University of Florida Horticultural Sciences Department Effect of timing and intensity of summer pruning on vegetative and reproductive traits of southern highbush blueberry Al Kovaleski September, 2013 Blueberry summer pruning No removal of flower buds Long growing season in FL Pruning promotes increased vigor More support for reproductive structures 2 Objectives Determine the effects of timing and severity of summer pruning: Vegetative traits: • Plant volume • Regrowth • Timing of defoliation • Incidence of leaf spots • Incidence and severity of stem blight Reproductive traits: • Flower bud initiation • Fruit set • Yield • Quality of fruit 3 Plant material Two cultivars ‘Emerald’ and ‘Jewel’ Six year old plants Commercial cultural practices PSREU – Citra, FL 4 Treatments No summer pruning control Prune 30% early June Prune 30% mid-July Prune 30% early June+tip Prune 60% early June+tip Detailed hand pruning control www.caes.uga.edu 5 Treatments Unpruned 30% 60% 6 Vegetative traits Canopy volume Regrowth Condition of fall foliage Time of defoliation Leaf spot 7 Vegetative traits Incidence and severity of Stem Blight 8 Reproductive traits Re-growth shoots collected to assess timing of flower bud initiation – Late summer until defoliation 9 Reproductive traits Harvest Period Yield Fruit quality Total soluble solids picturesbychristopher.wordpress.com Titratable acidity Firmness Average berry weight Labmate-online.com 10 RESULTS TO DATE 11 Canopy volume - Emerald Treatment Non-pruned Hand pruned 30% June 30% June+tip 60% June+tip 30% July Winter volume (m3) 1.26a 1.06b 1.01bc 0.91c 0.68d 0.91c 12 Regrowth volume - Emerald 13 Flower bud initiation Important to: Develop management strategies to enhance flowering Regulate fruit load First sign of transition detectable 14 Flower bud initiation 15 Flower bud initiation 16 Flower bud initiation No differences between treatments Emerald – Sep 8th Jewel – Oct 20th 17 Leaf spots - Jewel Leaf spot incidence (%) 2011 Treatment 2012 17 Nov 1 Dec 21 Dec 25 Oct 8 Nov 23 Nov 11 Dec Non-pruned 70.0 a 78.8 a 57.6 ab 38.3 a 81.7 a 88.3 a 97.5 Hand pruned 33.3 b 25.4 b 54.3 ab 31.7 a 56.7 bc 78.3 bc 96.7 30% June 43.3 ab 48.8 ab 50.9 b 35.0 a 61.7 b 83.3 ab 95.0 30% June+tip 36.7 b 48.8 ab 64.3 ab 26.7 ab 53.3 bc 81.7 abc 96.7 60% June+tip 36.7 b 52.1 ab 84.3 a 15.0 b 53.3 bc 73.3 c 100.0 30% July 66.7 a 82.1 a 67.6 ab 15.8 b 41.7 c 78.3 bc 94.2 18 Defoliation - Jewel Defoliation (%) 2011 Treatmentz 2012 1 Dec 21 Dec 25 Oct 8 Nov 23 Nov 11 Dec Non-pruned 15.0 aby 37.4 ab 21.7 a 27.5 a 68.3 a 95.0 a Hand pruned 0.0 c 30.8 b 4.2 ab 13.3 b 31.7 b 80.0 abc 30% June 6.7 bc 27.4 b 10.0 ab 10.0 b 36.7 b 81.6 abc 30% June+tip 5.0 bc 34.1 ab 6.7 ab 11.7 b 36.7 b 86.6 ab 60% June+tip 5.0 bc 52.4 a 0.0 b 6.7 b 25.0 b 71.6 c 50.8 a 4.2 ab 13.3 b 35.0 b 80.0 bc 30% July 20.0 a 19 Stem blight Jewel was not affected No differences among treatments in Emerald 20 Berry quality Average weight - Jewel Reduction in the 60%+tip 2g 1.5g Others averaged 1.7g pH, acid and sugar content, anthocyanins, firmness No differences 21 Yield - Emerald Treatment Yield (lbs) Periods 2 3 Total 1 4 Non-pruned 14.4 NS 5.0 a 6.2 NS 2.2 NS 0.7 NS Hand pruned 13.4 3.7 ab 6.4 3.4 1.1 30% June 12.6 3.1 ab 6.8 3.4 0.7 30% June+tip 14.6 3.7 ab 6.9 3.2 0.6 60% June+tip 12.6 1.5 b 5.5 3.6 1.1 30% July 13.1 2.0 b 5.3 2.4 1.0 22 Yield - Jewel 23 Yield - Jewel 24 Acknowledgements Dr. Darnell and Dr. Williamson Dr. Olmstead and Dr. Harmon Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 25 Thank you! 26