THE CRIMINAL LAW (TWO STRIKES CHILD SEX OFFENDERS) AMENDMENT ACT 2012.
THE CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT 2012
THE WEAPONS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT ACT 2012
THE CRIMINAL LAW (FALSE EVIDENCE BEFORE PARLIAMENT) AMENDMENT ACT 2012
THE PENALTIES AND SENTENCES AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT ACT 2012
THE YOUTH JUSTICE (BOOTCAMP ORDERS) AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT ACT2012
THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDS CONFISCATION (UNEXPLAINED WEALTH AND SERIOUS DRUG
OFFENDERS CONFISCATION ORDER) AMENDMENT ACT 2013
THE CRIMINAL LAW AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT ACT 2013
THE CRIMINAL LAW (CHILD EXPLOITATION AND DANGEROUS DRUGS) AMENDMENT ACT 2013
THE VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATION DISESTABLISHMENT ACT 2013
THE CRIMINAL LAW (CRIMINAL ORGANISATION DISRUPTION) AMENDMENT ACT 2013
THE CRIMINAL LAW AMENDMENT (PUBLIC INTEREST DECLARATION) AMENDMENT ACT 2013
VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATION
DISESTABLISHMENT ACT 2013
and
CRIMINAL LAW (CRIMINAL ORGANISATIONS
DISRUPTION) AMENDMENT ACT 2013
SECTION 16(3A) OF THE BAIL ACT
TOTO, I’VE A FEELING
WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS
ANYMORE!
VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATION DISESTABLISHMENT
ACT 2013 (“THE VLAD ACT”)
“ASSOCIATION”
(A) A CORPORATION;
(B) AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION;
(C) A CLUB OR LEAGUE;
(D) ANY OTHER GROUP OF 3 OR MORE PERSONS BY WHATEVER
NAME
CALLED,
WHETHER
ASSOCIATED
FORMALLY
INFORMALLY AND WHETHER THE GROUP IS LEGAL OR ILLEGAL.
OR
“PARTICIPANT”
FOR THIS ACT, A PERSON IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE AFFAIRS OF AN ASSOCIATION IF THE PERSON—
(A) (WHETHER BY WORDS OR CONDUCT, OR IN ANY OTHER WAY) ASSERTS, DECLARES OR
ADVERTISES HIS OR HER MEMBERSHIP OF, OR ASSOCIATION WITH, THE ASSOCIATION; OR
(B) (WHETHER BY WORDS OR CONDUCT, OR IN ANY OTHER WAY) SEEKS TO BE A MEMBER OF, OR TO
BE ASSOCIATED WITH, THE ASSOCIATION; OR
(C) HAS ATTENDED MORE THAN 1 MEETING OR GATHERING OF PERSONS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE
AFFAIRS OF THE ASSOCIATION IN ANY WAY; OR
(D) HAS TAKEN PART ON ANY 1 OR MORE OCCASIONS IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE ASSOCIATION IN ANY
OTHER WAY.
“OFFICE BEARER”
OFFICE BEARER, OF AN ASSOCIATION, MEANS—
(A) A PERSON WHO IS A PRESIDENT, VICE-PRESIDENT, SERGEANT-AT-ARMS,
TREASURER, SECRETARY, DIRECTOR OR ANOTHER OFFICE BEARER OR A
SHAREHOLDER OF THE ASSOCIATION; OR
(B) A PERSON WHO (WHETHER BY WORDS OR CONDUCT, OR IN ANY OTHER
WAY) ASSERTS, DECLARES OR ADVERTISES HIMSELF OR HERSELF TO HOLD A
POSITION OF AUTHORITY OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE ASSOCIATION.
“PROOF THAT A PERSON IS AN OFFICE BEARER”
SECTION 6
FOR THIS ACT, PROOF THAT A PERSON—
(A) HAS ASSERTED, DECLARED OR ADVERTISED THAT HE OR SHE IS AN OFFICE BEARER OF AN
ASSOCIATION; OR
(B) IS COMMONLY TREATED BY OTHER PERSONS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE
ASSOCIATION AS AN OFFICE BEARER OF THE ASSOCIATION; OR
(C) EXERCISES OR PURPORTS TO EXERCISE AUTHORITY IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE ASSOCIATION;
IS, UNLESS THE CONTRARY IS PROVED, SUFFICIENT PROOF THAT THE PERSON IS AN OFFICE BEARER OF
THE ASSOCIATION.
“VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE
SECTION 5(1)
FOR THIS ACT, A PERSON IS A VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE IF THE PERSON—
(A) COMMITS A DECLARED OFFENCE; AND
(B) AT THE TIME THE OFFENCE IS COMMITTED, OR DURING THE COURSE OF THE
COMMISSION OF THE OFFENCE, IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE AFFAIRS OF AN ASSOCIATION
(RELEVANT ASSOCIATION); AND
(C) DID OR OMITTED TO DO THE ACT THAT CONSTITUTES THE DECLARED OFFENCE FOR
THE PURPOSES OF, OR IN THE COURSE OF PARTICIPATING IN THE AFFAIRS OF, THE
RELEVANT ASSOCIATION.
EXCULPATORY PROVISION
(2) HOWEVER, A PERSON IS NOT A VICIOUS LAWLESS
ASSOCIATE IF THE PERSON PROVES THAT THE RELEVANT
ASSOCIATION IS NOT AN ASSOCIATION THAT HAS, AS 1 OF
ITS PURPOSES, THE PURPOSE OF ENGAGING IN, OR
CONSPIRING TO ENGAGE IN, DECLARED OFFENCES.
“A DECLARED OFFENCE”
DECLARED OFFENCE MEANS—
(A) AN OFFENCE AGAINST A PROVISION MENTIONED IN SCHEDULE
1; OR
(B) AN OFFENCE PRESCRIBED UNDER A REGULATION TO BE A
DECLARED OFFENCE.
EXAMPLES OF “DECLARED OFFENCES”
• AFFRAY (IF THE PERSON IS A MEMBER OF A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION, THE MINIMUM IS NOW 6 MONTHS ACTUAL
IMPRISONMENT. THE MAXIMUM IS NOW 7 YEARS)
• RIOT (CRIMINAL CODE)
• UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY, RIOT OR MUTINY (CORRECTIVE SERVICES ACT)
• ASSAULT OCCASIONING BODILY HARM
• SERIOUS ASSAULT
• POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS DRUG (SIMPLICITER, AND NOT LIMITED TO ANY CLASS OF DRUG)
• STEALING OR RECEIVING A FIREARM OR AMMUNITION
CONSEQUENCES
SECTION 7
(1) A COURT SENTENCING A VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE FOR A DECLARED OFFENCE MUST IMPOSE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
SENTENCES ON THE VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE—
(A) A SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER THE LAW APART FROM THIS ACT AND WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY FURTHER
PUNISHMENT THAT MAY OR WILL BE IMPOSED UNDER THIS ACT;
(B) A FURTHER SENTENCE OF 15 YEARS IMPRISONMENT SERVED WHOLLY IN A CORRECTIVE SERVICES FACILITY;
(C) IF THE VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE WAS, AT THE TIME OF THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENCE, OR DURING THE COURSE
OF THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENCE, AN OFFICE BEARER OF THE RELEVANT ASSOCIATION—A FURTHER SENTENCE OF
10 YEARS IMPRISONMENT SERVED WHOLLY IN A CORRECTIVE SERVICES FACILITY WHICH MUST BE SERVED CUMULATIVELY
WITH THE FURTHER SENTENCE MENTIONED IN PARAGRAPH (B).
CONSEQUENCES, CONT’D
(2) A FURTHER SENTENCE—
(A) MUST NOT BE MITIGATED OR REDUCED UNDER ANY OTHER ACT OR LAW; AND
(B) MUST BE ORDERED TO BE SERVED CUMULATIVELY WITH THE BASE SENTENCE IMPOSED.
(3) HOWEVER, IF THE BASE SENTENCE DOES NOT—
(A) IMPOSE A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT ON THE VICIOUS LAWLESS ASSOCIATE; OR
(B) REQUIRE THE ASSOCIATE TO IMMEDIATELY SERVE A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT IN A CORRECTIVE SERVICES
FACILITY;
THE ASSOCIATE IS TO IMMEDIATELY BEGIN TO SERVE THE FURTHER SENTENCE MENTIONED IN SUBSECTION (1)(B) AND THE
BASE SENTENCE IS TO HAVE EFFECT, SO FAR AS PRACTICABLE, AT THE END OF THE FURTHER SENTENCE OR SENTENCES.
CONSEQUENCES, CONT’D
• IF THE “BASE SENTENCE” IS LIFE IMPRISONMENT, THE 15 YEARS COMMENCES FROM
THE PAROLE ELIGIBILITY DATE APPLICABLE TO THE LIFE SENTENCE: SECTION 7(4)
• IF THE OFFENDER IS BEING SENTENCED FOR MORE THAN ONE DECLARED OFFENCE,
THE FURTHER SENTENCE CAN ONLY BE IMPOSED WITH RESPECT TO ONE OF THEM:
SECTION 7(5)
• BUT, WHEN DECIDING WHICH OFFENCE TO CHOOSE, THE COURT MUST SELECT THE
OFFENCE THAT RESULTS IN THE LONGEST PERIOD OF IMPRISONMENT: SECTION 7(6)
PAROLE ELIGIBILITY – AN EXAMPLE
SECTION 8
A “VLA” IS SENTENCED TO 5 YEARS IMPRISONMENT WITH PAROLE
ELIGIBILITY AFTER 3 YEARS, AND THEN TO A FURTHER SENTENCE OF
25 YEARS.
THE VLA’S PAROLE ELIGIBILITY DATE WILL BE AFTER SERVING 28
YEARS.
WHEN SECTION 8 DOES NOT APPLY
SECTION 9
(2) FOR THE PENALTIES AND SENTENCES ACT 1992, SECTION 13A, AN OFFENDER IS TAKEN TO
HAVE UNDERTAKEN TO COOPERATE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN A PROCEEDING
ABOUT AN OFFENCE IF AND ONLY IF—
(A) THE OFFENDER HAS OFFERED IN WRITING TO COOPERATE WITH LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN A PROCEEDING ABOUT A DECLARED OFFENCE; AND
(B) THE OFFER HAS BEEN ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE
SERVICE.
WHEN SECTION 8 DOES NOT APPLY, CONT’D
SECTION 9
(3) WHEN DECIDING WHETHER TO ACCEPT AN OFFER OF COOPERATION, THE COMMISSIONER MUST BE SATISFIED THAT THE
COOPERATION WILL BE OF SIGNIFICANT USE IN A PROCEEDING ABOUT A DECLARED OFFENCE.…
(5) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (6), THE DECISION—
(A) IS FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE; AND
(B) CAN NOT BE CHALLENGED, APPEALED AGAINST, REVIEWED, QUASHED, SET ASIDE OR CALLED IN QUESTION IN ANY OTHER
WAY UNDER THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 1991 OR OTHERWISE (WHETHER BY THE SUPREME COURT, ANOTHER COURT, A
TRIBUNAL OR ANOTHER ENTITY); AND
(C) IS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE OR OTHER ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, ANOTHER COURT, A
TRIBUNAL OR ANOTHER ENTITY ON ANY GROUND.
WHEN SECTION 8 DOES NOT APPLY, CONT’D
SECTION 9
(6) THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 1991, PART 5 APPLIES TO THE DECISION TO THE
EXTENT IT IS AFFECTED BY JURISDICTIONAL ERROR.
ESTABLISHING JURISDICTIONAL ERROR IS NO EASY TASK
SEE, FOR EXAMPLE: PARKER V PRESIDENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF QUEENSLAND [2009] QCA 120 PER KEANE JA AT
[32] ET SEQ
SUMMARY
• THE CONCEPT OF A “CRIMINAL ORGANISATION” IS NOT RELEVANT UNDER THE VLAD ACT, WHICH
IS CONCERNED WITH “ASSOCIATION”.
• THESE PROVISIONS ARE NOT LIMITED TO OMCG’S
• THE LEVEL OF FORMALITY REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH AN ASSOCIATION IS UNSPECIFIED
• MERELY TAKING PART IN THE INDEX OFFENCE IS SUFFICIENT TO AMOUNT TO PARTICIPATION IN THE
AFFAIRS OF THE ASSOCIATION
• 3 PEOPLE WHO FORM A PLAN TO ASSAULT ANOTHER PERSON AND WHO DO SO MAY BE CAUGHT
• 3 PEOPLE WHO UNDERTAKE A BUSINESS OF TRAFFICKING IN DRUGS ARE ALMOST CERTAINLY
CAUGHT
• IF A PERSON IS ALLEGED TO BE A VLA, THAT SHOULD BE SPECIFICALLY CHARGED AS A
CIRCUMSTANCE OF AGGRAVATION
• ISSUES THEN ARISE AS TO WHETHER THE INDICTMENT IS LIABLE TO BE QUASHED OR SEVERED
UNINTENDED RESULTS
PAUL GALLEN GETS $1000 FINE
WITH NO CONVICTION
RECORDED…
PLUS 15 YEARS
PLUS ANOTHER 10 AS AN “OFFICE
BEARER”
ALL FUTURE STATE OF ORIGIN
GAMES TO BE PLAYED IN NSW
CRIMINAL LAW (CRIMINAL ORGANISATIONS DISRUPTION)
AMENDMENT ACT 2013 (“COD ACT”)
SECTION 16(3A) OF THE BAIL ACT 1980
AMENDMENT OF SECTION 16 OF THE BAIL ACT
SECTION 4 OF THE COD ACT INSERTS NEW PROVISIONS INTO SECTION 16:
(3A) IF THE DEFENDANT IS A PARTICIPANT IN A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION, THE COURT OR POLICE
OFFICER MUST—
(a) REFUSE TO GRANT BAIL UNLESS THE DEFENDANT SHOWS CAUSE WHY THE DEFENDANT’S
DETENTION IN CUSTODY IS NOT JUSTIFIED;
…
(3C) FOR SUBSECTION (3A), IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER THE OFFENCE WITH WHICH THE
DEFENDANT IS CHARGED IS AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE, A SIMPLE OFFENCE OR A REGULATORY
OFFENCE.
“CRIMINAL ORGANISATION”
SECTION 1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE:
CRIMINAL ORGANISATION MEANS—
(A) AN ORGANISATION OF 3 OR MORE PERSONS—
(I) WHO HAVE AS THEIR PURPOSE, OR 1 OF THEIR PURPOSES, ENGAGING IN, ORGANISING, PLANNING, FACILITATING,
SUPPORTING, OR OTHERWISE CONSPIRING TO ENGAGE IN, SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AS DEFINED UNDER THE CRIMINAL
ORGANISATION ACT 2009; AND
(II) WHO, BY THEIR ASSOCIATION, REPRESENT AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK TO THE SAFETY, WELFARE OR ORDER OF THE
COMMUNITY; OR
(B) A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION UNDER THE CRIMINAL ORGANISATION ACT 2009;
(C) AN ENTITY DECLARED UNDER A REGULATION TO BE A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION.
“SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY”
SECTION 6, CRIMINAL ORGANISATION ACT 2009
SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY MEANS—
(A) A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE; OR
(B) AN ACT DONE OR OMISSION MADE OUTSIDE QUEENSLAND, INCLUDING OUTSIDE
AUSTRALIA, THAT, IF DONE OR MADE IN QUEENSLAND WOULD HAVE BEEN OR WOULD
BE A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE.
“PARTICIPANT”
SECTION 60A, CRIMINAL CODE
PARTICIPANT, IN A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION, MEANS—
(A) IF THE ORGANISATION IS A BODY CORPORATE—A DIRECTOR OR OFFICER OF THE BODY CORPORATE; OR
(B) A PERSON WHO (WHETHER BY WORDS OR CONDUCT, OR IN ANY OTHER WAY) ASSERTS, DECLARES OR ADVERTISES HIS OR HER MEMBERSHIP OF, OR
ASSOCIATION WITH, THE ORGANISATION; OR
(C) A PERSON WHO (WHETHER BY WORDS OR CONDUCT, OR IN ANY OTHER WAY) SEEKS TO BE A MEMBER OF, OR TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH, THE
ORGANISATION; OR
(D) A PERSON WHO ATTENDS MORE THAN 1 MEETING OR GATHERING OF PERSONS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE ORGANISATION IN ANY
WAY; OR
(E) A PERSON WHO TAKES PART IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE ORGANISATION IN ANY OTHER WAY;
BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE A LAWYER ACTING IN A PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY.
“SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE”
SECTION 7, CRIMINAL ORGANISATION ACT
(1) SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE MEANS THE FOLLOWING—
(A) AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE BY AT LEAST 7 YEARS IMPRISONMENT,
INCLUDING AN OFFENCE AGAINST A REPEALED PROVISION OF AN ACT;
(B) AN OFFENCE AGAINST THIS ACT;
(C) AN OFFENCE AGAINST A SECTION OF THE CRIMINAL CODE MENTIONED IN
SCHEDULE 1.
EXAMPLES OF SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCES
• ASSAULT OCCASIONING BODILY HARM
• POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS DRUG
• THREATENING VIOLENCE
• ASSAULTS IN INTERFERENCE WITH FREEDOM OF TRADE OR WORK
• THREATS
SECTION 16(3A) V 16(3)
• IS THE “SHOW CAUSE” TEST ANY DIFFERENT?
 (3A) SAYS “MUST REFUSE” TO GRANT BAIL…”
 (3) SAYS “SHALL REFUSE…”
• THE SAME WORDS USED IN DIFFERENT PLACES IN THE ONE SECTION SHOULD HAVE THE SAME
MEANING
 (3A) SHOULD NOT REQUIRE “EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES”
• WHAT DOES “SHOW CAUSE” MEAN?
 A NEBULOUS CONCEPT INVOLVING MULTIFARIOUS FACTORS. IT DOES NOT REQUIRE “PROOF”,
HOWEVER.
RETROSPECTIVITY
• S 16(3A) USES THE PRESENT TENSE: “IS A PARTICIPANT IN A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION”
• THE SECTION ARGUABLY APPLIES AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION FOR BAIL, NOT WHEN THE
OFFENCE WAS ALLEGEDLY COMMITTED
• THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE COD ACT CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING:
“THE AMENDMENTS OPERATE PROSPECTIVELY AND WILL ONLY CAPTURE OFFENDERS
WHO COMMIT OFFENCES AFTER THE AMENDMENTS COMMENCE.”
• ARGUABLY THEN, THE “SHOW CAUSE” REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE ENGAGED FOR AN OFFENCE THAT
PREDATES THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE LEGISLATION (17 OCTOBER 2013)
• BUT WHAT ABOUT CONTINUING OFFENCES THAT STRADDLE THE COMMENCEMENT DATE?
OTHER ISSUES RELEVANT TO SHOWING CAUSE
• DELAY, ESPECIALLY IN CASES WITH A LARGE AMOUNT OF TELECOMMUNICATION INTERCEPT
PRODUCT
• CONDITIONS IN CUSTODY WHILST ON REMAND
• CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE DEPONENTS OF “OBJECTION TO BAIL AFFIDAVITS”
PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO ALLEGATIONS OF MEMBERSHIP OF CRIMINAL
ORGANISATIONS
• CARE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN, AS SUBMISSIONS OR EVIDENCE ON A BAIL APPLICATION MIGHT BE
USED TO PROVE MEMBERSHIP OF A “RELEVANT ASSOCIATION” FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE
VLAD ACT.
• WHAT IF ALL MEMBERS OF THE ASSOCIATION ARE ARRESTED? ARE THEY, AT THE TIME OF THE
APPLICATION FOR BAIL, MEMBERS OF AN ASSOCIATION THAT HAS A PURPOSE OF ENGAGING
IN SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?