IP OWNERSHIP and MANAGEMENT Practical Considerations for Protecting and Using Your IP March 19, 2013 • Eugene F. Derényi • Partner, Patent and Trademark Agent • Fogler, Rubinoff LLP • Shane Nason • Intellectual Property Manager • Office of Research Services, UNB INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OVERVIEW WHAT IS “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY”? • Certain creations of the mind can be considered “property”, because legal means exist to allow owners to exclude others from using the property • “Intellectual property, simply defined, is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes such things as inventions; computer software; trade-marks; literary, artistic, musical or visual works; and even simple know-how.” Source: Canadian University Intellectual Property Group 3 3 WHY SHOULD YOU CARE ABOUT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY? • IP issues arise for researchers and employees • Often a major portion of a company’s assets consist of registered and unregistered IP • Identifying and protecting IP adds value to university or private sector research • Sword/Shield • Revenue Generation 4 4 TRADE-MARKS • Building a Brand or Rebranding • Reputation • Simplify • Bring clarity to your business goals • Bring customers back to your products or services • Official Marks (S. 9) for universities 5 5 TRADE-MARKS • Most valuable assets • 70% of a company’s valuable assets can be ascribed to its intangible assets • Examples of brand value in 2011 • Coca-Cola - $71 Million • IBM - $59 Million (Profit attributable to the brand alone and nothing else) 6 6 EXPANDING ASPECTS OF TRADE-MARK PROTECTION • Louboutin red soled shoe 7 7 EXPANDING ASPECTS OF TRADE-MARK PROTECTION 8 8 EXPANDING ASPECTS OF TRADEMARK PROTECTION • SOUND MARKS • MGM Lion Roar protected • As of March 2012 • MARLBORO CASE • No name packaging for tobacco products • Court still found confusion 9 9 EXPANDING ASPECTS OF TRADE-MARK PROTECTION • Blackberry Maker RIM Won Court Case • BBM for the Blackberry messenger service vs. BBM for BBM Canada broadcast measurement services 10 10 PATENTS • Can protect: • Apparatus - e.g. machines, products, hardware • Methods - e.g. software, business methods • Compositions of matter - e.g. compounds, genes • Value – Nortel patents 4.5 Billion 11 11 INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS • What are they – aesthetic protection – overall impression produced by the products • Various designs on the IPad product • Litigation between Apple and Samsung • The Apple design is dominated by its simplicity. The article is unadorned and tile shaped. A drawing from the design is reproduced below: 12 12 INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS • Crystal Head Vodka •Simultaneous use of trade-mark and industrial design protection •Launch by Dan Aykroyd and his partner in Canada •Banned by the LCBO for awhile – too appealing to underage drinkers 13 13 COPYRIGHT • Employees vs. Independent contractors • Moral Rights • Copyright Act • Can be waived • Cannot be assigned • Independent contractors – you need waiver in writing 14 14 INTEGRATED CIRCUIT TOPOGRAPHIES • 3-D computer chip circuit designs • Mask works (U.S.) 15 15 TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION • Trade Secrets • Provide owner with business/competitive advantage • Fundamental conflict with patenting • Patent – disclosure of the invention, rather than keeping it secret • Patent has a limited life – trade secret has no fixed term • Trade secret – can be confidential forever • A third party may reverse engineer it or may discover the trade secret and use it itself (event patent it) 16 16 TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION • Trade Secrets (cont’d) • Not all inventions are patentable, i.e. novel, inventive, have utility and the right subject matter – use trade secret protection • Patenting is expensive but have substantial value as assets of the company 17 17 TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION • Confidential Information • Employer confidential information – employee’s age may be important • 68% of 18 to 34 year olds – acceptable to remove confidential information from their place of employment • 86% of those 55 year olds and over believe someone should be fired for taking confidential information • Only 74% of those younger than 55 think the same 18 18 TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION • Confidential Information (cont’d) • 40% of adults believe it is never acceptable to take confidential company information outside the office • But others think it is acceptable to do so under certain circumstances • Challenges to employers in protecting confidential information, particularly where younger generations have grown up in a culture where data is freely available and readily exchanged. 19 19 TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION • Trade Secrets/Confidential Information – To Do • Company/University training • Company/University policies • Employee/University agreements • Monitor your employees’ use of information 20 20 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) OWNERSHIP AT UNB • • • • • • Faculty (Full-Time) Contract Academic Employees Staff Visiting Researchers Post Doctoral Fellows Students 21 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Full-Time: Faculty, Instructors, Librarians • AUNBT Collective Agreement (2009 – 13); Articles 38, 39. • Employee owns copyright - traditional works of authorship. • IP developed using normal University resources (salary, benefits, office and lab space, library, ordinary computer access, routine financial and administrative support) is owned by Employee (i.e., Inventor-owned). • Exceptions: administrative documents/correspondence; computer software for internal administrative use. • Decision to commercialize IP (or not) is with the Inventor; University has the right to negotiate an agreement to own and manage the IP. 22 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Full-Time: Faculty, Instructors, Librarians • Inventor must disclose to University if intention is to patent or commercialize IP themselves, within 1 month prior to filing patent or IP sale. • Must identify in writing: - whether discovery made with normal or above normal resources (describe circumstances, resources used) - that he/she is owner of the IP - financial or other relationships with third parties that might affect rights • There is a process for confirming use of resources. 23 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Full-Time: Faculty, Instructors, Librarians • IP developed using above normal University resources is Inventor-owned, unless an agreement is negotiated with University to transfer or share ownership. • Above normal resources include funding targeted to development of IP (development stipends, extensive use of technician time, etc.). • Inventor recognizes that request for above normal resources may be considered decision to commercialize. • Inventor and University shall enter into IP Agreement specifying share of net proceeds based on relative contribution. • Process for confirming use of resources. 24 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Contract Academic Employees (Part-Time) • AUNBT Collective Agreement (May 1, 2010 – April 30, 2013); Article 29. • Ownership of IP created for scholarly work rests with Employee who creates it, whether IP was created in the course of employment or using University facilities and resources. • Exceptions for administrative documents/correspondence; work related to day-to-day management, modification of provided materials (e.g. lab manuals). • University has the right to negotiate an agreement to own and manage the IP. 25 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Staff • IP ownership covered under terms of employment contract. • If silent, is a case-by-case basis depending on circumstances of employment (what hired to do, resources used, etc.) for invention rights. • Copyright typically institution-owned if made in course of employment. Visiting Researchers • IP ownership outlined in position offer (letter) from UNB. • Typically, IP created by visiting researcher is owned by UNB; raises obligation to assign (to be confirmed by actual assignment). 26 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Post-Doctoral Fellows (PDF): • IP terms contained in offer of appointment from VP Research. • Unless otherwise agreed in writing between PDF and UNB, PDF typically retains ownership of IP. • Exceptions in instances where PDF is working under a University research contract or sponsored agreement. • In cases where PDF retains ownership, University retains non-exclusive, royalty-free right to use such IP for internal purposes (education and research). 27 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Students • Students hold copyright in thesis/reports; ownership of ideas themselves normally shared among those who have made material contribution. • If have employment relationship with University, IP may be institution-owned (depends on circumstances). • UNB may also request, when they work on sponsored research projects, that students assign IP to the institution. • If employed on contract involving external client, IP ownership may be covered under terms of related agreement (i.e., IP could be client-owned). • Student should be informed up front by faculty/supervisor. • Otherwise, IP is Inventor-owned by student. 28 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB Students (exception): • Graduate Student Workers who fall under PSAC-UGSW Collective Agreement, Article 22. • Retain ownership and copyright of any lectures and course materials created. • Except where precluded by terms of funding agreement, creative contribution to research project (invention) is shared between graduate student and faculty/supervisor. • Proportion of ownership decided up front based on planned contribution; revised as things progress (in writing). • University has right to negotiate agreement to own and manage the IP; if not, retains a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use IP for internal purposes. 29 IP OWNERSHIP AT UNB • Inventors (faculty, staff, students) can decide to assign right, title, and interest in IP to University, in return for IP protection, commercialization assistance, and share of proceeds (typical process). • Number of policies, guidelines, and scenarios – can be quite complex. • Important: investigate, discuss, and decide on IP ownership up front, in the early stages of a project. Consult with ORS. Easier to manage expectations and document early on, rather than try to fix disagreements or problems later. 30 EXAMPLES: IP ASSIGNMENT REQUESTED/REQUIRED Precluded by terms of funding arrangement: • NSERC Engage Projects • NSERC Idea to Innovation (I2I) Projects • Springboard Atlantic Funding • ACOA Atlantic Innovation Fund 31 NSERC ENGAGE • Supports projects undertaken by University researchers and new private sector partners (up to $25K) • Aimed at solving company-specific problem • IP developed under the project owned by the company. • IP ownership by company is not automatic in other collaborative research agreements. • Must follow NSERC Policy on Intellectual Property: - use results in Canada - publication of research results - student graduation not impeded by IP issues - University/researcher retains right to use IP for noncommercial purposes 32 NSERC I2I • Grants to accelerate development of promising inventions from University • Options: Market Assessment, Reduction-to-Practice, Technology Enhancement • Discoveries to be disclosed and assigned to University; proposal must be endorsed by University ILO (ORS). • IP must be protected, or protection applied for (e.g., provisional patent, trademark, trade secrets) to be eligible. • University must justify technology transfer expenses and commit itself to bear 1/2 of their costs. 33 SPRINGBOARD ATLANTIC • Innovation Mobilization (IM) Program – help industry engage with researchers and commercialize opportunities. • Funds for Industry Engagement ($15,000), Proof of Concept ($20,000), Patent & Legal ($15,000), and Marketing Support ($25,000; $15,000 for prototypes) -$50K max/tech. • Springboard covers 66.73%; University 33.27%. • Applications co-written and submitted by ILO (ORS). • Intellectual property must be assigned to the University. 34 ACOA AIF • Funds helping Atlantic Canadians compete … through the development and commercialization of new ideas, technologies, products and services. • Instances where applications are University-led (UNB is “Proponent”) • Intellectual Property terms: - Ensure that the Proponent and Collaborator(s) own any Background IP or hold sufficient rights in same to permit the Project to be carried out and Foreground IP to be exploited. - That the title to Foreground IP is to be vested and, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by ACOA, to remain exclusively with the Proponent. - Take appropriate steps to protect the Foreground IP it owns. 35 IP OWNERSHIP: COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS While case-by-case basis, standard is: • Background IP - IP existing before collaborative project: - Owned by party bringing the IP to project - Made available to carry out new project • Foreground IP - IP developed under new project: - Owned by party creating it (or by institution/company policy) - Joint ownership for joint development - Non-exclusive license(s) to internal use for all project parties • Licensing of IP – commercial use of University portion of IP: - Option to license IP upon successful completion of Project; details (e.g., royalty rate) negotiated after IP better defined. - University retains right to use IP for internal purposes (research and education). 36 PATENTING – AN OVERVIEW 37 37 WHAT IS THE TEST FOR PATENTABILITY? • Useful - Invention must work • Non-Obvious - An objective test using “person skilled in the art” • Novel - Watch out for public disclosure and prior art 38 38 IT MUST BE NOVEL (NEW) • Your invention must be distinguishable from any technology previously publicly disclosed anywhere in the world Prior: • patents and applications • journal/conference proceedings • products on the market count against you, even if your own 39 39 PATENT APPLICATION PROCESS • Search the prior art (optional, but avoid at your peril) • Freedom to operate review (optional) • Draft an enabling disclosure (application description) • Submit application to patent office • Wait for examination • Respond to examiner • Allowance and issuance • Payment of maintenance fees 40 40 TYPES OF APPLICATIONS • Provisional • Non-provisional • Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) 41 41 ANATOMY OF A PATENT APPLICATION • • • • • • • Field Background Summary Brief Description of Drawings Detailed Description of the Embodiments Drawings Claims 42 42 PATENT APPLICATION TIMELINE http://blog.patents-tms.com 43 43 ACCELERATED EXAMINATION • • • • Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Green Technology Patents Special Order (Canada) Track I (U.S.) 44 44 ACCELERATED EXAMINATION • Expanding PPH Network http://www.jpo.go.jp/ppph-portal/index.htm 45 45 WHAT’S NEW? • America Invents Act (AIA) • Historic shift to first to file – March 16, 2013 • New CIPO Examination Guidelines • Computer implemented inventions after Amazon.com 46 46 PATENT BEST PRACTICE/TIPS • Process-Related Items - Public Disclosure - Inventorship - Timelines • Application-Related Items - “Quick and Dirty” Provisionals - Specification and Claims - Drawings 47 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE • Public disclosure prior to patenting can present a bar to patenting in most countries. • Some countries (including US and Canada) have a one-year grace period. • Must be an enabling disclosure - one of ordinary skill in the art could combine the publication's description with own knowledge to make the claimed invention. 48 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXAMPLES • disclosing invention to individual, company, or another institution without an NDA in place. • presenting or displaying the invention at a conference, workshop, poster session, seminar, lecture, or trade show open to the public. • publishing the invention in a paper, manuscript, book, pamphlet, etc. • submitting an abstract or paper to a journal for publication (depending on journal’s confidentiality policy). 49 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXAMPLES • posting a description of the invention on a Web site • describing the invention in a news article or feature report • leaving an invention in plain sight in a lab or office that is accessible by the public • demonstrating a prototype in a public forum • offering the invention for sale, or selling the invention (United States) 50 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE EXAMPLES • distributing a thesis to an external reviewer without an expectation of confidentiality • making a thesis available for public viewing before a defense (e.g.; department office) • defending a thesis; publishing thesis in the library • orally presenting an invention 51 NOT A PUBLIC DISCLOSURE • researcher submitting Invention Disclosure to Research Services • submitting invention to patent agent or attorney • signed agreement confirming expectation of confidentiality 52 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE - TIPS • Put NDA in place prior to external discussions. • Consult with Research Services before any public disclosure is made. • After patent protection established, are free to publish and discuss (but not beyond what covered) • Grant applications should be marked “Confidential” (each page) – header or footer, watermark, etc. 53 INVENTORSHIP • Determined by patent laws of each country. • Patents can be invalidated if application fails to name an inventor, or adds someone who is not a true inventor (i.e., not for recognition sake). • Inventor - person who first independently thought of the invention and objectively manifested idea. • Inventorship based on claims of issued patent. • Inventorship can be corrected (add or delete names), as long as the error arose without any deceptive intention. 54 INVENTOR VS. CONTRIBUTOR Contributor who may not be an inventor: • does fully directed work to help reduce an invention to practice (tests, experiments, lab work, assistance) • supervises the work being done, but does not contribute directly to the claimed invention • suggests an idea or result without providing the means of reaching that result 55 TIMELINES Don’t expect quick turnaround on a patent: • US Provisional is placeholder that establishes priority date; examination does not start until Non-Provisional application (1 year) • Examination: in US, current average is 2 years before application is picked up by examiner the first time for review • Option with new rules in US: Accelerated Examination; can submit RFE in Canada. 56 TIMELINES TIMELINES UNB experience (46 issued patents to January 2013): • Avg. time to issuance (from Non-Provisional application): 3 years, 7 months • Shortest time to issuance: 1 year, 8 months • Longest time to issuance: 7 years, 3 months 57 AVOID “QUICK-AND-DIRTY” PROVISIONALS • Only in instances where disclosure is imminent and cannot be avoided. • Must be comprehensive enough to support eventual claims in Non-Provisional. • Issues: poor language, not comprehensive, doesn’t support eventual claims • Tip : spend more time/resources at Provisional stage to reduce effort and cost at Non-Provisional stage. 58 SPECIFICATION AND CLAIMS • Work closely with patent agent to draft the specification (disclosure and claims); claims language key • First claim is broadest to attempt to get most coverage • Tip: try to think of ways others might try to work around your claims, to help agent word claims to protect against this. • Tip: be aware of excess claims fees in the US and Europe 59 DRAWINGS • If drawings are incomplete or do not follow guidelines, receive Notice of Incomplete Reply • Failing to respond can result in abandonment • Tip: Black and white drawings normally required in USPTO (cannot use colours to distinguish items) • Tip: Photographs can be very hard to reproduce 60 DRAWINGS • The following will result in rejected drawings: - portions of figure blurry, missing or improperly shaded (difficult to electronically reproduce) - text touching or running over borders or lines (e.g., flow chart) - figures that are too small to be properly reproduced • Tip: while can change fonts, size, shading, etc., drawings must be identical to what originally filed (e.g. can’t introduce new information) 61 QUESTIONS? Eugene F. Derényi Partner Fogler, Rubinoff LLP ederenyi@foglers.com Tel: 613-842-4299 Shane Nason Intellectual Property Manager Office of Research Services, UNB nasons@unb.ca Tel: (506) 648-5995 62