CIU 20 Educator Effectiveness Updates

advertisement

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Educator Effectiveness - Act 82

Summer 2014 Update

CIU 20 – Curriculum Department -Summer 2014

Information synthesized and presented by Heather Brown and Kathy Emeigh

610-515-6424

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012

Building Level Data/School Performance Profile

Teacher Observation/ Practice

Planning and Preparation

Classroom Environment

Instruction

Professional Responsibilities

Indicators of Academic Achievement

Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students

Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Historically

Underperforming Students

Indicators of Academic Growth/ PVAAS

Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement

Teacher Specific Data

Building Level

Data 15%

Teacher Specific

Data 15%

Student Performance on Assessments

PVAAS 3-Year Rolling Average

IEP Goals Progress*

LEA Developed Rubrics*

Observation/

Practice 50%

Elective Data*

Began 2013-2014 SY

Elective

Data 20%

District Designed Measures and Examinations

Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests

Industry Certification Examinations

Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements

Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements

*Student Learning Objective Process

2

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012

Teacher Specific Data 15%

Building

Level

Data(SPP

) 15%

Student Performance on Assessments

• Not more than 5%

Observation

/Practice

50%

PDE strongly recommends that these determinations need to be done in consult and collaboration with their teachers ---

Elective

Data

20%

Value- added Assessment Data/ PVAAS Growth

3-Year Rolling Average

• At least 10%

• Applies to all teachers in PA assessed subjects/grades/courses

Progress in Meeting IEP Goals

• Not more than 5%

• Validated through a SLO Process

Locally Developed School District Rubrics

• Not more than 15%

• Validated through a SLO Process

3

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Principal Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012

Begins 2014 – 2015 SY

Building Level Data/School Performance Profile

Observation/ Practice

Framework for Leadership Domains

Strategic/Cultural Leadership

Systems Leadership

Leadership for Learning

Professional and Community Leadership

Indicators of Academic Achievement

Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students

Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Historically

Underperforming Students

Academic Growth PVAAS

Other Academic Indicators

Extra Credit for Advanced Achievement

Building

Level Data,

15%

“Correlation” Data/Relationship

Based on Teacher Level Measures

Observation

/Practice

50%

“Correlation”

Data Based on

Teacher-Level

Measures,

15%

Elective Data/Student Learning Objectives

NOTE: for the 2014 – 2015 SY Elective Data for principals is OPTIONAL

Elective

Data

20%

District Designed Measures and Examinations

Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests

Industry Certification Examinations

Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements

Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements

3

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

• “Correlation” Data/Relationship

• Based on Teacher Level Measures

Building

Level Data,

15%

DEGREE OF UNDERSTANDING of evidence presented regarding the relationship between teacher-level measures and teacher observation and practice ratings.

Observation

/Practice

50%

“Correlation”

Data Based on

Teacher-Level

Measures,

15%

QUALITY OF EXPLANATIONS provided for observed relationship between teacher-level measures and teacher observation and practice ratings.

Elective

Data

20%

PLANS for how the data will be used to support school and LEA goals.

5

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Table H: Correlation Data

Performance Level Descriptors

6

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Elective Data – SLO for Pricipals

Observation/Pra ctice

50%

Building Level

Data,

15%

Elective Data/Student Learning Objectives

“Correlation” Data

Based on Teacher-

Level Measures,

15%

District Designed Measures and Examinations

Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests

Industry Certification Examinations

Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements

Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements

Elective Data

20%

Elective Data/Student Learning

Objectives

NOTE: for the 2014 – 2015 SY

Elective Data for principals is

OPTIONAL

7

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Non Teaching Professional Employee

Educator Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012

Begins 2014 – 2015 SY

Observation and Practice

Student Performance/School Performance Profile

(SPP) Planning and Preparation

Educational Environment

Delivery of Service

Professional Development

“A nonteaching professional employee

Observation/

Practice

80%

Student

Performance

20% or a person who is an education specialist or a professional employee or temporary professional employee who provides services other than classroom instruction, and includes supervisors and employees with instructional certification who are not categorized as “classroom teachers” by

the LEA.” (Page 3511 from rules and regs – June 14, 2014)

8

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

Deciding:

Teaching vs Nonteaching Professional

To determine whether you are a teaching professional, you must be able to answer YES to the following two questions:

1) Are you working under your instructional certification?

2) Do you provide direct instruction to students in a particular subject or grade level?

9

Measuring Educator Effectiveness

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education www.education.state.pa.us

PDE Resources on CIU 20 Website

• http://www.ciu20.org/ under Departments then Curriculum

• Educator Effectiveness

– Administrative Manual (July 2014)

– Rules and Regulations for Teachers, Principals and Nonteaching

Professionals

– FAQs for Student Performance Measures

– Updated PDE Rating Tools

• Non-Teaching Professionals

– Frameworks for each Educational Specialist with and without examples

• SLO Teacher Training Materials

– SLO PPT with notes

– SLO Template

– SLO Help Desk

– SLO Decision Making Guide

10

Download