Overview: Reviewing Your Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Facilitated by: Sara Summ & Kao Moua Her Regional Technical Assistance Coordinators Leslie Connors Principal – Franklin Elementary August 19, 2014 The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this PowerPoint and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material. Participant Outcomes • Understand the essential components of Selected and Intensive levels of support • Learn how a school has established a culturally responsive multi-level system of support focusing in on the selected and intensive levels Overview of Wisconsin’s RtI Framework Response to Intervention Is what? Does what? An organizational framework that guides implementation of a culturally responsive multi-level system of support to For what? achieve academic and behavioral success for all http://www.wisconsinrticenter.org/assets/files/rti-guiding-doc.pdf CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE PRACTICES include the degree to which a school’s programs, practices, procedures, and policies account for and adapt to the broad diversity of students' race, language, and culture. i.e., the students and community your school serves Multi-Level System of Support UNIVERSAL SELECTED INTENSIVE What level and type of support does student need? Well below or above Can we verify need? If so, what is underlying need? Moderately below or above DIG DEEPER Is student on track to meet or exceed outcome? SCREEN On track MATCH SUPPORTS TO NEEDS College & Career Readiness Outcome Balanced Assessment Instruction Collaboration High quality instruction Regular ongoing collaboration Formative, benchmark & summative assessments Universal PLUS Intervention or add’l challenge Universal PLUS Collaboration Universal PLUS Progress monitoring Universal PLUS Intervention Universal PLUS Problemsolving team Universal PLUS Progress monitoring (well below) or IN LIEU OF Universal (well above) Universal Level: Instruction, Assessments, & Collaboration • Provided for and about all students in the school Also referred to as core or tier one UNIVERSAL LEVEL OF SUPPORT Screening process Ongoing team collaboration Data driven Guided by protocols Cultural competence Family engagement Summative, benchmark, and formative assessments Multiple measures Culturally relevant Fidelity implementation Collaboration Culturally Responsive Practices High Quality Instruction Driven by CCR/CCSS Research-based practices Differentiated Culturally responsive Fidelity implementation Balanced Assessment UNIVERSAL LEVEL OF SUPPORT All learners have access to Universal level of support Balanced Assessment Collaboration Culturally Responsive Practices High Quality Instruction Goal = 100% proficiency with grade level standards/College and Career Readiness RtI premise: In a healthy system, 8090% of students’ needs can be met by Universal supports alone Selected Level: Instruction, Assessment, & Collaboration Provided for and about students: • With moderate learning needs • Above or below benchmarks • In addition to universal Also referred to as Tier 2, supplementary, secondary SELECTED LEVEL OF SUPPORT Regular collaboration Guided by protocols Content area expertise Cultural competence Student and family engagement Collaboration Digging deeper Progress monitoring Multiple measures Cultural relevance Student and family engagement Culturally Responsive Practices Balanced Assessment High Quality Instruction Driven by CCR/CCSS Menu of evidence-based interventions and add’l challenges Culturally responsive SELECTED LEVEL OF Provided in addition to the Universal level of support SUPPORT Think “groups” and common needs above and beyond the Universal reach Collaboration Balanced Assessment Culturally Responsive Practices High Quality Instruction RtI theory: In a healthy system, 10-15% of students are in need of support at the Selected level Below benchmark: Goal is success at the Universal Above: Goal is accelerated growth Intensive Level: Instruction, Assessment, & Collaboration Provided for and about students: • With significant learning needs • Well below or well above benchmarks • In addition to (below) or may be in lieu of (well above) universal Also referred to as Tier 3, targeted, tertiary INTENSIVE LEVEL OF SUPPORT Digging deeper and diagnostic Frequent progress monitoring Multiple measures Cultural relevance Student and family engagement Frequent collaboration High level of expertise Guided by protocols Cultural competence Student, family, community engagement Collaboration Culturally Responsive Practices Balanced Assessment High Quality Instruction Highly focused interventions and additional challenges Driven by CCR/CCSS High level of expertise Culturally responsive INTENSIVE LEVEL OF Think “individualized” and integrated RtI theory: In a healthy system, 1-5% of students are in need of support at the Intensive level SUPPORT Collaboration Balanced Assessment Culturally Responsive Practices High Quality Instruction Below benchmark: • Provided in addition to the Universal level of support • Goal is success at the Universal Above benchmark: • Provided in lieu of the Universal level of support • Goal is accelerated growth Reflection: Think, Pair, Share Squares with your thinking New idea or way of thinking Still a conflicting concept for you Handout C r e a tin g a n d S u stain ing Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Before beginning to collect data, first establish: Outcomes Screening measures Progress monitoring measures Decision rules and protocols Interventions and Additional Challenges C O L L A B O R AT I O N ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Multiple times throughout each school year: Screen students and organize data Monitor progress and adjust accordingly Match supports to needs Review data and set goals Dig deeper At the end of each school year: Evaluate and refine the process W H I L E D E M O N S T R AT I N G Plan logistics C U LT U R A L C O M P E T E N C E Then, at the start of each school year: Franklin Elementary School Multi-Level System of Support Building Our Future...One Child at a Time About Franklin Need for Action Encouraging Results C r e a tin g a n d S u stain ing Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Before beginning to collect data, first establish Progress monitoring measures Screening measures Outcomes Decision rules and protocols Interventions and additional challenges C O L L A B O R AT I O N ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Multiple times throughout each school year Screen students and organize data Monitor progress and adjust accordingly Match needs to supports Review data and set goals Dig deeper Ongoing Process Evaluate and refine the process W H I L E D E M O N S T R AT I N G Plan logistics C U LT U R A L C O M P E T E N C E Then, at the start of each school year Developing Cultural Competence “Seeds are only as good as the soil in which they are planted; likewise; school structures and practices are only as good as the climate/culture in which they are implemented.” Anthony Muhammad The Will to Lead, The Skill to Teach Our Vision Drives our System and Practices The school expectation is that all students must be successful academically and behaviorally. Every child - - no matter who they are - - learns Examples in Action! C r e a tin g a n d S u stain ing Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Before beginning to collect data, first establish Progress monitoring measures Screening measures Outcomes Decision rules and protocols Interventions and additional challenges C O L L A B O R AT I O N ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Multiple times throughout each school year Screen students and organize data Monitor progress and adjust accordingly Match needs to supports Review data and set goals Dig deeper Ongoing Process Evaluate and refine the process W H I L E D E M O N S T R AT I N G Plan logistics C U LT U R A L C O M P E T E N C E Then, at the start of each school year “We all have a hand in making Franklin a great school.” Wisconsin’s Vision for RtI • Structures to regularly review, analyze, and act on student data and adult practices • Cultural competence • Student and family engagement • Multiple types of measures: quantitative and qualitative • Student and implementation data • Screening and progress monitoring • Culturally relevant • Student and family engagement http://www.wisconsinrticenter.org/assets/files/rti-guiding-doc.pdf Essential Elements for Successful Team Collaboration • Schedule times to collaborate and decide on an agenda before meeting • Teams based on trust • Establish group norms • Hold each other accountable • Shift thinking from “my students” to “our students” • Divide responsibilities and meet deadlines Staff Collaborative Team Schedule • Mondays and Fridays – Tier 2/3 academic, GCT and Tier 2/3 behavior meetings • Tuesdays – professional development on the week’s focus • Wednesdays – analysis of student work • Thursdays – designing instruction and assessments C r e a tin g a n d S u stain ing Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Before beginning to collect data, first establish Progress monitoring measures Screening measures Outcomes Decision rules and protocols Interventions and additional challenges C O L L A B O R AT I O N ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Multiple times throughout each school year Screen students and organize data Monitor progress and adjust accordingly Match needs to supports Review data and set goals Dig deeper Ongoing Process Evaluate and refine the process W H I L E D E M O N S T R AT I N G Plan logistics C U LT U R A L C O M P E T E N C E Then, at the start of each school year Wisconsin’s Vision for RtI • • • • • Based on CCSS Research- and evidence-based practices Engaging Differentiated Culturally responsive http://www.wisconsinrticenter.org/assets/files/rti-guiding-doc.pdf Before beginning to collect data, first establish Outcomes Screening measures Progress monitoring measures Decision rules and protocols Interventions and additional challenges Continuum of Supports In addition to Tier 3 More than a year behind, gaps and misconceptions from many years Instead of Tier 2 Gaps and misconceptions disrupt participation Urgent Care Keeps up Thrives Tier 1 ½ Excels Tier 2 GCT Years ahead Tier 1 *Graphic adapted from Phil Daro, Tools for Principals & Administrators: Intervention Worksheet, Inside Mathematics Tier 1 • 75 minute block • Inclusive, team teaching • Technology-enhanced personalized learning • Differentiated • Use balanced instructional model: • shared large group learning, • small guided groups, • and workshop experiences that engage students through rigorous collaborative and independent practice using a variety of venues Tier 1 Mathematics Urgent Care – Tier 1 Double Dosing Examples Student A • Area of Need – Number sense • Dose 1 = Guided math at grade level • Dose 2 = Guided math at instructional level Student B • Area of Need – Reasoning • Dose 1 = Guided math at grade level • Dose 2 = Dream Box GCT • Tier 1 ½ - spiraling of math skills in addition to inclusion of learning pathways based on student voice and choice • Tier Two deep focus on application of skills to real life, relevant situations Digging Deeper ALL Some Few • NWEA MAP Assessment (grades 1-5) • Number Sense Screener • District Formative Assessment • Analysis of Qualitative Data • Diagnostic Assessments Matching Needs and Supports “We evolve as the kids evolve.” Finding time to meet a range of learner needs beyond Universal 30 minute math breakout Purpose and Goals of Math Breakout • To fill number sense gaps that were prohibiting students from moving forward in math and achieving at their grade level • To provide an opportunity for students to achieve mastery in number sense concepts; giving them time to learn and apply their new learning Math “Breakout” • All students have math breakout 4 times a week for 30 minutes • Teachers group students according to need, based on common assessments, and separate into groups for 4-6 week sessions • Specific differentiated instruction based on research, focused on number relations/operations and spiraling math strands • Progress is monitored by the child-teacher team daily and by a collaborative teacher team weekly and monthly Constant Evolution… If students need to change groups during a round of math intervention, the teachers decide together where they fit best and move them right away. Wrapping Up an Intervention Teachers reassess their homeroom students beginning where they left off. Purpose: • Ensure the transfer and mastery of skills acquired during intervention Encouraging Results: Intervention Assessment Data Year One 2010-11 Mid Year Check Year Three 2012-13 Mid Year Check Foundations of Number Sense (Numbers up to 10) 5% of students (7) 2% of students (3) Completion of Number Sense Screener 2% of students (3) 18% of students (35) Students Achieving MASTERY WKCE Same cohort group 2009 3rd – 79% 2010 4th - 80% 2011 5th - 80.9% 2012 MAP Met growth target (K-5) Less than 70% (K-5) 79.1% (K-5) 79.5% (K-5) 77.7% C r e a tin g a n d S u stain ing Selected and Intensive Levels of Support Before beginning to collect data, first establish: Outcomes Screening measures Progress monitoring measures Decision rules and protocols Interventions and Additional Challenges C O L L A B O R AT I O N ACCOMPLISH THROUGH Multiple times throughout each school year: Screen students and organize data Monitor progress and adjust accordingly Match supports to needs Review data and set goals Dig deeper At the end of each school year: Evaluate and refine the process W H I L E D E M O N S T R AT I N G Plan logistics C U LT U R A L C O M P E T E N C E Then, at the start of each school year: Upcoming RtI Events http://www.wisconsinrticenter.org/event/all.html Wisconsin RtI Center Professional Development www.wisconsinrticenter.org Upcoming Events Wisconsin RtI Framework Training (Elementary & Secondary) (2 days) Screening & Progress Monitoring (2 days) Reviewing Universal K-5 Reading Instruction (3 days) Reviewing Universal K-12 Math Instruction (3 days) Leadership & Coaching for RtI Implementation (6 days) Integrated Networking and Technical Assistance Universal Design for Learning Overview (1 day) Reviewing Selected & Intensive Levels of Support (1 day) Culturally Responsive Classroom Practices (4 days) Contact your Technical Assistance Coordinator for more information: Heidi Erstad, Liz Gaebler Kao Moua Her, Lynn Johnson Jill Koenitzer, Sarah Nelson Dan Seaman, Sara Summ http://www.wisconsinrticente r.org/regionalcoordinators.html Thank You!