Recall Capacity of Short

advertisement

Recall Capacity of Short-term

Memory

Michael Schielke

Objective

• Determine whether short-term memory store is based on time or chunks

• Determine capacity of short-term store

Baddeley vs. Cowan

Baddeley

• 1-2second working memory

• Memory stores over a span of time

• Memory Decay

• Phonological loop model

Cowan

• 4+/-1 chunk capacity

• Overload

• Effect of long-term memory

• Focus of attention

Baddeley’s Time Span Model

• Rate of Decay

– Short-term memory fades over a few seconds

– Rate of decay experiment

– Subsequent silence vs. speech

• Phonological Loop Model

– Evolved system to facilitate language acquisition

– Phonological store of 1 to 2 seconds

– Maximum capacity before fading occurs

Cowan’s Chunking Model

• What makes up a chunk?

– Effect of Long-term memory

• Overload

– More information than can be recalled

• Focus of Attention

– Items must exist in the focus of attention directly preceding the response

– Serial recall test

The Study

• Method

– Syllabic chunks based on unfamiliar language

– Stimuli recorded in Japanese by Native speaker

• 3-10 syllables (.45-1.6seconds)

• Two words from each set

– Items played to participants once each

• Participants repeat what is heard

• Correct and incorrect repetition recorded

– 25 participants with no Japanese exposure

• 14 males/11 females

• Age 15-65

• 19 monolingual English/ 6 Bilinguals (English +)

Stimuli

• 3 Syllables

• waraji, hakari

• 4 Syllables

• kurogane, samehada

5 Syllables

• tarachineno, kusamakura

• 6 Syllables

• zashikiwarashi, warabukiyane

7 Syllables

• tanabatamatsuri, hokosugibayashi

• 8 Syllables

• kamakuramonogatari, yamagoyamitorizu

9 Syllables

• harimayabashimeguri, kikagakutekizushiki

• 10 Syllables

• kamagasakiyudetamago, hakodateyamashikimado

Results

Chunking

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.6

sec

120%

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Time Elapsed

Results cont.

• 84% recall of 3 and 4 syllables

• 48% recall of 5 syllables

• Highest probable recall time .715%

Monolinguals vs. Bilinguals

Chunks

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

3 5 7 9

Monolinguals Bilinguals

1.6sec

120%

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Time Elapsed

Monolinguals Bilinguals

Monolingual vs. Bilingual

Results

• Higher level of recall by native bilinguals

– 32% increase in recall of 3-4 syllable words

– Increased recall capacity on 5-10 syllable words

Discussion

• Influence of Chunks and Time

– As word length increases, recall decreases

• Possible Explanations

– Focus of Attention (Cowen 2001)

– Rate of Decay (Baddeley 1998)

• Monolingual vs. Bilingual Recall

– Phonological Inventory?

Conclusion

• Support towards Cowan’s 4+/-1 Model

• Evidence for a 1-second working memory

• Additional research needed to reveal contrast between monolingual and bilingual recall probability.

Download