Recall Capacity of Short

advertisement
Recall Capacity of Short-term
Memory
Michael Schielke
Objective
• Determine whether short-term memory
store is based on time or chunks
• Determine capacity of short-term store
Baddeley vs. Cowan
•
•
•
•
Baddeley
1-2second working
memory
Memory stores over a
span of time
Memory Decay
Phonological loop
model
•
•
•
•
Cowan
4+/-1 chunk capacity
Overload
Effect of long-term
memory
Focus of attention
Baddeley’s Time Span Model
• Rate of Decay
– Short-term memory fades over a few seconds
– Rate of decay experiment
– Subsequent silence vs. speech
• Phonological Loop Model
– Evolved system to facilitate language acquisition
– Phonological store of 1 to 2 seconds
– Maximum capacity before fading occurs
Cowan’s Chunking Model
• What makes up a chunk?
– Effect of Long-term memory
• Overload
– More information than can be recalled
• Focus of Attention
– Items must exist in the focus of attention
directly preceding the response
– Serial recall test
The Study
• Method
– Syllabic chunks based on unfamiliar language
– Stimuli recorded in Japanese by Native speaker
• 3-10 syllables (.45-1.6seconds)
• Two words from each set
– Items played to participants once each
• Participants repeat what is heard
• Correct and incorrect repetition recorded
– 25 participants with no Japanese exposure
• 14 males/11 females
• Age 15-65
• 19 monolingual English/ 6 Bilinguals (English +)
Stimuli
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
3 Syllables
waraji, hakari
4 Syllables
kurogane, samehada
5 Syllables
tarachineno, kusamakura
6 Syllables
zashikiwarashi, warabukiyane
7 Syllables
tanabatamatsuri, hokosugibayashi
8 Syllables
kamakuramonogatari, yamagoyamitorizu
9 Syllables
harimayabashimeguri, kikagakutekizushiki
10 Syllables
kamagasakiyudetamago, hakodateyamashikimado
Results
Chunking
Time Elapsed
120%
90%
80%
100%
70%
80%
60%
50%
60%
40%
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10 1.6
sec
1.6
1.52
9
1.32
8
1.17
7
1.05
6
0.88
5
0.73
4
0.68
3
0.45
0%
0%
Results cont.
• 84% recall of 3 and 4 syllables
• 48% recall of 5 syllables
• Highest probable recall time .715%
Monolinguals vs. Bilinguals
Chunks
Time Elapsed
120%
100%
90%
100%
80%
70%
80%
60%
50%
60%
40%
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
Monolinguals
Bilinguals
Monolinguals
Bilinguals
1.6
1.52
1.32
0%
1.17
1.6sec
1.05
9
0.88
7
0.73
5
0.68
3
0.45
0%
Monolingual vs. Bilingual
Results
• Higher level of recall by native bilinguals
– 32% increase in recall of 3-4 syllable words
– Increased recall capacity on 5-10 syllable words
Discussion
• Influence of Chunks and Time
– As word length increases, recall decreases
• Possible Explanations
– Focus of Attention (Cowen 2001)
– Rate of Decay (Baddeley 1998)
• Monolingual vs. Bilingual Recall
– Phonological Inventory?
Conclusion
• Support towards Cowan’s 4+/-1 Model
• Evidence for a 1-second working memory
• Additional research needed to reveal
contrast between monolingual and bilingual
recall probability.
Download
Related flashcards

Rayman

15 cards

Consciousness studies

16 cards

Consciousness studies

41 cards

Raving Rabbids

11 cards

Create Flashcards