Blending Assessments for Optimizing Learning Patricia McGee This work is licensed under the Creative Commons NonCommercial Sampling Plus 1.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc-sampling+/1.0/ 1 Agenda • • • • • • Feedback Placing Assessment Authentic Blended Assessments Rubrics for Assessment Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Aligning Strategy with Map 2 Feedback 3 Student reported tech preferences The Student View of Blended Learning 4 Learning cycle Receive information Assess Process/practice Apply Self-assess 5 1. Lecturecast Confirmatio n of Learning Practice 5. Present/tes t Active Learning Most important tool for students 4. Complete Assignment –complete rubric 2. Discussion Homework Metacognition 3. Plan w/ rubric 6 Example: Distributed Feedback • Podcast • Text • Video Introduce Interact • Chat • Discussion • Office Hours Demonstrate • Technology • Peer Critique • Report • Present • Document • Produce Practice 7 Activity: Where’s your feedback? Classroom? • Written? • Oral? • Peer? Online? • Synchronous? • Asynchronous? In Between? • Just-in-time? • Just-in-need? 8 Overview Overview Placing Assessment 9 • • • • One to many Just in time assessment Immediacy Focus on methods • • • • One to one Just in need assessment Ambiguity Focus on strategies 10 Where, what and how • Institutional policy • Most assessments occur online – Exceptions: proctored exams – Classroom exams (typically include performance) Online typically… – Low stake – Reinforce content learning – Serve as a bridge 11 Starting with Objectives • Formative: 1-2 objectives • Summative: multiple objectives • Practice vs. assessment (ex) • Classroom, online, independent levels of Bloom’s From http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy 12 Formal Informal Quizzes Homework Tests Classroom Assessment Projects SelfAssessment Presentations 13 What is your approach? Learnercentered SelfMonitored Instructordirected 14 Learner-centered: Open Wiki Exam • Questions, based on the week's topic, are devised by the students—not the lecturer. • During the first six weeks of the semester, 10 students are required to post one question each week on the wiki in response to the lectures • Approximately 60 questions resulted, from which the final questions for the exam were selected. From http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=103-1 15 Self-Monitored (Hyflex) Self-paced Benchmarks Assignment/Quizzes Final exam Pre-test Instructor as Consultant Completed Assignments/Quizzes/Projects Team-based Final Exam 16 Discussion: Assessment • What are highest priorities for assessment? • What are greatest concerns? • Write on index card and exchange with other group. 17 http://teachingcommons.depaul.edu/Feedback_Grading/learning.html AUTHENTIC BLENDED ASSESSMENT 18 Authentic Assessments Characteristics Situated Cognition • Typically performancebased • Embedded tasks that are similar to those performed by professionals as they do their jobs • Usually associated with inquiry, hands-on and performance-based activities • Measure both knowledge and ability 19 Goals of Situated Cognition • Allow learner to apply knowledge to day-to-day situations • Retrieve knowledge when needed • Brings together individual and environment Brown, Collins, Duguid 20 https://sites.google.com/site/conceptlearninginstruction/ 21 Examples of “authentic assessments”? • Model building • Measurement taking • Narrative/Investigating reporting • Lab reporting • Debates • Documentation • Portfolios • Science notebook/journals • Demonstrations • Simulations • Other??? http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/ 22 Informal Example: Week Overview 23 Sample Map Informal 24 Sample Map Informal 25 Sample Map Informal 26 Activity Consider strategies for assessment: – Your approach? – Location? – Frequency? – Feedback to learner? Challenge: How can you turn an objective assessment into an authentic assessment using the advantage of blended? 27 RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT 28 Rubrics http://wiki.bssd.org/images_up/d/d0/BSSD_Presentation_Rubric.png 29 Rubric Evaluation Checklist • Does it assess what you think it assesses? • Does it really reflect what the students were actually doing? • Is it fair and is it doable? • Does it heavily assess prior knowledge? • Do the students know about it ahead of time? (first day of unit?) 30 Development Steps 1. Identify: excepted and exemplary category 2. Describe the worst acceptable product using these characteristics: lowest category of what you are assessing (e.g., critical thinking, writing, process, participation) 3. Identify the characteristics/behavior of what you are assessing (e.g., presenting, problemsolving) 4. Decide what kind of scales you will use to score the rubric (e.g. numerical, qualitative, or numerical-qualitative) 31 Then… 5.Develop descriptions of intermediate-level products and assign them to intermediate categories: – 1-5: unacceptable, marginal, acceptable, good, outstanding – 1-5: novice, competent, exemplary – Other meaningful set 6.Test it out with colleagues or students by applying it to some products or behaviors and revise as needed to eliminate ambiguities 32 Rubric Tips • Consider developing a rubric with students in class • Use examples to share with students, so they can begin to understand what excellent, good, and poor work looks like • Have students grade sample products using a rubric to help them understand how they are applied • In a peer-review process, have students apply the rubric to each other’s work before submitting it for official grading • Provide rubric to students when assignment is given 33 ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES IN THE CLASSROOM : BLENDED? 34 Applications in the class… • High stakes • Clarify – Online quizzes/tests – Muddy points • Control context – Security – Academic integrity • Expand options – – – – Performance Peer assessment Timing Tools/materials (e.g., lab) 35 Classroom Assessment Techniques Quick snapshots of learner’s progress Informal Ungraded Low threat and no risk Inform instructor about student learning Inform learner about learning progress From Classroom Assessment Techniques 36 CAT: Chain Notes Description What do to with the data Students pass around an envelope on which the teacher has written one question about the class. When the envelope reaches a student he/she spends a moment to respond to the question and then places the response in the envelope. Go through the student responses and determine the best criteria for categorizing the data with the goal of detecting response patterns. Discussing the patterns of responses with students can lead to better teaching and learning. Time Required Prep: Low In class: Low Analysis: Low √ Survey/poll: online √ Envelope: class Taken verbatim from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm 37 CAT: One Minute Paper Description During the last few minutes of the class period, ask students to answer on a half-sheet of paper: "What is the most important point you learned today?"; and, "What point remains least clear to you?". The purpose is to elicit data about students' comprehension of a particular class session. What do to with the data Review responses and note any useful comments. During the next class periods emphasize the issues illuminated by your students' comments. Time Required Prep: Low In class: Low Analysis: Low Google Forms: online Discussion: class/online Taken verbatim from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm 38 CAT: Memory Matrix Description What do to with the data Students fill in cells of a twodimensional diagram for which instructor has provided labels. For example, in a music course, labels might consist of periods (Baroque, Classical) by countries (Germany, France, Britain); students enter composers in cells to demonstrate their ability to remember and classify key concepts. Tally the numbers of correct and incorrect responses in each cell. Analyze differences both between and among the cells. Look for patterns among the incorrect responses and decide what might be the cause (s). Time Required Prep: Med In class: Med Analysis: Med Concept Map: class/online Clickers: class Google Spreadsheet: online Taken verbatim from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm 39 CAT: Prior Knowledge Description What do to with the data Probe for background knowledge with short, simple questionnaires prepared by instructors for use at the beginning of a course or at the start of new units or topics; can serve as a pretest Summarize and present to class or have students use for goal setting. Used to determine what to review or focus on in course. Time Required Prep: Low In class: Low Analysis: Low Survey/Polls: class/online Clickers: class Taken verbatim from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm 40 CAT: Empty Outlines Description In a limited amount of time students complete an empty or partially completed outline of an in-class presentation or homework assignment. What do to with the data Time Required Analyze to identify gaps Prep: Low or misconceptions In class: Low Have students identify Analysis: Low or correct errors Shared Notetaking: class/online Concept Mapping; class/online Bubblus™ Mind42™ Mindomo™ Wordle™ Taken verbatim from http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/assess.htm 41 Self-Assessment & Reflection • Relates to accountability • Provides a mirror of progress to student • Instills satisfaction and supports goalachievement • EXAMPLE: Electronic Personal Development Planning ePDP as a strategy increases learner’s awareness of themselves University of Wolverhampton 42 ALIGNING ACTIVITY WITH MAP 43 Activity: Where is feedback & assessment? Part 1 Part 2 Consider: When, where, how? • Communicating progress • Communicating achievement • Self-reflection • Acknowledgement • Accountability • Go to wiki • Click on Assessment Scavenger Hunt (Google Doc) • Optional – share tech you use for assessment and add to doc 44 Take-Aways • Have you built in feedback and assessment points? • Where and how does formal and informal assessment provide information to the learner? • Does assessment reflect all modes:F2F, online, blended? • In what ways are students provide opportunities to reflect upon their learning? 45 Patricia McGee, PhD Patricia.mcgee@utsa.edu This work is licensed under the Creative Commons NonCommercial Sampling Plus 1.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/nc-sampling+/1.0/ 46