Best Practice in Nuclear Security
and the role of the
World Institute for Nuclear Security
(WINS)
Towards a CBN Security Culture: developing a holistic approach, 24 April 2012
Launch in September 2008 at the IAEA GC
“WINS fills an urgent gap in our need to
strengthen the nuclear security system.”
Corporate Governance and Security Strategy
Respective responsibilities
WHAT
WHO
Develop International Guidelines and
Recommendations
IAEA
Define National Security Policy
Government
Define Regulatory Requirements
National Security Regulator
Inspect and Verify Compliance on
behalf of the State
National Security Regulator
Legal Accountability for Implementing
Security
Private Companies or Government
Owned Facilities
Managing the Risk
Doing exactly what the regulator requires satisfies one aspect of
security. However, in spite of meeting regulatory requirements, in a
successful attack your company would likely lose credibility and
stature as well as becoming the liable party. Your company must
determine what is “financially affordable”.
WINS’ MISSION
To provide those who are
accountable for nuclear
security with an international
forum in which to share and
promote best security
practice.
How WINS can support UNSCR/1540
Promote Dialogue and Exchange with
Industry
Operators are key to effective implementation
of nuclear security measures
Learn from experience of others and share
best practice
WINS offers opportunities to engage the
nuclear industry but NOT to speak for it
Political Commitment to Improve Nuclear Security
The 2010 Nuclear Security Work Plan
Promote and sustain strong nuclear security culture
and corporate commitment to implement robust security
practices, including regular exercises and performance
testing of nuclear security features
Facilitate exchange of best practices...in nuclear
security in the nuclear industry and in this respect will
utilise relevant institutions to support such exchanges
“Nuclear security, which aims to
secure nuclear materials from
terrorists, is a prerequisite for all
nuclear activities.”
President Lee Myung-bak
The 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit
“We are keen to contribute to the peaceful use of nuclear
energy by leading the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit to a
success. Nuclear security, which aims to secure nuclear
materials from terrorists, is a prerequisite for all nuclear
activities. I look forward to leaders from all over the world
gathering in Seoul ...to reach concrete and action-oriented
agreements to guide future activities”
President Lee Myung-bak
The Key Issues
HOW DO WE CONVERT
POLITICAL COMMITMENT INTO
A PRACTICAL AND SUSTAINABLE
REALITY?
HOW DO WE DEVELOP
NUCLEAR SECURITY LEADERS
FOR THE FUTURE?
WINS’ Achievements to the End of 2011
25
30
8
International
Best Practice
Guides
published
International
Best Practice
Workshops
Published
languages
About Best Practices
?
About Best Practices
best practice = most expensive practice
?
About Best Practices
best practice = most expensive practice
About Best Practices
Impact/
Effectiveness
Sustainability
Efficiency
Collaboration/
Integration
Threats,
consequences, and
targets
International
recommendations
and guidance
BEST
PRACTICES
Operator’s
experience
State and
regulator’s
experience
Facilitated Workshops using Innovative Techniques
Practical exercises including simulated Force on Force
Best Practice Guides; All Operationally Based
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
NUCLEAR SECURITY FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS
LEARNING FROM OPERATING EXPERIENCE
HUMAN RELIABILITY
EFFECTIVE SECURITY REGULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
TRACKING TRANSPORT OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL
SECURITY OF HIGH ACTIVITY RADIOACTIVE SOURCES
MAKING SECURITY EFFICIENT
MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN NUCLEAR SECURITY
WORKING EFFECTIVELY WITH EXTERNAL RESPONSE FORCES
GUARD FORCE TRAINING AND MOTIVATION
SECURITY EXERCISES
MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTANCY IN SUPPORT OF
NUCLEAR SECURITY
Best Practice Guides; All Operationally Based
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NUCLEAR SECURITY CULTURE
SECURITY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
MANAGING INTERNAL THREATS
THREAT ASSESSMENT
SECURITY GOVERNANCE
ACCOUNTABILITY AND LIABILITY FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY
INCIDENTS
INTEGRATED APPROACH TO NUCLEAR SAFETY AND SECURITY
SECURITY BY DESIGN
MANAGEMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF ARMED GUARD
FORCES
NUCLEAR SECURITY GUARD SELECTION AND RECRUITMENT
SECURITY OF WELL LOGGING RADIOACTIVE SOURCES
SECURITY OF IT & IC SYSTEMS AT NUCLEAR FACILITIES
COMMUNICATING NUCLEAR SECURITY INFORMATION
All Guides have a Self Assessment Section
THE “RIGHT”
ANSWER IS
ALWAYS “YES”
We Provide a Security Management “Maturity Scale”
1
2
3
4
5
INEFFECTIVE
DEVELOPING
GOOD
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
WORLD CLASS
Compendium Of Best Practices Launched
Compendium Of Best Practices Launched
Market Mechanisms to Improve Security
 NUCLEAR SAFETY PERFORMANCE
IN US POWER PLANTS AS
DETERMINED BY INPO
INFLUENCES THE INSURANCE
PREMIUM PAID, BUT THERE IS
CURRENTLY NO SUCH LINKAGE
WITH NUCLEAR SECURITY
PERFORMANCE
 OTHER MARKET SECTORS, E.G.
MARITIME, IT SYSTEMS, ARE
EXPLORING THE USE OF MARKET
INCENTIVES TO IMPROVE
SECURITY PERFORMANCE
Constantly Updated Website
2008
2009
2010
2011
Interactive Member’s Area 2012
ANNUAL REPORT 2011
WINS Membership Growth
1000+
Members
Interface Between Nuclear Safety and Security
SECURITY
SAFETY
Interface Between Nuclear Safety and Security
ALL HAZARDS APPROACH
SECURITY
SAFETY
WANO/WINS Collaboration Launched
WORKING GROUP
Professional Development
NUCLEAR SECURITY
UNEQUAL
OPPORTUNITIES
NUCLEAR SAFETY
The WINS Academy Launched
WINS is proud to
introduce….
The WINS Academy Launched
THE WINS ACADEMY MISSION
To provide world-class, accredited, competencybased training materials for those managers with
nuclear security responsibilities.
The WINS Academy Launched
The WINS Academy
materials will be available
for use by Institutes and
Centres of Excellence
around the world, to help
integrate security into daily
operations…
The WINS Academy Launched
....help Operators
understand their
responsibilities, which will
also support effective
implementation of
UNSCR/1540.
CONCLUSIONS
We helped improve the quality of
nuclear security implementation
worldwide.
2011
2010
2009
2012
Thank you for your attention
Funding sources from 2009 – 2012
2.9%
0.1%
50% USG
1.1%
5.3%
28.6%
17.1%
0.7%
9.6%
4.4%
30.1%
NTI
US DOE
Norway
Canada
New Zealand
US State
UK FCO
US DOD
McArthur
JAEA