LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 5: Relationships in RDA -- in bibliographic records and in authority records Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division Library of Congress Sept. 2012 Adapted by the National Library of New Zealand, November 2012 Acknowledgements This course has been adapted from training developed by Barbara Tillett and Judith Kuhagen, Library of Congress Policy and Standards Division, for several training sessions. COIN gratefully acknowledges their permission to adapt the material for the present purpose 2 This version of this material Adapted from the original Library of Congress training programme by the National Library of New Zealand Some slides have been edited in red Other slides have been removed to fit with the way training has been organised by the National Library of New Zealand Extra slides have been added with red title boxes to distinguish them from the LC originals. Basics of relationships 1. What are relationships? Associations between entities 2. Why relationships? To help users find what they want 4 What kinds of relationships? 1. Primary relationships (section 5, chapt. 17) Relationships within a resource, such as the work it represents 2. Persons/families/corporate bodies related to a resource (section 6, chapts 18-22) Authors, illustrators and other contributors to content. Also relationships at the manifestation and item level, e.g donor, former owner, etc. What kinds of relationships? (contd.) 3. Relationships between works, expressions, manifestations & items (section 8, chapts. 24-28) e.g. Adaptations, translations, arrangements, etc. 4. Relationships between persons, families & corporate bodies (section 9, chapts. 29-32) Authority relationships such as pseudonyms or former and later names Methods for recording relationships 1. Identifiers (not yet) 2. Authorized access points, e.g. 110 2# $a Society of Linguists, $e author. 3. Structured description, e.g. 776 08 $i Also issued as: $t Health statistics 4. Unstructured description, e.g. 500 ## $a Translation of the author’s novel Digital fortress. 7 Core Relationships RDA: Creator used to construct authorized access point for the work LC: Above plus first illustrator of resources intended for children NLNZ? Will follow the RDA and LC core relationships – no further policy on choice of relationships to record yet. NLNZ policy criteria? User needs Sustainable Explainable (to other cataloguers) Predictable (for other librarians & users) 1. Primary Relationship or Relationships between … Primary Relationships Section 5 Chapter 17 Relationships between a work and its expressions, the expression and its manifestations, etc. Work Expression Manifestation From NLA RDA Train the Trainer Course Item Primary relationships Work manifested Larsson, Stieg, 1954-2004. Man som hatar kvinnor Expression manifested Larsson, Stieg, 19542004. Man som hatar kvinnor. English From VUW MLIS paper INFO 546 11 2. Persons/families/bodies and resources Creators and others associated with works (ch. 19) Contributors associated with expressions (ch. 20) Manufacturers, publishers, distributors associated with manifestations (ch. 21) Owners, annotator, autographer, etc. associated with items (ch. 22) 12 Creator relationships Persons/families/bodies related to works author compiler filmmaker interviewer programmer and others … 13 Creator relationships (con’t) LCPS 19.2: LC/RDA core relationship: Give first creator with principal responsibility LC: If multiple creators associated with the work are present, apply cataloger judgment (NLNZ: apply some criteria that you can explain to other cataloguers) to give more than the first 14 Creator relationships in bibliographic records Give as authorized access point in MARC 1XX field (and 7XX field if more than one creator or if “other” associated with work) in bibliographic record Relationship designators from RDA appendix I.2 in subfield $e of 1XX and 7XX field Not a closed list Do not include $e in name authority record 15 Example Creator work relationship 110 $a Society of Linguists, $e author. 710 $a Linguists International, $e author. 100 $a Glass, Philip, $e composer. 110 $a Virginia, $e enacting jurisdiction. 16 Example Others associated with work Others associated with works (19.3): 710 $a U.S. Geology Society, $e issuing body. 710 $a ABC Institute, $e sponsoring body. 17 Contributor relationships Persons/families/bodies related to expressions Translators Editors of compilations Performers Illustrators Arrangers of music Compilers 18 Contributor relationships (cont.) LCPS 20.2: LC core relationship: first illustrator of resources intended for children If multiple illustrators are present, apply cataloger judgment (NLNZ: apply criteria that you can explain to other cataloguers) to give more than the first 19 Contributor relationships (cont.) Give as authorized access point in MARC 7XX fields in bibliographic record Relationship designators from RDA appendix I.3 in subfield $e of 7XX field – only required for illustrator Not a closed list Do not include $e in name authority record 20 Example 1: Contributor relationships 100 1# $a Wood, Audrey. 245 14 $a The napping house / $c Audrey Wood ; illustrated by Don Wood. 700 1# $a Wood, Don, $e illustrator. Notes: 1) Relationship designator “author” could be given for creator in 100 field. 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; (but NLNZ would record it following our policy) also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field. 3) LC policy: give $e illustrator 21 Example 2: Contributor relationships 100 1# $a Lindgren, Astrid, $d 1907-2002, $e author. 240 10 $a Pippi Långstrump. $l English 245 10 $a Pippi Longstocking / $c Astrid Lindgren ; translated by Tiina Nunnally. 700 1# $a Nunnally, Tiina, $d 1952- $e translator. Notes: 1) Relationship designators “author” and “translator” could be given -- cataloger judgment.(for LC) 2) 2nd statement of responsibility is not core; also, it isn’t needed to justify the 700 field. 22 Example 3: Contributor relationships 245 $a Favorite American music / $c performed by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra with Marin Alsop conducting.. 505 $a ... 710 $a Baltimore Symphony Orchestra, $e performer. 700 $a Alsop, Marin, $e conductor.* * Could have used the more general “$e performer” for Alsop. 23 Relationships to manifestations Persons/families/bodies related to manifestations (RDA 21.0, Appendix I.4) Producers Publishers (e.g., broadcasters) Manufacturers (e.g., engravers, printers) Distributors (e.g., film distributor) These relationships are also recorded as attributes of manifestations 24 Examples: Relationships to manifestations 264 #1 $a Bethesda : $b NIH, $c 2008. 710 2# $a National Institutes of Health (U.S.), $e broadcaster. * “Publisher” isn’t used as an RDA relationship designator because that relationship is an element. 25 Relationships to items Persons/families/bodies related to items (RDA 22.0, Appendix I.5) Owners Custodians Curators LC: cataloger judgment NLNZ: case-bycase as requested by curators 26 Examples: Relationships to items 500 $a University Library's copy has ms. notes by author on endpapers. $5 IaH 700 $a Smiley, Jane, $e annotator. 541 $c Gift; $a John Jefferson; $d 2011. $5 DLC 700 $a Jefferson, John, $e donor. 27 Summary Works: Expression: First creator in 1XX, others in 7XX $e is optional First contributor in 7XX field $e required for illustrator for resources intended for children Manifestations: Items: NLNZ policy for which relationships to record is yet to be developed 28 3. Relationships between resources Related works, expressions, manifestations, and items Relationships in bibliographic and/or authority records: Related Related Related Related works (ch. 25) expressions (ch. 26) manifestations (ch. 27) items (ch. 28) 29 Related works RDA 25.1 Common work relationships: Whole-part, e.g., Works in a compilation Chapters in a book Adaptations Supplements Sequential relationships (e.g., earlier and later serials) 30 Related works: LC core LCPS 25.1 LC core work relationships: Whole-part relationships for works in a compilation Sequential serial relationships 31 Whole-part relationships for compilations LC: Give MARC 505 contents note unless contents indicated in another part of the description (e.g., in MARC 245 $a because no collective title present) or unless burdensome LC: Give one MARC 7XX analytical authorized access point; cataloger judgment if additional 7XX fields for other works Don’t give analytical authorized access points for some works: anthologies of poetry, conference proceedings, hymnals, journals, interviews, etc. – LCPS 25.1 32 Example: Whole-part work Authorized access points for the works: 100 1# $a Shakespeare, William, 1616. 245 10 $a Hamlet ; $b King Lear William Shakespeare. *700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, 1616. $t Hamlet. *700 12 $a Shakespeare, William, 1616. $t King Lear. $d 1564- / $c $d 1564$d 1564- * 2nd indicator in 700 indicates the relationship “Contains” 33 Example: Adaptation of work 130 0# $a Hobbit (Motion picture : 2012) 245 00 $a The Hobbit : an unexpected journey / $c directed by Peter Jackson *700 1 $i Motion picture adaptation of (work)$a Tolkien, J. R. R.$q (John Ronald Reuel),$d 1892-1973).$t Hobbit. Related expressions RDA 26.1 Common expression relationships: Whole-part (e.g., translations in a compilation) Revisions Editions Translations Language editions Abridgements 35 Related expressions: LC core LCPS 26.1 LC core expression relationships: Whole-part relationships for expressions in a compilation (same policy as for works) Sequential serial relationships 36 Example 1: Whole-part expression Authorized access points for the expressions: 100 1# $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952245 10 $a Two Norwegian novels / $c Per Petterson. 505 0# $a Out stealing horses -- To Siberia. 700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Ut og stjæle hester. $l English. 700 12 $a Petterson, Per, $d 1952- $t Til Sibir. $l English. 740 02 $a Out stealing horses. 740 02 $a To Siberia. 37 Example 2: Related expression translation Authorized access point: 100 240 245 700 1# $a Brown, Dan, $d 196410 $a Digital fortress. $l French 10 $a Forteresse digitale. 1# $i Translation of: $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964- $t Digital fortress. 38 Example 3: Related expression translation Structured description in 500 field: 100 240 245 500 1# 10 10 ## $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964$a Digital fortress. $l French $a Forteresse digitale. $a Translation of: Digital fortress / Dan Brown. -- 1st ed. -- New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998. -- 371 pages ; 22 cm. Example 4: Related expression translation Structured description in 765 field: 100 240 245 *765 1# 10 10 0# $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964$a Digital fortress. $l French $a Forteresse digitale. $a Brown, Dan, 1964- $t Digital fortress $b 1st ed. $d New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1998 $h 371 pages ; 22 cm $w (DLC) 9703318 * 2nd indicator “blank” = “Translation of” 40 Example 5: Related expression translation Unstructured description in 500 field: 100 240 245 500 1# 10 10 ## $a $a $a $a Brown, Dan, $d 1964Digital fortress. $l French Forteresse digitale. Translation of the author’s novel Digital fortress. 41 Related manifestations RDA 27.1 Common manifestation relationships: Reproductions Different formats for same expression (e.g., book vs. CD; book vs. PDF) Special issues LC core relationships: reproductions 42 Recording related manifestations Structured or unstructured description: Linking entry fields: 775 or 776 5XX Not by an authorized access point LC: cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.4 in subfield $i if MARC content designation does not give relationship 43 Example: Related manifestations 245 00 $a Health statistics for elementary -school children. 264 #1 $a Baltimore : $b Johns Hopkins University, $c 2009300 ## $a volumes ; $c 27 cm 776 08 $i Also issued as: $t Health statistics for elementary-school children $d Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University, 2009- $h CD-ROMs : 4 3/4 in. 44 Reproductions: LC core LC: Generally, give information about the original in a linking field (i.e. a structured description): MARC 775 field if same carrier 776 field if different carrier Use information as is from the record for the original If detailed information is not available, give a bibliographic history note in a MARC 500 field (this is an unstructured 45 description) Example: Reproduction Structured description including an identifier: 100 1# $a Ringwalt, J. Luther $q (John Luther) 245 10 $a Anecdotes of General Ulysses S. Grant. 264 #1 $a Washington, D.C. : $b Library of Congress Preservation Microfilming Program, $c 1993. 300 ## $a 1 microfilm reel (118 pages) ; $c 35 mm 776 08 $i Reproduction of (manifestation): $a Ringwalt, J. Luther (John Luther) $t Anecdotes of General Ulysses S. Grant $d Philadelphia : J.B. Lippincott Company, 1886 $h 118 p. ; 18 cm. $n Call number of original: E672.R58 $w (DLC) 10032685 46 Related items RDA 28.1 Common item relationships Reproduction of a specific copy “Bound with” Item added to copy of manifestation in a special collection Relationships that apply only to a single copy of the manifestation -so, usually local information 47 Recording Related items RDA 28.1 Structured or unstructured description: Linking entry fields: 7XX 5XX (NLNZ uses 5XX fields for these relationships in the AACR2 environment) Not by an authorized access point Cataloger judgment to use relationship designators in RDA appendix J.5 in subfield $i if MARC content designation does not give relationship 48 Examples: Related items 501 $i Bound with: $a ___________. $5 DLC 775 $i Reprint of (item): $t Hiking in Unicoi State Park $d Helen, GA : RST Publishers, 1955 $h 22 p. : ill. ; 19 cm. 49 Summary Related resources LC core: Works and Expressions: Manifestations: Whole part compilations Serial sequential relationships Reproductions Items: “Bound withs” Reproductions 50 4. Relationships between persons, families, and corporate bodies Entities in relationships: Group 2 Relationships in authority records: Related persons (ch. 30) Related families (ch. 31) Related corporate bodies (ch. 32) 51 What’s really important Identify relationships for the resource you describe Determine which ones are important Work out how to record those using RDA instructions and MARC coding Contribute your ideas for NLNZ policy on criteria for relationships Exercise Complete the Module 5 exercise Record relationships for the resource(s) you have been describing