Chapter 12 Depository Financial Institutions Fundamentals of Bank Management Banks are like any other business firms that Buy Sell Make a profit However there is a difference What they buy and sell is money When they buy money, we say they are borrowing When they sell money, we say they are lending Fundamentals of Bank Management For banks, the raw material is money They are the Repackagers of money They make a profit when When they buy (borrow) money at a lower rate then sell (lend) it for When they manage risk successfully Fundamentals of Bank Management Similar to any other business, their accounting principles follow the simple rule Asset = Liability + Owner’s Equity Which can be reorganized as Asset - Liability = Owner’s Equity Lets go over these components carefully Fundamentals of Bank Management Assets or Uses of Funds Loans are major component of their assets Trends of loans In 1980 loans were 54% of all assets in 2007 they grew to 59% Most of this increase coming from mortgages Cash and investments in state and local government securities is another category of asset Over the years this asset has declined Holding assets in the form of cash has opportunity cost Fundamentals of Bank Management Assets or Uses of Funds Federal government securities Remained fairly constant over the years. highly marketable and liquid Counter cyclical Increase during recessions Decrease during expansions Banks treat federal securities as a residual use of funds Fundamentals of Bank Management Assets or Uses of Funds Banks are barred by law from owning stocks—why? It is a consumer protection law Stock returns are too volatile and risky Banks are not allowed to engage in risky speculation with depositors’ money However, banks do buy stocks for trusts they manage—not shown among bank’s own assets Fundamentals of Bank Management Liabilities of Sources of Funds Transaction Deposits: 23% of all liabilities in 1970 6% of all liabilities in 2007 Used to be major source of funds Generally banks pay low interest (if any) on demand deposits. Increase in interest paid on other types of assets has caused this decline Fundamentals of Bank Management Liabilities of Sources of Funds Non-transaction deposits Represented 46% of banks’ funds in 2007 Passbook savings deposits—traditional form of savings Time deposits—certificates of deposit with scheduled maturity date with penalty for early withdrawal Money Market Deposit Accounts (MMDA)—pay money market rates and offer limited checking functions Negotiable CDs—can be sold prior to maturity Fundamentals of Bank Management Liabilities of Sources of Funds Miscellaneous Liabilities have experienced a significant increase during past 30 years Discount Borrowing: Borrowing from Federal Reserve Bank Federal Funds Market: Borrowing from another bank Unsecured loans between banks, often on an overnight basis Foreign Banks: Borrowing from their foreign branches, Parent corporation, and Subsidiaries and affiliates Fundamentals of Bank Management Liabilities of Sources of Funds Miscellaneous Liabilities Repurchase Agreements Sell government securities to another banks or corporate depositors With agreement to re-purchase at later date at a higher price Higher price represents the interest Securities serves as a collateral Securitization Pooling loans into securities Selling them to investors to raise new funds Fundamentals of Bank Management Liabilities of Sources of Funds Miscellaneous Liabilities Securitization Transform non traded financial instruments into traded securities Pooling non traded loans into securities Selling them to investors to raise new funds Underlying assets serve as a collateral Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Capital or Equity Individuals purchase stock in bank Bank pays dividends to stockholders Serves as a buffer against risk Equity capital has remained stable at 6%-8% However, riskiness of banks’ assets has increased Bank regulators force banks to increase their capital position to compensate for the increased risk of assets (loans) Equity is most expensive source of funds so bankers prefer to minimize the use of equity Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Profitability Bank management must balance between liquidity and profitability tradeoff. Net Interest Income Difference between total interest income (interest on loans and interest on securities and investments) and interest expense (amount paid to lenders) NII = Interest income – Interest expense Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Profitability Net Interest Margin (NIM) Net interest income as a percentage of total bank assets NIM = (NII/Asset)*100 Also known as interest rate spread Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Profitability Factors that determine Net Interest Margin Better service Implies higher rates on loans and lower interest on deposits Monopoly power Allows bank to pay lower deposit rate Charge higher interest rate However, it is becoming more unlikely due to enormous competition from other banks and nonbank competitors Bank’s risk Interest rate and credit risk Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Profitability Service charges and fees and other operating income Additional source of revenue Become more important as banks have shifted from traditional interest income to more nontraditional sources on income Fundamentals of Bank Management Bank Profitability Net Income after Taxes Net Income less taxes Return on Assets (ROA) Net Income after taxes expressed as a percentage of total assets Return on Equity (ROE) Net Income after taxes expressed as a percentage of total equity capital Bank Risks Leverage Risk Leverage—Combine debt with equity to purchase assets Leveraging with debt increases risk because debt requires fixed payments in the future The more leveraged a bank is, the less its ability to absorb a loss in asset value Leverage Ratio—Ratio of bank’s equity capital to total assets [10% in 2007] Regulators in US and other countries impose risk-based capital requirements— riskier the asset, higher the capital requirement Fundamentals of Bank Management Credit Risk Possibility that borrower may default Important for bank to get as much information as possible about borrower— asymmetric information Charge higher interest or require higher collateral for riskier borrower Loan charge-offs is a way to measure past risk associated with a bank’s loans Ratio of non-performing loans (delinquent 30 days or more) to total loans is a forward-looking measure Fundamentals of Bank Management Interest Rate Risk Mismatch in maturity of a bank’s assets and liabilities Traditionally banks have borrowed short and lent long Profitable if short-term rates are lower than long-term rates Due to discounting, increasing interest rates will reduce the present value of bank’s assets Use of floating interest rate to reduce risk The one-year re-pricing GAP is the simplest and most commonly used measure of interest rate risk Fundamentals of Bank Management Trading Risk Banks act as dealers in financial instruments such as bonds, foreign currency, and derivatives At risk of a drop in price of the financial instrument if they need to sell before maturity Difficult to develop a good measure of trading risk since is it hard to estimate the statistical likelihood of adverse price changes Fundamentals of Bank Management Liquidity Risk Possibility that transactions deposits and savings account can be withdrawn at any time Banks may need additional cash if withdrawals significantly exceed new deposits Traditionally banks provided liquidity through the holding of liquid assets (cash and government securities) Historically these holdings were a measure of a bank’s liquidity, but have declined as a percentage of total assets during the past 30 years (41%-1970; 24%-2002) During past 30 years banks have used miscellaneous liabilities to increase their liquidity Major Trends in Bank Management For most of the 20th century banks were insulated from competition from other financial institutions However, that has changed over time Trends that produced this transition can be summarized by the following: Consolidation within the banking industry Rise of non traditional banking Globalization Consolidation McFadden Act of 1927 Prohibited banks from branching across state lines Intension was to prevent the formation of a few large, nationwide banks, who might monopolize the industry For that purpose, many states also had restrictions that limited or prohibited branching within their state boundaries Result—many, many small banks protected from competition from larger national banks Consolidation McFadden Act of 1927 Unintended Consequences: Created banking a localized monopoly Inefficient local banks There were over 14,000 small 40% of these banks had less 25 million assets Consolidation McFadden Act of 1927 Large efficient banks wanted to enter into these untapped market Over the years a number of loopholes were exploited to bypass this act Loan production offices Acquisition of failed thrift institutions under S&L bail out Most effective was the use of Bank Holding Company (BHC) Reciprocity rights Consolidation McFadden Act of 1927 Bank Holding Company: An entity that can own one of more banks and non bank institutions as subsidiary Under the McFadden act BHC could own banks in different states if permitted by state laws Therefore, a BHC to own banks across state lines This would serve the same purpose as to having branches across different states Consolidation McFadden Act of 1927 Reciprocity Rights 1975 Maine allowed BHC from other states to enter, if Maine BHC received the same rights 1982 New York passed the same law Massachusetts formed regional reciprocity pact By mid 1990 about 30% of domestic banking assets were owned by out of state BHCs All these severely compromised the effectiveness of the McFadden Act Consolidation Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act Passed in 1994 Allowed BHC to acquire banks in any state By 1997 all banks were permitted to open branches across states Number of unit banks shrunk dramatically 14,400 in the early 1980 7,282 in 2007 For banks with $100 million assets Total assets was 17% all banking assets in 1980 It declined to less that 3% in 2007 Consolidation Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act Consolidation however did not affect the availability of banking services for consumers Although the number of unit banks declined, the number of bank offices (branch and head office) actually went up In addition ATM, telephone and internet banking were introduced These provided better access to banking services for consumers Nontraditional Banking The Glass-Steagall Act of1933 Prohibited commercial banking from engaging in investment banking Some investment banking operations were allowed: Underwriting general obligation municipal bonds Act as agent for private placements Not for public, not registered with SEC, Raising funds small business They were still prohibited from underwriting corporate bonds and equity (stocks) Nontraditional Banking The Glass-Steagall Act Commercial banks gradually weakened the effectiveness of the act They resorted to court system to argue that they should be allowed to perform activities like: Underwriting municipal revenue bonds Underwriting commercial paper Managing mutual funds Finally Fed agreed to let BHC to own investment banking subsidiary known as section 20 affiliates on a limited basis Nontraditional Banking The Glass-Steagall Act Essentially Fed broaden the definition of activities “closely related to banking” Operations of section 20 affiliates could not exceed 5% of total investment banking revenue Limit was increased gradually to 10% and 25% Nontraditional Banking The Glass-Steagall Act This led to emergence of mega universal banks through acquisition of several investment banks: Bank of America and Montgomery Securities (now Merrill Lynch) Citibank and Travelers Group (Salomon Smith Barney) Nontraditional Banking The Glass-Steagall Act Finally, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999) repealed the Glass-Steagall Act Off-balance Sheet Activities Another area of growth in recent years These activities increase risk exposure for banks with no effect on bank’s balance sheet Future market Option market Guarantee and commitment business Globalization American Banks Abroad Two major factors explain rapid expansion of US banks in foreign countries: Growth of international trade American multinational corporation with operations abroad Globalization Edge Act (1919) Permitted US banks to establish special subsidiaries to facilitate international financing Exempt from the McFadden Act’s prohibition against interstate banking. Subsidiary in California to manage trade and financing with South Korea Florida to manage trade and financing with Latin America Globalization Foreign Banks in the United States About one third of all business loans are made by foreign banks. Some of the well known foreign banks include: French Bank BNP Paribas Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi HSBC Bank of Montreal Globalization Foreign Banks in the United States Organizational Forms: Branch of a Foreign Bank Subsidiary of a Foreign Bank Agency of a Foreign Bank Globalization Foreign Banks in the United States Prior to 1978 foreign banks operating in the US were largely unregulated No reserve requirement Exempt from McFadden act International Banking Act of 1978 Foreign banks subject to same federal regulations as domestic banks However, certain established banks were grandfathered and were not subject to the law Globalization Eurodollars Eurodollar deposits made in foreign banks were denominated in US dollars, which eliminated the foreign exchange risk These foreign banks were exempt from Regulation Q and could offer higher interest than US banks American banks opened foreign branches: Gain access to Eurodollars Borrow abroad during periods of tight money by the FED Globalization Eurobonds Corporate and foreign government bonds sold: Outside borrowing corporation’s home country Principal and interest are denominated in borrowing country’s currency Number of tax advantages Little government regulation Globalization Domestically Based International Banking Facilities (IBF) Offers both US and foreign banks comparable conditions as foreign countries to lure offshore banking back to US IBF is a domestic branch that is regulated by Fed as if it were located overseas. No reserve or deposit insurance requirements Essentially bookkeeping operations with no separate office Globalization Domestically Based International Banking Facilities (IBF) Many states exempt income from IBFs from state and local taxes IBFs are not available to domestic residents, only to business that is international in nature with respect to sources and uses of funds Foreign subsidiaries of US multinationals can use IBFs provided funds to not come from domestic sources and not used for domestic purposes