting and diffusion Slaughter (2004) •Information networks => exchange of information and knowledge. •Enforcement networks => enhancing cooperation among national regulators to enforce existing rules • Harmonization networks (trade agreements) =>harmonizing regulatory standards such as product-safety standards with the aim of abolishing technical barriers to trade. Networks for Prosperity: Achieving Development Goals Through Knowledge Sharing Networks for Prosperity Initiative Networks for Prosperity Initiative Networks for Prosperity Initiative Knowledge without Frontiers: international networks 1 2 3 Cases from Cuba and Viet Nam. Regional networks like ERIA, Red Mercosur and NEPAD UNIDO supported networks like AfrIPAnet & CAMI From Dialogue to Collaboration: interorganizational networks Positive experiences • • Cases of public-private sector networking from Bolivia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Panama, • Peru, Serbia. • The Knowledge Organization: intra-organizational networks 1 2 Cases from Egypt, El Salvador and Turkey. UN Teamworks social network • • Costa Rica’s medical devices cluster is achieving better than average knowledge spillovers Panama’s Ciudad de Saber is pioneering a knowledge economy Improved public-private dialogue in Ethiopia and Serbia Innovation in Bolivia’s sugar supply chain Technology transfer in shoes, pisco and gastronomy in Peru Securing public procurement success for SMEs in Republica Dominicana; www.Networks4Prosperity.org Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Networks for Prosperity Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Case Studies Jorge Rodríguez Vives on competitiveness councils in Costa Rica Johan Adriaensen on the importance of inter-organisational networks in trade policy Ariane Corradi on the importance of network managers in incubators (business development centres) Thomas Vogel and Petra Koppensteiner provide a perspective from civil society on a project (HORIZONT3000) which aims to construct a network for sharing best practices among partner organizations in the developing world. Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Essays Jacint Jordana on the proliferation of regulatory agencies and the role they play in new forms of governance including network governance Ettore Bolisani and Enrico Scarso on knowledge networks in business stressing the diversity of knowledge networks in business and their varying effectiveness. Ana Miric on barriers to building learning networks stressing the importance of strategy, culture and leadership for making knowledge networks performant Tim Meyer analyzing the transformation in international organization from hierarchies to networks with a specific emphasis on managing knowledge and science Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Essays Orly Lobel reflecting on how to manage knowledge in organizations focusing on different aspects related to legal governance of human resources and intellectual capital Michele Clara, from UNIDO, reflecting on the importance of knowledge networks in industrial policymaking and related learning processes Networks for Prosperity Initiative Connectedness Index Aim: Capture the degree to which countries are networked and analyze variation between countries (include many countries) How: Creating a connectedness index which consists of three subindices on the basis of existing databases (best available data) Approach: Inductive – screening of 70+ ‘global’ databases containing more than 7000 variables. Status: Data availability, methodological issues => improve it Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Measuring Connectedness: levels and components Each component is transformed to the same scale, ranging 0-1. Each sub-index is created by averaging its components. Connectedness Index is the average of its three sub-indices. => Do not weigh components Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Connectedness Index 2012 Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Variation in the connectedness sub-indices Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Connectedness Index 2012 – Main Results Switzerland, Sweden and Denmark are the three most connected countries (equal to the previous index). Differences in the countries rankings are moderate compared to 2011 Overall, countries are slightly more connected. Differences in scores are sometimes very small => small changes can lead to ranking changes => better work in the future with clusters of countries Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Connectedness and development measures Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Connectedness and development measures Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Connectedness and development measures The graphs show a strong positive linear relationship between connectedness and government effectiveness, GDP per capita and industrial performance. However, these linear relationship (or high correlations) cannot be interpreted as cause and effect. Future work Many methodological issues, many questions Understand better variation between countries Networks for Prosperity: Connecting Development Knowledge Beyond 2015 Conclusions Establish the foundations for a research program on the importance of network governance, especially MICs Future work to concentrate on types of networks, management of networks and effectiveness of network governance. The UNIDO Connectedness Index is distinct from others, as it accounts for the degree to which a country is networked externally and internally = further development and consolidation