Consultative Group Meeting M&E Sector Working Group Enabling Environment Challenges 1. 2. Inadequate institutional, legal and regulatory framework Roles, responsibilities and functional relationships between key players and stakeholders unclear 3. Planning and budgeting processes treated as separate functions with a weak link between the two 4. Policy cycle unharmonised across sectors 5. Weak response of MDAs to planning initiatives 6. Delay in the preparation of sector and district medium term development plans 7. Inadequate allocation of resources to planning 8. Inadequate capacity of NDPC, PPMEDS, RPCUs and DPCUs 9. Mainstreaming communication and stakeholder consultation and participation in the development planning, budgeting and monitoring processes. 10. Inadequate collaboration with media 11. Political polarisation of issues on national development Enabling environment Key priorities 1. Clarify and streamline roles of central management agencies 2. Harmonise the planning, budgeting and M&E cycle across sectors through Legislative Instruments and strengthening the linkages between each. 3. Strengthen national capacity to enforce rules and regulations 4. Develop capacity of NDPC, PPMEDs, RPCUs and DPCU’s through training and the adequate allocation of resources 5. Enhance stakeholder participation/citizen’s engagement in planning, budgeting and M&E 6. Ensure the adoption and implementation of the Freedom of Information Bill- preparation/training for Ministries is critical 7. Develop a Communication Strategy to drive communication around the MTDPF. 8. Review composition and tenure of NDPC – to remove political bias. M&E and Statistics Challenges 1. Weak demand for, and utilisation of, statistics and M&E results including budget performance 2. Weak institutional capacity at NDPC, GSS, MMDAs, MDAs 3. Existing M&E plan failed to fully deliver on the development and institutionalisation of M&E and statistics functions 4. Non compliance with planning and M&E guidelines 5. Limited incentives for M&E 6. Limited resources and budgetary allocations for statistics and M&E 7. Poor data quality, data gaps, inconsistencies and limited disaggregation 8. Inadequate MIS and ICT connectivity M&E and statistics Key priorities 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Reinforce the institutional arrangements to support and sustain effective M&E Strengthen, coordinate and harmonise existing M&E mechanisms for effective service delivery Develop a national M&E Plan containing a results matrix based on sector and district M&E plans. Strengthen technical capacity at all levels in M&E and statistics Roll out Ghana Statistics Development Plan including 2010 PHC, reform of GSS, long term census and survey programme Strengthen administrative statistics and sector/district level M&E Improve reporting on equity issues e.g., sex disaggregation and gender analysis Strengthen MIS systems and ICT connectivity SWG – Priority actions • Strengthen Government’s demand and use of information for policy making and monitoring • Improve the linkages between planning, budgeting , M&E and statistics with key focus on supporting roll-out of programme based budgeting • Prepare the National M&E plan including the results matrix • Build the institutional capacity in the collection, analysis and use of statistics and M&E information • Reduce DP support of parallel M&E systems at all levels of Government • Roll out of GSDP including 2010 PHC, reform of GSS, implementation of long term census and survey programme, improvement of administrative data • Identify champions in Government and SWGs for M&E and statistics. • Develop legal instruments based on Act 480,1994 • Increase stakeholder participation in planning and M&E • Consider how to institutionalise independent evaluations Thank you for listening…any questions?