Care Quality Commission: ‘A
New Start’ Consultation
(England)
June 2013
Full details on the CQC Consultation are available here:
http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/cqc_consultation_2013_tagged.pdf
Introduction
This slide deck presents key points and
emerging issues on the consultation ‘A
New Start’ from the Care Quality
Commission
Please use it to share with your
colleagues and feedback to
leela.barham@rcn.org.uk by mid July
as the RCN develops our response
Background to the
consultation
Prompted by:
Francis, Winterbourne View, Morecambe
Bay
Implementing new strategy under new
leadership of David Behan and David Prior
Widespread criticism of ‘old’ CQC (and
new reports emerging all the time of
problems at CQC in the past)
New operating model
Informed by 6 C’s
Chief Inspector of
Hospitals can
request
Monitor/TDA to
take action
Simplification to focus on 5
questions
When CQC inspect they will ask the
following questions about care services:
Are they safe?
Are they effective?
Are they caring?
Are they responsive to people’s needs?
Are they well-led?
Proposed changes and initial RCN
view
RCN View*
✔
?
?
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
*RCN based on previous consultation responses and member engagement. Subject to discussion
and due process to reach final position(s)
Other encouraging signs
Staffing highlighted in registration:
“They must show us that they focus on the right things when they employ staff, such as their
qualifications, clinical supervision and continuing professional development” (p11)
Approach inspections from the perspective of peer review
Co-ordination with existing inspections and visits e.g. Royal
College visits
Inspect at night and at weekends and talk more to frontline staff
Can ask NMC to act or HSE
Will include concerns raised by staff as part of indicators looked
at
Will consider avoidable morbidity
Tier 1 Indicators for an Acute Trust
RCN view that
staffing is both
an indicator for
safety and a
well-led
organisation
‘Well led’ indicators
RCN looking at indicators and exploring whether there are preferred
indicators for staffing that can act as a trigger for further investigation
Areas where there may be
tension with RCN view
Ratings
Intention for overall rating
But devil in the detail
Setting is relevant; makes more sense for care homes than for hospitals
Further consultation later this year on the details of this
But just what will this mean for public, patients, carers, staff?
Frequency of inspection
In 2011 our members told us that they wanted annual inspections
Not sure of view about ‘earned autonomy’ which will mean an unannounced
inspection once every 3 to 5 years for those rated as ‘outstanding’
CQC Examples
‘Reasonable’ fundamental standards
“I will be helped to use the toilet and to
Organisational not individual?
wash when I need it”
Complementary to code or duplicatory?
“There will always be enough members
Realistic or setting up organisations to fail? of staff available to keep me safe and
meet my health and welfare needs”
Areas we’re unsure about
How will CQC work with Monitor and others?
Will it work?
Will CQC be able to staff this new model?
But intention to make work at CQC an attractive
career option but concerns of workload, lack of
support voiced by our members working at CQC
Sufficient focus on staffing (numbers and skill
mix)?
What could it mean to
practicing nurses?
See CQC less often but when they do it will be for
longer (6-7 days on site) and it should be more
clinically credible
May be asked by public and patients and carers
about their organisations’ rating
May be less work in preparing for CQC inspection
Opportunities for members to get involved:
Directly - as part of expert team
Indirectly - their comments will be looked at by CQC and as
part of peer review?
Timeline
Consultation response
due 12th August but
your thoughts by mid
July please to allow for
sign off
Implementing changes
will take 2 years
Tell us your thoughts
Contact: Leela Barham
leela.barham@rcn.org.uk
020 7647 3901
By mid July