Supplemental to Caroline C. Fitz, Alyssa N. Zucker and Laina Y. Bay-Cheng Vol. 36(3), September 2012 and podcast DS1 Explore potential differences among women who endorse feminist ideals but not a feminist identity Examine the phenomenon of “I am not a feminist, but…” (see also Zucker, PWQ, 2004) DS2 A response to discrimination and marginalization Aims to empower women and produce equality Can manifest in individuals’ attitudes, identities, or both What does feminism mean to you? DS3 Who is a feminist? ◦ Women who label themselves as feminists and hold feminist attitudes Who is a nonlabeler? ◦ Women who do not label themselves as feminist yet hold feminist attitudes Who is a nonfeminist? ◦ Women who neither label themselves nor hold feminist attitudes DS4 Quasi-feminists: individuals who closely resemble feminists in their attitudes and values but not identification Neoliberals: individuals who hold some of the same positions as feminists on certain issues but for different ideological reasons DS5 Why might an individual be a “quasi-feminist? Stigmatization of feminists Little or no exposure to positive portrayals of feminists DS6 What is a neoliberal ideology? Belief an equitable society is formed by personal responsibility and competition The “American Dream”: Hard work + ability = success -regardless of group membership DS7 Support equal pay for equal work Support affirmative action Question sexual double standard Support social justice and collectivism FEMINIST Support equal pay for equal work Oppose regulating opportunities Adhere more to sexual double standard See social justice as unnecessary-focus on individual effort and merit NEOLIBERAL DS8 Most past research has suggested nonlabelers are either: ◦ All quasi-feminist Or ◦ All Neoliberal This study examines potential differences among nonlabelers into these two groups DS9 Report weaker sexist beliefs Report less support of meritocratic, systemjustifying and social dominance beliefs Quasi-Feminists Report stronger sexist beliefs Report stronger support of meritocratic, systemjustifying and social dominance beliefs Neoliberals DS10 Sample 1: ◦ 211 women ◦ Mean age 19.27 ◦ 153 (73%) in 1st or 2nd year of college Sample 2: ◦ 301 women ◦ Mean age 19.19 ◦ 222 (73.8%) in 1st or 2nd year of college DS11 Feminist Beliefs and Behavior Measure ◦ Categorize participants as nonfeminists, feminists or nonlabelers ◦ Extent of agreement with three statements: Girls and women have not been treated as well as boys and men in our society Women and men should be paid equally for the same work Women’s unpaid work should be more socially valued Indicate whether they identify as feminist DS12 Perceptions of Meritocracy Inventory ◦ Extent to which one believes in a system of equal opportunity where success is based on individual merit Just World Scale Modern Sexism Scale ◦ Extent to which one believes people get what they work for and what they deserve ◦ Extent to which an individual believes sexism no longer impacts society DS13 Ambivalent Sexism Inventory ◦ Attitudes toward women that are antagonistic or attitudes that reinforce traditional stereotypes about women Equal Opportunity Scale ◦ How strongly one believes that hard work and ability are the determinants of success and support free competition without social policy to enforce equality Social Dominance Orientation Scale for Others ◦ Preference for inequality among social groups DS14 Feminists=60 participants Nonfeminists= 62 participants Nonlabelers= 89 participants ◦ 45 (51%)=neoliberal ◦ 44 (49%)= quasi-feminist DS15 Report weaker sexist beliefs Modern Sexism Scale Hostile Sexism Hostile Sexism S1:M= 2.07 S2: M=2.08 S2:M= 2.47 Report stronger sexist beliefs Modern Sexism Scale Benevolent Sexism S2:M=2.70 S1:M= 2.67 S2: M=2.60 S2: M= 2.72 Benevolent Sexism S2: M=3.06 All means between quasi-feminists and neoliberals were significantly different Hypothesis was supported Quasi-Feminists Neoliberals DS16 Report less support of meritocratic beliefs Perceptions of Meritocracy Inventory S1:M= 3.21 S2: M=2.97 Report more support of meritocratic beliefs Perceptions of Meritocracy Inventory S1:M= 3.89 S2: M=3.84 All means between quasi-feminists and neoliberals were significantly different Hypothesis was supported Quasi-Feminists Neoliberals DS17 Report less systemjustifying beliefs Just World Scale S1:M= 3.94 S2: M=3.81 S1:M= 2.76 S2: M=2.45 Equal Opportunity Beliefs S2: M=2.77 Report more systemjustifying beliefs Just World Scale Equal Opportunity Beliefs S2: M=3.72 All means between quasi-feminists and neoliberals were significantly different Hypothesis was supported Quasi-Feminists Neoliberals DS18 Report less social dominance beliefs Social Dominance Orientation S2: M=2.36 Report more social dominance beliefs Social Dominance Orientation S2: M=2.91 Means between quasi-feminists and neoliberals were significantly different Hypothesis was supported Quasi-Feminists Neoliberals DS19 See article for means for feminists and nonfeminists for all measures See article for additional information regarding cluster analysis and MANOVA results DS20 What are the possible implications of these findings? Neoliberals see gender equality as a meritocratic issue rather than a feminist issue Political differences among nonfeminists, feminists, quasi-feminists, and neoliberals DS21 Experiences of discrimination can have a detrimental impact on well-being ◦ This impact may be heightened for neoliberals who believe the world is fair and just Attributing negative experiences to discrimination can protect self-esteem ◦ Neoliberals may be at risk for blaming themselves rather than recognizing bias ◦ Quasi-feminists are more likely to recognize social injustice when it occurs and not blame themselves DS22 Neoliberals may be less likely than quasifeminists or feminists to work to improve women and other minority groups’ well-being Neoliberals can be allies in activism efforts if issues are presented in terms of fairness Quasi-feminists may engage in more activism if they are exposed to positive attitudes about feminists DS23 Where should this topic of study go next? Develop a single questionnaire to differentiate between quasifeminists and neoliberals Explore the impact of SES, ethnicity, sexual orientation or other identity factors DS24 DS25