Lecture 11 Economic Propositions about Costs 1. The higher the selling price of a good, the greater the amount that producers will offer. (The Law of Supply) 2. Marginal costs (MC) determine the rate of output (supply curve). 3. Marginal costs rise (1) at higher production rates than planned and (2) for quick changes in output. 4. Average Cost (AC) and MC decrease for larger planned volumes of output. That is, 100 Boeing 787s will cost more per unit than if 1,000 Boeing 787s are made. This is economies of scale or mass production. Engineering, not economics. More economic propositions on costs 5. Money prices are measures of costs because the buyer must pay at least the value of the resources to their current owners—opportunity costs. All costs are opportunity costs. 7. Implicit costs exist even if no accounting expenditure is recorded for a good or service. 8. Cost and revenue should be calculated in terms of present value (details in Finance class) Present Value Example You can buy a membership in the Executive Room at airports from an airline for €125 per year or €300 now for a 3 year membership. You know you will use it all three years. Should you buy the 3 year membership? It Depends It depends on the interest (discount) rate. If the interest (discount) rate is 5%, buy the 3 year membership: PV = €125 + €125/1.05 + €125/(1.05)(1.05) €357.43 = €125 + €119.05 + €113.38 vs. €300 now (savings is €57.43 not €75) What if interest rate is 20%? Discount or Interest Rates Discount rates always exist whether we calculate them or not. Money today is always more valuable than a promise of money in the future. Paying tomorrow is preferred to paying today. This is the time value of money that represents its opportunity cost. Suppose Things Change? The best plans can be upset by changes in technology. What was “state of the art” becomes obsolete. Obsolescence is an unanticipated development that reduces the value of existing assets. Obsolescence and Cost A machine costs £100,000 It is expected to help produce 10,000 units of output before it is depreciated to nothing. If so, then there is a fixed cost of £10 per unit spread over the units. Assume other costs (labor and supplies) are £20 per unit. Output costs £30 per unit. Obsolescence and Cost… Now a new and better machine comes on the market. It costs £100,000 also. It is expected to produce 10,000 units before it is out of service. Hence, a fixed cost of £10 per unit. However, it needs only £15 worth of labor and supplies Cost per unit output is £25, not £30. What is the value of the old machine? Considerations The old machine falls in value due to unexpected obsolescence. Even if old machine has never been used, the new machine causes the present value of the old machine to fall by £50,000 in value. The old machine is what we have. Should we sell it? Given changes in the market price, how long can we continue production? Effects of Obsolescence Old Machine: Fixed Cost £10 Variable Cost £20 Total cost: £30/unit Market Market Market Market price price price price for for for for output output output output New Machine: Fixed Cost £10 Variable Cost £15 Total cost: £25/unit £27. £22. £18. £13. What What What What do do do do we we we we do? do? do? do? Economic Value of Assets Economic value of an asset requires an estimate of the net cash flow expected from the asset (discounted). Hence, valuation is continuous and is subjective: an educated guess about expected cash flows. Past cash flows (accounting data) from an asset can provide useful information to a manager in making valuation decisions, but alone should not drive the decision. Consider New Asset Purchase price is accounting value of asset. Economic value? Higher than accounting value or would not buy. Expected value in use of asset must be more valuable than purchase price. New machine purchased for $35,000 (asset value). Estimate machine life of five years with revenue of $10,000/yr. (discounted 10%/yr.) for net present value of $37,910. Profit of $2,910 not recorded. Changes in Asset Value We acquired the machine for $35,000 (recorded value) that had a present value (PV) of $37,910. Suppose costs rise and cash flow falls to $9,000/yr. from $10,0000/yr. Then PV falls to $34,120. Or demand increases and allows us to extend the life to six years for PV of $43,550. Or discount rate (alternative investment return) changes to 12%; then PV falls to $36,050. None of these changes in economic value cause accounting value to change. It continues to show initial value ($35,000) depreciated over 5 year expected life. More Mundane: Small (Marginal) Changes in Cost Add Up Most managerial decisions involve cost changes at the margin—small changes that can have big impacts. Starbucks, studying worker time in production, noticed that employees had to dig twice into ice machines to get sufficient ice for large drinks. The developed a new ice scoop that requires one scoop for any size drink. Time savings of 14 seconds for large drinks. Working on such margins for 5 years reduced average waiting time from 3.5 minutes to 3 minutes per customer (a 15% improvement). Small Changes Can Mean Higher Profits: Where Managers Should Make a Difference Over five years, such improvements in productivity at Starbucks (shorter waiting time for customers, so more sales) meant store sales up an average of $200,000. Wendy’s developed a double-sided grill that cuts cooking time for a hamburger patty from 5 minutes to 1.5 minutes. Caribou Coffee uses “floater” workers who are not assigned to one task but help direct others to where need is greatest and jumps in to help where help is needed. Added cost of one worker less than added revenue from faster productivity (more sales). Opportunity Costs “Few firms make a profit.” Peter Drucker Why? Most focus on accounting costs, failing to consider opportunity costs, so constantly overestimate profits. Accounting Profit versus Economic Profit Accounting Profit = Sales Revenue – Accounting Cost Economic Profit = Sales Revenue – Economic Cost Economic Cost = Accounting Cost + Unrecorded Opportunity Cost Example of difference: McDonald’s reported $2 billion accounting profit in 2002; economic profit estimated to be - $124 million Opportunity Cost: A Real World Issue Why has there been a push to “just in time inventory” in production? Even if debt collection from customers is certain to happen, why is sooner better than later? How do you get managers to be more responsible about firm assets? Google makes divisions bid for server use. Internal competition. Example: John Deere - Tough competition in heavy equipment. New CEO focused on reducing all costs: Sold and leased excess plant space (capitalized an undervalued asset) - Reduced end of year unsold combines from 1,600 to 200 in 5 years (value of unsold inventory reduced $1/3 billion—opportunity cost of cash) How one firm accounts for opportunity cost: Gillette requires each division to count the opportunity cost of cash tied up in different parts of the operation. Example: one new division showed accounting revenues of $1,069 million and costs of $1,001 million, for an accounting profit of $68 million. Division was required to count the opportunity cost of cash, which changed the results. Previously, the division had less incentive to consider the value of cash used or idled. Measuring Opportunity Cost The rule is that 12% interest is charged by the parent company to each division for idle cash: Average inventory in stock: 242 days Average time for debt collection, 105 days Cash tied up in equipment Opportunity cost of this: $119 million. Now: $68 million accounting profit minus $119 cost of cash yields $51 million loss. Managers told to reform or division would be liquidated. Reducing Opportunity Cost within the Firm Steps taken to reduce those costs: 1. Outsource debt collection to specialist firm. Average debt collection time reduced from 105 to 41 days over 5 years. 2. Average inventory time cut from 242 to 198 days over five years. 3. New applications for existing production machinery devised to increase revenue from equipment (also new revenue source). Net result: These opportunity costs cut $35 million. The division treated cash as a free good from the parent company. Cost Control by InBev: Much of This Should Seem Obvious Wait 120 days to pay vendors (the jerks). Double sided, no-color printing in England offices saved $325,000 a year. 40% fewer Blackberries for U.S. employees. Few private offices—everyone in large rooms (one impact—faster communication). No private airplanes; everyone flies commercial. Zero-based budgets every year. Ad firms paid by project, not by annual budget. Efforts at other firms… Nicholas & Co., a Salt Lake City food distributor cuts sales commissions 25% when customers’ bills are more than 45 days past due. Sales reps now think about creditworthiness. Bill payment time dropped in half. Slack & Co. Contracting, Houston, borrowed $1 million a month to cover late payments from clients. Slack now refuses to deal with firms with bad reputations and histories. Mr. Slack: “Don’t confuse volume with profit.” Think Outside of the Box: Can we make cost fit demand? Most firms imitate existing firms and processes. But, if we want to serve the market better, we should ask—can we supply something demanders want—not just copy what is already there? That is what Toyota and Honda did. And now, Tata Motors. They asked—can we make a car that millions in India can afford—they did. Price is $2,200. No car in the U.S. is near that. Also--$20 cell phones; efficient wood burning stove for $23; water purifier for $43. Summary: Costs The economic way of thinking about costs is not the same as accounting costs or the common way people think of costs. This helps us consider opportunity costs — what does it cost us to command resources for some purpose — so we can contrast it to our next best understood alternative.