Prof Urata presentation

advertisement

Japan’s New Economic Strategy in

Asia-Pacific:

Implications for the EU

July X, 2012

Shujiro URATA

Waseda University

1

Contents

I. Japan’s Economic Situation

II. High Economic Growth and Regional

Economic Integration in Asia-Pacific

III. Japan’s New Economic Strategy in Asia-

Pacific

IV. Japan-EU EPA/FTA

V. Concluding Remarks

2

1. Japan’s Economic Situation

Current situation

 Low economic growth

 Recovering from the Eastern Japan Disaster (March 11,

2011)

 Closed economy

Future prospects

Declining and aging population

Declining savings rate

 Increasing government debt

Challenge for achieving economic growth

Increase productivity

Increase economic interaction with growing Asia

Solutions

 New Economic Strategy in Asia-Pacific

 Japan-EU EPA

3

GDP Growth Rates (%)

4

GDP

5

Trade-GDP Ratios (%)

6

80 000

60 000

40 000

20 000

0

1,000

140 000

120 000

100 000

65-

15-64

0-14

Japan’s Declining Population

7

%

Gross Domestic Savings (% of GDP)

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

8

250

%

France

Italy

Canada

Government Debt-GDP Ratios (%)

Japan

US

UK

Germany

200

150

100

50

0

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

9

II. High Economic Growth and Regional Economic

Integration in Asia-Pacific

Market-driven Regional Economic Integration

 High economic growth achieved by rapid expansion of foreign trade and foreign direct investment (FDI)

 Advances in regional economic integration

 Expansion of trade and FDI in machinery sector

(electronic machinery, transportation machinery)

 Increase in parts and components trade

 Fragmentation strategy by multinational corporations: formation of regional production networks

 Liberalization of trade and FDI policies

10

Total Trade (Exports+Imports) :

EU, East Asia and North America

11

Intra-regional Trade Dependence (%)

12

Intra-regional Trade Ratio (%)

13

Shares of East Asia’s Trade with Regions (%)

14

Share of Parts and Components in

Intra-regional Trade (%)

15

Declining Tariff Rates

20.0

10.0

60.0

%

50.0

40.0

30.0

C hina

Indonesia

M alaysia

P hilippines

Thailand

0.0

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

16

Trade Liberalization: Declining Tariff Rates (%)

Japan

China

1988

2007

1992

Korea

2007

1988

2007

Indonesia 1989

2007

Malaysia 1988

2007

Philippines1988

2007

Singapore 1989

2007

Thailand 1989

2006

Australia 1991

2007

Primary Manufactured goods goods

8.3

11.4

35.1

3.5

2.9

40.6

4.2

4.2

40.4

9.0

19.3

20.8

18.2

6.6

10.9

2.8

29.9

6.0

0.2

0.2

30.0

13.6

3.0

0.9

8.9

18.6

6.6

19.2

5.8

14.9

6.5

27.9

4.8

0.4

0.0

39.0

10.4

14.1

3.1

10.8

12.8

2.8

8.9

18.6

8.5

19.2

5.9

14.5

5.9

28.3

5.0

0.4

0.0

38.5

17

Emergence of institution-driven regional economic integration

 Rapid expansion of free trade agreements (FTAs) in East

Asia in the 21 st century

 FTA (free trade agreement): free trade (elimination, reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers among FTA members)

 In East Asia ASEAN has become a hub of FTAs:

5 ASEAN+1 FTAs have been implemented

 4 initiatives have been proposed for region-wide FTA:

ASEAN+3 (East Asia FTA), ASEAN+6 (CEPEA),

ASEAN++ (RCEP), Free Trade Area of Asia-Pacific

(FTAAP)

 The US has become active in region-wide FTA: Trans-

Pacific Partnership (TPP)

18

FTAs in East Asia (December 2011)

Bangkok Treaty (1976)

AFTA (1992)

Thailand-NZ (2005) Japan-Brunei (2008)

Singapore-India (2005) China-NZ (2008)

Singapore-NZ (2001) Korea-Singapore (2006) Taiwan-Nicaragua (2008)

Japan-Singapore (2002) Japan-Malaysia (2006) Singapore-Peru (2009)

Singapore-Australia (2003) Korea-EFTA (2006)

Singapore-EFTA (2003) China-Chile (2006)

China-Singapore (2009)

Japan-Switzerland (2009)

Singapore-US (2004)

Korea-Chile (2004)

China-Hong Kong (2004) Japan-Chile (2007)

China-Macao (2004) Japan-Thailand (2007)

Taiwan-Panama (2004)

Korea-ASEAN (2006) Japan-Vietnam (2009)

Singapore-Panama (2006) India-ASEAN (2010)

China-Pakistan (2007)

ASEAN-Australia-NZ (2010)

China-Peru (2010)

China-Taiwan (2010)

Singapore-Jordan (2004) Malaysia-Pakistan (2007) Korea-EU (2011)

Japan-Mexico (2005)

China-ASEAN (2005)

Japan-Philippines (2008)

Japan-ASEAN (2008)

Japan-India (2011)

China-Consta Rica (2011)

Thailand-Australia (2005) Japan-Indonesia (2008) Korea-Peru (2011)

19

FTAAP: Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific

Efforts under various frameworks

ASEAN+3 ( EAFTA )

( ASEAN + JP, CH, KR )

ASEAN+6 ( CEPEA)

( ASEAN+JP, CH, KR, IND, AUS, NZ )

TPP

Current members

Malaysia

Singapore

Brunei

US

A

Peru

TPP

Australia

New Zealand

Chile

RCEP

Establishment of 3 working groups (for trade in goods, services and investment) in 2012

Japan-China-Korea

Launch of negotiations in 2012

FTAAP (APEC)

Russia

China

Korea Japan

CH.

CH. Taipei

Brunei

Malaysia

Singapore

Vietnam

Philippines

Indonesia PNG

Australia

New Zealand

Canada

US

Mexico

Peru

Chile

(Source: METI, Japan)

20

7

Motives behind FTAs in East Asia

 Increase market access through trade and FDI

 Rapid expansion of FTAs in the world

 Promote domestic reform

 Rivalry between East Asian countries

Motives behind region-wide FTAs in East Asia

 Financial crisis in 1997-98

 Global financial crisis in 2008-

 Overcome Spaghetti bowl effect

 Establish region-wide single production base and unified market 21

Rapidly Increasing FTAs in the World

22

Expected Impacts of FTAs

 Trade and FDI expansion between and among FTA members

 Economic growth

Economic Obstacles to FTAs

 Opposition from non-competitive sectors

23

IV. Japan’s New Economic Strategy in Asia-Pacific

 Comprehensive Economic Partnership

Agreement (EPA) including trade and FDI liberalization, facilitation, economic cooperation

 Export infrastructure such as transportation system and water supply system including hard and soft infrastructure

 Export agricultural products

 Attracting foreign direct investment inflows and high skilled personnel

 Attracting foreign tourists

 etc.

24

Japan’s FTAs (EPAs): June 2012

Implemented

Singapore November 2002

Mexico April 2005

Malaysia July 2006

Chile

Thailand

Indonesia

Brunei

Philippines

ASEAN

Switzerland

Vietnam

India

Peru

Share in

Japan's trade

(2010)

September 2007

November 2007

July 2008

July 2008

December 2008

December 2008

September 2009

October 2009

August 2011

March 2012

18.7%

Under negotiation

Korea

GCC

Australia

Mongolia

20.0%

Under study

ASEAN+3

ASEAN+6

China, Japan, Korea

EU

TPP

Canada

Colombia

25

Motives

 Expand export market for Japanese firms

 Improve investment environment for

Japanese firms

 Obtain energy and natural resources

 Promote structural reform in Japan

 Improve and establish good relationship

 Provide economic assistance to developing countries

Opposition

 Agriculture, fishery

26

Impacts of FTAs on GDP (%): Simulation Results

Japan

China

Korea

Indonesia

Malaysia

Philippines

Singapore

Thailand

Vietnam

Other Southeast Asia

Australia

New Nealand

India

Hong Kong

Taiwan

NAFTA

EU15

Rest of the World

ASEAN+3 ASEAN+6

FTA

0.44

4.72

3.55

3.94

8.62

6.28

4.24

7.02

9.67

2.91

-0.09

-0.06

-0.1

0

-0.08

-0.01

-0.01

-0.06

-0.08

FTA

0.54

4.84

3.71

4.14

9

6.52

4.42

7.32

9.92

2.95

1.35

1.87

3.45

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

ASEAN

ASEAN+3

ASEAN+6

5.67

1.93

1.68

5.89

2.05

2.11

27

High Tariff Agricultural Products (%)

B eef

D airy products

W heat

B arley

Sugar

P ork

C orn

Starch

P eanuts

R ice

Konnyaku potato

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

28

Japan-EU EPA

Developments

 Scoping exercise for Japan-EU EPA began in May

2011 and ended in May 2012

 Waiting for the negotiations to begin

Expected benefits

 Strengthen economic and non-economic relations

 Expand exports and FDI not only bilaterally but with other countries, contributing to economic growth: EU

GDP to increase 0.14 percent, Japan’s GDP 0.31 percent (Copenhagen Economics, 2009)

 Contribute to rule-making in the global economic system

29

Japan’s Trading Partners: 2010 (%)

Others

25%

China

21%

Hong Kong

Malaysia

3%

3%

Saudi Arabia

3%

Indonesia

3%

Thailand

4%

Australia

4%

Taiwan

5%

Korea

6%

EU

10%

US

13%

30

Japan’s Foreign Direct Investment Destinations: 2011 (%)

31

Japan’s Position

 Eager to start negotiations with an interest in strengthening economic relations and overcoming disadvantageous position in the EU market vis-à-vis

Korean firms: EU tariffs--cars (10%), flat screen TVs

(14%), microwave ovens (5%) etc.

EU position

Somewhat hesitant in starting negotiations immediately (in response to Japan’s inability to join

TPP negotiations?)

Eager to open Japan’s government procurement market and reduce non-tariff measures, in order to expand trade and FDI 32

V. Concluding Remarks

 Faced with many difficult challenges, Japan has to open up its economy and carry out structural reforms, in order to achieve economic growth or to maintain high living standard, to contribute to economic growth in Asia-Pacific and in the world.

 WTO liberalization being stalled, free trade agreements

(FTAs) are second-best solution for promotion of trade and

FDI

 Japan can gain a lot from FTAs not only in East Asia but also with countries in other parts of the world such as the

US, the EU, and Latin American countries

33

 Japan should play active roles in establishing regionwide FTAs: RCEP, TPP by liberalizing its market

 Then expand these FTAs by merging with other

FTAs, leading to global trade liberalization

 FTAs face opposition from non-competitive sectors

 For Japan, trade liberalization in agriculture faces strong opposition

 Various measures including gradual phase-in liberalization, and temporary assistance to negatively affected workers can moderate the negative impacts during the process of transition

 Need strong political leadership to promote FTAs

34

Download