Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports Reading Implementation-Garden City Today’s Agenda • Review Reading Implementation Steps 1 – 9 using new data from the most recent Universal Screening • Building Leadership Team Implementation Guide for Reading Steps 9 – 18: Progress Monitoring Students in Interventions WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 1: Review and Validate Universal Screening Data • Discuss as a team: How is universal screening data being reviewed and validated? • Remember, if you have questions about the validity of any student’s scores, then re-screen WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 2:Analyze Building Level Data Locate building level reports (AIMSweb: Tier Transition Report or DIBELS: Distribution Report) will provide percentage and numbers of students falling at Benchmark or Tier 1 (25th percentile and above), at Strategic or Tier 2 (10th – 24th percentile), and the Intensive or Tier 3 range (9th percentile and below). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG AIMSweb Tier Transition Report Curriculum Based Measurement WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Tier Transition Report MAZE-Comprehension WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG AIMSweb Grade Level Assessments to Include for Composite Score Grade Fall Winter Spring Kdg LNF LNF, LSF, PSF, NWF LNF, LSF, PSF, NWF 1st LNF, LSF, PSF, NWF PSF, NWF, R-CBM NWF, R-CBM 2nd R-CBM R-CBM R-CBM R-CBM, Maze R-CBM, Maze R-CBM, Maze Maze Maze 3rd-6th 7th-High Maze WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG School Building Level Status WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 3: Analyze Grade Level Data Use grade level reports AIMSweb: Distribution by Scores & Percentiles (Well Above Average, Above Average, Average, Below Average, & Well Below Average) (Rainbow Report with target score) WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 3: Analyze Grade Level Data 1. Analyze the screening data for each grade level in the building and add it to the appropriate Grade Level Status worksheet 2. Compare this universal screening data to the previous screening data and answer the following questions: 1. What is our current Grade Level status? 2. Are we on track to meet our goal? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grade Level Status for each Measurement Question: What is our current grade level status and end of the year goal? % Benchmark/ Target and above % % Supplemental Intensive/Well /Below Below Average Average % Below Target (Differentiation) Fall Winter Spring Grade Goal: By Spring, we want ___% to be at benchmark with their literacy skills. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 4: Analyze classroom level data 1. Find the classroom level report 2. Analyze the screening data for at least one classroom in the building and add it to the Classroom Level Status worksheet for that classroom. 3. After evaluating the classroom level data and its implications, teams need to answer the following questions: • What is the current Classroom Level status? • Is this classroom on track to meet the goal? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG As collaborative teams evaluate classroom level data, here are issues that should be discussed and, if needed, reported to the leadership team 1. What do the strengths/needs of each class make us think about for differentiation? 2. Are core instructional practices and the core curriculum being implemented with fidelity? 3. Do staff have professional development or other needs? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 5: Use New Screening Data to Revise How Students are Sorted into Groups. • Have any issues come up in your building regarding sorting students into the four Groups? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping Worksheet WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG AIMSweb Grouping Indicators Kdg Fall 1st Grade LNF Step 1: NWF PAST: Initial Phoneme, Step 2: PSF 2nd- 6th Grade 7th – 8th Grade R-CBM Maze Syllable Blending, Segmentation, & Deletion , Word Concept Alphabet Knowledge Winter PSF NWF R-CBM Maze Spring PSF R-CBM R-CBM Maze WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Phoneme Segmentation WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping for Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) 1. Locate Class Distribution Report 2. Identify students needing strategic and intensive instructional services 3. Review the students’ PSF assessment and determine accuracy percentage by dividing the student’s score by the number attempted. 4. Place into groups WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Phoneme Segmentation Grouping Summary Group 1: Accurate and Fluent Group 2: Accurate but Slow • Student segments all phonemes including phonemes in blends with good speed and accuracy(more than 95% accuracy) Focus instruction on short vowels or CVC words and progress monitor using Nonsense Word Fluency •Student segments all phonemes including phonemes in blends with good accuracy(more than 95% accuracy) but did not pass phoneme segmentation fluency. Focus instruction on automaticity or fluency. Group 3: Inaccurate and Slow Group 4: Inaccurate and Fluent • Student attempts to segment sounds or word parts, but is often incorrect. (less than 95% accuracy) •Initial phonemes •Final phonemes •Vowel phonemes Focus instruction on identifying specific phonemes (initial, final, vowels) •Student segments only partially with good accuracy (more than 95% accuracy) •Does not segment blends WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG •Produces onset and rime Focus instruction on teaching single phoneme •Student segments sounds very quickly but produces inaccurate sounds. Teacher should cue the student to slow down and retest. Nonsense Word Fluency WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping for Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) 1. Locate Class Distribution Report 2. Review the students NWF assessment and determine pattern performance and accuracy % by dividing the student’s score by the number attempted. 3. Place into groups 4. Identify students needing strategic and intensive instructional services WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Nonsense Word Fluency Grouping Summary Group 1: Whole Word Reading (Unitization) Accurate Not Accurate Group 2: Sound-by-Sound and Recoding /t/ /o/ /b/ /tob/ Accurate Focus instruction on accuracy and fluency in connected text Group 3: Partial Blends /t/ /ob/ Accurate Not Accurate Focus instruction on blending fluency practice at the word level Instruction in “reading the WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG words the fast way” Not Accurate Focus on accuracy instruction at the letter-sound level and then accuracy instruction at the blending level Group 4: Decoding Sound-by-Sound /t/ /o/ /b/ .Accurate Not Accurate Focus instruction on accuracy instruction at the letter-sound level Oral Reading Fluency WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping for Grades 7-8 • All students are given grade level Maze passages • Students not passing grade level Maze are given Oral Reading Fluency passages at their grade level Kdg 1st Grade 2nd- 6th Grade 7th – 8th Grade AK or PAST:IS PSF or NWF ORF Maze Winter LSF NWF ORF Maze Spring PSF ORF ORF Maze Fall WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping is a Multi-Step Process Grades 9-12 • Students in grades 9-12 are given a grade level comprehension assessment • Students who do not pass the grade level comprehension assessment are given an 8th grade Maze • Students not passing 8th grade Maze are given 8th grade level Oral Reading Fluency passages • Determine accuracy and fluency • Determine instructional focus WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 6: Determine what Additional Information is Needed and Complete Diagnostic Process • Discuss any issues in your building related to completing the diagnostic process with students. • Does any further training of collaborative teams need to occur? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Diagnostic Process for Oral Reading Fluency Once the initial instructional sort has been completed, the diagnostic process is started. • Students in Group 3 on the Oral Reading Fluency Grouping Sort should be given either a phonological awareness assessment (PAST), phonics assessment (QPS), or both to determine a student’s instructional need. These assessments are based on skill continuums. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping Worksheet WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG QPS Information WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping by Phonics Continuum Use Phonics Grouping Worksheet Student Letter Names Letter Sounds VC/CVC Digraphs Blends Silent e RControlled Vowels Danny 26 26 10 7 6 5 9 Troy 26 26 7 6 9 7 5 Jenny 26 26 6 6 7 6 5 WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Do the data indicate the need to implement a class-wide intervention? If more than 40% of the class need the same intervention then a class-wide intervention is needed. Q: What is considered a class-wide intervention? A: One example would be providing a protocol intervention to the entire class. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 7: Determine Instructional Focus for Each Student and Finalize Instructional Groupings • Have any issues come up in your building related to determining the instructional focus for each student and finalizing instructional groups? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Considerations for Finalizing Groups • Keep group sizes small – Supplemental: Small group instruction with group size depending on age level and materials being used; generally no more than about 3-5 students – Intensive: group size of 1-3 students • Base small groups on instructional need • Consider attitudes, behaviors, and motivation of each student • Monitor the progress of high risk students more frequently WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Considerations for Finalizing Homogeneous Intervention Groups Supplemental: – (K-6)an additional 30 minutes of targeted instruction should be provided beyond the core with groups of 3-5 students – (4-12) groups as large as 10 to 16 students for 30-50 minutes per day or one class period. Intensive: – (K-6) No more than 1-3 students for 60 additional minutes – (middle school) 1 to 4 students – (high school) 1- 5 students WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 8: Determine Appropriate Instructional Materials to Be Used For Each Instructional Grouping • Read Building Leadership Team Work for Implementation Step 8 (pg. 26-30). • Also read Collaborative Team Work (pg. 27). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Elementary Curriculum Protocol Example WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Intervention Log WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Reading Implementation Day 2 WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 9: Review Frequency of Progress Monitoring Data Collection and Review • Read Building Leadership Team Work for Step 9 (pgs. 31-32 ). • Also read Collaborative Team Work for Step 9 (pg. 31-32). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Determine frequency of progress monitoring data collection for Supplemental and Intensive intervention, • Determine how frequently collaborative teams should meet to review the progress monitoring data. • Review the decision rule (from Structuring) regarding the number of data points needed to determine whether student performance indicates that adjustment to instruction may be appropriate. • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for frequency of progress monitoring. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work (cont’d) • Consider whether staff members have been informed about the data point decision rules of the system. • Consider any needs for professional development. • Consider how staff and resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups and whether any changes in staff/resource allocation are warranted. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • A workbook of the implementation steps will be provided for work with the collaborative teams. • Think about issues related to progress monitoring collection and review that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 10: Identify Skills to be Progress Monitored • Read Building Leadership Team Work for Step 10 (pgs. 34-35 ). • Also read Collaborative Team Work for Step 10 (pg. 44). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Postponing Progress Monitoring “By postponing progress monitoring you will lose the data that motivates teachers to keep going because progress monitoring documents the improvements that students are making.” (Hall, 2011, p. 31) WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Progress Monitoring Does Matter • Students whose teachers progress monitor regularly and use the data to make instructional decisions show more academic progress than students whose teachers do not progress monitor. • Teachers' accuracy in judging student progress increases when progress monitoring is used consistently. (Stecker & Fuchs, 2000) WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Why Is Progress Monitoring Important? • Research has demonstrated that when teachers use progress monitoring for instructional decision-making purposes: – Students achieve more. – Teacher decision-making improves. – Students tend to be more aware of their performance. (Fuchs, Deno, Mirkin, 1984; Fuchs, Fuchs, Hamlett, & Ferguson, 1992; Stecker, Fuchs, & Fuchs, 2005) WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Pre-Post Testing is Not Progress Monitoring • Pre-Post Tests measure – student growth within a specific program, or – whether a student has mastered specific skills • Progress Monitoring measures – whether growth is occurring on critical skills – whether sufficient growth is occurring for students to close the gap WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Grouping Worksheet MAZE NWF R-CBM WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG R-CBM Matching Progress Monitoring to Instructional Focus Focus of Instruction Alphabet Knowledge Initial Phoneme Isolation Onset/Rime Phoneme Segmentation Short Vowels Accuracy (Advanced Phonics) Fluency WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Comprehension Progress Monitor Letter Naming Fluency First Sound Fluency Phoneme Segmentation Fluency Nonsense Word Fluency Oral Reading Fluency Passages/RCBM (Accuracy percent) Oral Reading Fluency Passage (wcpm)/R-CBM Daze/Maze Building Team Work • Support the collaborative teams in their work, • Check to make sure that students in intervention are being monitored on the correct skill, • Ensure correct progress monitoring measures are being used • Consider the current distribution of building resources and whether those resources need to be distributed differently, • Identify and plan for needed professional development, and • Consider any issues reported to the leadership team by the collaborative teams. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • A workbook of the implementation steps will be provided for work with the collaborative teams. • Think about issues related to identifying skills to be progress monitored that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 11: Determine the Instructional Level for Off Grade Level Progress Monitoring • Read both sections of Step 11 (pg. 36 ). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determine the Appropriate Level of Progress Monitoring • The appropriate level for progress monitoring each student is the instructional level determined for that student using the backwards testing process • A reminder: Only students in intervention are progress monitored. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determining Instructional Level • Collaborative teams will need to determine instructional level for oral reading fluency using the Oral Reading Fluency Instructional Grouping Worksheet for the following students: • students in Group 3 who have passed the phonological awareness assessment (PAST) and short vowels on the phonics assessment (QPS), and • students who need intensive support (highlighted in red) in Group 2 (accurate & slow) Determining Instructional Level Use the following steps to determine instructional level of oral reading fluency: 1. test down (using progress monitoring probes) one grade level at a time. 2. find the level at which the student reaches the 25th percentile for AIMSweb (forms included in collaborative team workbooks) 3. use the norms for the grade level and the time of year of testing, with 95% accuracy for 1st - 2nd grade and 98% accuracy for 3rd grade and above WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determining Instructional Level 4. the student’s instructional level is one gradelevel higher 5. use the instructional level for instructional materials and progress monitoring WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Activity: Determining Instructional Level by Backward Testing Step 1: Locate the Fall Example Backwards Testing Worksheet Step 2: Locate the Grade Level Universal screening score and accuracy percentage Step 3: Test backwards using grade level progress monitoring probes. Test backwards one grade level at a time until student reaches a passing DIBELS or AIMSweb score and accuracy percentage (label as independent level) Step 4: Determine student’s instructional level which is one Grade level higher (circle scores and label as instructional level) Step 5: Use the instructional level for instructional materials and progress monitoring WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Backward Testing Worksheet WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for determining the level for progress monitoring, • Consider whether staff have the needed materials and know the procedures for maintaining an intervention log, • Consider any needs for professional development, and • Consider how staff and resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups, and whether any changes in staff/resource allocation are warranted Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • A workbook of the implementation steps will be provided for work with the collaborative teams. • Think about issues related to determining instructional level that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 12: Review Progress Monitoring Data • • • • The leadership team will be looking to make sure: the correct skill(s) were progress monitored at the correct level, that sufficient data have been collected to make valid decisions, and to determine if the data appear to have been correctly graphed. Read both sections of Step 12 (pg. 37-39) WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Were the directions for the administration of the progress monitoring assessment followed exactly? • Were the time limits for each test followed exactly? • Was shadow scoring used to check scoring fidelity? • Have all the staff who administer the progress monitoring assessment been trained? • Did collaborative teams verify the individual student data? • Have collaborative teams established and are they following a routine for examining progress monitoring graphs for accuracy? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for reviewing the progress monitoring data and applying the decision rules correctly, • Check to see if staff are charting the progress monitoring data accurately, • Check to see if periodic progress monitoring is occurring for students that have exited supplemental intervention in case a need re-emerges for additional support, and • Consider any needs for professional development. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Frequency of Progress Monitoring The recommended frequency of progress monitoring within the MTSS framework is: • every other week for students receiving supplemental instruction and • weekly for students receiving intensive instruction. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Documenting Student Progress • Maintaining an intervention log is critical for tracking student’s progress in intervention. • Any changes to the intervention should be based on the results of the progress monitoring data, and documented. • Documenting this information can be done both on the progress monitoring graph and the intervention log. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Intervention Log Monitor and Evaluate Progress: Modify Instruction? Whoops! Time to make an adjustment! Lowered group size to 3 students 60 50 40 30 20 10 Dec. Scores Jan. Scores Feb. Sc ores Aimline Ma r ch Scores A pril Scores May Sc ore s June Scores 3-Point Decision Making Rule Given at least 6 data points, examine the last 3 consecutive scores to determine instructional success. • If all 3 scores fall above the aim line and at or above benchmark, decrease intervention intensity or increase the goal • If all 3 scores fall below the aim line, an adjustment in instruction is recommended. • If neither applies, keep collecting data until the 3 point rule can be applied. 3 consecutively above 3 consecutively below not consecutively above or below If Students Have 3 or More Data Points Consecutively Above The Aimline • Regroup to work on new intervention skill • Exit supplemental intervention and continue core with periodic monitoring WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG If Students Have 3 Or More Data Points Consecutively Below The Aimline Teams should consider the following questions: • What needs to be adjusted? • What have we learned works? • What have we learned doesn’t work? WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determine Instructional Adjustment When data show that a student’s scores are below the aimline, follow these steps to adjust the intervention: 1. Check what you are monitoring 2. Check fidelity of instruction 3. Increase pacing of instruction 4. Change pace of intervention 5. Ensure alignment of programs 6. Adjust the instructional materials 7. Move the student to a different group WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determine If Progress Is Being Achieved Analysis of progress monitoring data is a twostep process: 1. determine if progress is being achieved (slope), and 2. determine if the gap is closing (level). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Closing the Achievement Gap • Determine student’s instructional level • Involve student in goal-setting and monitoring • Increase difficulty of instructional level based on positive progress monitoring results • Continue monitoring after exiting intervention to assure maintenance of skills WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Closing the Gap • Progress monitor frequently at student’s instructional level • Involve student in goal-setting and monitoring • Provide targeted interventions – Accuracy, Fluency, Comprehension • Increase difficulty of instructional level based on positive progress monitoring results • Continue monitoring after exiting intervention to assure maintenance of skills WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to reviewing progress monitoring data that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 13: If Sufficient Progress – Continue the Intervention • Read both sections of Step 13(pg. 40). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Positive Response By Level And Slope Growth in Performance and Growth Rate benchmark Tier 2 instruction Tier 1 instruction Shores & Chester, Positive Response by Level and Slope •Positive response by level and slope means that the intervention is working for the student and by continuing the intervention the student should reach the benchmark goal by the end of the year. •The intervention should continue until the student reaches the goal WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to identifying a positive response and determining when to continue an intervention that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 14: If Insufficient Progress- Intensify the Intervention • Read both sections of Step 14 (pg. 41). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Positive Response By Slope Growth in Performance but Insufficient Growth Rate benchmark Tier 2 instruction Tier 1 instruction Shores & Chester, Growth in Performance but Insufficient Growth Rate? Increase intensity of instruction by: • increasing number of student responses in a minute by reducing group size • Increase number of questions and error corrections student receives in a minute • Increase scaffolding • Provide more modeling (I Do and We Do) • Increase number of repetition cycles on each skill • Use more systematic curriculum (Hall, 2007) Building Team Work • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for reviewing the progress monitoring data and applying the decision rules correctly, • Ensure that instruction is being intensified for any students not making sufficient growth, WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Check to see if staff are charting the progress monitoring data accurately, • Consider any needs for professional development, and • Consider how resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups, and whether any changes in resource allocation are warranted. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to intensifying instruction that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 15: What to Do If a Student is Not Making Progress-Use Problem Solving to Customize the Intervention • Read both sections of Step 15(pg. 42-43). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Research-Based Practices Regarding Intervention Effectiveness Instruction Curriculum •Fidelity of Instruction •Modeling and guided practice prior to independent practice (I Do, We Do, You Do) •Explicit Teaching •Opportunities to respond •Sufficient questioning, check for understandings •Sufficient practice •Appropriate match between learner and intervention •Appropriate rate of progress to reach goal •Instructional focus based on diagnostic process •Variety of Interests •Teaches skills to mastery •Appropriate independent work activities Setting Individual •Classroom routines/behavior management support learning •Appropriate person teaching the intervention group •Transitions are short and brief WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG •Academic learning time is high •Motivation •Task persistence •Attendance •Pattern of performance errors reflect skill deficits •Commitment to school Non- Response By Level And Slope Lack of Growth in Performance and Insufficient Growth Rate benchmark Tier 2 instruction Tier 1 instruction Shores & Chester, Lack of Growth in Performance and Insufficient Growth Rate? Steps to Customize the Intervention 1. Begin with intensive protocol intervention 2. Teach protocol intervention with fidelity 3. The team determines whether a revision to the program is needed to boost the student’s rate of improvement. 4. If so, an instructional feature, based on a well researched instructional principle, is added to the validated protocol. Building Team Work Building leadership team responsibilities for this step are: • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for reviewing the progress monitoring data and applying the decision rules correctly and in sequence, • Review fidelity data of the protocol intervention being used, WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Ensure teams are using the Research-Based Practices sheet in problem solving to begin the customization of intervention changing only one practice at a time, • Review the intervention log to ensure group size and time guidelines for supplemental and intensive interventions are being followed, • Consider any needs for professional development, and • Consider how resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups, and whether any changes in resource allocation are warranted WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Conduct fidelity checks to make sure that the collaborative teams are following the guidelines for reviewing the progress monitoring data and applying the decision rules correctly, • Ensure that instruction is being intensified for any students not making sufficient growth, WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Check to see if staff are charting the progress monitoring data accurately, • Consider any needs for professional development, and • Consider how resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups, and whether any changes in resource allocation are warranted. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to customizing instruction that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 16: Determine the Short Term Goals for Students not Making Progress • Read both sections of Step 16 (pg. 44-45). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Determine Goal to Close the Gap • The goal for a student should be the end-ofyear benchmark (or the 25th percentile on end-of-year norms) of the grade level at which the student is being progress monitored. • If the screening assessment being used does not have norms, the Hasbrouck & Tindal (2006) oral reading fluency norms can be used. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Expected Rate of WCPM Increase by Week Grade Level Realistic Goals Ambitious Goals 1 2.0 3.0 2 1.5 2.0 3 1.0 1.5 4 .85 1.1 5 .5 .8 6 .3 .65 Collaboration Log Example of Setting a Short Term Goal • • • • Fall target for 4th grade is 136 wcpm Johnny, a 4th grade student is reading 70 wcpm in fall End of year 25%ile goal for 4th grade 112wcpm 4th grade ambitious goals are 1.1 wcpm increase in a week • End of year goal: 36 weeks x 1.1=39.6 wcpm • 70 wcpm + 39.6 wcpm increase = end of year goal of 109.6 wcpm • 3 week short term goal 70 + 3.3=73.3 wcpm WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to setting short term goals that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 17: Determine if Student Interventions are Working • Read Building Leadership Team/Collaborative Team work for Step 17 (pg. 46). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Summary of Effectiveness/Impact Report Additional Assessment Whenever students fail to make adequate growth on progress monitoring assessments, it may be an indication that additional diagnostic assessment needs to be conducted to obtain additional information about skill weaknesses. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learn today. • Think about issues related to determining if student interventions are working that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Step 18: Update Student Intervention/Collaboration Logs • Read both sections of Step 18 (pg. 47-48). WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Keep Logs and Charts Up-to-date • Need an accurate record of interventions • Need an accurate record of actual student participation in intervention instruction • Need an accurate record of progress monitoring results • Need on-going consistent regular data review meetings with instructional adjustments made according to decision rules WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Building Team Work • Ensure that staff are keeping student intervention logs (including student attendance) updated, • Ensure that staff are charting the progress monitoring data consistently and accurately, • Ensure that data review meetings are being held as scheduled, • Ensure that decision rules are being followed, • Conduct periodical reviews of the entire process with staff to ensure fidelity, and • Consider any needs for professional development. Building Team Work • Review records to ensure that the MTSS process is not being used to delay or deny appropriate referrals and/or requests for initial evaluation for special education or other entitlement services, and • Consider how resources are currently allocated to support instructional groups, and whether any changes in resource allocation are warranted. WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG Planning to Train Collaborative Teams • When you return home, you will need to train the collaborative teams on the information you learned today. • Think about issues related to updating student intervention/collaboration logs that you will need to present to the collaborative teams. Are there issues that your leadership team needs to be sure to discuss? • Document these on the Action Plan WWW.KANSASMTSS.ORG