Architecture, Taxonomies and DPM

advertisement

The European Banking Authority:

Update on XBRL Architecture, Taxonomies and

DPM

16 th Eurofiling Workshop

12 December 2012 | Frankfurt am Main

Andreas Weller | Head of IT, EBA

© 2012 | EBA | European Banking Authority

Eurofiling

> The 16 th Eurofiling Workshop and what it mean for EBA

The year 2012 the year of awareness

> DPM, Taxonomy and XBRL is more as to write a regulation

> The difference are the data points, the full description of the data points and the technology

> To agree on data points in a European level is a challenge

> The description to make it crystal clear for everybody is a challenge

(DPM) as the content is very complex.

> The technology XBRL is not more a challenge

The role of the EBA

Business side: IT side

Several committees or subgroups

Scara

…..

FINREP

COREP to build different parts of the DPM

(datapoints and data points description,…)

EBA and taskforces ensure consistency of all groups

- IT of EBA

- XBRL subgroup of ITSB

- project teams from EBA to build the architecture and the

Taxonomy of FINREP and

COREP.

Eurofiling members give a helping hand

Build Process

Reporting

Templates

1

Analysis

Matrix

2

DPM process

DPM

Database

3

XBRL

Taxonomy

4

Business representation of reporting requirements

Dimensional categorisation of template data elements

Quality checks

DPM representation in a formal metamodel

Business experts I T experts

Technical format for data exchange

Business Process

Who is participating?

> 6 working groups and committees

> EBA staff

> IT support

> 30 countries

> +/- 50 active contributors

> +/- 200 voting contributors

> In Public consultations: +/- 1000 market participants

What was done in 2012:

> Solid Base for DPM from most of the groups

> Modeling in the DPM

> +/- 40 rounds to harmonize

> Alignment pre CRDIV

> Basic validation

> Definition of specific features for the taxonomies

> Basic relation ship regulation

DPM

Technical part for COREP and FINREP

DPM:

> Support in executing the Quality checks in the DPM

> Tune the quality checks for the

DPM

> Build a database Meta-model to support the complexity of the

DPM (UK FSA and EBA)

Meta-model

(DP formal model)

De scri bes

Data model

Metadata

DPM

Published in

XBRL Taxonomy files

IT deliverable Architecture document

Architecture document :

Open points:

> Control of validations: assertion sets or preconditions

Closed discussions:

> General topics

> Modelling of primary items

Modelling of primary items

Option B

AT dimension determines:

> Data type (monetary, date…)

> Period type (instant / duration)

Base dimension determines:

> Sign convention (credit / debit)

Primary items are used to model the AT dimension.

Around 350 primary items

XBRL standards and the reporting process

> Modelling of primary items: Decision on Option B

Filer Consumer

Table Spec

Instance document

Staging

DB

Instance document

Analysis

DB

ETL Validation

XBRL 2.1

XDT

XBRL Formulae

Submission

/ reception

XBRL

API

TF

Validation

XBRL 2.1

XDT

XBRL Formulae

ETL

Query & report

XBRL standards and the reporting process

> Modelling of primary items: Decision on Option B

Filer Consumer

Table Spec

Instance document

Staging

DB

Instance document

Analysis

DB

ETL Validation

XBRL 2.1

XDT

XBRL Formulae

Submission

/ reception

XBRL

TF

Validation

XBRL 2.1

XDT

XBRL Formulae

ETL

Query & report

Option C

Transformation from Option B to C

Data type Period type Member number mi125

Primary item mi

Primary item x125

Dimension AT

Control of validations: assertion sets

Instance document table A reported?

Perform validation

Validate Set A ?

Yes

Results of assertion A.1

Results of assertion A.2

Results of assertion A.3

table B reported?

Validate Set B ?

No

Application layer

Taxonomy

Assertion Set (table A)

Assertion A.1

Assertion A.2

Assertion A.3

Assertion Set (table B)

Assertion B.1

Assertion B.2

XBRL Processor

Control of validations: preconditions

Instance document table A reported?

table B reported?

Perform validation

Result of assertion A.1

Result of assertion A.2

Result of assertion A.3

Assertion A.1

Assertion A.2

Assertion A.3

Taxonomy

Precondition

(table A reported?)

Precondition

(table B reported?)

Assertion B.1

Assertion B.1

Application layer XBRL Processor

IT deliverables: Quality Handbook

 This document summarizes the European Banking Authority (EBA) Due Process

Handbook for the EBA Taxonomy Review.

 In order to achieve the necessary level of quality, a substantial effort has been devoted to reviewing and defining a proper due process. The due process of the

EBA for reviewing the EBA Data Point Model (DPM) based taxonomies is a formal approach to insure delivery of a set of high quality XBRL taxonomies.

 The taxonomies developed by the EBA Taxonomy Team are the XBRL representations of the DPMs published as a part of the Implementing Technical

Standards (ITSs). The taxonomies are developed by the EBA Taxonomy Team according to the DPMs approved by EBA business experts.

 This document focuses primarily on the quality assurance activities of the

Taxonomy Review Group and their interaction with other groups.

 The objective of the taxonomy review is specifically to review the developed taxonomies for syntactical compliance to the XBRL standard and semantical compliance against the DPM as defined by the EBA as well as to track of noncompliance and follow-up.

Quality Review: The stages of the due process

Beta Release Taxonomy FINREP

What is the Beta Release of FINREP?:

 +/- 95 % business content of future FINREP

 +/- 98% of the Taxonomy of the future architecture

What can you do with it?:

 Check your systems if you are able to process

 Check the performance of your systems

 Come up with creative ideas for your customer how to fill in

 Use it for demos with your customer

 Feel free to inform us, when your system is compatible to the

Beta Taxonomy

 Feel free to inform us about any non compatibilty to the XBRL

Standard

Beta Release Taxonomy FINREP

What can you not do with it?:

 The business content is not finalised, do not start to hardcode on the base of this Taxonomy when you are a system integrator.

 Do not analyse the content of the data points.

 Do not make a gap analysis with the Beta Taxonomy on your business data. Use the DPM, the first final release for FINREP and

COREP will be a DPM

 Get test data with the Beta Release

 Take an assumption on the open point in the architecture document

 See the Beta Taxonomy in isolation

Beta Release Taxonomy FINREP

You can find it from the 12/12/12 on www.eurofiling.info

with some supporting documents.

Contact information

Andreas Weller

Head of IT andreas.weller@eba.europa.eu

European Banking Authority

Floor 18 | Tower 42 | 25 Old Broad Street

London EC2N 1HQ | United Kingdom t +44 (0)20 7933 9900 f +44 (0)20 7382 1771 info@eba.europa.eu

www.eba.europa.eu

Download