to the Frame slides

advertisement

FRAME what is to be evaluated

Patricia Rogers, RMIT University, Melbourne

Part 3 of 8 AEA Coffee Break Webinars 2013

The Rainbow Framework

Why do we need to start with a clear definition?

Make Decision

Source: Hobbies on a Budget / Flickr

Why do we need to start with a clear definition?

Frame Decision Make Decision

Source: Hobbies on a Budget / Flickr

Why do we need to start with a clear definition?

Frame Decision Make Decision

Design Evaluation

Source: Hobbies on a Budget / Flickr

Why do we need to start with a clear definition?

Frame Decision Make Decision

Frame Evaluation Design Evaluation

Source: Hobbies on a Budget / Flickr

Four evaluation tasks in FRAMING

Identify primary intended users

Decide purpose(s)

(intended uses)

Specify key evaluation questions

Determine what

‘success’ looks like

1.

Identify primary intended users

Possible primary intended users

Image source: IN 157s01 – Curt Carnemark/ World Bank

Families

Teachers

Principal

School

Council

Education

Department

Other schools

2.

Decide purpose(s)(intended uses)

Purposes

(intended uses)

Image source: CK-CO138 - Charlotte Kesl / World Bank

Formative – improve it

Summative – continue or stop it

Broader evidence base

Lobby and advocate

Purposes

(intended uses)

Provide voice

Build trust and legitimacy

Accountability

Interconnection between intended users and intended uses

FRAME

Identify primary intended users

Decide purpose(s)

(intended uses)

3.

Specify the key evaluation questions

Descriptive:

How many children attend?

What learning tools are used?

Has learning improved?

Key evaluation questions

Image source: ML030S09 - Curt Carnemark / World Bank

Causal:

Has the program contributed to improved learning?

Key evaluation questions

Synthesis:

Has the program been a success?

Is it Value For Money compared to alternatives?

Key evaluation questions

Action:

How can the program be improved? Should it continue?

Key evaluation questions

Options for answering different types of questions

MANAGE

DEFINE

FRAME

DESCRIBE Descriptive Questions-

What were the activities, changes, context?

UNDERSTAND

CAUSES

Causal questions –What caused or contributed to the identified changes?

SYNTHESIZE Synthesis questions –

Overall was it good? Value for money?

REPORT &

SUPPORT USE

Action questions-

What should we do?

4.

Determine what success looks like

What does success look like?

Image source: LQ-CN7499 World Bank

Processes:

Are students fairly treated?

What does success look like?

Outcomes:

Do students learn to read?

What does success look like?

Distribution of costs and benefits:

Who benefits from the program? Whose needs are met? Who is disadvantaged by it?

What does success look like?

Criteria and standards:

Reading levels – better than before, or better than national average, or national benchmark?

You can read about this case here : http://betterevaluation.org/blog

/outcome_harvesting_bionet

Further resources http://betterevaluation.org/plan/ frame facebook.com/betterevaluation

@bettereval

Patricia Rogers

RMIT University patricia.rogers@rmit.edu.au

Download