The impact of local associational life on citizens` attitudes towards

advertisement

The impact of local associational life on citizens’ attitudes towards local government

Jacob Aars & Dag Arne Christensen

Putnam’s study of civic traditions in

Italian regions (1993)

 “Conditions for creating strong, responsive, effective representative institutions”

 The vibrancy of associational life affects institutional performance:

 The more associations within a community, the more responsive and effective government

A contextual argument

 Context matters?

 Vibrancy of associational life:

 Contextual or compositional explanation

A multilevel analysis

 The argument for individual-level dependent variables

 The effects of institutional performance feeds back into the political system only through citizens’ perceptions

 Creates demands/support

Three dependent variables

 Effectiveness: Councillors’ knowledge about local issues

 Effectiveness: Councillors’ ability to solve problems

 Responsiveness: Councillors willingsness to listen to citizens’ views

Data

 Individual level

 Largest ever Norwegian survey of citizen attitudes towards public services and the political system

 12.659 respondents

 Municipal level

 The Central Coordinating Register for Legal

Entities (Brønnøysund Register Centre)

 Municipal-level data from the Regional Database,

Norwegian Social Science Databases

Results

Table X. Multi-Level regressions: Final models with individual- and municipal-level effects

Constant

Individual effects

Complain

Political interest

University education

Progress Party

Red-green parties

Male

Age

Income

Active resident org.

Active sports org.

Active unions

Active music org.

Active state church

Active other rel/livssyn.

Municipal effects

Number of organisations

Population (logged)

Number of parties

University education

Poverty

Individual-level variance

Municipal-level variance

ICC

N Level-1

N Level-2

Knowledge

5.100****

-0.490***

0.071***

-0.009

-0.274***

0.145***

-0.139***

0.008***

-0.007

-0.031

-0.006

-0.025

0.040

0.065*

0.249***

-0.212***

-0.153***

0.078

3.987

8170

408

Capacity

4.936***

-0..481***

0.067***

0.002

-0.294***

0.197***

-0.146***

0.009***

-0.017**

-0.019

0.006

0.014

0.052

0.078**

0.195***

-0.166***

-0.107***

-0.098***

.0021***

-0.124**

0.016**

0.004 -0.016

Random effects (variance components)

1.890 1.841

0.137

6.935

8867

410

1.948

0.121

5.833

8890

409

Note: Table entries are maximum likelihood estimates. *** p< 0.01, ** p< 0.05, * p<0.10

Listen

5.015****

-0.481***

0.094***

0.068**

-0.352***

0.136***

-0.127***

0.007***

-0.000

0.006

0.027

0.037

0.076

0.041

0.235***

-0.164***

-0.135***

-0.118***

0.019***

-0.005

Download